Differences in epistemic practices among scientists, young earth creationists, intelligent design creationists, and the scientist-creationists of Darwin's era

Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Controversy

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 38-76

  Chinn, Clark A ^a   Buckland, Luke A ^b  

^a Rutgers Cooperative   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920759867     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (99)

1. Ashmore, M. (1993). The theatre of the blind: Starring a Promethean prankster, a phoney phenomenon, a prism, a pocket and a piece of wood. Social Studies of Science, 23, 67-106.
2. Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin's black box. New York: Free Press.
3. Boyd, R. (1991). On the current status of scientific realism. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper, & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science (pp. 195-222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Brandon, R. (1983). The spiritualists: The passion for the occult in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New York: Knopf.
5. Browne, J. (1995). Charles Darwin: Voyaging. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Browne, J. (2002). Charles Darwin: The power of place. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Center for Science & Culture. (n.d.). Top questions. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php
8. Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture. (n.d.). The wedge strategy. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.public.asu.edu/~jmlynch/idt/wedge.html
9. Chambers, P. (2002). Bones of contention: The fossil that shook science. London: John Murray.
10. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
11. Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2005, July). Toward a broader conceptualization of epistemology in science education. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Leeds, United Kingdom.
12. Collins, H. M. (1981). Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Social Studies of Science, 11, 3-10.
13. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Dawkins, R. (1996). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton.
15. Dembski, W. A. (1998). The design inference: Eliminating chance through small probabilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Dembski, W. A. (1999). Intelligent design: The bridge between science and theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
17. Dembski, W. A. (2003). Still spinning just fine: A response to Ken Miller. Accessed July 12, 2009, at www.designinference.com/documents/2003.02.Miller_Response.htm
18. Denton, M. (1985). Evolution: A theory in crisis. Bethesda, MD: Adler & Adler.
19. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 35, 125-129.
20. Donovan, A., Laudan, L., & Laudan, R. (1998). Scrutinizing science: Empirical studies of scientific change. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Dunbar, K. (1993). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Elsberry W., & Shallit, J. (2004). Playing games with probability: Dembski's complex specified information. In M. Young & T. Edis (Eds.), Why intelligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism (pp. 121-138). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23. Fitelson, B., Stephens, C., & Sober, E. (1999). How not to detect design-A review of William Dembski's The Design Inference. Philosophy of Science, 66, 472-488.
24. Forrest, B. (2001). The wedge at work: How intelligent design creationism is wedging its way into the cultural and academic mainstream. In R. T. Pennock (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological and scientific perspectives (pp. 5-53). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Forrest, B. (in press). The non-epistemology of intelligent design: Its implications for public policy. Synthese.
26. Forrest, B., & Gross, P. R. (2004). Creationism's Trojan horse: The wedge of intelligent design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28. Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742-752.
29. Goldman, A. (2006). Social epistemology, theory of evidence, and intelligent design: Deciding what to teach. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44, 1-22.
30. Gregory, T. R. (Ed.). (2008). The evolution of eyes. Special issue of Evolution: Education and Outreach. New York: Springer.
31. Gruber, J. W. (1960). A conscience in conflict: The life of St. George Jackson Mivart. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
32. Haack, S. (2003). Defending science: Between scientism and cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
33. Ham, K. (2007). The new answers book: What really happened to the dinosaurs. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/what-happened-to-the-dinosaurs
34. Ham, K. (2009). Arguments we think creationists should not use. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp
35. Hovind, K. (2009). Creation science evangelism. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.drdino.com/
36. Johnson, P. E. (1993). Darwin on trial (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
37. Johnson, P. E. (1994). Introduction. In J. Buell & V. Hearn (Eds.), Darwinism: Science or philosophy? Richardson, TX: Foundation for Thought & Ethics. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.veritas-ucsb.org/reading/BuDSP.html
38. Johnson, P. E. (2000). Forward. In R. G. Bohlin, Creation, evolution, and modern science: Probing the headlines that impact your family (pp. 5-6). Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications.
39. Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Kitcher, P. (1982). Abusing science: The case against creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Kitcher, P. (2007). Living with Darwin: Evolution, design, and the future of faith. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. (2005). Dover, Pennsylvania Intelligent Design Case. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover.html
44. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Kofahl, R. E. (2008). Creation essays: Where does knowledge come from? Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.parentcompany.com/creation_essays/essay1.htm
46. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Laudan, L. (1982, Fall). Commentary: Science at the bar. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 41, 16-19.
49. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Lurie, E. (1988). Louis Agassiz: A life in science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. Lynch, J. M. (2008). The year in ID: 2007 edition. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://scienceblogs.com/strangerfruit/2007/12/the_year_in_id_2007_edition.php
