Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 425-443

  Dubois, Julien ^a   Adolphs, Ralph ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

BOLD fMRI; Individual differences; Neurometrics; Prediction; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; RELIABILITY; SEMANTICS;

BOLD FMRI; GENETIC VARIATION; IMAGING MODALITY; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; NEUROMETRICS; STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL POWER; VALIDITY;

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING;

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AGENTS; VASOACTIVE AGENT;

BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN SIZE; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HEAD MOVEMENT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TOPOGRAPHY; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INDIVIDUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84971224863     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.014     Document Type: Review

References (202)

1. Miller M.B., Van Horn J.D. Individual variability in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval: a role for large-scale databases. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 63:205-213.
2. Van Horn J.D., et al. Individual variability in brain activity: a nuisance or an opportunity?. Brain Imaging Behav. 2008, 2:327-334.
3. Kirilina E., et al. The quest for the best: the impact of different EPI sequences on the sensitivity of random effect fMRI group analyses. Neuroimage 2016, 126:49-59.
4. Dosenbach N.U.F., et al. Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 2010, 329:1358-1361.
5. Geerligs L., et al. A brain-wide study of age-related changes in functional connectivity. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 25:1987-1999.
6. Yarkoni T. Neurobiological substrates of personality: a critical overview. In Personality Processes and Individual Differences 4 2015, American Psychological Association, pp. 000-000. M.M. Shaver (Ed.).
7. van den Heuvel M.P., et al. Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:7619-7624.
8. Finn E.S., et al. Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18:1664-1671.
9. Smith S.M., et al. A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18:1565-1567.
10. Murphy S.E., et al. The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on amygdala function: a meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18:512-520.
11. Arbabshirani M.R., et al. Classification of schizophrenia patients based on resting-state functional network connectivity. Front. Neurosci. 2013, 7:133.
12. Yahata, N. et al. A small number of abnormal brain connections predicts adult autism spectrum disorder. Nature Communications 7, Article number: 11254 . doi:10.1038/ncomms11254.
13. Orrù G., et al. Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 2012, 36:1140-1152.
14. Wolfers T., et al. From estimating activation locality to predicting disorder: a review of pattern recognition for neuroimaging-based psychiatric diagnostics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015, 57:328-349.
15. Williams L.M., et al. Amygdala reactivity to emotional faces in the prediction of general and medication-specific responses to antidepressant treatment in the randomized iSPOT-D trial. Neuropsychopharmacology 2015, 40:2398-2408.
16. Whelan R., et al. Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers. Nature 2014, 512:185-189.
17. Gabrieli J.D.E., et al. Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron 2015, 85:11-26.
18. Laird A.R., et al. Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: validation of the Lancaster transform. Neuroimage 2010, 51:677-683.
19. Klein A., et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009, 46:786-802.
20. Fischl B., et al. II. Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 1999, 9:195-207.
21. Yeo B.T.T., et al. Spherical demons: fast diffeomorphic landmark-free surface registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2010, 29:650-668.
22. Klein A., et al. Evaluation of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration methods. Neuroimage 2010, 51:214-220.
23. Frost M.A., Goebel R. Measuring structural-functional correspondence: spatial variability of specialised brain regions after macro-anatomical alignment. Neuroimage 2012, 59:1369-1381.
24. Langers D.R.M. Assessment of tonotopically organised subdivisions in human auditory cortex using volumetric and surface-based cortical alignments. Hum. Brain Mapp 2014, 35:1544-1561.
25. Glasser M.F., et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 2013, 80:105-124.
26. Hasson U., et al. Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:40-48.
27. Sabuncu M.R., et al. Function-based intersubject alignment of human cortical anatomy. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:130-140.
28. Conroy B.R., et al. Inter-subject alignment of human cortical anatomy using functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2013, 81:400-411.
29. Khullar S., et al. ICA-fNORM: spatial normalization of fMRI data using intrinsic group-ICA networks. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2011, 5:93.
30. Çetin M.S., et al. Enhanced disease characterization through multi network functional normalization in fMRI. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9:95.
