Transcriptomic and epigenomic characterization of the developing bat wing

Nature Genetics

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 528-536

  Eckalbar, Walter L ^a   Schlebusch, Stephen A ^b   Mason, Mandy K ^b   Gill, Zoe ^b   Parker, Ash V ^b   Booker, Betty M ^a   Nishizaki, Sierra ^a   Muswamba Nday, Christiane ^b   Terhune, Elizabeth ^c,d   Nevonen, Kimberly A ^c   Makki, Nadja ^a   Friedrich, Tara ^a,e   VanderMeer, Julia E ^a   Pollard, Katherine S ^a,e,f   Carbone, Lucia ^c,g   Wall, Jeff D ^a,f   Illing, Nicola ^b   Ahituv, Nadav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e GLADSTONE INSTITUTES   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LONG UNTRANSLATED RNA; RIBOSOME PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARCHAEAL GENOME; ARTICLE; BAT; EPIGENETICS; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; HINDLIMB; LIMB DEVELOPMENT; MINIOPTERUS NATALENSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WING; ANIMAL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CHIROPTERA; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOME; MALE; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; RNA, LONG NONCODING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84961922811     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3537     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Gunnell G.F, & Simmons N.B. Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
2. Cooper L.N, Cretekos C.J, & Sears K.E. The evolution and development of mammalian flight. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 1, 773-779 (2012).
3. Swartz S.M, & Middleton K.M. Biomechanics of the bat limb skeleton: scaling, material properties and mechanics. Cells Tissues Organs. 187, 59-84 (2008).
4. Hockman D, et al. A second wave of Sonic hedgehog expression during the development of the bat limb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 16982-16987 (2008).
5. Wang Z, et al. Unique expression patterns of multiple key genes associated with the evolution of mammalian flight. Proc. Biol. Soc. 281, 20133133 (2014).
6. Mason M.K, et al. Retinoic acid-independent expression of Meis2 during autopod patterning in the developing bat and mouse limb. Evodevo. 6, 6 (2015).
7. Wang Z, et al. Digital gene expression tag profiling of bat digits provides robust candidates contributing to wing formation. BMC Genomics. 11, 619 (2010).
8. Weatherbee S.D, Behringer R.R, Rasweiler J.J, & IV, & Niswander L.A. Interdigital webbing retention in bat wings illustrates genetic changes underlying amniote limb diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 15103-15107 (2006).
9. Cretekos C.J, et al. Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals. Genes Dev. 22, 141-151 (2008).
10. Hockman D, Mason M.K, Jacobs D.S, & Illing N. The role of early development in mammalian limb diversification: a descriptive comparison of early limb development between the Natal long-fingered bat (Miniopterus natalensis) and the mouse (Mus musculus). Dev. Dyn. 238, 965-979 (2009).
11. Rada-Iglesias A, et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature. 470, 279-283 (2011).
12. Creyghton M.P, et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107, 21931-21936 (2010).
13. Barski A, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 129, 823-837 (2007).
14. Zhang G, et al. Comparative analysis of bat genomes provides insight into the evolution of flight and immunity. Science. 339, 456-460 (2013).
15. Seim I, et al. Genome analysis reveals insights into physiology and longevity of the Brandt's bat Myotis brandtii. Nat. Commun. 4, 2212 (2013).
16. Lindblad-Toh K, et al. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature. 478, 476-482 (2011).
17. Parra G, Bradnam K, & Korf I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 23, 1061-1067 (2007).
18. Lallemand Y, Bensoussan V, Cloment C.S, & Robert B. Msx genes are important apoptosis effectors downstream of the Shh/Gli3 pathway in the limb. Dev. Biol. 331, 189-198 (2009).
19. Collins E.C, et al. Mouse Af9 is a controller of embryo patterning, like Mll, whose human homologue fuses with Af9 after chromosomal translocation in leukemia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 7313-7324 (2002).
20. Zhao Y, et al. The LIM-homeobox gene Lhx8 is required for the development of many cholinergic neurons in the mouse forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100, 9005-9010 (2003).
21. Wang K.C, et al. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature. 472, 120-124 (2011).
22. Quek X.C, et al. lncRNAdb v2.0: expanding the reference database for functional long noncoding RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D168-D173 (2015).
23. Agarwal P, et al. Tbx5 is essential for forelimb bud initiation following patterning of the limb field in the mouse embryo. Development. 130, 623-633 (2003).
24. Rallis C, et al. Tbx5 is required for forelimb bud formation and continued outgrowth. Development. 130, 2741-2751 (2003).
25. Carroll S.B. Evolution at two levels: on genes and form. PLoS Biol. 3, e245 (2005).
26. McLean C.Y, et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495-501 (2010).
27. Booker B, et al. Bat accelerated regions identify a bat forelimb specific enhancer in the HoxD locus. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005738 (2016).
28. Pollard K.S, Hubisz M.J, Rosenbloom K.R, & Siepel A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 20, 110-121 (2010).
29. Homma S, Shimada T, Hikake T, & Yaginuma H. Expression pattern of LRR and Ig domain-containing protein (LRRIG protein) in the early mouse embryo. Gene Expr. Patterns. 9, 1-26 (2009).
30. Tossell K, et al. Lrrn1 is required for formation of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary and organiser through regulation of affinity differences between midbrain and hindbrain cells in chick. Dev. Biol. 352, 341-352 (2011).
31. Ito T, et al. Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity. Science. 327, 1345-1350 (2010).