53. Lynch, J. M. (2009). The year in ID: 2008 edition. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://scienceblogs.com/strangerfruit/2009/01/the_year_in_id_2008_edition.php
54. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
55. Matsumura, M., & Mead, L. (2007). Ten major court cases about evolution and creationism. National Center for Science Education. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://ncseweb.org/taking-action/ten-major-court-cases-evolution-creationism
56. Matzke, N. (2009). God of the gaps...in your own knowledge. Luskin, Behe, & blood-clotting. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/01/god-of-the-gapsin-your-own-knowledge-luskin-behe-blood-clotting.html
57. Mayo, D. G. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. New York: Basic Books.
60. McKeever, S. (2008). Feedback: Should we keep them from seeing? Teaching discernment to children. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.answersingenesis.org/art-icles/2008/03/28/feedback-keep-from-seeing
61. Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
62. Meyer, S. C. (1986). Scientific tenets of faith. Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith, 38, 40-42.
63. Meyer, S. (2004). The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 117, 213-239.
64. Miller, K. R. (1984). Scientific creationism versus evolution: The mislabeled debated. In A. Montagu (Ed.), Science and creationism (pp. 18-63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Miller, K. (2004). The flagellum unspun: The collapse of "irreducible complexity." In W. A. Dembski & M. Ruse (Eds.), Debating design: From Darwin to DNA (pp. 81-97). New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Miller, K. (2009). Smoke and mirrors, whales and lampreys. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/01/02/smoke-and-mirrors-whales-and-lampreys-a-guest-post-by-ken-miller/
67. Morris, H. M., & Parker, G. E. (1987). What is creation science? El Cajon, CA: Master Books.
68. Numbers, R. L. (1995). The early writings of Harold W. Clark and Frank Lewis Marsh. New York: Garland Publishing.
69. Numbers, R. L. (2006). The creationists: From scientific creationism to intelligent design (expanded ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Petto, J. P., & Godfrey, L. R. (Eds.). (1998). Scientists confront intelligent design and creationism. London: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
71. Picart, C. J. S. (1994). Scientific controversy as farce: The Benveniste-Maddox counter trials. Social Studies of Science, 24, 7-37.
72. Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing quarks: A sociological history of particle physics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73. Rupke, N. A. (1994). Richard Owen: Victorian naturalist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74. Ruse, M. (1982a, Summer). Creation-science is not science. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 7, 72-78.
75. Ruse, M. (1982b, Fall). Response to commentary: Pro judice. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 7, 19-23.
76. Ruse, M. (1999). The Darwinian revolution: Science red in tooth and claw (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77. Ruse, M. (2005). The Darwinian revolution, as seen in 1979 and as seen twenty-five years later in 2004. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 3-17.
78. Sarfati, J. (n.d.). Arguments creationists should not use. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2996/
79. Schafersman, S. (2008). The disjunctive duality of science distinction: A new argument from the Institute for Creation Research. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from www.texscience.org/reviews/icr-duality-science.htm
80. Shallit, J. (2002). William Dembski, no free lunch. Biosystems, 66, 93-99.
81. Shanks, N., & Joplin, K. H. (1999). Redundant complexity: A critical analysis of intelligent design in biochemistry. Philosophy of Science, 66, 268-298.
82. Smocovitis, V. B. (1996). Unifying biology: The evolutionary synthesis and evolutionary biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83. Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and evolution: The logic behind the science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84. Solomon, M. (2001). Social empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Stenger, V. J. (1998). Physics, cosmology and the new creationism. In J. P. Petto & L. R. Godfrey (Eds.), Scientists confront intelligent design and creationism (pp. 131-149). London: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
86. Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Stopping America's war of words. New York: Ballantine Books.
87. Trott, R. (1999). Duane Gish and creationism. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://talkorigins.org/faqs/gish-rutgers.html
88. Ussery, D. (2004). Darwin's transparent box: The biochemical evidence for evolution. In M. Young & T. Edis (Eds.), Why intelligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism (pp. 48-57). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
89. van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. Walters, S. M., & Stow, E. A. (2001). Darwin's mentor: John Stevens Henslow 1796-1861. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91. Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Weber, B. H., & Depew, D. J. (2004). Darwinism, design, and complex systems dynamics. In W. A. Dembski & M. Ruse (Eds.), Debating design: From Darwin to DNA (pp. 173-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
93. Weiss, M. (2005, November 6). War of ideas fought in a small-town courtroom: Intelligent design theory vs. the science of evolution at center of Pennsylvania trial. San Francisco Chronicle.
94. Wells, J. (1996). Issues in the creation-evolution controversies. The World & I, 11, 294-305.
95. Wilson, L. (1970). Sir Charles Lyell's scientific journals on the species question. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
96. Witham, L. (2002). Where Darwin meets the Bible: Creationists and evolutionists in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
97. Wolpert, D. (2003). William Dembski's treatment of the No Free Lunch Theorems is written in jello. Mathematical Reviews. Review 2003b:00012.
98. Wright, P. W. G. (1979). A study in the legitimisation of knowledge: The 'success' of medicine and the 'failure' of astrology. In R. Wallis (Ed.), On the margins of science: The social construction of rejected knowledge (pp. 85-101). Keele: University of Keele.
99. Young, M., & Edis, T. (Eds.). (2004). Why intelligent design fails: A scientific critique of the new creationism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.