Label-free quantification in ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition proteomics

Nature Protocols

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 795-812

  Distler, Ute ^a   Kuharev, Jörg ^a   Navarro, Pedro ^a   Tenzer, Stefan ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL LYSATE; DATA INDEPENDENT ACQUISITION; DATA PROCESSING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ION MOBILITY SEPARATION; ION TRANSPORT; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HELA CELL LINE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PROCEDURES; TIME FACTOR;

CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES, ANALYTICAL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84962243105     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.042     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Mallick, P. & Kuster, B. Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 695-709 (2010).
2. Gstaiger, M. & Aebersold, R. Applying mass spectrometry-based proteomics to genetics, genomics and network biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 617-627 (2009).
3. Bensimon, A., Heck, A. J. R. & Aebersold, R. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and network biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 379-405 (2012).
4. Neilson, K. A. et al. Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 11, 535-553 (2011).
5. Filiou, M. D., Martins-de-Souza, D., Guest, P. C., Bahn, S. & Turck, C. W. To label or not to label: applications of quantitative proteomics in neuroscience research. Proteomics 12, 736-747 (2012).
6. Nahnsen, S., Bielow, C., Reinert, K. & Kohlbacher, O. Tools for label-free peptide quantification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 549-556 (2013).
7. Tate, S., Larsen, B., Bonner, R. & Gingras, A.-C. Label-free quantitative proteomics trends for protein-protein interactions. J. Proteomics 1-11 (2012).
8. Evans, C. et al. An insight into iTRAQ: where do we stand now? Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404, 1011-1027 (2012).
9. Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M. & Kuster, B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404, 939-965 (2012).
10. Distler, U., Kuharev, J. & Tenzer, S. Biomedical applications of ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition-based label-free quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 11, 675-684 (2014).
11. Daly, C. E., Ng, L. L., Hakimi, A., Willingale, R. & Jones, D. J. L. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of plasma proteins when incorporating traveling wave ion mobility into a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry workflow for biomarker discovery: use of product ion quantitation as an alternative data analysis. Anal. Chem. 86, 1972-1979 (2014).
12. McQueen, P. et al. Whole cell, label free protein quantitation with data independent acquisition: quantitation at the MS2 level. Proteomics 15, 16-24 (2015).
13. Chapman, J. D., Goodlett, D. R. & Masselon, C. D. Multiplexed and data-independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 33, 452-470 (2014).
14. Silva, J. C. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. Anal. Chem. 77, 2187-200 (2005).
15. Bateman, R. H. et al. A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13, 792-803 (2002).
16. Li, G.-Z. et al. Database searching and accounting of multiplexed precursor and product ion spectra from the data independent analysis of simple and complex peptide mixtures. Proteomics 9, 1696-1719 (2009).
17. Valentine, S. J. et al. Developing liquid chromatography ion mobility mass spectometry techniques. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2, 553-565 (2005).
18. Baker, E. S. et al. An LC-IMS-MS platform providing increased dynamic range for high-throughput proteomic studies. J. Proteome Res. 9, 997-1006 (2010).
19. Fenn, L. S., Kliman, M., Mahsut, A., Zhao, S. R. & McLean, J. A. Characterizing ion mobility-mass spectrometry conformation space for the analysis of complex biological samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 394, 235-244 (2009).
20. Geromanos, S. J., Hughes, C., Ciavarini, S., Vissers, J. P. C. & Langridge, J. I. Using ion purity scores for enhancing quantitative accuracy and precision in complex proteomics samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404, 1127-1139 (2012).
21. Distler, U. et al. Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat. Methods 11, 167-170 (2014).
22. Shliaha, P. V., Bond, N. J., Gatto, L. & Lilley, K. S. Effects of traveling wave ion mobility separation on data independent acquisition in proteomics studies. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2323-2339 (2013).
23. Rodriguez-Suarez, E. et al. An ion mobility assisted data independent LC-MS strategy for the analysis of complex biological samples. Curr. Anal. Chem. 9, 199-211 (2013).
24. Schwanhäusser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337-342 (2011).
25. Qi, D. et al. A software toolkit and interface for performing stable isotope labeling and top3 quantification using Progenesis LC-MS. OMICS 16, 489-495 (2012).
26. Grossmann, J. et al. Implementation and evaluation of relative and absolute quantification in shotgun proteomics with label-free methods. J. Proteomics 73, 1740-1746 (2010).
