Spatiotemporal variation of mammalian protein complex stoichiometries

Genome Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ori, Alessandro ^a,d   Iskar, Murat ^a,e   Buczak, Katarzyna ^a   Kastritis, Panagiotis ^a   Parca, Luca ^a   Andrés Pons, Amparo ^a   Singer, Stephan ^a,b   Bork, Peer ^a,c   Beck, Martin ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

^d FRITZ LIPMANN INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^e GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cancer; Epigenetic; Paralog; Protein complex; Proteomics; Reprogramming; Stoichiometry; Transport

Indexed keywords

BARRIER TO AUTOINTEGRATION FACTOR; BRM PROTEIN; CELL PROTEIN; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 2; MESSENGER RNA; METHYL CPG BINDING PROTEIN 2; MICRORNA; PROTEIN CHD3; PROTEIN CHD4; PROTEIN COPI; PROTEIN COPII; PROTEIN MBD3; PROTEIN MTA1; PROTEIN MTA2; PROTEIN MTA3; PROTEIN NURD; PROTEIN SEC23A; PROTEIN SEC23B; PROTEIN SEC31A; PROTEIN SEC31B; PROTEIN SMARCA1; PROTEIN SMARCC1; PROTEIN SMARCC2; PROTEIN SMARCD1; PROTEIN SMARCD3; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; SNARE PROTEIN; UBIQUINOL CYTOCHROME C REDUCTASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL TRANSPORT; CHROMATIN; COLON CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY YIELD; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMAL; METASTASIS; MITOCHONDRION; PARALOG SWITCH; PARALOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN COMPLEX STOICHIOMETRY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEOMICS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RIBOSOME; RNA PROCESSING; RNA TRANSLATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STOICHIOMETRY; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL; CELL LINEAGE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CELL LINEAGE; CHROMATIN; HUMANS; MAMMALS; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOME; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84962783040     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0912-5     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Moghaddas Gholami A, Lieberenz M, Savitski MM, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:582-7.
2. Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, Nirujogi RS, Manda SS, Chaerkady R, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:575-81.
3. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P, Krause R, Boesche M, Marzioch M, et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature. 2006;440:631-6.
4. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, Zhong G, Guo X, Ignatchenko A, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2006;440:637-43.
5. Havugimana PC, Hart GT, Nepusz T, Yang H, Turinsky AL, Li Z, et al. A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell. 2012;150:1068-81.
6. Malovannaya A, Lanz RB, Jung SY, Bulynko Y, Le NT, Chan DW, et al. Analysis of the human endogenous coregulator complexome. Cell. 2011;145:787-99.
7. de Lichtenberg U, Jensen LJ, Brunak S, Bork P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science. 2005;307:724-7.
8. Jensen LJ, Jensen TS, de Lichtenberg U, Brunak S, Bork P. Co-evolution of transcriptional and post-translational cell-cycle regulation. Nature. 2006;443:594-7.
9. Lenstra TL, Benschop JJ, Kim T, Schulze JM, Brabers NA, Margaritis T, et al. The specificity and topology of chromatin interaction pathways in yeast. Mol Cell. 2011;42:536-49.
10. Ori A, Banterle N, Iskar M, Andres-Pons A, Escher C, Khanh Bui H, et al. Cell type-specific nuclear pores: a case in point for context-dependent stoichiometry of molecular machines. Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9:648.
11. Jüschke C, Dohnal I, Pichler P, Harzer H, Swart R, Ammerer G, et al. Transcriptome and proteome quantification of a tumor model provides novel insights into post-transcriptional gene regulation. Genome Biol. 2013;14:r133.
12. Hansson J, Rafiee MR, Reiland S, Polo JM, Gehring J, Okawa S, et al. Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Rep. 2012;2:1579-92.
13. Geiger T, Wehner A, Schaab C, Cox J, Mann M. Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:M111.014050.
14. Ruepp A, Waegele B, Lechner M, Brauner B, Dunger-Kaltenbach I, Fobo G, et al. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes-2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D497-501.
15. Vinayagam A, Hu Y, Kulkarni M, Roesel C, Sopko R, Mohr SE, et al. Protein complex-based analysis framework for high-throughput data sets. Sci Signal. 2013;6:rs5.
16. Beck M, Schmidt A, Malmstroem J, Claassen M, Ori A, Szymborska A, et al. The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:549.
17. Nagaraj N, Wisniewski JR, Geiger T, Cox J, Kircher M, Kelso J, et al. Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:548.
18. Li G-W, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS. Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell. 2014;157:624-35.
19. Kondrashov N, Pusic A, Stumpf CR, Shimizu K, Hsieh AC, Xue S, et al. Ribosome-mediated specificity in Hox mRNA translation and vertebrate tissue patterning. Cell. 2011;145:383-97.
20. Kearse MG, Chen AS, Ware VC. Expression of ribosomal protein L22e family members in Drosophila melanogaster: rpL22-like is differentially expressed and alternatively spliced. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:2701-16.