31. Robinson E.C., et al. MSM: a new flexible framework for multimodal surface matching. Neuroimage 2014, 100:414-426.
32. Glasser M.F., Van Essen D.C. Mapping human cortical areas in vivo based on myelin content as revealed by T1- and T2-weighted MRI. J. Neurosci 2011, 31:11597-11616.
33. Abdollahi R.O., et al. Correspondences between retinotopic areas and myelin maps in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 2014, 99:509-524.
34. Haxby J.V., et al. A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron 2011, 72:404-416.
35. Guntupalli, J.S. et al. (2016) A model of representational spaces in human cortex. Cereb. Cortex Published online February 26, 2106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw068.
36. Saxe R., et al. Divide and conquer: a defense of functional localizers. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1088-1096.
37. Gorgolewski K.J., et al. Adaptive thresholding for reliable topological inference in single subject fMRI analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:245.
38. Smith S.M., Nichols T.E. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009, 44:83-98.
39. Nieto-Castañón A., Fedorenko E. Subject-specific functional localizers increase sensitivity and functional resolution of multi-subject analyses. Neuroimage 2012, 63:1646-1669.
40. Kanwisher N., Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 2006, 361:2109-2128.
41. Saxe R., Powell L.J. It's the thought that counts: specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:692-699.
42. Spunt R.P., Adolphs R. Validating the why/how contrast for functional MRI studies of theory of mind. Neuroimage 2014, 99:301-311.
43. Friston K.J., et al. A critique of functional localisers. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1077-1087.
44. Handwerker D.A., et al. The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI. Neuroimage 2012, 62:1017-1023.
45. Liu T.T. Neurovascular factors in resting-state functional MRI. Neuroimage 2013, 80:339-348.
46. Bandettini P.A. Neuronal or hemodynamic? Grappling with the functional MRI signal. Brain Connect. 2014, 4:487-498.
47. Shan Z.Y., et al. Genes influence the amplitude and timing of brain hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 2016, 124:663-671.
48. Buxton R.B., et al. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S220-S233.
49. Stephan K.E., et al. Comparing hemodynamic models with DCM. Neuroimage 2007, 38:387-401.
50. D'Esposito M., et al. Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4:863-872.
51. Lindquist M.A., et al. Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. Neuroimage 2009, 45:S187-S198.
52. Henson R.N.A., et al. Detecting latency differences in event-related BOLD responses: application to words versus nonwords and initial versus repeated face presentations. Neuroimage 2002, 15:83-97.
53. Woolrich M.W., et al. Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using variational Bayes. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1748-1761.
54. Glover G.H. Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI1. Neuroimage 1999, 9:416-429.
55. Calhoun V.D., et al. fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms. Neuroimage 2004, 22:252-257.
56. Degras D., Lindquist M.A. A hierarchical model for simultaneous detection and estimation in multi-subject fMRI studies. Neuroimage 2014, 98:61-72.
57. Pedregosa F., et al. Data-driven HRF estimation for encoding and decoding models. Neuroimage 2015, 104:209-220.
58. Chen J.E., Glover G.H. BOLD fractional contribution to resting-state functional connectivity above 0.1 Hz. Neuroimage 2015, 107:207-218.
59. Wu G.-R., et al. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data. Med. Image Anal. 2013, 17:365-374.
60. Sreenivasan K.R., et al. Nonparametric hemodynamic deconvolution of FMRI using homomorphic filtering. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2015, 34:1155-1163.
61. Griffeth V.E.M., Buxton R.B. A theoretical framework for estimating cerebral oxygen metabolism changes using the calibrated-BOLD method: modeling the effects of blood volume distribution, hematocrit, oxygen extraction fraction, and tissue signal properties on the BOLD signal. Neuroimage 2011, 58:198-212.
62. Liu T.T., et al. An introduction to normalization and calibration methods in functional MRI. Psychometrika 2013, 78:308-321.
63. Pike G.B. Quantitative functional MRI: concepts, issues and future challenges. Neuroimage 2012, 62:1234-1240.
64. Blockley N.P., et al. Calibrating the BOLD response without administering gases: comparison of hypercapnia calibration with calibration using an asymmetric spin echo. Neuroimage 2015, 104:423-429.
