3DRobot: Automated generation of diverse and well-packed protein structure decoys

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 378-387

  Deng, Haiyou ^a,b   Jia, Ya ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b CENTRAL CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BOND; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ALGORITHMS; HYDROGEN BONDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84962320188     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv601     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anfinsen C.B, et al. (1961). The kinetics of formation of native ribonuclease during oxidation of the reduced polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 47, 1309-1314.
2. Benkert P, et al. (2008). QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins. 71, 261-277.
3. Blaszczyk M, et al. (2013). CABS-fold: server for the de novo and consensusbased prediction of protein structure. Nucleic Acids Res.41, W406-W411.
4. Bradley P, et al. (2005). Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science. 309, 1868-1871.
5. Chen V.B, et al. (2010). MolProbity: all-Atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12-21.
6. Deng H, et al. (2012). What is the best reference state for designing statistical atomic potentials in protein structure prediction? Proteins. 80, 2311-2322.
7. Frishman D, and Argos P. (1995). Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins. 23, 566-579.
8. Handl J, et al. (2009). Artefacts and biases affecting the evaluation of scoring functions on decoy sets for protein structure prediction. Bioinformatics. 25, 1271-1279.
9. Hess B, et al. (2008). GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, loadbalanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435-447.
10. Jamroz M, et al. (2013). CABS-flex: server for fast simulation of protein structure fluctuations. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W427-W431.
11. John B, and Sali A. (2003). Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3982-3992.
12. Lu H, and Skolnick J. (2001). A distance-dependent atomic knowledgebased potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins. 44, 223-232.
13. Park B, and Levitt M. (1996). Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258, 367-392.
14. Park B.H, et al. (1997). Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 831-846.
15. Rajgaria R, et al. (2008). Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys. Proteins. 70, 950-970.
16. Ray A, et al. (2012). Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2. BMC Bioinformatics. 13, 224.
17. Roy A, et al. (2010). I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 725-738.
18. Rykunov D, and Fiser A. (2007). Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparse statistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials. Proteins. 67, 559-568.
19. Samudrala R, and Levitt M. (2000). Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 9, 1399-1401.
20. Samudrala R, and Moult J. (1998). An all-Atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 275, 895-916.
21. Shen M.Y, and Sali A. (2006). Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 15, 2507-2524.
22. Simons K.T, et al. (1997). Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 209-225.
23. Teodorescu O, et al. (2004). Enriching the sequence substitution matrix by structural information. Proteins. 54, 41-48.
24. Topf M, et al. (2005). Structural characterization of components of protein assemblies by comparative modeling and electron cryo-microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 149, 191-203.
25. Vajda S, et al. (2013). Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven. Proteins. 81, 1874-1884.
26. Wang G, and Dunbrack R.L. (2003). PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics. 19, 1589-1591.
27. Wu S, et al. (2007). Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol. 5, 17.
28. Xu D, and Zhang Y. (2011). Improving the physical realism and structural accuracy of protein models by a two-step atomic-level energy minimization. Biophys. J. 101, 2525-2534.
29. Xu D, and Zhang Y. (2012). Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins. 80, 1715-1735.
30. Yang J, et al. (2015). The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods. 12, 7-8.
31. Yeh H.Y, et al. (2015). Decoy database improvement for protein folding. J. Comput. Biol. 22, 823-836.
32. Zhang J, et al. (2011). Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling. Structure. 19, 1784-1795.
33. Zhang J, and Zhang Y. (2010). A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction. PloS One. 5, e15386.
34. Zhang Y. (2008). Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 342-348.
35. Zhang Y, et al. (2003). TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys. J. 85, 1145-1164.
36. Zhang Y, and Skolnick J. (2004). Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 57, 702-710.
37. Zhang Y, and Skolnick J. (2005). TM-Align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2302-2309.
38. Zhou H., and Zhou Y. (2002). Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11, 2714-2726.