The construction of knowledge in classroom talk

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 358-402

  Atwood, Sherrie ^a   Turnbull, William ^a   Carpendale, Jeremy I M ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954632714     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2010.481013     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. C. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1996). The problem of speech genres (V. W. McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 134-165). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3. Brown, R. A. J., & Renshaw, P. D. (2000). Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 52-66). New York, NY: Pergamon.
4. Bruner, J. S. (1997). Celebrating divergence: Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 40, 63-73.
5. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
6. Carpendale, J. I. M. (2009). Piaget's theory of moral development. In U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 270-286). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carpendale, J. I. M., & Müller, U. (Eds.). (2004). Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cazden, C. B. (1986). Language in the classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 7, 18-33.
9. Chapman, M. (1991). The epistemic triangle: Operative and communicative components of cognitive competence. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (Eds.), Criteria for competence: Controversies in the conceptualization and assessment of children's abilities (pp. 209-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Chapman, M. (1999). Constructivism and the problem of reality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 31-43.
11. Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning. Computers Education, 30(3/4), 237-247.
12. Csomay, E. (2005). Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education, 15, 243-274.
13. Csomay, E. (2006). Academic talk in American university classrooms: Crossing the boundaries of oral-literate discourse? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 117-135.
14. Csomay, E. (2007). A corpus-based look at linguistic variation in classroom interaction: Teacher talk versus student talk in American University classes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 336-355.
15. Darling, A. L., & Civikly, J. M. (1986). The effect of teacher humor on student perceptions of classroom communicative climate. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 22(1), 24-30.
16. De Lisi, R. (2002). Promoting thinking through peer learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 5-12.
17. DeVries, R. (1997). Piaget's social theory. Educational Researcher, 26(2), 4-17.
18. DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 187-213.
19. Dixon, C., de la Cruz, E., Green, J., Lin, L., & Brandts, L. (1992). Do you see what we see? The referential and intertextual nature of classroom life. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 29-36.
20. Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 92-118). London, England: Sage.
21. Edwards, A. D., & Furlong, V. J. (1978). The language of teaching: Meaning in classroom interactions. London, England: Heinemann Educational.
22. Edwards, A. D., & Westgate, D. P. G. (1994). Investigating classroom talk (2nd ed.). London, England: Falmer Press.
23. Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1891-1914.
24. Eassinger, P. (2000). How classes influence students' participation in college classrooms. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 35(2), 38-47.
25. Grossen, M. (2000). Institutional framings in thinking, learning and teaching. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 21-34). New York, NY: Pergamon.
26. Hammersley, M. (Ed.). (1986). Controversies in classroom research. Milton Keyes, England: Open University Press.
27. Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2008). Learning an additional language through dialogic inquiry. Language and Education, 22(2), 144-123.
28. He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 568-582.
29. Heap, J. L. (1992). Seeing snubs: An introduction to sequential analysis of classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 23-29.
30. Henning, J., Nielson, L., Henning, M., & Schulz, E. U. (2008). Designing discussions: Four ways to open up discussion. Social Studies, 99, 122-126.
31. Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2, 149-181.
32. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-103.
33. Kaartinen, S., & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Negotiating meaning in science classroom communities: Cases across age levels. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2)-37(1), 4-16.
34. Kitchener, R. F. (2004). Piaget's social epistemology. In J. I. M. Carpendale & U. Müller (Eds.), Social interaction and the development of knowledge (pp. 45-66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (2000). Mapping the dynamics of peer group interaction: A method of analysis of socially shared learning processes. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aaalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 144-160). New York, NY: Pergamon.
36. Kumpulainen, K., & van der Aaalsvoort, G. M. (2001). Negotiating meaning in a community of learners: Discussion. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 74-76.
37. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.
40. McCroskey, J. C., & McVetta, R. W. (1978). Classroom seating arrangements: Instructional communication theory versus student preferences. Communication Education, 27(2), 99-111.
41. McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
42. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
44. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds. New York, NY: Routledge.
45. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168.
46. Mercer, N. (2008a). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33-59.
47. Mercer, N. (2008b). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51,90-100.
48. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London, England: Routledge.
49. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95-111.
50. Mori, J. (2007). Border crossings? Exploring the intersection of second language acquisition, conversation analysis, and foreign language pedagogy. Modern Language Journal, 91, 849-862.
51. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
52. Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition process in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (original work published in 1947)
55. Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932)
56. Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies (2nd ed.; L. Smith, Ed., L. Smith et al., Trans.). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1977)
57. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 679-744). New York, NY: Wiley.
59. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Situating cognition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 27-61.
60. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1-2). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
61. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
62. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp.51-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63. Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631.
64. Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165-187.
65. Sinclair, J. M. (1992). Priorities in discourse analysis. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 79-88). New York, NY: Routledge.
66. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
67. Smith, L. (2009). Piaget's pedagogy. In U. Müller, J. I. M. Carpendale, & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 324-343). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. Turnbull, W. (2003). Language in action: Psychological models of conversation. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
69. Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (1999). A social pragmatic model of talk: Implications for research on the development of children's understanding of mind. Human Development, 42, 328-355.
70. van Boxtel, C., & Roelofs, E. (2001). Investigating the quality of student discourse: What constitutes a productive student discourse? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 55-62.
71. van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Deep processing in a collaborative learning environment. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 161-178). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
72. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. New York, NY: Longman.
73. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
74. Viechnicki, G. B. (1997). An empirical analysis of participant intentions: Discourse in a graduate seminar. Language and Communication, 17, 103-131.
75. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (2000). Language for thinking: A study of children solving reasoning test problems together. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 179-192). New York, NY: Pergamon.
76. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5,1-37.
77. Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 379-428.
78. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Wright, D. (1982). Piaget's theory of moral development. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Jean Piaget: Consensus and controversy (pp. 207-217). London, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
80. Young, R. E. (1982). Critical theory, curriculum, and teaching. Discourse: The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 3(1), 22-39.
81. Young, R. E. (1992). Critical theory and classroom talk. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.