Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2015, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Kyrgiou, Maria ^a   Mitra, Anita ^b   Arbyn, Marc ^c   Paraskevaidi, Maria ^d   Athanasiou, Antonios ^e   Martin Hirsch, Pierre P L ^f   Bennett, Phillip ^b   Paraskevaidis, Evangelos ^e  

^a QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^f ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER SURGERY; CONCEPTION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE FERTILITY; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SECOND TRIMESTER ABORTION; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; STATISTICAL BIAS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR ABLATION; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; FERTILITY; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84961834143     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008478.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (118)

1. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, Irgens LM, Iversen OE. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a1343.
2. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD. Efficacy and safety of large loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet 1994;343:32-4.
3. Blomfield PI, Buxton J, Dunn J, Luesley DM. Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;169(3):620-5.
4. Buller RE, Jones HW. Pregnancy following cervical conization. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1982;142(5):506-12.
5. Cruickshank ME, Flannelly G, Campbell DM, Kitchener HC. Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1995;102(6):467-70.
6. Frega A, Sesti F, De Sanctis L, Pacchiarotti A, Votano S, Biamonti A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2013;122(2):145-9.
7. Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M, Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2012;119(2):227-35.
8. Larsson G, Grundsell H, Gullberg B, Svennerud S. Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1982;61(5):461-6.
9. Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer N, Lopes P, Boog G. Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology andReproductive Biology 1995;58(1):53-8.
10. Sjøborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2007;86(4):423-8.
11. Spitzer M, Herman J, Krumholz BA, Lesser M. The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995;86(4):504-8.
12. Spracklen CN, Harland KK, Stegmann BJ, Saftlas AF. Cervical surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and prolonged time to conception of a live birth: a case-control study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013;120(8):960-5.
13. Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK. The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2004;24(1):25-7.
14. Turlington WT, Wright BD, Powell JL. Impact of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future fertility. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1996;41(11):815-8.
15. Weber T, Obel EB. Pregnancy complications following conization of the uterine cervix. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1979;58:347-51.
16. Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, Sørheim N, Jacobsen BK, Maltau JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2005;272(2):109-12.
17. Anderson MC, Horwell DH, Broby Z. Outcome of pregnancy after laser vaporization conization. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 1984;1(1):35-9.
18. Armarnik S, Sheiner E, Piura B, Meirovitz M, Zlotnik A, Levy A. Obstetric outcome following cervical conization. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2011;283:765-9.
19. Berretta R, Gizzo S, Dall'Asta A, Mazzone E, Monica M, Franchi L, et al. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone. Disease Markers 2013;35(6):721-6.
20. Braet PG, Peel JM, Fenton DW. A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1994;19:79-82.
21. Conner SN, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, et al. Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2013;122(6):1154-9.
22. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E. The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;172(4):1246-50.
23. Forsmo S, Hansen MH, Jacobsen BK, Oian P. Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1996;75(1):139-43.
24. Gordon HK, Duncan ID. Effective destruction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 at 100°Cusing the Semm cold coagulator: 14 years experience. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991;98(1):14-20.
25. Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW, Read MD. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;100(11):1059-60.
26. Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE. The outcome of pregnancy after CO, laser conisation of the cervix. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;100:717-20.
27. Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM. The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1979;86(12):913-6.
28. Keijser KG, Kenemans P, van der Zanden PH, Schijf CP, Vooijs GP, Rolland R. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;166(4):1281-7.
29. Khalid S, Dimitriou E, Conroy R, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Harrity C, et al. The thickness and volume of LLETZ specimens can predict the relative risk of pregnancy-related morbidity. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2012;119(6):685-91.
30. Kuoppala T, Saarikoski S. Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1986;237(3):149-54.
31. Luesley DM, McCrum A, Terry PB, Wade-Evans T, Nicholson HO, Mylotte MJ, et al. Complications of cone biopsy related to the dimensions of the cone and the influence of prior colposcopic assessment. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985;92(2):158-64.
32. Macvicar J, Willocks J. The effect of diathermy conization of the cervix on subsequent fertility, pregnancy and delivery. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1968;75(3):355-6.
33. Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, Dargent D. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;106(2):214-8.
34. Mazouni C, Porcu G, Haddad O, Dalès JP, Taranger-Charpin C, Piana L, et al. Conservative treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using a cold-knife section technique. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2005;121(1):86-93.
35. Michelin MA, Merino LM, Franco CA, Murta EF. Pregnancy outcome after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009;36(1):17-9.
36. Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E, Papanikou E, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnantis NJ. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IA1) cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2002;86(1):10-3.
37. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Lüscher KP. Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1997;90(6):978-82.
38. Shanbhag S, Clark H, Timmaraju V, Bhattacharya S, Cruickshank M. Pregnancy outcome after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009;114(4):727-35.
39. van de Vijver A, Poppe W, Verguts J, Arbyn M. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2010;117(3):268-73.