65. Blockley N.P., et al. A review of calibrated blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) methods for the measurement of task-induced changes in brain oxygen metabolism. NMR Biomed 2013, 26:987-1003.
66. Bandettini P.A., Wong E.C. A hypercapnia-based normalization method for improved spatial localization of human brain activation with fMRI. NMR Biomed. 1997, 10:197-203.
67. Handwerker D.A., et al. Reducing vascular variability of fMRI data across aging populations using a breathholding task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28:846-859.
68. Lu H., et al. Improving fMRI sensitivity by normalization of basal physiologic state. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:80-87.
69. Kannurpatti S.S., Biswal B.B. Detection and scaling of task-induced fMRI-BOLD response using resting state fluctuations. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1567-1574.
70. Kalcher K., et al. RESCALE: voxel-specific task-fMRI scaling using resting state fluctuation amplitude. Neuroimage 2013, 70:80-88.
71. 2 response function in the resting-state BOLD fMRI signal: spatial specificity, test-retest reliability and effect of fMRI sampling rate. Neuroimage 2015, 104:266-277.
72. Fair D.A., et al. A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study 'resting state' functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2007, 35:396-405.
73. Kazan S.M., et al. Vascular autorescaling of fMRI (VasA fMRI) improves sensitivity of population studies: A pilot study. Neuroimage 2016, 124:794-805.
74. Tsvetanov K.A., et al. The effect of ageing on fMRI: correction for the confounding effects of vascular reactivity evaluated by joint fMRI and MEG in 335 adults. Hum. Brain Mapp 2015, 36:2248-2269.
75. Bennett C.M., Miller M.B. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1191:133-155.
76. Zuo X.-N., Xing X.-X. Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 45:100-118.
77. Andellini M., et al. Test-retest reliability of graph metrics of resting state MRI functional brain networks: a review. J. Neurosci. Methods 2015, 253:183-192.
78. Barch D.M., Mathalon D.H. Using brain imaging measures in studies of procognitive pharmacologic agents in schizophrenia: psychometric and quality assurance considerations. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 70:13-18.
79. Bennett C.M., Miller M.B. fMRI reliability: influences of task and experimental design. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2013, 13:690-702.
80. Churchill N.W., et al. Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. 2. Interactions with ICA, PCA, task contrast and inter-subject heterogeneity. PLoS One 2012, 7:e31147.
81. Aurich N.K., et al. Evaluating the reliability of different preprocessing steps to estimate graph theoretical measures in resting state fMRI data. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9:48.
82. Raemaekers M., et al. Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades. Neuroimage 2007, 36:532-542.
83. Caceres A., et al. Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient. Neuroimage 2009, 45:758-768.
84. Greve D.N., et al. A survey of the sources of noise in fMRI. Psychometrika 2013, 78:396-416.
85. Murphy K., et al. Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. Neuroimage 2013, 80:349-359.
86. Power J.D., et al. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 2012, 59:2142-2154.
87. Power J.D., et al. Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2014, 84:320-341.
88. Fox M.D., et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2005, 102:9673-9678.
89. Satterthwaite T.D., et al. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. Neuroimage 2012, 60:623-632.
90. Van Dijk K.R.A., et al. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 2012, 59:431-438.
91. Pruim R.H.R., et al. Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2015, 112:278-287.
92. Power J.D., et al. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2015, 105:536-551.
93. Zeng L.-L., et al. Neurobiological basis of head motion in brain imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2014, 111:6058-6062.
94. Geerligs L., et al. State and trait components of functional connectivity: individual differences vary with mental state. J. Neurosci 2015, 35:13949-13961.
95. Tyszka J.M., et al. Largely typical patterns of resting-state functional connectivity in high-functioning adults with autism. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:1894-1905.
96. Satterthwaite T.D., et al. Heterogeneous impact of motion on fundamental patterns of developmental changes in functional connectivity during youth. Neuroimage 2013, 83:45-57.
97. Turner B.O., et al. One dataset, many conclusions: BOLD variability's complicated relationships with age and motion artifacts. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015, 9:115-127.