21. D'Angelo MA, Gomez-Cavazos JS, Mei A, Lackner DH, Hetzer MW. A change in nuclear pore complex composition regulates cell differentiation. Dev Cell. 2012;22:446-58.
22. Polo JM, Anderssen E, Walsh RM, Schwarz BA, Nefzger CM, Lim SM, et al. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell. 2012;151:1617-32.
23. Pan L, Wang S, Lu T, Weng C, Song X, Park JK, et al. Protein competition switches the function of COP9 from self-renewal to differentiation. Nature. 2014;514:233-6.
24. Kadoch C, Crabtree GR. Reversible disruption of mSWI/SNF (BAF) complexes by the SS18-SSX oncogenic fusion in synovial sarcoma. Cell. 2013;153:71-85.
25. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:1731-7.
26. Wu JI, Lessard J, Crabtree GR. Understanding the words of chromatin regulation. Cell. 2009;136:200-6.
27. Ho L, Ronan JL, Wu J, Staahl BT, Chen L, Kuo A, et al. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:5181-6.
28. Subramanyam D, Lamouille S, Judson RL, Liu JY, Bucay N, Derynck R, et al. Multiple targets of miR-302 and miR-372 promote reprogramming of human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:443-8.
29. Yang CS, Chang KY, Rana TM. Genome-wide functional analysis reveals factors needed at the transition steps of induced reprogramming. Cell Rep. 2014;8:327-37.
30. Wisniewski JR, Ostasiewicz P, Dus K, Zielinska DF, Gnad F, Mann M. Extensive quantitative remodeling of the proteome between normal colon tissue and adenocarcinoma. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:611.
31. ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.
32. Rugg-Gunn PJ, Cox BJ, Lanner F, Sharma P, Ignatchenko V, McDonald AC, et al. Cell-surface proteomics identifies lineage-specific markers of embryo-derived stem cells. Dev Cell. 2012;22:887-901.
33. Zanetti G, Pahuja KB, Studer S, Shim S, Schekman R. COPII and the regulation of protein sorting in mammals. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:20-8.
34. Szklarczyk R, Huynen MA, Snel B. Complex fate of paralogs. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:337.
35. Komili S, Farny NG, Roth FP, Silver PA. Functional specificity among ribosomal proteins regulates gene expression. Cell. 2007;131:557-71.
36. Parenteau J, Durand M, Morin G, Gagnon J, Lucier JF, Wellinger RJ, et al. Introns within ribosomal protein genes regulate the production and function of yeast ribosomes. Cell. 2011;147:320-31.
37. Luc PV, Tempst P. PINdb: a database of nuclear protein complexes from human and yeast. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:1413-5.
38. Pu S, Wong J, Turner B, Cho E, Wodak SJ. Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:825-31.
39. Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Heng L, Durbin R, Birney E. EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res. 2009;19:327-35.
40. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D749-55.
41. Durinck S, Spellman PT, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1184-91.
42. Kapushesky M, Adamusiak T, Burdett T, Culhane A, Farne A, Filippov A, et al. Gene Expression Atlas update--a value-added database of microarray and sequencing-based functional genomics experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1077-81.
43. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D991-5.
44. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249-64.
45. Smyth GK. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman RCV, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W, editors. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 397-420.
46. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.
47. Janin J. Specific versus non-specific contacts in protein crystals. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:973-4.
48. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971;55:379-400.
49. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1976;105:1-12.
50. de Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AM. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:883-97.
51. Kastritis PL, Bonvin AM. Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:2216-25.
52. Jorgensen W, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:1657-66.
53. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J Mol Biol. 2004;335:843-65.
54. Brunger AT. Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:2728-33.
55. Kastritis PL, Rodrigues JP, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK(2P2I): a biophysical model for predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein interaction inhibitors. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54:826-36.
56. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15-20.
57. Ori A, Andres-Pons A, Beck M. The use of targeted proteomics to determine the stoichiometry of large macromolecular assemblies. Methods Cell Biol. 2014;122:117-46.
58. Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6567-72.
59. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D447-52.
60. Minguez P, Letunic I, Parca L, Garcia-Alonso L, Dopazo J, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. PTMcode v2: a resource for functional associations of post-translational modifications within and between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D494-502.