The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 873-884

  Greco, Ermanno ^a   Litwicka, Katarzyna ^a   Arrivi, Cristiana ^a   Varricchio, Maria Teresa ^a   Caragia, Alina ^a   Greco, Alessia ^a   Minasi, Maria Giulia ^a   Fiorentino, Francesco ^b  

^a EUROPEAN HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b GENOMA Molecular Genetics Laboratory   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blastocyst transfer; Endometrial preparation; Euploid embryos; Vitrification

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; ESTRADIOL; ESTRADIOL VALERATE; ESTROGEN; GONADORELIN; PROGESTERONE;

ADULT; AGONISTS; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANXIETY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DEPRESSION; DRUG EFFECTS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS; NIDATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; ANXIETY; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CRYOPRESERVATION; DEPRESSION; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; ESTRADIOL; ESTROGENS; FEMALE; GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE; HUMANS; OVULATION INDUCTION; PITUITARY GLAND; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGESTERONE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84969932769     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0736-y     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Hill MJ, Miller A, Frattarelli JL. A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:416–22.
2. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:344–8.
3. Weinerman R, Mainigi M. Why we should frozen instead of fresh embryos: the translational rationale. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:10–8.
4. Abeyta M, Behr B. Morphological assessment of embryo viability. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32(2):114–26.
5. Munné S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(12):2185–91.
6. Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman LR, Austin C, Goldberg J, Falcone T. Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;20:12–54.
7. Katz Jaffe MG, McReynolds S. Embryology in the era of proteomics. Fertil Steril. 2013;15(4):1073–7. 99.
8. Uyar A, Seli E. Metabolomic assessment of embryo viability. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32(2):141–52.
9. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(3):281–9.
10. Sahin L, Bozkurt M, Sahin H, Gürel A, Yumru AE. Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening? Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014;30(10):491–8.
11. Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):473–83.
12. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(6):841–7.
13. Murata Y, Oku H, Morimoto Y, Tokuda M, Murata T, Sugihara K, et al. Freeze-thaw programmes rescue the implantation of day 6 blastocyts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;1:428–33.
14. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Thomas S. Large blastocyst diameter, early blastulation, and low preovulatory serum progesterone are dominant predictors of clinical pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:302–9.
15. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:389–92.
16. Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67(1):73–80.
17. Lopes AS, Frederickx V, Van Kerkhoven G, Campo R, Puttemans P, Gordts S. Survival, re-expansion and cell survival of human blastocysts following vitrification and warming using two vitrification systems. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(1):83–90.
18. Check JH, Choe JK, Katsoff D, Summers-Chase D, Wilson C. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation adversely affects implantation after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:416–20.
19. Haouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, Tondeur S, Reme T, Hedon B, et al. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1436–45.
20. Horcajadas JA, Dıaz-Gimeno P, Pellicer A, Simon C. Uterine receptivity and the ramifications of ovarian stimulation on endometrial function. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:454–60.
21. Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C, Osmanagaoglu K, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:1025–9.
22. Nikas G, Develioglu OH, Toner JP, Jones Jr HW. Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:787–92.
23. Papanikolaou EG, Bourgain C, Kolibianakis E, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Steroid receptor expression in late follicular phase endometrium in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles is already altered, indicating initiation of early luteal phase transformation in the absence of secretory changes. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1541–7.
24. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:156–62.
25. Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD003414.
26. Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):458–70.
27. Candido T, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, Humaidan P. Pregnancy lost after frozen-embryo transfer-a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1165–9.
28. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, Fitgerald CT, Horne G, Pease EEH, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:603–9.
29. Prato LD, Borini A, Cattoli M, Bonu MA, Sciajno R, Flamigni C. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:956–60.
30. Spandorfer SD, Fasouliotis SJ, Cimmino C, Shpizner M, Veeck L, Rosenwaks Z. Blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET): comparison of outcome with replacement in natural or programmed/medicated cycle. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:s154.
31. Mounce G, McVeigh E, Turner K, Child TJ. Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:915–20.
32. An Y, Sun Z, Li L, Zhang Y, Ji H. Relationship between psychological stress and reproductive outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: psychological and neurohormonal assessment. J Assis Reprod Genet. 2013;30(1):35–41.
33. Pasch LA, Gregorich SE, Katz PK, Millstein SG, Nachtigall RD, Bleil ME, et al. Psychological distress and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):459–64.
34. Eyal S, Weizman A, Toren P, Dor Y, Mester R, Rehavi M. Chronic GnRH agonist administration down-regulates platelet serotonin transporter in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 1996;125(2):141–5.
35. Amir BY, Yaacov B, Guy B, Gad P, Itzhak W, Gal I. Headaches in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo-transfer treatment. Headache. 2005;45(3):215–9.
36. Greco E, Litwicka K, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Rienzi L. GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for ICSI with oocyte restriction: a matched, controlled study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;14(5):572–8.
37. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Toward reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond. London: Parthenon Publishing; 1999. p. 378–88.
