Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies

Genome Research

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 110-121

  Pollard, Katherine S ^a   Hubisz, Melissa J ^b   Rosenbloom, Kate R ^c   Siepel, Adam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Plant Breeding and Genetics Section in the School of Integrative Plant Science   (United States)

^c University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESMOGLEIN 1; NUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOMIC EVOLUTIONARY RATE PROFILING TEST; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; NUMBER OF SUBSTITUTION TEST; PHYLOGENETIC TREE CONSTRUCTION METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORE TEST; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAMMALS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATES; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

GLIRES; MAMMALIA; PRIMATES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 74949092081     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.097857.109     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Asthana S, Roytberg M, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Sunyaev S. 2007. Analysis of sequence conservation at nucleotide resolution. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030254.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57: 289-300.
3. Bird CP, Stranger BE, Liu M, Thomas DJ, Ingle CE, Beazley C, Miller W, Hurles ME, Dermitzakis ET. 2007. Fast-evolving noncoding sequences in the human genome. Genome Biol 8: R118. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r118.
4. Blanchette M, Kent WJ, Riemer C, Elnitski L, Smit AFA, Roskin KM, Baertsch R, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Green ED, et al. 2004. Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res 14: 708-715.
5. Boffelli D, McAuliffe J, Ovcharenko D, Lewis KD, Ovcharenko I, Pachter L, Rubin EM. 2003. Phylogenetic shadowing of primate sequences to find functional regions of the human genome. Science 299: 1391-1394.
6. Bradley RK, Roberts A, Smoot M, Juvekar S, Do J, Dewey C, Holmes I, Pachter L. 2009. Fast statistical alignment. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000392.
7. Casella G, Berger RL. 2002. Statistical inference. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA.
8. Chiaromonte F, Weber RJ, Roskin KM, Diekhans M, Kent WJ, Haussler D. 2003. The share of human genomic DNA under selection estimated from human-mouse genomic alignments. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 68: 245-254.
9. Cooper GM, Brudno M, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Green ED, Batzoglou S, Sidow A. 2003. Quantitative estimates of sequence divergence for comparative analyses of mammalian genomes. Genome Res 13: 813-820.
10. Cooper GM, Brudno M, Stone EA, Dubchak I, Batzoglou S, Sidow A. 2004. Characterization of evolutionary rates and constraints in three mammalian genomes. Genome Res 14: 539-548.
11. Cooper GM, Stone EA, Asimenos G, Green ED, Batzoglou S, Sidow A. 2005. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res 15: 901-913.
12. Dreszer TR, Wall GD, Haussler D, Pollard KS. 2007. Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: The footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion. Genome Res 17: 1420-1430.
13. Eddy SR. 2005. A model of the statistical power of comparative genome sequence analysis. PLoS Biol 3: e10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0030010.
14. Ehrlich M, Wang RY. 1981. 5-Methylcytosine in eukaryotic DNA. Science 212: 1350-1357.
15. The ENCODE Project Consortium. 2007. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447: 799-816.
16. Eöry L, Halligan DL, Keightley PD. 2009. Distributions of selectively constrained sites and deleterious mutation rates in the hominid and murid genomes. Mol Biol Evol (in press). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp219.
17. Garber M, Guttman M, Clamp M, Zody MC, Friedman N, Xie X. 2009. Identifying novel constrained elements by exploiting biased substitution patterns. Bioinformatics 25: 54-62.
18. Green P, Ewing B, Miller W, Thomas PJ, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Green ED. 2003. Transcription-associated mutational asymmetry in mammalian evolution. Nat Genet 33: 514-517.
19. Gross SS, Do CB, Sirota M, Batzoglou S. 2007. CONTRAST: A discriminative, phylogeny-free approach to multiple informant de novo gene prediction. Genome Biol 8: R269. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-12-r269.
20. Guigó R, Dermitzakis ET, Agarwal P, Ponting CP, Parra G, Reymond A, Abril JF, Keibler E, Lyle R, Ucla C, et al. 2003. Comparison of mouse and human genomes followed by experimental verification yields an estimated 1,019 additional genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 1140-1145.
21. Hardison RC, Roskin KM, Yang S, Diekhans M, Kent WJ, Weber R, Elnitski L, Li J, O'Connor M, Kolbe D, et al. 2003. Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution. Genome Res 13: 13-26.
22. Harrow J, Denoeud F, Frankish A, Reymond A, Chen C-K, Chrast J, Lagarde J, Gilbert JGR, Storey R, Swarbreck D, et al. 2006. GENCODE: Producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol 7: S4. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s4.
23. Haygood R, Fedrigo O, Hanson B, Yokoyama K-D, Wray GA. 2007. Promoter regions of many neural- and nutrition-related genes have experienced positive selection during human evolution. Nat Genet 39: 1140-1144.
24. Huelsenbeck J, Rannala B. 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: Testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276: 227-232.
25. Hwang D, Green P. 2004. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 13994-14001.
26. Keightley PD, Lercher MJ, Eyre-Walker A. 2005. Evidence for widespread degradation of gene control regions in hominid genomes. PLoS Biol 3: e42. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030042.
27. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES. 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241-254.
28. Kim SY, Pritchard JK. 2007. Adaptive evolution of conserved noncoding elements in mammals. PLoS Genet 3: 1572-1586.
29. Kimura M. 1977. Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Nature 267: 275-276.