27. AhrnÉ, E., Molzahn, L., Glatter, T. & Schmidt, A. Critical assessment of proteome-wide label-free absolute abundance estimation strategies. Proteomics 13, 2567-2578 (2013).
28. Silva, J. C., Gorenstein, M. V., Li, G.-Z., Vissers, J. P. C. & Geromanos, S. J. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 144-156 (2006).
29. Kuharev, J., Navarro, P., Distler, U., Jahn, O. & Tenzer, S. In-depth evaluation of software tools for data-independent acquisition based label-free quantification. Proteomics 15, 3140-3151 (2015).
30. Docter, D. et al. Quantitative profiling of the protein coronas that form around nanoparticles. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2030-2044 (2014).
31. Distler, U. et al. In-depth protein profiling of the postsynaptic density from mouse hippocampus using data-independent acquisition proteomics. Proteomics 14, 2607-2613 (2014).
32. Craxton, A. et al. XLS (c9orf142) is a new component of mammalian DNA double-stranded break repair. Cell Death Differ. 22, 890-897 (2015).
33. Beasley-Green, A., Bunk, D., Rudnick, P., Kilpatrick, L. & Phinney, K. A proteomics performance standard to support measurement quality in proteomics. Proteomics 12, 923-931 (2012).
34. Köcher, T., Pichler, P., Swart, R. & Mechtler, K. Analysis of protein mixtures from whole-cell extracts by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS using ultralong gradients. Nat. Protoc. 7, 882-890 (2012).
35. Kelstrup, C. D., Young, C., Lavallee, R., Nielsen, M. L. & Olsen, J. V. Optimized fast and sensitive acquisition methods for shotgun proteomics on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer. J. Proteome Res. 11, 3487-3497 (2012).
36. Michalski, A., Cox, J. & Mann, M. More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1785-1793 (2011).
37. Tabb, D. L. Quality assessment for clinical proteomics. Clin. Biochem. 46, 411-420 (2013).
38. Walzer, M. et al. qcML: an exchange format for quality control metrics from mass spectrometry experiments. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 1905-1913 (2014).
39. Brownridge, P. & Beynon, R. J. The importance of the digest: proteolysis and absolute quantification in proteomics. Methods 54, 351-360 (2011).
40. Piehowski, P. D. et al. Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2128-2137 (2013).
41. Little, D. et al. Proteomic differences between male and female anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon. PLoS ONE 9, e96526 (2014).
42. Hoos, M. D. et al. Longitudinal study of differential protein expression in an Alzheimer's mouse model lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase. J. Proteome Res. 12, 4462-4477 (2013).
43. Wi?niewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359-362 (2009).
44. Manza, L. L., Stamer, S. L., Ham, A.-J. L., Codreanu, S. G. & Liebler, D. C. Sample preparation and digestion for proteomic analyses using spin filters. Proteomics 5, 1742-1745 (2005).
45. Smith, R. D. et al. An accurate mass tag strategy for quantitative and high-throughput proteome measurements. Proteomics 2, 513-523 (2002).
46. Wang, X., Stoll, D. R., Schellinger, A. P. & Carr, P. W. Peak capacity optimization of peptide separations in reversed-phase gradient elution chromatography: fixed column format. Anal. Chem. 78, 3406-3416 (2006).
47. Hahne, H. et al. DMSO enhances electrospray response, boosting sensitivity of proteomic experiments. Nat. Methods 10, 989-991 (2013).
48. Richards, A. L. et al. One-hour proteome analysis in yeast. Nat. Protoc. 10, 701-714 (2015).
49. Meyer, J. G. & A Komives, E. Charge state coalescence during electrospray ionization improves peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 23, 1390-1399 (2012).
50. Bond, N. J., Shliaha, P. V., Lilley, K. S. & Gatto, L. Improving qualitative and quantitative performance for MSE-based label-free proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2340-2353 (2013).
51. Podwojski, K. et al. Retention time alignment algorithms for LC/MS data must consider non-linear shifts. Bioinformatics 25, 758-764 (2009).
52. Crowell, K. L. et al. Increasing confidence of LC-MS identifications by utilizing ion mobility spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 354-355, 312-317 (2013).
53. Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. 226-231 (1996).
54. Nesvizhskii, A. I. & Aebersold, R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1419-1440 (2005).
55. MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966-968 (2010).
56. Sturm, M. et al. OpenMS-an open-source software framework for mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 163 (2008).
57. Kelly, R. T. et al. Chemically etched open tubular and monolithic emitters for nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78, 7796-7801 (2006).
58. Schwarz, A. et al. A systems level analysis reveals transcriptomic and proteomic complexity in Ixodes ricinus midgut and salivary glands during early attachment and feeding. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2725-2735 (2014).
59. Fonslow, B. R. et al. Digestion and depletion of abundant proteins improves proteomic coverage. Nat. Methods 10, 54-56 (2012).
60. Vizcaíno, J. A. et al. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1063-D1069 (2013).