Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy

Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 510-514

  Jeon, Woo Jae ^a   Cho, Sang Yun ^a   Baek, Seong Jin ^a   Kim, Kyoung Hun ^a  

^a Hanyang University Guri Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

I gel; PLMA

Indexed keywords

GLYCOPYRRONIUM BROMIDE; PYRIDOSTIGMINE; ROCURONIUM;

ADULT; AERATION; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GAS EXCHANGE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; PILOT STUDY; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; SPIROMETRY; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84871817781     PISSN: 20056419     EISSN: 20057563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.510     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Uppal V, Gangaiah S, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 882-5.
2. Cattano D, Ferrario L, Maddukuri V, Sridhar S, Khalil Y, Hagberg CA. A randomized clinical comparison of the Intersurgical i-gel and LMA Unique in non-obese adults during general surgery. Minerva Anesthesiol 2011; 77: 292-7.
3. Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott DA, Haslam GM, Muchatuta N, Cook TM. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 991-5.
4. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B. A comparison of the i-gel with The LMA-Unique™ in non-paralyzed anaesthetized patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1118-24.
5. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F, Torrielli R, Cros AM. A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1137-9.
6. Gatward JJ, Cook TM, Seller C, Handel J, Simpson T, Vanek V, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in 100 non-paralyzed patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1124-30.
7. Bapat PP, Verghese C. Laryngeal mask airway and the incidence of regurgitation during gynecological laparoscopies. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 139-43.
8. Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Bang MR, Ko SY. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 60: 167-72.
9. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 264-8.
10. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-7.
11. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135-9.
12. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The proseal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 739-60.
13. Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C, Brimacombe L, Brimacombe M. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthesized patients. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1560-3.
14. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell'Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-Proseal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 428-32.