Landrace Germplasm for Improving Yield and Abiotic Stress Adaptation

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 31-42

  Dwivedi, Sangam L ^a   Ceccarelli, Salvatore ^b   Blair, Matthew W ^c   Upadhyaya, Hari D ^a   Are, Ashok K ^a   Ortiz, Rodomiro ^d  

^a INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

^b Rete Semi Rurali   (Italy)

^c TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Cereals; Climate change; Haplotype; Legumes; Quantitative trait loci

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BREEDING; CROP; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HAPLOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; HAPLOTYPES; SEEDS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84964469237     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.012     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Khoury C.K., et al. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:4001-4006.
2. Gepts P. Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishment and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Sci. 2006, 46:2278-2292.
3. Ceccarelli S., Grando S. Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent: a lesson for plant breeders. Genes in the Field: On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity 2000, 51-76. International Development Research Center. S.B. Brush (Ed.).
4. Sarker A., Erskine W. Recent progress in the ancient lentil. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144:19-29.
5. Rodriguez M., et al. Genotype by environment interactions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L): different responses of landraces, recombinant inbred lines and varieties to Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 2008, 163:231-247.
6. Abay F., Bjørnstad A. Specific adaptation of barley varieties in different locations in Ethiopia. Euphytica 2009, 167:181-195.
7. Frison E.A., et al. Agricultural biodiversity is essential for a sustainable improvement in food and nutrition security. Sustainability 2011, 3:238-253.
8. Esquinas-Alcázar J. Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nature 2010, 6:946-953.
9. Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources 1992, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Chapman & Hall. B. Groombridge (Ed.).
10. Hammer K., et al. Estimating genetic erosion in landraces - two case studies. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 1996, 43:329-336.
11. Lopez P.B. A new plant disease: uniformity. CERES 1994, 26:41-47.
12. Ceccarelli S. Landraces: importance and use in breeding and environmentally friendly agronomic systems. Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Securing the Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces 2012, 103-117. CAB International. N. Maxted (Ed.).
13. Frison A.E., et al. Agricultural biodiversity is essential for a sustainable improvement in food and nutrition security. Sustainability 2011, 3:238-253.
14. Van de Wouw M., et al. Genetic diversity trends in twentieth century crop cultivars: a meta-analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 120:1241-1252.
15. Rasmusson D.C., Phillips R.L. Plant breeding progress and genetic diversity from de novo variation and elevated epistasis. Crop Sci. 1997, 37:303-310.
16. Sharma, et al. Pre-breeding for diversification of primary gene pool and genetic enhancement of grain legumes. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4:309.
17. Mackill D.J., et al. Development and rapid adoption of submergence-tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties. Adv. Agron. 2012, 155:299-352.
18. Ruiz Corral, et al. Climatic adaptation and ecological descriptors of 42 Mexican maize races. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:1502-1512.
19. Prasanna B.M. Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. J. Biosci. 2012, 37:843-855.
20. Meseka S., et al. Introgression of alleles from maize landraces to improve drought tolerance in an unadapted germplasm. J. Crop. Improv. 2013, 27:96-112.
21. Meseka S., et al. Exploitation of beneficial alleles from maize (Zea mays L.) landraces to enhance performance of an elite variety in water stress environments. Euphytica 2015, 201:149-160.
22. Kholová J., et al. Drought stress characterization of post-rainy (rabi) sorghum in India. Field Crops Res. 2013, 141:38-46.
23. Rakshit S., et al. Morphological and molecular diversity reveal wide variability among sorghum Maldandi landraces from India. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 21:145-156.
24. Andrews D.J., Anand Kumar K. Use of the West African pearl millet landrace Iniadi in cultivar development. Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett. 1996, 105:15-22.
25. Rai K.N., et al. Registration of ICTP 8203 pearl millet. Crop Sci. 1990, 30:959.
26. Mula R.P., et al. Case study of adoption of a pearl millet variety in a non-target region. SAT eJ. 2010, 8:1-5. (ejournal.ICRISAT.org/Volume 8/sorghum_millets/case_study_of.pdf).
27. Yadav O.P., Bidinger F.R. Utilization, diversification and improvement of landraces for enhancing pearl millet productivity in arid environments. Ann. Arid Zone 2007, 46:49-57.
28. Harlan J.R., Zohary D. Distribution of wild wheat's and barley. Science 1966, 153:1074-1080.
29. Russell I.K., et al. Analysis of >1000 single nucleotide polymorphisms in geographically matched samples of landrace and wild barley indicates secondary contact and chromosome level differences in diversity around domestication genes. New Phytol. 2011, 191:564-578.
30. Newton A.C., et al. Cereal landraces for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron. Sust. Dev. 2010, 30:237-269.