38. Testart J, Frydman R, Feinstein MC, Thebault A, Roger M, Scholler R. Interpretation of plasma luteinizing hormone assay for the collection of mature oocytes from women: definition of a luteinizing hormone-surge-initiating rise. Fertil Steril. 1981;36:50–4.
39. Iani L, Lauriola M, Costantini M. A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an Italian community sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;5:12–84.
40. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.
41. Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Crain JL, Wilson JM, Griffin DK. Blastocyst euploidy and implantation rates in a young (<35 years) and old (≥35 years) presumed fertile and infertile patient population. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1318–23.
42. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):3–9.
43. Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, Lyu SW, Lee WS, Yoon TK. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes: cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(4):369–74.
44. Creus M, Ordi J, Fábregues F, Casamitjana R, Carmona F, Cardesa A, et al. The effect of different hormone therapies on integrin expression and pinopode formation in the human endometrium: a controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):683–93.
45. Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, Moodie G, Brenner S. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24(4):119–23.
46. Richter KS, Shipley SK, McVearry I, Tucker MJ, Widra EA. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(4):862–6.
47. El-Toukhy T, Taylor A, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K, Rowell P, Seed P, et al. Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:874–9.
48. Karlström PO, Bergh T, Forsberg AS, Sandkvist U, Wikland M. Prognostic factors for the success rate of embryo freezing. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(6):1263–6.
49. Toner JP, Veeck LL, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ. Predictive value of pregnancy during original in vitro fertilization cycle on implantation and pregnancy in subsequent cryothaw cycles. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(3):505.
50. Hong SW, Sepilian V, Chung HM, Kim TJ. Cryopreserved human blastocysts after vitrification result in excellent implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(6):2062–4.
51. Youssry M, Ozmen B, Zohni K, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Current aspects of blastocyst cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16(2):311–20.
52. Al-Shawaf T, Yang D, Al-Magid Y, Seaton A, Iketubosin F, Craft I. Infertility: ultrasonic monitoring during replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in natural and hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:2068–74.
53. Queenan JT, Ramey JW, Seltman HJ, Eure L, Veeck LL, Muasher SJ. Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos in a cycle using exogenous steroids without prior gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression yields favourable pregnancy results. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1176–80.
54. Simon A, Hurwitz A, Zetner BS, Bdolah Y, Laufer N. Transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in artificially prepared cycles with and without prior gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2712–7.
55. Levron J, Yerushalmi GM, Brengauz M, Gat I, Katorza E. Comparison between two protocols for thawed embryo transfer: natural cycle versus exogenous hormone replacement. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(7):494–7.
56. Alama P, Melo MAB, Garcia G, Garrido N, Meseguer M, Remohi J. Higher ongoing pregnancy rates in lastocyst transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2007;8:s161.
57. Givens CR, Markun LC, Ryan IP, Chenette PE, Herbert CM, Schriock ED. Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:380–4.
58. Gingold, J.A., Lee, J.A., Rodriguez-Purata, J., Whitehouse, M.C., Sandler, B., Grunfeld, L., Mukherjee, T., Copperman, A.B. Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):620–8.
59. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Li Y. The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:100.
60. Werner MD, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Franasiak JM, Bergh PA, Scott RT. Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(4):557–62.
61. Harper MJ. The implantation window. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;6(2):351–71.
62. Tabibzadeh S. Molecular control of the implantation window. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(5):465–71.
63. Andersen AG, Als-Nielsen B, Hornnes PJ, Franch Andersen L. Time interval from human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection to follicular rupture. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3202–5.
64. Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abeel E, Griesunger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2054–8.
65. Griesinger G, Weig M, Schroer A, Diedrich K, Kolibianakis EM. Mid-cycle serum levels of endogenous LH are not associated with the likelihood of pregnancy in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles without pituitary suppression. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2589–93.
66. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):520–4.
67. Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C, Dumesic D, Surrey M, Munné S, et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):876–80.
68. Forman EJ, Upham KM, Cheng M, Zhao T, Hong KH, Treff NR, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):718–24.
69. Weissman A, Horowitz E, Ravhon A, Steinfeld Z, Mutzafi R, Golan A, et al. Spontaneous ovulation versus HCG triggering for timing natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):484–9.
70. Mahajan NN, Turnbull DA, Davies MJ, Jindal UN, Briggs NE, Taplin JE. Changes in affect and state anxiety across an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):517–26.
71. Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Evers AW, Kremer JA, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DD. Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):27–36.
72. Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(2):293–308.
73. Turner K, Reynolds-May MF, Zitek EM, Tisdale RL, Carlisle AB, Westphal LM. Stress and anxiety scores in first and repeat IVF cycles: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2013;23:8(5).
74. Stenbæk DS, Toftager M, Hjordt LV, Jensen PS, Holst KK, Bryndorf T, et al. Mental distress and personality in women undergoing GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocols for assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(1):103–10.
75. Karatas JC, Strong KA, Barlow-Stewart K, McMahon C, Meiser B, Roberts C. Psychological impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a review of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(1):83–91.