Comprehensive RNA-seq analysis on the regulation of tomato ripening by exogenous auxin

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Li, Jiayin ^a   Tao, Xiaoya ^a   Li, Li ^a   Mao, Linchun ^a   Luo, Zisheng ^a   Khan, Zia Ullah ^b   Ying, Tiejin ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ABDUL WALI KHAN UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUXIN; CAROTENOID; CYTOSINE 5 DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE; DNA DEMETHYLASE; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE; ETHYLENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA (CYTOSINE 5) METHYLTRANSFERASE; ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PLANT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL METABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; ENERGY METABOLISM; FRUIT RIPENING; GENE EXPRESSION; METHYLATION; NONHUMAN; RNA SEQUENCE; STRESS; TOMATO; UPREGULATION; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METABOLISM;

DNA (CYTOSINE-5-)-METHYLTRANSFERASE; ETHYLENES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PLANT PROTEINS;

EID: 84971325676     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156453     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Srivastava A, Handa AK. Hormonal regulation of tomato fruit development: A molecular perspective. J Plant Growth Regul. 2005; 24(2):67-82. doi: 10.1007/s00344-005-0015-0.
2. Seymour GB, Chapman NH, Chew BL, Rose JK. Regulation of ripening and opportunities for control in tomato and other fruits. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00738.x PMID: 22958755
3. Seymour GB, Ostergaard L, Chapman NH, Knapp S, Martin C. Fruit development and ripening. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013; 64:219-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120057 PMID: 23394500
4. Cara B, Giovannoni JJ. Molecular biology of ethylene during tomato fruit development and maturation. Plant Sci. 2008; 175(1-2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.03.021
5. Barry CS, Giovannoni JJ. Ethylene and fruit ripening. J Plant Growth Regul. 2007; 26(2):143-59. doi: 10.1007/s00344-007-9002-y
6. Alexander L, Grierson D. Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening. J Exp Bot. 2002; 53(377):2039-55. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erf072 PMID: 12324528
7. Trainotti L, Tadiello A, Casadoro G. The involvement of auxin in the ripening of climacteric fruits comes of age: the hormone plays a role of its own and has an intense interplay with ethylene in ripening peaches. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58(12):3299-308. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm178 PMID: 17925301
8. Bottcher C, Burbidge CA, Boss PK, Davies C. Interactions between ethylene and auxin are crucial to the control of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berry ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13(1):222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-222 PMID: 24364881
9. Su L, Diretto G, Purgatto E, Danoun S, Zouine M, Li Z, et al. Carotenoid accumulation during tomato fruit ripening is modulated by the auxin-ethylene balance. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0495-4 PMID: 25953041
10. Bottcher C, Boss PK, Davies C. Delaying Riesling grape berry ripening with a synthetic auxin affects malic acid metabolism and sugar accumulation, and alters wine sensory characters. Funct Plant Biol. 2012; 39 (9):745-53. doi: 10.1071/FP12132
11. Symons GM, Chua YJ, Ross JJ, Quittenden LJ, Davies NW, Reid JB. Hormonal changes during non-climacteric ripening in strawberry. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63(13):4741-50. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers147 PMID: 22791823
12. Li J, Yuan R. NAA and ethylene regulate expression of genes related to ethylene biosynthesis, perception, and cell wall degradation during fruit abscission and ripening in 'Delicious' apples. J Plant Growth Regul. 2008; 27(3):283-95. doi: 10.1007/s00344-008-9055-6
13. Kondo S, Takano Y. Cell Wall Metabolism and Induction of Ripening Capacity inLa France'Pear as Influenced by 2, 4-DP. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2000; 125(2):242-7.
14. Yuan R, Carbaugh DH. Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on ethylene biosynthesis, preharvest fruit drop, fruit maturity, and quality of 'Golden Supreme'and 'Golden Delicious' apples. HortScience. 2007; 42(1):101-5.