31. Ceccarelli S. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica 1994, 77:205-219.
32. Acevedo E., Ceccarelli S. Role of physiologist breeder in a breeding program for drought resistance conditions. Drought Resistance in Cereals 1989, 117-139. CAB International. F.W.G. Baker (Ed.).
33. Comadran J., et al. Mixed model association scans of multi-environmental trial data reveal major loci controlling yield and yield related traits in Hordeum vulgare in Mediterranean environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 122:1363-1373.
34. Ceccarelli S., et al. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 1991, 56:169-185.
35. ICARDA Annual Report 2006 2007, ICARDA, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas.
36. Lopes M.S., et al. Exploiting genetic diversity from landraces in wheat breeding for adaptation to climate change. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, Published online March 28, 2015. 10.1093/jxb/erv122.
37. Shewayrga H., Sopade P.A. Ethnobotany, diverse food uses, claimed health benefits and implications on conservation of barley landraces in North Eastern Ethiopia highlands. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2011, 7:19.
38. Uarrota V.G., et al. Maize landraces (Zea mays L.): a new prospective source for secondary metabolite production. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6:218-226.
39. Privita Edwina R.G.E., et al. Biochemical and antioxidant activities of pigmented landraces of Oryza sativa - Koraput District, Odisha, India. Int. Food Res. J. 2014, 21:1941-1949.
40. Bhat F.M., Riar C.S. Health benefits of traditional rice varieties of temperate regions. Med. Aromat. Plants 2015, 4:198.
41. Mamidi S., et al. Investigation of the domestication of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) using multilocus sequence data. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38:953-967.
42. Sharma P.N., et al. Genetic diversity of Indian common beans elucidated with two germplasm collections and by morphological and microsatellite markers. Plant Genet. Resour. 2013, 11:121-130.
43. Avila T., et al. Genetic diversity of bean (Phaseolus) landraces and wild relatives from the primary center of origin of the Southern Andes. Plant Genet. Resour. 2012, 10:83-92.
44. Díaz L.M., et al. Genetic diversity of Colombian landraces of common bean as detected through the use of silver-stained and fluorescently labeled microsatellites. Plant Genet. Resour. 2011, 9:86-96.
45. Blair M.W., et al. Extensive diversity and inter-genepool exchange of phaseolin alleles found in world-wide snap bean germplasm analyzed with AFLP and microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 120:1381-1391.
46. Blair M.W., et al. Inter-genepool introgression, genetic diversity and nutritional quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Central Africa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:237-248.
47. López-Marín H.D., et al. Quantitative trait loci for root morphology traits under aluminum stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119:449-458.
48. Ramaekers L., et al. Improving phosphorus uptake efficiency of crop plants. Field Crops Res. 2010, 117:169-176.
49. Cichy K.A., et al. QTL analysis of root architecture traits and low phosphorus tolerance in an Andean bean population. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:59-68.
50. Schmutz J., et al. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46:707-713.
51. Blair M.W., et al. Race structure in the Mexican collection of common bean landraces. Crop Sci. 2013, 53:1517-1528.
52. Chavarro M.C., Blair M.W. QTL analysis of heat and drought tolerance in an inter-genepool common bean population. Trop. Plant Biol. 2010, 3:204-218.
53. Mukeshimana G., et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with drought tolerance in common bean using SNP markers. Crop Sci. 2014, 54:923-938.
54. Blair M.W., et al. Development of a Mesoamerican intra-genepool genetic map for QTL detection in a drought tolerant × susceptible common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Mol. Breed. 2012, 29:71-88.
55. Asfaw A., Blair M.W. Quantitative trait loci for rooting pattern traits of common beans grown under drought stress versus non-stress conditions. Mol. Breed. 2012, 30:681-695.
56. Asfaw A., et al. Multi-environment quantitative trait locus analyses for photosynthate acquisition, accumulation and remobilization traits in a common bean. Genes Genomes Genet. 2012, 2:579-595.
57. Muñoz L.C., et al. Introgression in common bean × tepary bean interspecific congruity-backcross lines as measured by AFLP markers. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:637-645.
58. Lasky J.R., et al. Genotype-environment associations in sorghum landraces predict adaptive traits. Science Adv. 2015, 1:e1400218.
59. Yamasaki M., et al. A large-scale screen for artificial selection in maize identifies candidate agronomic loci for domestication and crop improvement. Plant Cell 2005, 17:2859-2872.
60. Liu K., et al. Genetic structure and diversity among maize inbred lines as inferred from DNA microsatellites. Genetics 2003, 165:2117-2128.
61. Maron L.J., et al. Aluminum tolerance in maize is associated with higher MATE1 gene copy number. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5241-5246.
62. Yan J., et al. Association mapping for enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) genetic improvement. Crop Sci. 2011, 51:433-449.
63. Vielle-Calzada J-P., et al. The Palomero genome suggests metal effects on domestication. Science 2009, 326:1078.