98. Raj D., et al. Respiratory effects in human functional magnetic resonance imaging due to bulk susceptibility changes. Phys. Med. Biol 2001, 46:3331-3340.
99. Wise R.G., et al. Resting fluctuations in arterial carbon dioxide induce significant low frequency variations in BOLD signal. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1652-1664.
100. Chang C., Glover G.H. Relationship between respiration, end-tidal CO2, and BOLD signals in resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 2009, 47:1381-1393.
101. Dagli M.S., et al. Localization of cardiac-induced signal change in fMRI. Neuroimage 1999, 9:407-415.
102. Birn R.M., et al. The influence of physiological noise correction on test-retest reliability of resting-state functional connectivity. Brain Connect. 2014, 4:511-522.
103. Lipp I., et al. Understanding the contribution of neural and physiological signal variation to the low repeatability of emotion-induced BOLD responses. Neuroimage 2014, 86:335-342.
104. Kassner A., et al. Blood-oxygen level dependent MRI measures of cerebrovascular reactivity using a controlled respiratory challenge: reproducibility and gender differences. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 31:298-304.
105. Särkkä S., et al. Dynamic retrospective filtering of physiological noise in BOLD fMRI: DRIFTER. Neuroimage 2012, 60:1517-1527.
106. Kay K., et al. GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data. Front. Neurosci 2013, 7:00247.
107. Churchill N.W., Strother S.C. PHYCAA+: an optimized, adaptive procedure for measuring and controlling physiological noise in BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 2013, 82:306-325.
108. Salimi-Khorshidi G., et al. Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 2014, 90:449-468.
109. Anderson J.S., et al. Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase-shifted soft tissue correction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32:919-934.
110. Pruim R.H.R., et al. ICA-AROMA: a robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage 2015, 112:267-277.
111. Kelly R.E., et al. Visual inspection of independent components: defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 189:233-245.
112. Kundu P., et al. Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI. Neuroimage 2012, 60:1759-1770.
113. Kundu P., et al. Robust resting state fMRI processing for studies on typical brain development based on multi-echo EPI acquisition. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015, 9:56-73.
114. Moeller S., et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med 2010, 63:1144-1153.
115. Olafsson V., et al. Enhanced identification of BOLD-like components with multi-echo simultaneous multi-slice (MESMS) fMRI and multi-echo ICA. Neuroimage 2015, 112:43-51.
116. Bright M.G., Murphy K. Removing motion and physiological artifacts from intrinsic BOLD fluctuations using short echo data. Neuroimage 2013, 64:526-537.
117. Tong Y., Frederick B.D. Studying the spatial distribution of physiological effects on BOLD signals using ultrafast fMRI. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:196.
118. Rayshubskiy A., et al. Direct, intraoperative observation of ~0.1 Hz hemodynamic oscillations in awake human cortex: implications for fMRI. Neuroimage 2014, 87:323-331.
119. MacIntosh B.J., et al. Impact of a single bout of aerobic exercise on regional brain perfusion and activation responses in healthy young adults. PLoS One 2014, 9:e85163.
120. Rajab A.S., et al. A single session of exercise increases connectivity in sensorimotor-related brain networks: a resting-state fMRI study in young healthy adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:625.
121. Keulers E.H.H., et al. The association between cortisol and the BOLD response in male adolescents undergoing fMRI. Brain Res. 2015, 1598:1-11.
122. Levin J.M., et al. Influence of baseline hematocrit and hemodilution on BOLD fMRI activation. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001, 19:1055-1062.
123. Yoo S.S., et al. The human emotional brain without sleep - a prefrontal amygdala disconnect. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:R877-R878.
124. Tagliazucchi E., Laufs H. Decoding wakefulness levels from typical fMRI resting-state data reveals reliable drifts between wakefulness and sleep. Neuron 2014, 82:695-708.
125. Dreher J.C., et al. Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2007, 104:2465-2470.
126. Poldrack R.A., et al. Long-term neural and physiological phenotyping of a single human. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6.
127. Mulderink T.A., et al. On the use of caffeine as a contrast booster for BOLD fMRI studies. Neuroimage 2002, 15:37-44.