15. Bottcher C, Keyzers RA, Boss PK, Davies C. Sequestration of auxin by the indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3-1 in grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) and the proposed role of auxin conjugation during ripening. J Exp Bot. 2010; 61(13):3615-25. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq174 PMID: 20581124
16. Liu KD, Kang BC, Jiang H, Moore SL, Li HX, Watkins CB, et al. A GH3-like gene, CcGH3, isolated from Capsicum chinense L. fruit is regulated by auxin and ethylene. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 58(4):447-64. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-6505-4 PMID: 16021332
17. Muday GK, Rahman A, Binder BM. Auxin and ethylene: collaborators or competitors? Trends Plant Sci. 2012; 17(4):181-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.001 PMID: 22406007
18. Audran-Delalande C, Bassa C, Mila I, Regad F, Zouine M, Bouzayen M. Genome-wide identification, functional analysis and expression profiling of the Aux/IAA gene family in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012; 53(4):659-72. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs022 PMID: 22368074
19. Kumar R, Tyagi AK, Sharma AK. Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor (ARF) gene family from tomato and analysis of their role in flower and fruit development. Mol Genet Genomics. 2011; 285 (3):245-60. doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0602-7 PMID: 21290147
20. Zouine M, Fu Y, Chateigner-Boutin AL, Mila I, Frasse P, Wang H, et al. Characterization of the tomato ARF gene family uncovers a multi-levels post-transcriptional regulation including alternative splicing. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e84203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084203 PMID: 24427281
21. Pirrello J, Prasad BC, Zhang W, Chen K, Mila I, Zouine M, et al. Functional analysis and binding affinity of tomato ethylene response factors provide insight on the molecular bases of plant differential responses to ethylene. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12(1):190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-190 PMID: 23057995
22. Consortium TG. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012; 485(7400):635-41. doi: 10.1038/nature11119 PMID: 22660326
23. Jones B, Frasse P, Olmos E, Zegzouti H, Li ZG, Latche A, et al. Down-regulation of DR12, an auxin-response-factor homolog, in the tomato results in a pleiotropic phenotype including dark green and blotchy ripening fruit. Plant J. 2002; 32(4):603-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01450.x PMID: 12445130
24. Sagar M, Chervin C, Mila I, Hao Y, Roustan JP, Benichou M, et al. SlARF4, an auxin response factor involved in the control of sugar metabolism during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2013; 161 (3):1362 -74. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.213843 PMID: 23341361
25. Chaabouni S, Jones B, Delalande C, Wang H, Li ZG, Mila I, et al. Sl-IAA3, a tomato Aux/IAA at the crossroads of auxin and ethylene signalling involved in differential growth. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (4):1349-62.
26. Fagundes C, Moraes K, Perez-Gago MB, Palou L, Maraschin M, Monteiro AR. Effect of active modified atmosphere and cold storage on the postharvest quality of cherry tomatoes. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2015; 109:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.05.017
27. Bu JW, Yu YC, Aisikaer G, Ying TJ. Postharvest UV-C irradiation inhibits the production of ethylene and the activity of cell wall-degrading enzymes during softening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2013; 86:337-45. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.07.026
28. Zhang M, Yuan B, Leng P. The role of ABA in triggering ethylene biosynthesis and ripening of tomato fruit. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60(6):1579-88.
29. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013; 14(4):R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 PMID: 23618408
30. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq - a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(2):166-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 PMID: 25260700
31. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate - a Practical And Powerful Approach To Multiple Testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met. 1995; 57(1):289-300.
32. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Method Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010; 11:R14.
33. Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, Wei L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21(19):3787-93. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti430 PMID: 15817693
34. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2- ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25(4):402-8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 PMID: 11846609
35. Diretto G, Al-Babili S, Tavazza R, Scossa F, Papacchioli V, Migliore M, et al. Transcriptional-metabolic networks in beta-carotene-enriched potato tubers: the long and winding road to the Golden phenotype. Plant Physiol. 2010; 154(2):899-912. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.159368 PMID: 20671108
36. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13(11):2498-504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303 PMID: 14597658
37. Quint M, Gray WM. Auxin signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006; 9(5):448-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.07.006 PMID: 16877027
38. Cummins I, Dixon DP, Freitag-Pohl S, Skipsey M, Edwards R. Multiple roles for plant glutathione transferases in xenobiotic detoxification. Drug Metab Rev. 2011; 43(2):266-80. doi: 10.3109/03602532.2011.552910 PMID: 21425939
39. Dixon DP, Lapthorn A, Edwards R. Plant glutathione transferases. Genome Biol. 2002; 3(3): REVIEWS3004. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-3-reviews3004 PMID: 11897031
40. Frova C. The plant glutathione transferase gene family: genomic structure, functions, expression and evolution. Physiol Plant. 2003; 119(4):469-79. doi: 10.1046/j.1399-3054.2003.00183.x
41. Yu T, Li YS, Chen XF, Hu J, Chang X, Zhu YG. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing cotton glutathione S-transferase (GST) show enhanced resistance to methyl viologen. J Plant Physiol. 2003; 160(11):1305-11. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-01205 PMID: 14658382
42. Karavangeli M, Labrou NE, Clonis YD, Tsaftaris A. Development of transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing maize glutathione S-transferase I for chloroacetanilide herbicides phytoremediation. Biomol Eng. 2005; 22(4):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2005.03.001 PMID: 16085457
43. Sharma R, Sahoo A, Devendran R, Jain M. Over-expression of a rice tau class glutathione s-transferase gene improves tolerance to salinity and oxidative stresses in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3): e92900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092900 PMID: 24663444
44. George S, Venkataraman G, Parida A. A chloroplast-localized and auxin-induced glutathione S-transferase from phreatophyte Prosopis juliflora confer drought tolerance on tobacco. J Plant Physiol. 2010; 167(4):311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.09.004 PMID: 19800709
45. Shi HY, Li ZH, Zhang YX, Chen L, Xiang DY, Zhang YF. Two pear glutathione S-transferases genes are regulated during fruit development and involved in response to salicylic acid, auxin, and glucose signaling. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089926 PMID: 24587129
46. Zhou JM, Goldsbrough PB. An Arabidopsis Gene with Homology To Glutathione S-Transferases Is Regulated by Ethylene. Plant Mol Biol. 1993; 22(3):517-23. doi: 10.1007/Bf00015980 PMID: 8329687
47. Xiang C, Miao ZH, Lam E. Coordinated activation of as-1-type elements and a tobacco glutathione S-transferase gene by auxins, salicylic acid, methyl-jasmonate and hydrogen peroxide. Plant Mol Biol. 1996; 32 (3):415-26. doi: 10.1007/BF00019093 PMID: 8980490
48. Olsen AN, Ernst HA, Leggio LL, Skriver K. NAC transcription factors: structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10(2):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.010 PMID: 15708345
49. Hu H, Dai M, Yao J, Xiao B, Li X, Zhang Q, et al. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(35):12987-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604882103 PMID: 16924117
50. Zheng X, Chen B, Lu G, Han B. Overexpression of a NAC transcription factor enhances rice drought and salt tolerance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 379(4):985-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.163 PMID: 19135985
51. Tran LSP, Nakashima K, Sakuma Y, Simpson SD, Fujita Y, Maruyama K, et al. Isolation and functional analysis of Arabidopsis stress-inducible NAC transcription factors that bind to a drought-responsive cis-element in the early responsive to dehydration stress 1 promoter. Plant Cell. 2004; 16(9):2481-98. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.022699 PMID: 15319476
52. Giorio G, Stigliani AL, D'Ambrosio C. Phytoene synthase genes in tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.) - new data on the structures, the deduced amino acid sequences and the expression patterns. FEBS J. 2008; 275(3):527 -35. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06219.x PMID: 18167141
53. Tatsuki M, Nakajima N, Fujii H, Shimada T, Nakano M, Hayashi K, et al. Increased levels of IAA are required for system 2 ethylene synthesis causing fruit softening in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch). J Exp Bot. 2013; 64(4):1049-59. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers381 PMID: 23364941
54. Wang CY, Steffens GL. Postharvest Responses Of Spartan Apples To Preharvest Paclobutrazol Treatment. Hortscience. 1987; 22(2):276-8.
55. Curry EA, Greene DW. Cppu Influences Fruit-Quality, Fruit-Set, Return Bloom, And Preharvest Drop Of Apples. Hortscience. 1993; 28(2):115-9.
