Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening?

Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 491-498

  Sahin, Levent ^a   Bozkurt, Murat ^b   Sahin, Hilal ^c   Gürel, Aykut ^d   Yumru, Ayse Ender ^e  

^a Park Hospital   (Turkey)

^b KAFKAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c INONU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d HRS IVF and Genetic Diagnosis Center   (Turkey)

^e ISTANBUL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Chromosomal anomalies; In vitro fertilization; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOCYST; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EMBRYOLOGY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GAMETE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRONUCLEUS; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW;

EID: 84908228676     PISSN: 1607551X     EISSN: 24108650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.05.008     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. E. Vanneste, C. Melotte, T. Voet, C. Robberecht, S. Debrock, and A. Pexsters PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization Hum Reprod 26 2011 941 949
2. A. Umranikar, D. Parmar, S. Davies, and S. Fountain Multiple births following in vitro fertilization treatment: redefining success Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170 2013 299 304
3. T. Ebner, M. Moser, M. Sommergruber, and G. Tews Selection based on morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages of preimplantation development: a review Hum Reprod Update 9 2003 251 262
4. E. Neuber, P. Rinaudo, J.R. Trimarchi, and D. Sakkas Sequential assessment of individually cultured human embryos as an indicator of subsequent good quality blastocyst development Hum Reprod 18 2003 1307 1312
5. L. Scott, A. Finn, T. O'Leary, S. McLellan, and J. Hill Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates Hum Reprod 22 2007 230 240
6. P. De Sutter, D. Dozortsev, C. Qian, and M. Dhont Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod 11 1996 595 597
7. B. Balaban, B. Urman, A. Sertac, C. Alatas, S. Aksoy, and R. Mercan Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection Hum Reprod 13 1998 3431 3433
8. M. Alikani, G. Palermo, A. Adler, M. Bertoli, M. Blake, and J. Cohen Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in dysmorphic human oocytes Zygote 3 1995 283 288
9. J. Otsuki, A. Okada, K. Morimoto, Y. Nagai, and H. Kubo The relationship between pregnancy outcome and smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters in MII human oocytes Hum Reprod 19 2004 1591 1597
10. T. Ebner, M. Moser, M. Sommergruber, U. Gaiswinkler, O. Shebl, and K. Jesacher Occurrence and developmental consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development Fertil Steril 83 2005 1635 1640
11. R. Sela, L. Samuelov, B. Almog, T. Schwartz, T. Cohen, and A. Amit An embryo cleavage pattern based on the relative blastomere size as a function of cell number for predicting implantation outcome Fertil Steril 98 2012 650 656
12. L.A. Scott, and S. Smith The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval Hum Reprod 13 1998 1003 1013
13. J. Tesarik, and E. Greco The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology Hum Reprod 14 1999 1318 1323
14. L. Scott, R. Alvero, M. Leondires, and B. Miller The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation Hum Reprod 15 2000 2394 2403
15. K. Matsuura, N. Hayashi, C. Takiue, R. Hirata, T. Habara, and K. Naruse Blastocyst quality scoring based on morphologic grading correlates with cell number Fertil Steril 94 2010 1135 1137
16. D. Blake, M. Proctor, N. Johnson, and D. Olive Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19 2005 CD002118
17. A. Mertzanidou, C. Spits, H.T. Nguyen, H. Van de Velde, and K. Sermon Evolution of aneuploidy up to day 4 of human preimplantation development Hum Reprod 28 2013 1716 1724
18. R. Machtinger, and C. Racowsky Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence Reprod Biomed Online 26 2013 210 221
19. M. Szczygiet, and M. Kurpisz Chromosomal anomalies in human gametes and pre-implantation embryos, and their potential effect on reproduction Andrologia 33 2001 249 265
20. V.I. Farfalli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, and L. Gianaroli Role of aneuploidy on embryo implantation Gynecol Obstet Invest 64 2007 161 165
21. N.E. Lamb, S.B. Freeman, A. Savage-Austin, D. Pettay, L. Taft, and J. Hersey Susceptible chiasmate configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non-disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis II Nat Genet 14 1996 400 405
22. W.D. Warren, and K.L. Gorringe A molecular model for sporadic human aneuploidy Trends Genet 22 2006 218 224
23. D. Wells, T. Escudero, B. Levy, K. Hirschhorn, J.D. Delhanty, and S. Munné First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy Fertil Steril 78 2002 543 549