128. Laurienti P.J., et al. Relationship between caffeine-induced changes in resting cerebral perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. Am J Neuroradiol 2003, 24:1607-1611.
129. Addicott M.A., et al. The effects of dietary caffeine use and abstention on blood oxygen level-dependent activation and cerebral blood flow. Journal of caffeine research 2012, 2:15-22.
130. Liu T.T., Liau J. Caffeine increases the linearity of the visual BOLD response. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2311-2317.
131. Koppelstaetter F., et al. Caffeine and cognition in functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Alzheimers. Dis. 2010, 20(Suppl. 1):S71-S84.
132. Wang D.J.J., et al. Potentials and challenges for arterial spin labeling in pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337:359-366.
133. Whelan R., Garavan H. When optimism hurts: inflated predictions in psychiatric neuroimaging. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 75:746-748.
134. Lo A., et al. Why significant variables aren't automatically good predictors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2015, 112:13892-13897.
135. Linden D.E.J. The challenges and promise of neuroimaging in psychiatry. Neuron 2012, 73:8-22.
136. Yarkoni T., Westfall J. Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: lessons from machine learning 2016, figshare, Retrieved: 15 39, Apr 28, 2016 (GMT). https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2441878.v1.
137. Yarkoni T., Braver T.S. Cognitive neurosciences approaches to individual differences in working memory and executive control: conceptual and methodological issues. Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition: Attention, Memory, and Executive Control 2012, 87-107. Springer. A. Gruszka (Ed.).
138. Button K.S., et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14:365-376.
139. Schönbrodt F.D., Perugini M. At what sample size do correlations stabilize?. J. Res. Pers. 2013, 47:609-612.
140. Silva R.F., et al. The tenth annual MLSP competition: schizophrenia classification challenge. In 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) 2014, 1-6. IEEE.
141. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005, 2:e124.
142. Nosek B.A., Lakens D. Registered reports. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 45:137-141.
143. Siontis K.C.M., et al. Replication of past candidate loci for common diseases and phenotypes in 100 genome-wide association studies. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 18:832-837.
144. Van Horn J.D., Gazzaniga M.S. Why share data? Lessons learned from the fMRIDC. Neuroimage 2013, 82:677-682.
145. Biswal B.B., et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2010, 107:4734-4739.
146. Eickhoff S., et al. Sharing the wealth: neuroimaging data repositories. Neuroimage 2016, 124:1065-1068.
147. Poldrack R.A., Gorgolewski K.J. OpenfMRI: open sharing of task fMRI data. Neuroimage 2015, Published online June 3, 2015. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.073.
148. Blumensath T., et al. Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 2013, 76:313-324.
149. Schumann G., et al. The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology. Mol. Psychiatry 2010, 15:1128-1139.
150. Van Essen D.C., et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 2013, 80:62-79.
151. Taylor J.R., et al. The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample. Neuroimage. 2015, Published online September 12, 2015. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.018.
152. Crawford J.R., Garthwaite P.H. On the 'optimal' size for normative samples in neuropsychology: capturing the uncertainty when normative data are used to quantify the standing of a neuropsychological test score. Child Neuropsychol. 2008, 14:99-117.
153. Cuthbert B.N., Insel T.R. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med. 2013, 11:126.
154. Insel T.R., Cuthbert B.N. Brain disorders?. Precisely. Science 2015, 348:499-500.
155. Di X., et al. Calibrating BOLD fMRI activations with neurovascular and anatomical constraints. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:255-263.
156. Power J.D., et al. Studying brain organization via spontaneous fMRI signal. Neuron 2014, 84:681-696.
157. Biswal B., et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 34:537-541.
158. Smith S.M., et al. Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2009, 106:13040-13045.
159. Birn R.M., et al. The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 2013, 83:550-558.
160. Laumann T.O., et al. Functional system and areal organization of a highly sampled individual human brain. Neuron 2015, 87:657-670.
161. Patriat R., et al. The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: a comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated. Neuroimage 2013, 78:463-473.
162. Christoff K., et al. Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2009, 106:8719-8724.
163. Delamillieure P., et al. The resting state questionnaire: an introspective questionnaire for evaluation of inner experience during the conscious resting state. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 81:565-573.
