Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation adversely affects implantation following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 416-420

  Check, Jerome H ^a,b   Choe, Jung K ^a   Katsoff, Diane ^a   Summers Chase, Donna ^a   Wilson, Carrie ^a  

^a RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Frozen embryo transfer; Implantation; Recipient; Shared oocytes

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; ESTRADIOL; FOLLITROPIN; GONADOTROPIN; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; LEUPRORELIN; PROGESTERONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DONOR; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRAVAGINAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; NIDATION; OOCYTE; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; OOCYTES; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0032876889     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020565408018     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rosenwaks Z: Donor eggs: Their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1987;47:895-909
2. Serhal PR, Craft LL: Ovum donation - A simplified approach. Fertil Steril 1987;48:265-269
3. Ben-Nun I, Ghetler Y, Gruber A, Jaffe R, Fejgin M: Egg donation in an in vitro fertilization program: An alternative approach to cycle synchronization and timing of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1989;52:683-687
4. Devroey P, Smith J, Camus M, Sisanto A, Deschacht J, Van Waesberghe L, Van Steirteghem AC: Synchronization of donor's and recipient's cycles with GnRH analogues in an oocyte donation program. Hum Reprod 1989;4:270-274
5. Frydman R, Letur-Konirsch H, de Ziegler D, Bydlowski M, Raoul-Duval A, Selva J: A protocol for satisfying the ethical issues raised by oocyte donation: the free, anonymous and fertile donors. Fertil Steril 1990;53:666-672
6. Check JH, O'Shaughnessy A, Lurie D, Fisher C, Adelson HG: Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3022-3027
7. Pie-Zeigler R, Shelton KE, Tone JP: Salpingectomy(ies) improves the pregnancy rate after IVF in patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12:S65
8. Shelton KE, Butier L, Toner JP: Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod 1996;11:523-525
9. Puttermans PJ, Brosens IA: Salpingectomy improves in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with a hydrosalpinx: Blind victimization of the fallopian tube? Hum Reprod 1996;11:2079-2081
10. Aubriot FX, Chapron C, Morice P, Dubuisson JB: Hydrosalpinx et sterilite: indications de la salpingectomie. Contracept Fertil Sex 1995;23:670-673
11. Andersen AN, Linhard A, Loft A, Ziebe S, Andersen CY: The infertile patient with hydrosalpinges: IVF with or without salpingectomy? Hum Reprod 1996;11:2081-2084
12. Dechaud H, Daures JP, Arnal F, Humeau C, Heden B: Does previous salpingectomy improve implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with severe tubal factor infertility who are undergoing in vitro fertilization? A pilot prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1998;69:1020-1025
13. Shelton KE, Butler L, Toner JP, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ: Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod 1996;11:523-525
14. Check JH, Lurie D, Dietterich C, Callan C, Baker A: Adverse effect of a homogeneous hyperechogenic endometrial sonographic pattern, despite adequate endometrial thickness on pregnancy rates following in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1293-1296
15. Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, McCaffrey C, CookCA, Bustillo M, Obasaju M: Hydrosalpinx fluid has embryotoxic effects on murine embryogenesis: A case for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 1996;66:851-853
16. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA: Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 1990;53:870-874
17. Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L: Hydrosalpinx reduces in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 1994;9:861-863
18. Blazar AS, Hogan JW, Seifer DB, Frishman GN, Wheeler CA, Haning RV: The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1997;67:517-520
19. Vandromme J, Chasse E, Lejeune B, Van Rysselberge M, Selvigne A, Leroy F: Hydrosalpinges in in vitro fertilization: An unfavorable prognostic feature. Hum Reprod 1995;10:576-579
20. Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K: Low implantation rate after in vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935-1938
21. Fleming C, Hull MG: Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilization treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:268-272
22. Meldrum DR: Female reproductive aging-ovarian and uterine factors. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1-5
23. Al-Khatib RA, Fakih H: Artificial hormonal replacement cycles have no advantage over hyperstimulated cycles in a gamete intrafallopian transfer oocyte donation program. Fertil Steril 1995;63:1255-1259