30. Kondrashov AS, Crow JF. 1993. A molecular approach to estimating the human deleterious mutation rate. Hum Mutat 2: 229-234.
31. Kosiol C, Vinar T, da Fonseca R, Hubisz M, Bustamante C, Nielsen R, Siepel A. 2008. Patterns of positive selection in six mammalian genomes. PLoS Genet 4: e1000144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000144.
32. Kuhn RM, Karolchik D, Zweig AS, Wang T, Smith KE, Rosenbloom KR, Rhead B, Raney BJ, Pohl A, Pheasant M, et al. 2009. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: Update 2009. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D755-D761.
33. Lunter G, Ponting CP, Hein J. 2006. Genome-wide identification of human functional DNA using a neutral indel model. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020005.
34. Lunter G, Rocco A, Mimouni N, Heger A, Caldeira A, Hein J. 2008. Uncertainty in homology inferences: Assessing and improving genomic sequence alignment. Genome Res 18: 298-309.
35. Marais G. 2003. Biased gene conversion: Implications for genome and sex evolution. Trends Genet 19: 330-338.
36. Margulies EH, Blanchette M. NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Haussler D, Green ED. 2003. Identification and characterization of multi-species conserved sequences. Genome Res 13: 2507-2518.
37. Margulies EH, Cooper GM, Asimenos G, Thomas DJ, Dewey CN, Siepel A, Birney E, Keefe D, Schwartz AS, Hou M, et al. 2007. Analyses of deep mammalian sequence alignments and constraint predictions for 1% of the human genome. Genome Res 17: 760-774.
38. McAuliffe JD, Jordan MI, Pachter L. 2005. Subtree power analysis and species selection for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 7900-7905.
39. Miller W, Rosenbloom K, Hardison R, Hou M, Taylor J, Raney B, Burhans R, King D, Baertsch R, Blankenberg D, et al. 2007. 28-Way vertebrate alignment and conservation track in the UCSC Genome Browser. Genome Res 17: 1797-1808.
40. Miyata T, Yasunaga T, Nishida T. 1980. Nucleotide sequence divergence and functional constraint in mRNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 77: 7328-7332.
41. Moses AM, Chiang DY, Kellis M, Lander ES, Eisen MB. 2003. Position specific variation in the rate of evolution in transcription factor binding sites. BMC Evol Biol 3: 19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-3-19.
42. Moses AM, Chiang DY, Pollard DA, Iyer VN, Eisen MB. 2004. MONKEY: Identifying conserved transcription-factor binding sites in multiple alignments using a binding site-specific evolutionary model. Genome Biol 5: R98. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-r98.
43. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520-562.
44. Nobrega MA, Ovcharenko I, Afzal V, Rubin EM. 2003. Scanning human gene deserts for long-range enhancers. Science 302: 413. doi: 10.1126/science.1088328.
45. Paten B, Herrero J, Beal K, Birney E. 2009. Sequence progressive alignment, a framework for practical large-scale probabilistic consistency alignment. Bioinformatics 25: 295-301.
46. Pedersen JS, Bejerano G, Siepel A, Rosenbloom K, Lindblad-Toh K, Lander ES, Kent J, Miller W, Haussler D. 2006. Identification and classification of conserved RNA secondary structures in the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020033.
47. Pollard K, Salama S, King B, Kern A, Dreszer T, Katzman S, Siepel A, Pedersen J, Bejerano G, Baertsch R, et al. 2006a. Forces shaping the fastest evolving regions in the human genome. PLoS Genet 2: e168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020168.
48. Pollard KS, Salama SR, Lambert N, Lambot M-A, Coppens S, Pedersen JS, Katzman S, King B, Onodera C, Siepel A, et al. 2006b. An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in humans. Nature 443: 167-172.
49. Prabhakar S, Noonan JP, Paabo S, Rubin EM. 2006. Accelerated evolution of conserved noncoding sequences in humans. Science 314: 786. doi: 10.1126/science.1130738.
50. Rao CR. 1948. Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with applications to problems of estimation. Proc Camb Philol Soc 44: 50-57.
51. Rao CR. 2005. Score test: Historical review and recent developments. In Advances in ranking and selection, multiple comparisons, and reliability (eds. N Balakrishnan et al.), pp. 3-20. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.
52. Satija R, Novak A, Miklos I, Lyngso R, Hein J. 2009. BigFoot: Bayesian alignment and phylogenetic footprinting with MCMC. BMC Evol Biol 9: 217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-217.
53. Self S, Liang K. 1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 82: 605-610.
54. Siepel A, Haussler D. 2004a. Computational identification of evolutionarily conserved exons. In Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. on Research in Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 177-186. ACM Press, New York.
55. Siepel A, Haussler D. 2004b. Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 21: 468-488.
56. Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Spieth J, Hillier LW, Richards S, et al. 2005. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 15: 1034-1050.
57. Siepel A, Pollard K, Haussler D. 2006. New methods for detecting lineage-specific selection. In Proc. 10th Int'l Conf. on Research in Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 190-205. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
58. Siepel A, Diekhans M, Brejova B, Langton L, Stevens M, Comstock C, Davis C, Ewing B, Oommen S, Lau C, et al. 2007. Targeted discovery of novel human exons by comparative genomics. Genome Res 17: 1763-1773.
59. Stone EA, Cooper GM, Sidow A. 2005. Trade-offs in detecting evolutionarily constrained sequence by comparative genomics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 6: 143-164.
60. Wolfe KH, Sharp PM, Li W-H. 1989. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature 337: 283-285.
61. Wong WSW, Nielsen R. 2004. Detecting selection in noncoding regions of nucleotide sequences. Genetics 167: 949-958.
62. Xie X, Lu J, Kulbokas EJ, Golub TR, Mootha V, Lindblad-Toh K, Lander ES, Kellis M. 2005. Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 39 UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature 434: 338-345.
63. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39: 306-314.