Learning through interaction and co-construction of knowledge objects in teacher education

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-18

  Damşa, Crina I ^a   Ludvigsen, Sten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Contrasting groups; Interaction patterns; Knowledge objects; Learning trajectories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970021097     PISSN: 22106561     EISSN: 2210657X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A.-M., Ellis, R., Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education 38:9 (2013), 1239–1258, 10.1080/03075079.2011.616584.
2. van Aalst, J., Chan, C.K.K., Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 16:2 (2007), 175–220, 10.1080/10508400701193697.
3. Atwood, S., Turnbull, W., Carpendale, J.I.M., The construction of knowledge in classroom talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19:3 (2010), 358–402, 10.1080/10508406.2010.481013.
4. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Jaarvela, S., Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. 2013, Routledge Academic Publishers & Taylor and Francis Group, London.
5. Barron, B., When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12:3 (2003), 307–359, 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1.
6. Bereiter, C., Education and mind in the knowledge age. 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
7. Chernobilsky, E., DaCosta, M.C., Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Learning to talk the Educational Psychology talk through a problem-based course. Instructional Science 32 (2004), 319–356, 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000026552.14289.2c.
8. Cummings, A., Schlosser, A.E., Arrow, H., Developing complex group products: Idea combination in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4:2–3 (1996), 229–251.
9. Dahlberg, G.M., Bagga-Gupta, S., Communication in the virtual classroom in higher education: Languaging beyond the boundaries of time and space. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2:3 (2013), 127–142.
10. Damşa, C.I., The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2014, 10.1007/s11412-014-9193-8.
11. Damşa, C.I., Kirschner, P.A., Andriessen, J.E.B., Erkens, G., Sins, P.H.M., Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19:2 (2010), 143–186.
12. Damşa, C.I., Nerland, M., Student learning through participation in inquiry activities. Two cases from teaching and computer engineering education. Vocations and Learning, 2016, 10.1007/s12186-016-9152-9.
13. Design-Based Research Collective, Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher 32:1 (2003), 5–8 35-37.
14. Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., Studies of expansive learning: Foundation, findings and future challenge. Educational Research Review 5 (2010), 1–24, 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
15. Ewenstein, B., Whyte, J., Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. Organization Studies 30:1 (2009), 7–30, 10.1177/0170840608083014.
16. Havnes, A., Christiansen, B., Bjørk, I., Hessevaagbakke, E., Peer learning in higher education: Patterns of talk and interaction in skills centre simulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 8 (2016), 75–87.
17. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education 41 (2003), 397–420, 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001.
18. Jahreie, C.F., Making sense of conceptual tools in student-generated cases: Students teachersʼ problem-solving. Teaching and Teacher Education 26:6 (2010), 1229–1237, 10.1016/j.tate.2009.12.002.
19. Knorr-Cetina, K., Objectual practice. Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., von Savigny, E., (eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory, 2001, Routledge, London, 175–188.
20. Krange, I., Students' conceptual practices in science education: Productive disciplinary interactions in a participation trajectory. Cultural Studies of Science Education 2 (2007), 171–203, 10.1007/s11422-006-9040-y.
21. Lee, E.Y.C., Chan, C.K.K., van Aalst, J., Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1 (2006), 278–307, 10.1007/s11412-006-6844-4.
22. Linell, P., Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. 2009, Information Age Publishing Inc., Charlotte, NC.
23. Ludvigsen, S.R., Sociogenesis and cognition. The struggle between social and cognitive activities. Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T., Herskowitz, R., (eds.) Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction, 2009, Routledge, New York, 302–317.
24. Miettinen, R., Virkkunen, J., Epistemic objects, artifacts and organizational change. Organization 12:3 (2005), 437–456, 10.1177/1350508405051279.
25. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4:2 (2009), 187–211, 10.1007/s11412-009-9063-y.
26. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., Hakkarainen, K., Technology-mediation and tutoring: How do they shape progressive inquiry discourse?. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14:4 (2005), 527–565, 10.1207/s15327809jls1404_3.
27. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., Kaistinen, J., Nyman, G., Knowledge creating inquiry in a distributed project management course. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning 5 (2010), 73–96, 10.1142/S1793206810000827.
28. Paavola, S., Hakkarainen, K., The knowledge creation metaphor—an emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education 14 (2005), 535–557, 10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0.
29. Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Kosonen, K., Karlgren, K., The roles and uses of design principles for developing the trialogical approach on learning. Research in Learning Technology 19:3 (2011), 233–246.
30. Säljö, R., Learning and technologies, people and tools in co-ordinated activities. International Journal of Educational Research 41 (2010), 489–494, 10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.013.
31. Sarmiento-Klapper, J.W., The sequential co-construction of the joint problem space. Stahl, G., (eds.) Studying virtual math teams, 2009, Springer, New York, NY, 83–98, 10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3.
32. Stetsenko, A., Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity, mind. Culture and Social Interaction 12:1 (2005), 70–88, 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6.
33. Stokoe, E., Benwell, B., Attenborough, F., University students managing engagement, preparation, knowledge and achievement: Interactional evidence from institutional, domestic and virtual settings, learning. Culture and Social Interaction 2:2 (2013), 75–90.
34. Webster, L., Mertova, P., Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. 2007, Routledge, New York.
35. Yin, R., Case study research: Design and methods. 5rd ed., 2013, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.