40. Castanon A. Risk of preterm delivery after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England, United Kingdom. Conference: RCOG World Congress 2013 Liverpool United Kingdom. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013.
41. Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, et al. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study. Conference: Perinatal Medicine 2014 Harrogate United Kingdom. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2014.
42. Chatterjee S. Oncological and obstetric outcomes of excisional treatment for cervical cancer precursors in reproductive age women. 61st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, SGI 2014 Florence Italy. Reproductive sciences. 2014.
43. Gay C. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) management: Post treatment complications. Conference: 19th FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cape Town South Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009.
44. Hong J. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing bovie electroknife conization versus cold knife conization. Conference: 15th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society Melbourne, VIC Australia. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2014.
45. Hongo A. Analysis of pregnancy outcome after laser conization. Conference: 14th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society, IGCS 2012 Vancouver, BC Canada. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2012.
46. Jolley, J. The relationship between previous cervical surgery and gestational age at delivery in twin gestations. Conference: 2010 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, SMFM Chicago, IL United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and and Gynecology. 2010.
47. Khan N. Reproductive outcome after cone biopsy in a low resource setting in Nigeria. Conference: 3rd Regional International Gynecologic Cancer Society, IGCS Meeting 2014 Cape Town South Africa. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2014.
48. Kundu R. Pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of transformation zone treatment in an University Hospital, Ireland. Conference: RCOG World Congress 2014 Hyderabad India. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014.
49. Kyrgiou M. Proportion of excision, cervical healing and pregnancy outcomes after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia. Conference: 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, SGI 2013 Orlando, FL United States. Reproductive Sciences. 2013.
50. Kyrgiou M. Cervical-length indicated cervical cerclage versus routine antenatal care after treatment for cervical precancer. Conference: 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, SGI 2013 Orlando, FL United States. Reproductive Sciences. 2013.
51. Kyrgiou M. Proportion of cervical excision for CIN as a predictor of future pregnancy outcomes: A prospective study. 61st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, SGI 2014 Florence Italy. Reproductive Sciences. 2014.
52. Liu Z. Data analysis of 18 cases of the pregnancy with cervical epithelial neoplasia. Conference: 19th FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cape Town South Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009.
53. McGee J. Adverse obstetrical outcomes associated with treatment for cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia. Conference: 14th Biennial Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society, IGCS 2012 Vancouver, BC Canada. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2012.
54. Mozo De Rosales, F. Conization vs cervical pathology. Which is the real risk factor for prematurity? Conference: 19th FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cape Town South Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009.
55. Nehls K. Conization of the cervix during pregnancy: A retrospective study. Conference: 58th Congress of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010.
56. Papoutsis D. The SATH study: Preterm delivery rates in women following a first and second LLETZ conisation for CIN pathology. Conference: RCOG World Congress 2013 Liverpool United Kingdom. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013.
57. Peebles D. Risk of preterm delivery after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Conference: 59th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, SGI 2012 San Diego, CA United States. Reproductive Sciences. 2012.
58. Pinborg A, Ortoft G, Loft A, Ingerslev HJ. Cervical conisation doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm delivery in ART twins-national controlled cohort study. Conference: 70th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, ASRM 2014 Honolulu, HI, United States. Fertility & sterility. 2014.
59. Ruengkhachorn I. Long term outcomes of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical Neoplasia in a high-incidence country. Conference: 18th International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, ESGO 2013 Liverpool United Kingdom. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2013.
60. Smrkolj Eren M. The conservative management of patients with microinvasive cervical cancer. Conference: 19th FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cape Town South Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009.
61. Song F. Natural evolution and clinical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy and postpartum. Conference: 19th FIGO World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cape Town South Africa. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009.
62. Underwood M. Thermo-coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A successful alternative to cervical excision? Treatment success rates and obstetric outcomes. Conference: RCOG World Congress 2013 Liverpool United Kingdom. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013.
63. Vasiliu C. Cervical surgery and the risk of preterm birth. Conference: 22nd European Congress of Perinatal Medicine, 2010 Granada Spain. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2010.
64. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a1284.
65. Arbyn M, Raifu AO, Bray F, Weiderpass E, Anttila A. Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union. European Journal of Cancer 2009;45:2640-8.
66. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, Meijer CJ, Poljak M, Ogilvie G, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Vaccine 2012;30(Supp 5):F88-99.
67. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Gondry J, Petry KU, Paraskevaidis E. Long term outcomes for women treated for cervical precancer. BMJ 2014;348:f7700.
68. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50(4):1088-101.
69. Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, Quinn M. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007;114(1):70-80.
70. Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011;118(9):1031-41.
71. Castanon A, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P, et al. Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012;345:e5174.
72. Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, et al and the PaCT Study Group. Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study. BMJ 2014;349:g6223.
73. Chew GK, Jandial L, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC. Pattern of CIN recurrence following laser ablation treatment: long-term follow-up. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 1999;9:487-90.
74. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954;10:101-29.
75. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: 2nd editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London: BMJ Publication Group: In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (eds), 2001.
76. Dersimonian R, Laird NM. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7:177-88.
77. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-35.
78. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2013. http://globocan.iarc.fr.
79. Founta C, Arbyn M, Valasoulis G, Kyrgiou M, Tsili A, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Proportion of excision and cervical healing after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2010;117(12):468-74.
80. GRADE Working Group 2004 GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;7454:1490-4.
81. Hammond RH, Edmonds DK. Does treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia affect fertility and pregnancy?. BMJ 1990;301(6765):344-5.
82. Heinonen A, Gissler M, Riska A, Paavonen J, Tapper AM, Jakobsson M. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121(5):1063-8.
83. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60.
84. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
85. Holmes E, Kinross J, Gibson GR, Burcelin R, Jia W, Pettersson S, et al. Therapeutic modulation of microbiota-host metabolic interactions. Science Translational Medicine 2012;4(137):rv6.
86. Holmes E, Li JV, Marchesi JR, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiota composition and activity in relation to host metabolic phenotype and disease risk. Cell Metabolism 2012;16(5):559-64.
87. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012;486(7402):207-14.
88. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, Paavonen J, Tapper AM. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;109(2 Pt 1):309-13.
89. Jiménez B, Mirnezami R, Kinross J, Cloarec O, Keun HC, Holmes E, et al. 1H HR-MAS NMR spectroscopy of tumor-induced local metabolic "field-effects" enables colorectal cancer staging and prognostication. Journal of Proteome Research 2013;12(2):959-68.
90. Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M, Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2012;119(2):227-35.
91. Kennedy S, Robinson J, Hallam N. LLETZ and infertility. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;100(10):965.
92. Kitchener HC, Cruickshank ME, Farmery E. The 1993 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Coordinating Network United Kingdom Colposcopy Survey Comparison with 1988 and the response to introduction of guidelines. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1995;102:549-52.
93. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367(9509):489-98.
94. Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Paraskevaidis E. Increased risk of preterm birth after treatment for CIN. BMJ 2012;345:e5847.
95. Kyrgiou M, Valasoulis G, Stasinou SM, Founta C, Athanasiou A, Bennett P, et al. Proportion of cervical excision for CIN as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes: a prospective study. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2015;128(2):141-7.
96. Li JV, Ashrafian H, Bueter M, Kinross J, Sands C, le Roux CW, et al. Metabolic surgery profoundly influences gut microbial-host metabolic cross-talk. Gut 2011;60(9):1214-23.
97. Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub3]
98. Moher D, Liberati A, TetzlaffJ, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009;62(10):1006-12.
99. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Document No 20. Colposocopy and Programme Management. 2010. Available from www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/index.html.
100. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Annual Review. Available from http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/2012review.html, 2012.
101. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 2012;336(6086):1262-7.
102. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2009;114(6):1232-8.
103. Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Willan AR, Chan BK. Treatment outcomes for squamous intraepithelial lesions. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2000;68:25-33.
104. Paraskevaidis E, Jandial L, Mann EM, Fisher PM, Kitchener HC. Pattern of treatment failure following laser for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: implications for follow-up protocol. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;78:80-3.
105. Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M, Martin-Hirsch P. Have we dismissed ablative treatment too soon in colposcopy practice?. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007;114(1):3-4.
106. Phadnis SV, Atilade A, Bowring J, Kyrgiou M, Young MP, Evans H, et al. Regeneration of cervix after excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a study of collagen distribution. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011;118(13):1585-91.
107. Philipp T, Philipp K, Reiner A, Beer F, Kalousek DK. Embryoscopic and cytogenetic analysis of 233 missed abortions: factors involved in the pathogenesis of developmental defects of early failed pregnancies. Human Reproduction 2003;18:1724-32.
108. Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1989;96(9):1054-60.
109. Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ 1999;318(7188):904-8.
110. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011;108(Suppl 1):4680-7.
111. Soutter WP, de Barros Lopes A, Fletcher A, Monaghan JM, Duncan ID, Paraskevaidis E, et al. Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for CIN. Lancet 1997;349:978-80.
112. Steichen TJ. Tests for publication bias in meta-analysis. Stata Technical Bulletin 1998;7:125-33.
113. Strander B, Hällgren J, Sparén P. Effect of ageing on cervical or vaginal cancer in Swedish women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study of long term incidence and mortality. BMJ 2014;348:f7361.
114. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
115. Suarez S, Pacey A. Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Human Reprod Update 2006;12:23-37.
116. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2010. www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nos_manual.pdf.
117. Kyrgiou M, Arbyn M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch PPL, Alamanos YP, Prendiville WJ, at al. Obstetric outcomes and fertility after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008478]
118. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, Stasinou SM, Martin-Hirsch P, Bennett P, et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014 Oct;349:g6192.