24. S. Munné Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos Reprod Biomed Online 12 2006 234 253
25. G.L. Harton, M. De Rycke, F. Fiorentino, C. Moutou, S. SenGupta, J. Traeger-Synodinos European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD Hum Reprod 26 2011 33 40
26. A.H. Handyside, J.K. Pattinson, R.J.A. Penketh, J.D.A. Delhauty, R.M.L. Wintson, and E.G.D. Tuddenham Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification Lancet 1 1989 347 349
27. M.C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, A.P. Ferrareti, M. Lappi, A. Ruberti, and V. Farfalli Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosome complement Fertil Steril 87 2007 534 541
28. S. Munné, C. Serena, P. Colls, J. Garrisi, X. Zheng, and N. Cekleniak Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos Reprod Biomed Online 14 2007 628 634
29. M. Sandalinas, S. Sadowy, M. Alikani, G. Calderon, J. Cohen, and S. Munné Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage Hum Reprod 16 2001 1954 1958
30. E. Fragouli, S. Alfarawati, D.D. Daphnis, N.N. Goodall, A. Mania, and T. Griffiths Cyto-genetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH, scientific data and technical evaluation Hum Reprod 26 2011 480 490
31. S. Munné, A. Lee, Z. Rosenwaks, J. Grifo, and J. Cohen Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos Hum Reprod 8 1993 2185 2191
32. C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, I. Perez-Cano, A. Mercader, E. Mateu, and P. Buendia FISH screening of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos to improve IVF outcome Reprod Biomed Online 11 2005 497 506
33. S. Kahraman, M. Bahce, H. Samli, N. Imirzahoglu, K. Yakisn, and G. Cengiz Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure Hum Reprod 15 2000 2003 2007
34. T. Pehlivan, C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, J. Romero, J. Remohl, and C. Simon Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis on IVF outcome in implantation failure patients Reprod Biomed Online 6 2003 232 237
35. L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, C. Tabanelli, V. Farfalli, and G. Cavallini The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application Reprod Biomed Online 10 2005 633 640
36. S. Munne, C. Magli, J. Cohen, P. Morton, S. Sadowy, and L. Gianaroli Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos Hum Reprod 14 1999 2191 2199
37. N. Gleicher, V.A. Kushnir, and D.H. Barad Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review Reprod Biol Endocrinol 12 2014 22 10.1186/1477-7827-12-22
38. M. Sugiura-Ogasawara, and K. Suzumori Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve success rates in recurrent aborters with translocations? Hum Reprod 20 2005 3267 3270
39. P. Platteau, C. Staessen, A. Michiels, A. Van Steirteghem, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained miscarriages Fertil Steril 83 2005 393 397
40. Y. Verlinsky Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis Fertil Steril 82 2004 302 303
41. H.J. Carp, M. Dirnfeld, J. Dor, and J.G. Grudzinskas ART in recurrent miscarriage: preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening or surrogacy? Hum Reprod 19 2004 1502 1505
42. M. Ogasawara, K. Aoki, S. Okada, and K. Suzumori Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages Fertil Steril 73 2000 300 304
43. G.L. Harton, S. Munné, M. Surrey, J. Grifo, B. Kaplan, and D.H. McCulloh Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization Fertil Steril 100 2013 1695 1703
44. S. Munné, T. Dailey, K.M. Sultan, J. Grifo, and J. Cohen The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy Hum Reprod 10 1995 1014 1020
45. Y. Verlinsky, J. Cieslak, M. Freidine, V. Ivakhnenko, G. Wolf, and L. Kovalinskaya Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization Hum Reprod 10 1995 1923 1927
46. L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, S. Munné, A. Fiorentino, N. Montanaro, and A.P. Ferraretti Will preimplantation genetic diagnosis assist patients with a poor prognosis to achieve pregnancy? Hum Reprod 12 1997 1762 1767
47. M. Twisk, S. Mastenbroek, M. van Wely, M.J. Heineman, F. Van der Veen, and S. Repping Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25 2006 CD005291
48. J.C. Harper, L. Wilton, J. Traeger-Synodinos, V. Goossens, C. Moutou, and S.B. SenGupta The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection Hum Reprod Update 18 2012 234 247
49. P. Colls, N. Goodall, X. Zheng, and S. Munné Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy by testing 12 chromosomes Reprod Biomed Online 19 2009 532 538
50. R.P.S. Jansen, M.C. Bowman, K.A. De Boer, D.A. Leigh, D.B. Lieberman, and S.J. McArthur What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGD)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy Hum Reprod 23 2008 1476 1478
