Comparison of the I-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta- Analysis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Park, Sun Kyung ^a   Choi, Geun Joo ^b   Choi, Yun Suk ^a   Ahn, Eun Jin ^c   Kang, Hyun ^b  

^a Jeju National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Chung Ang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; BLOOD STAIN; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSPHAGIA; FIBER OPTICS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; META ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SORE THROAT; STOMACH TUBE; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADVERSE EFFECTS; PROCEDURES;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS;

EID: 84961289099     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119469     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Timmermann A. Supraglottic airways in difficult airway management: successes, failures, use and misuse. Anaesthesia. 2011; 66 Suppl 2: 45-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06934.x PMID: 22074079
2. Trivedi V, Patil B. A clinical comparative study of evaluation of proseal LMA V/S I-GEL for ease of insertion and hemodynamic stability; a study of 60 cases. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2011; 27.
3. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia. 2005; 60: 1022-1026. PMID: 16179048
4. Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-Gel with LMA-Proseal in Elective Surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2009; 53: 302-305. PMID: 20640137
5. Cook T, Howes B. Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia. Critical Care & Pain. 2011; 11: 56-61.
6. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93: 104-109. PMID: 10861152
7. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005; 52: 739-760. PMID: 16103390
8. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg. 2001; 93: 1351-1353. PMID: 11682428
9. Helmy AM, Atef HM, El-Taher EM, Henidak AM. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010; 4: 131-136. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.71250 PMID: 21189847
10. Sharma B, Sehgal R, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs. I-gel: A Comparative Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 26: 451-457. PMID: 21547168
11. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27: 598-601. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283340a81 PMID: 19915475
12. Chauhan G, Nayar P, Seth A, Gupta K, Panwar M, Agrawal N. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 29: 56-60. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185. 105798 PMID: 23493414
13. Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Perkhofer D, Kaufmann M, Keller C. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel. Anaesthesia. 2010; 65: 913-916. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06422.x PMID: 20645948
14. Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Baek SJ, Kim KH. Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012; 63: 510-514. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.6.510 PMID: 23277811
15. Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe JR. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012; 63: 35-41. PMID: 22783708
16. P. HJ. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011; Version 5.1.0.
17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560. PMID: 12958120
18. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel?plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta?analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56: 455-463. PMID: 10877304
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMID: 19621072
20. Shi YB, Zuo MZ, Du XH, Yu Z. Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013; 93: 1978-1980. PMID: 24169248
21. Hayashi K, Suzuki A, Kunisawa T, Takahata O, Yamasawa Y, Iwasaki H. A comparison of the single-use i-gel with the reusable laryngeal mask airway Proseal in anesthetized adult patients in Japanese population. Masui 2013; 62: 134-139. PMID: 23479911
22. Kini G, Devanna GM, Mukkapati KR, Chaudhuri S, Thomas D. Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014; 30: 183. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185. 130008 PMID: 24803754
23. Das A, Majumdar S, Mukherjee A, Mitra T, Kundu R, Hajra BK, et al. i-gel in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA-ProSeal in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2014; 8: 80. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7890.4113 PMID: 24783088
24. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650-654. PMID: 10844848
25. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F, Torrielli R, Cros AM. A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1137-1139. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f062 PMID: 18349185
26. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 602-607. PMID: 20540172
27. Goldmann K, Hoch N, Wulf H. Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2006; 41: 228-232. PMID: 16636947