32. Taylor G.P, Anderson R, Reginelli A.D, & Muneoka K. FGF-2 induces regeneration of the chick limb bud. Dev. Biol. 163, 282-284 (1994).
33. Eloy-Trinquet S, Wang H, Edom-Vovard F, & Duprez D. Fgf signaling components are associated with muscles and tendons during limb development. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1195-1206 (2009).
34. Kondrashov N, et al. Ribosome-mediated specificity in Hox mRNA translation and vertebrate tissue patterning. Cell. 145, 383-397 (2011).
35. Ball S. Diamond Blackfan anemia. Hematology (Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program) 2011, 487-491 (2011).
36. Xue S, et al. RNA regulons in Hox 5' UTRs confer ribosome specificity to gene regulation. Nature. 517, 33-38 (2015).
37. Chen J, Holguin N, Shi Y, Silva M.J, & Long F. mTORC2 signaling promotes skeletal growth and bone formation in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 30, 369-378 (2015).
38. Martin G.R. The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs. Genes Dev. 12, 1571-1586 (1998).
39. Kozhemyakina E, Lassar A.B, & Zelzer E. A pathway to bone: signaling molecules and transcription factors involved in chondrocyte development and maturation. Development. 142, 817-831 (2015).
40. Gao B, & Yang Y. Planar cell polarity in vertebrate limb morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 438-444 (2013).
41. Bisson J.A, Mills B, Paul Helt J.C, Zwaka T.P, & Cohen E.D. Wnt5a and Wnt11 inhibit the canonical Wnt pathway and promote cardiac progenitor development via the Caspase-dependent degradation of AKT. Dev. Biol. 398, 80-96 (2015).
42. Hall B.K, & Miyake T. Divide, accumulate, differentiate: cell condensation in skeletal development revisited. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 39, 881-893 (1995).
43. Sears K.E, Behringer R.R, Rasweiler J.J. IV, & Niswander L.A. Development of bat flight: morphologic and molecular evolution of bat wing digits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 6581-6586 (2006).
44. Pignatti E, Zeller R, & Zuniga A. To BMP or not to BMP during vertebrate limb bud development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 32, 119-127 (2014).
45. Kingsley D.M, et al. The mouse short ear skeletal morphogenesis locus is associated with defects in a bone morphogenetic member of the TGF β superfamily. Cell. 71, 399-410 (1992).
46. Francis-West P.H, et al. Mechanisms of GDF-5 action during skeletal development. Development. 126, 1305-1315 (1999).
47. Merino R, et al. The BMP antagonist Gremlin regulates outgrowth, chondrogenesis and programmed cell death in the developing limb. Development. 126, 5515-5522 (1999).
48. Bolger A.M, Lohse M, & Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30, 2114-2120 (2014).
49. Luo R, et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 1, 18 (2012).
50. Magoč, T, & Salzberg S.L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 27, 2957-2963 (2011).
51. Xu H, et al. FastUniq: a fast de novo duplicates removal tool for paired short reads. PLoS One 7, e52249 (2012).
52. Li H, & Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
53. Li H, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
54. Holt C, & Yandell M. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinformatics. 12, 491 (2011).
55. Altschul S.F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E.W, & Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
56. Slater G.S, & Birney E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 6, 31 (2005).
57. Johnson A.D, et al. SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics. 24, 2938-2939 (2008).
58. Stanke M, Steinkamp R, Waack S, & Morgenstern B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W309-W312 (2004).
59. Haas B.J, et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654-5666 (2003).
60. Borodina T, Adjaye J, & Sultan M. A strand-specific library preparation protocol for RNA sequencing. Methods Enzymol. 500, 79-98 (2011).
61. Grabherr M.G, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644-652 (2011).
62. Harrow J, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for the ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 22, 1760-1774 (2012).
63. Kong L, et al. CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W345-W349 (2007).
64. Kim D, et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
65. Anders S, Pyl P.T, & Huber W. HTSeq-A Python framework to work with high-Throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 31, 166-169 (2015).
66. Love M.I, Huber W, & Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
67. Mason M.K, Hockman D, Jacobs D.S, & Illing N. Evaluation of maternal features as indicators of asynchronous embryonic development in Miniopterus natalensis. Acta Chiropt. 12, 161-171 (2010).
68. Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, & Behringer R. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2002).
69. Langmead B, & Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 9, 357-359 (2012).
70. Zang C, et al. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics. 25, 1952-1958 (2009).
71. Quinlan A.R, & Hall I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 26, 841-842 (2010).
72. Neph S, et al. BEDOPS: high-performance genomic feature operations. Bioinformatics. 28, 1919-1920 (2012).
73. Audic S, & Claverie J.M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 7, 986-995 (1997).
74. Harris R.S. Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA. PhD thesis, Penn. State Univ. (2007).
75. Blanchette M, et al. Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res. 14, 708-715 (2004).
76. Hubisz M.J, Pollard K.S, & Siepel A. PHAST and RPHAST: phylogenetic analysis with space/time models. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 41-51 (2011).
77. Huang W, Sherman B.T, & Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44-57 (2009).
78. Huang W, Sherman B.T, & Lempicki R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1-13 (2009).