51. Y. Verlinsky, I. Tur-Kaspa, J. Cieslak, A. Bernal, R. Morris, and B. Kaplan Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor prognosis patients Reprod Biomed Online 11 2005 219 225
52. K. Sermon, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers Preimplantation genetic diagnosis Lancet 363 2004 1633 1641
53. C.M. Ogilvie, P.R. Braude, and P.N. Scriven Preimplantation genetic diagnosis-an overview J Histochem Cytochem 53 2005 255 260
54. L. Wilton Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review Prenat Diagn 22 2002 512 518
55. E.B. Baart, I. van den Berg, E. Martini, H.J. Eussen, B.C. Fauser, and D. Van Opstal FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and 5 preimplantation embryos: the added value of extended aneuploidy detection Prenat Diagn 27 2007 55 63
56. E. Baart, D. Van Opstal, F.J. Los, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and E. Martini Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day-3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day-5 Hum Reprod 19 2004 685 693
57. C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, and M. Camus Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 19 2004 2849 2858
58. V.K. Berger, and V.L. Baker Preimplantation diagnosis for single gene disorders Semin Reprod Med 32 2014 107 113
59. S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, J. Van Echten-Arends, B. Sikkema-Raddatz, J.C. Korevaar, and H.R. Verhoeve Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age N Engl J Med 357 2007 9 17
60. C.B. Coulam, R.S. Jeyendram, M. Fiddler, and E. Pergament Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective J Assist Reprod Genet 24 2007 37 41
61. G. Sher, L. Keskintepe, M. Keskintepe, M. Ginsburg, G. Maassarani, and T. Yakut Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genome hybridization provides a highly reliable method for selecting "competent" embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study Fertil Steril 87 2007 1033 1040
62. C. Rubio, J. Bellver, L. Rodrigo, E. Bosch, A. Mercader, and C. Vidal Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: two randomized trials Fertil Steril 99 2013 1400 1407
63. S. Debrock, C. Melotte, C. Spiessens, K. Peeraer, E. Vanneste, and L. Meeuwis Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy of embryos after in vitro fertilization in women aged at least 35 years: a prospective randomized trial Fertil Steril 93 2010 364 373
64. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 430 Preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 766 767
65. N.A. Gueye, B. Devkota, D. Taylor, R. Pfundt, R.T. Scott Jr., and N.R. Treff Uniparental disomy in the human blastocyst is exceedingly rare Fertil Steril 101 2014 232 236
66. L. Wilton, A. Thornhill, J. Traeger-Synodinos, K.D. Sermon, and J.C. Harper The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD Hum Reprod 24 2009 1221 1228
67. I. Abdelhadi, P. Colls, M. Sandalinas, T. Escudero, and S. Munné Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes Reprod Biomed Online 6 2003 226 231
68. L. Voullaire, H. Slater, R. Williamson, and L. Wilton Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization Hum Genet 106 2000 210 217
69. D. Wells, and J.D. Delhanty Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: applications for molecular medicine Trends Mol Med 7 2001 23 30
70. F. Fiorentino, L. Spizzichino, S. Bono, A. Biricik, G. Kokkali, and L. Rienzi PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization Hum Reprod 26 2011 1925 1935
71. J.C. Harper, and G. Harton The use of arrays in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening Fertil Steril 94 2010 1173 1177
72. S. Alfarawati, E. Fragouli, P. Colls, and D. Wells First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis Hum Reprod 26 2011 1560 1574
73. M.C. Magli, M. Montag, M. Köster, L. Muzi, J. Geraedts, and J. Collins Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects Hum Reprod 26 2011 3181 3185
74. L. Wilton Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization Hum Reprod Update 11 2005 33 41
75. M. Rius, A. Obradors, G. Daina, L. Ramos, A. Pujol, and O. Martínez-Passarell Detection of unbalanced chromosome segregations in preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations by short comparative genomic hybridization Fertil Steril 96 2011 134 142
76. E.C. Lau, M.M. Janson, C.B. Ball, M.R. Roesler, P. VanTuinen, and D.P. Bick Preimplantation genetic testing: current status and future prospects S. Friedler, In vitro fertilization-Innovative clinical and laboratory aspects. InTech 2012 ISBN 978-953-51-0503-9
77. Y.Q. Tan, K. Tan, S.P. Zhang, F. Gong, D.H. Cheng, and B. Xiong Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers Hum Reprod 28 2013 2581 2592