164. Hurlburt R.T., et al. What goes on in the resting-state?. A qualitative glimpse into resting-state experience in the scanner. Front. Psychol 2015, 6:1535.
165. Tung K.-C., et al. Alterations in resting functional connectivity due to recent motor task. Neuroimage 2013, 78:316-324.
166. Hutchison R.M., et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 2013, 80:360-378.
167. Cole M.W., et al. Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain. Neuron 2014, 83:238-251.
168. Smith S.M., et al. Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 2013, 80:144-168.
169. Beckmann C.F., et al. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 2005, 360:1001-1013.
170. Yeo B.T.T., et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol 2011, 106:1125-1165.
171. Craddock R.C., et al. A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum. Brain Mapp 2012, 33:1914-1928.
172. Wig G.S., et al. Parcellating an individual subject's cortical and subcortical brain structures using snowball sampling of resting-state correlations. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:2036-2054.
173. Arslan S., et al. Joint spectral decomposition for the parcellation of the human cerebral cortex using resting-state fMRI. Inf. Process. Med. Imaging 2015, 24:85-97.
174. Wig G.S., et al. An approach for parcellating human cortical areas using resting-state correlations. Neuroimage 2014, 93:276-291.
175. Gordon E.M., et al. Generation and evaluation of a cortical area parcellation from resting-state correlations. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26:288-303.
176. Beckmann C.F., et al. Group comparison of resting-state FMRI data using multi-subject ICA and dual regression. Neuroimage 2009, 47:S148.
177. Hacker C.D., et al. Resting state network estimation in individual subjects. Neuroimage 2013, 82:616-633.
178. Wang D., et al. Parcellating cortical functional networks in individuals. Nat. Neurosci 2015, 18:1853-1860.
179. Carp J. On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6:149.
180. Neuroskeptic The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 7:643-644.
181. Simmons J.P., et al. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci 2011, 22:1359-1366.
182. Simonsohn U., et al. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2014, 143:534-547.
183. Pernet C., Poline J.-B. Improving functional magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility. Gigascience 2015, 4:15.
184. Peng R.D. Reproducible research in computational science. Science 2011, 334:1226-1227.
185. Drummond C. Replicability is not reproducibility: nor is it good science. Proceedings of the Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning Workshop at the 26th International Conference for Machine Learning 2009.
186. Poldrack R.A., et al. Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 40:409-414.
187. Regev M., et al. Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives. J. Neurosci 2013, 33:15978-15988.
188. Hanke M., et al. A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie. Sci. Data 2014, 1:140003.
189. Labs A., et al. Portrayed emotions in the movie 'Forrest Gump'. F1000Res. 2015, 4:92.
190. Hasson U., et al. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 2004, 303:1634-1640.
191. Kriegeskorte N., Kievit R.A. Representational geometry: integrating cognition, computation, and the brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:401-412.
192. Nili H., et al. A toolbox for representational similarity analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol 2014, 10:e1003553.
193. Skerry A.E., Saxe R. Neural representations of emotion are organized around abstract event features. Curr. Biol 2015, 25:1945-1954.
194. Tamir D.I., et al. Neural evidence that three dimensions organize mental state representation: rationality, social impact, and valence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113:194-199.
195. Charest I., et al. Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2014, 111:14565-14570.
196. Charest I., Kriegeskorte N. The brain of the beholder: honouring individual representational idiosyncrasies. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 2015, 30:367-379.
197. Naselaris T., et al. Encoding and decoding in fMRI. Neuroimage 2011, 56:400-410.
198. Huth A.G., et al. A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain. Neuron 2012, 76:1210-1224.
199. Huth A.G., et al. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 2016, 10.1038/nature17637.
200. Glasser, M.F. et al. A Multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature (in press).
201. Gordon E.M., et al. Individual variability of the system-level organization of the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 2015, Published online October 13, 2015. 10.1093/cercor/bhv239.
202. Dwork C., et al. STATISTICS. The reusable holdout: Preserving validity in adaptive data analysis. Science 2015, 349:636-638.