Surgical and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement With Patient-Specific Implants Compared With “Off-the-Shelf” Implants

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Schwarzkopf, Ran ^a   Brodsky, Merrick ^a   Garcia, Giancarlo A ^a   Gomoll, Andreas H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

estimated blood loss; length of stay; patient specific implants; range of motion; surgical time; total knee arthroplasty; tourniquet time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE IMPLANT; KNEE INJURY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PATIENT SPECIFIC IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TOURNIQUET; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84962965931     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23259671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2325967115590379     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. L.AbaneP.AnractS.BoisgardS.DescampsJ.P.CourpiedM.Hamadouche. A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:56–63.
2. K.BaliP.WalkerW.Bruce. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1149–1154.
3. R.L.BarrackE.L.RuhB.M.WilliamsA.D.FordK.ForemanR.M.Nunley. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 suppl A):95–99.
4. B.BoonenM.G.SchotanusB.KerensW.van der WeegenR.A.van DrumptN.P.Kort. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2206–2212.
5. K.ChareancholvanichR.NarkbunnamC.Pornrattanamaneewong. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95B:354–359.
6. J.Y.ChenS.J.YeoA.K.Yew. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:630–635.
7. M.Collins. The impact patient specific instrumentation has on my practice in the last 5 years. Am J Orthop. 2014;XLIII:3S.
8. P.CramX.LuS.L.KatesJ.A.SinghY.LiB.R.Wolf. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010. JAMA. 2012;308:1227–1236.
9. A.M.DeHaanJ.R.AdamsM.L.DeHartT.W.Huff. Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:2065–2069.
10. W.G.HamiltonN.L.ParksA.Saxena. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomised trial. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(suppl):96–100.
11. D.Hoeffel. Patient specific instrumentation for the obese patient. Am J Orthop. 2014;XLIII:3S.
12. J.N.Insall. Historic development, classification, and characteristics of knee prostheses. In: W.N.Scott, ed. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 5th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2012:952–987.
13. S.KurtzK.OngE.LauF.MowatM.Halpern. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.
14. P.LachiewiczR.Henderson. Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:513–518.
15. J.W.NobleJrC.A.MooreN.Liu. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:153–155.
16. V.Y.NgJ.H.DeClaireK.R.BerendB.C.GulickA.V.Lombardi. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:99–107.
17. R.M.NunleyB.S.EllisonE.L.Ruh. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:889–894.
18. M.PietschO.DjahaniC.Zweiger. Custom-fit minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: effect on blood loss and early clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2234–2240.
19. Y.W.RohT.W.KimS.LeeS.C.SeongM.C.Lee. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of 1 system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3988–3995.
20. C.SchnurrG.CsécseiP.EyselD.König. The effect of computer navigation on blood loss and transfusion rate in TKA. Orthopedics. 2010;33:474.
21. S.SigmanK.Proverb. Patient specific instrumentation: total knee arthroplasty in sports medicine. Am J Orthop. 2014;XLIII:3S.
22. B.A.SpencerM.A.MontM.S.McGrathB.BoydM.F.Mitrick. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1571–1575.
23. B.M.StronachC.E.PeltJ.EricksonC.L.Peters. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:169–174.
24. T.S.WattersR.C.Mather3rdJ.A.BrowneK.R.BerendA.V.LombardiJrM.P.Bolognesi. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20:112–116.
25. M.YaffeM.LuoN.Goyal. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9:837–844.