56. Chen J, Mao L, Lu W, Ying T, Luo Z. Transcriptome profiling of postharvest strawberry fruit in response to exogenous auxin and abscisic acid. Planta.2016; 243(1):183-97. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2402-5 PMID: 26373937
57. Ma QL, Ding YD, Chang JW, Sun XH, Zhang L, Wei QJ, et al. Comprehensive insights on how 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid retards senescence in post-harvest citrus fruits using transcriptomic and proteomic approaches. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65(1):61-74. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert344 PMID: 24215076
58. Stopar M, Resnik M, Pongrac VZ. Non-structural carbohydrate status and CO2 exchange rate of apple fruitlets at the time of abscission influenced by shade, NAA or BA. Sci Hortic. 2001; 87(1-2):65-76. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00169-2
59. Amorós A, Zapata P, Pretel M, Botella M, Almansa M, Serrano M. Role of naphthalene acetic acid and phenothiol treatments on increasing fruit size and advancing fruit maturity in loquat. Sci Hortic. 2004; 101(4):387-98. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.11.010
60. Nakatsuka A, Murachi S, Okunishi H, Shiomi S, Nakano R, Kubo Y, et al. Differential expression and internal feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, and ethylene receptor genes in tomato fruit during development and ripening. Plant Physiol. 1998; 118 (4):1295-305. PMID: 9847103
61. Oetiker JH, Olson DC, Shiu OY, Yang SF. Differential induction of seven 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase genes by elicitor in suspension cultures of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Mol Biol. 1997; 34(2):275-86. doi: 10.1023/A:1005800511372 PMID: 9207843
62. Zhang Z, Zhang H, Quan R, Wang XC, Huang R. Transcriptional regulation of the ethylene response factor LeERF2 in the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes controls ethylene production in tomato and tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2009; 150(1):365-77. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.135830 PMID: 19261734
63. Jafari Z, Haddad R, Hosseini R, Garoosi G. Cloning, identification and expression analysis of ACC oxidase gene involved in ethylene production pathway. Mol Biol Rep. 2013; 40(2):1341-50. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2178-7 PMID: 23076530
64. Sell S, Hehl R. A fifth member of the tomato 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) oxidase gene family harbours a leucine zipper and is anaerobically induced. DNA Seq. 2005; 16(1):80-2. doi: 10.1080/10425170500050817 PMID: 16040352
65. Barry CS, Llop-Tous MI, Grierson D. The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2000; 123(3):979-86. PMID: 10889246
66. Lincoln JE, Campbell AD, Oetiker J, Rottmann WH, Oeller PW, Shen NF, et al. LE-ACS4, a fruit ripening and wound-induced 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Expression in Escherichia coli, structural characterization, expression characteristics, and phylogenetic analysis. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268(26):19422-30. PMID: 8366090
67. Barry CS, Blume B, Bouzayen M, Cooper W, Hamilton AJ, Grierson D. Differential expression of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene family of tomato. Plant J. 1996; 9(4):525-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365 -313X.1996.09040525.x PMID: 8624515
68. Cao D, Ju Z, Gao C, Mei X, Fu D, Zhu H, et al. Genome-wide identification of cytosine-5 DNA methyltransferases and demethylases in Solanum lycopersicum. Gene. 2014; 550(2):230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.08.034 PMID: 25149677
69. Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen YR, Zheng Y, Huang M, Vrebalov J, et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31 (2):154-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2462 PMID: 23354102
70. Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S, Lohar DP, Sharopova N, Saeed NA, Wang XD, et al. The transcription factor MtSERF1 of the ERF subfamily identified by transcriptional profiling is required for somatic embryogenesis induced by auxin plus cytokinin in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2008; 146(4):1622-36. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.110379 PMID: 18235037
71. Li J, Dai X, Zhao Y. A role for auxin response factor 19 in auxin and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006; 140(3):899-908. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.070987 PMID: 16461383
72. Liu K, Yuan C, Li H, Lin W, Yang Y, Shen C, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of auxin response factor (ARF) family genes related to flower and fruit development in papaya (Carica papaya L.). BMC Genomics. 2015; 16(1):901. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2182-0 PMID: 26541414
73. Gutterson N, Reuber TL. Regulation of disease resistance pathways by AP2/ERF transcription factors. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7(4):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.04.007 PMID: 15231271
74. Hao Y. Auxin-mediated fruit development and ripening: new insight on the role of ARFs and their action mechanism in tomato (S. lycopersicum). PhD. Thesis, The University of Toulouse, 2014. Available: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/13598.