64. Ortiz R., et al. Conserving and enhancing maize genetic resources as global public goods - a perspective from CIMMYT. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:13-28.
65. Huang X., et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:961-965.
66. Xu K., Mackill D.J. A major locus for submergence tolerance mapped on rice chromosome 9. Mol. Breed. 1996, 2:219-224.
67. Xu K., et al. A high-resolution linkage map in the vicinity of the rice submergence tolerance locus Sub1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2000, 263:681.
68. Xu K., et al. Sub1A is an ethylene responsive-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 2006, 442:705-708.
69. Bailey-Serres J., et al. Submergence tolerant rice: SUB1's journey from landrace to modern cultivar. Rice 2010, 3:138-147.
70. Dar M.H., et al. Flood tolerant rice reduces yield variability and raises expected yield, differentially benefitting socially disadvantaged groups. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:3315.
71. Kumar A., et al. Breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant rice: genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65:6265-6278.
72. Sanchez P.A., Salinas J.G. Low input technology for managing oxisols and utisols in tropical America. Adv. Agron. 1981, 34:279-406.
73. Wissuwa M., Ae N. Genotypic variation for tolerance to phosphorus deficiency in rice and the potential for exploitation in rice improvement. Plant Breed. 2001, 120:43-48.
74. Wissuwa M., et al. Substitution mapping of the Pup1: a major QTL increasing phosphorus uptake of rice from a phosphorus deficient soil. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105:890-897.
75. Chin J.H., et al. Development and application of gene-based markers for the major rice QTL Phosphorus uptake1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 120:1073-1086.
76. Chin J.H., et al. Developing rice with high yield under phosphorus deficiency: Pup1 sequence to application. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:1202-1216.
77. Gamuyao R., et al. The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 2012, 488:535-541.
78. Ren Z.H., et al. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37:1141-1146.
79. Bonilla P., et al. RFLP and SSLP mapping of salinity tolerance genes in chromosome 1 of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using recombinant inbred lines. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 2002, 85:68-76.
80. Thompson M.J., et al. Characterizing the Saltol quantitative trait locus for salinity tolerance in rice. Rice 2010, 3:148-160.
81. Kumar V., et al. Genome-wide association mapping of salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa). DNA Res. 2015, Published online January 27, 2015. 10.1093/dnares/dsu046.
82. Bimpong I.K., et al. New quantitative trait loci for enhancing adaptation to salinity in rice from Hasawi, a Saudi landrace into three African cultivars at the reproductive stage. Euphytica 2014, 200:45-60.
83. Fan Y., et al. Using QTL mapping to investigate the relationships between abiotic stress tolerance (drought and salinity) and agronomic and physiological traits. BMC Genomics 2015, 16:43.
84. Yau S.K., Ryan J. Boron toxicity tolerance in crops: a viable alternative to soil amelioration. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:854-865.
85. Nable R.O. Resistance to boron toxicity amongst several barley and wheat cultivars: a preliminary examination of the resistance mechanism. Plant Soil 1988, 112:45-52.
86. Sutton T., et al. Boron-toxicity tolerance in barley arising from efflux transporter amplification. Science 2007, 318:1446-1449.
87. Paull J.G., et al. Physiological and genetic control of the tolerance of wheat to high concentrations of boron and implications for plant breeding. Plant Soil 1992, 146:45-52.
88. Xiao S.H., et al. Germplasm improvement for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in Chines white-grained wheat. An overview of the current strategy. Euphytica 2002, 126:35-38.
89. Haiping Z., et al. Investigation of main loci contributing to strong seed dormancy of Chinese wheat landrace. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2011, 19:270-277.
90. Fujita D., et al. NAL1 allele from a rice landrace greatly increases yield in modern indica cultivars. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:20431-20436.
91. Ishimaru K., et al. Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGWS enhances rice grain weight and increases yield. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:707-711.
92. Li J., et al. Farmers' adoption of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and the persistence of landraces in Southwest China: implications for policy and breeding. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2012, 59:1147-1160.
93. Ceccarelli S. Utilization of landraces and H. spontaneum in barley breeding for dry areas. Rachis 1984, 3:8-11.
94. Weltzien E. Observation on the growth habit of Syrian and Jordanian landraces of barley. Rachis 1982, 1:6-7.
95. Weltzien E., Fischbeck G. Performance and variability of local barley landraces in Near-Eastern environments. Plant Breed. 1990, 104:58-67.
96. Yahiaoui S., et al. Spanish barley landraces outperform modern cultivars at low-productivity sites. Plant Breed. 2014, 133:218-226.
97. Mohammadi R., et al. Adaptation patterns and yield stability of durum wheat landraces to highland cold rainfed areas of Iran. Crop Sci. 2014, 54:944-954.
98. Ceccarelli S. Drought. Plant Genetic Resources and Climate Change 2014, 221-235. CABI International. M. Jackson (Ed.).
99. Dwivedi S.L., et al. Food, nutrition and agrobiodiversity under global climate change. Adv. Agron. 2013, 120:1-128.