Noninvasive hemodynamic measurements during neurosurgical procedures in sitting position

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 251-257

  Schramm, Patrick ^a   Tzanova, Irene ^b   Goock, Tilman ^a   Hagen, Frank ^a   Schmidtmann, Irene ^a   Engelhard, Kristin ^a   Pestel, Gunther ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Christophorus Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

anesthesia; hemodynamic monitoring; modified Penaz technique; neurosurgery; sitting position; TEE; volume clamp

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL LINE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSURGERY; NON INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; PRESSURE PLETHYSMOGRAPH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME ULTRASOUND SCANNER; SITTING; SUPINE POSITION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY POSITION; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMODYNAMICS; INTRAOPERATIVE MONITORING; PATIENT POSITIONING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 84961390601     PISSN: 08984921     EISSN: 15371921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000300     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Lindroos A-CB, Niiya T, Silvasti-Lundell M, et al. Stroke volumedirected administration of hydroxyethyl starch or Ringer's acetate in sitting position during craniotomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:729-736.
2. Jadik S, Wissing H, Friedrich K, et al. A standardized protocol for the prevention of clinically relevant venous air embolism during neurosurgical interventions in the semisitting position. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:533-538.
3. Kallmeyer IJ, Collard CD, Fox JA, et al. The safety of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: A case series of 7200 cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1126-1130.
4. Eeftinck Schattenkerk DW, van Lieshout JJ, van den Meiracker AH, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22:378-383.
5. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van Goudoever J, et al. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfins. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1092-1103.
6. Fischer MO, Avram R, Carjaliu I, et al. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:514-521.
7. Guo C, Lingzhong M, Brenton BA, et al. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24: 275-283.
8. Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, et al. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preloadmodifying maneuvers. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:366-372.
9. van der Spoel AGE, Voogel AJVM, Folkers AF, et al. Comparison of noninvasive continuous arterial waveform analysis (Nexfin) with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for monitoring of cardiac output. J Clin Anesth. 2012;24:304-309.
10. Wesseling KH. Finger arterial pressure measurement with Finapres. Z Kardiol. 1996;85(suppl 3):38-44.
11. Bogert LWJ, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from non-invasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1119-1125.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1: 307-310.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160.
14. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute; 2002:1-25.
15. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85-91.
16. Saugel B, Grothe O, Wagner JY. Tracking changes in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:514-524.
17. Perrino AC, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: A comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology. 1998;89: 350-357.
18. Benes J, Simanova A, Tovarnicka T, et al. Continuous non-invasive monitoring improves blood pressure stability in upright position: Randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29:11-17.
19. Chen G, Chung E, Meng L, et al. Impact of non invasive and beatto-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26:133-140.
20. Vos JJ, Poterman M, Mooyaart EAQ, et al. Comparison of continuous non-invasive finger arterial pressure monitoring with conventional intermittent automated arm arterial pressure measurement in patients under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113: 67-74.
21. Hohn A, Defosse JM, Becker S, et al. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin(R) does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:178-184.
22. Weiss E, Gayat E, Dumans-Nizard V, et al. Use of the Nexfin device to detect acute arterial pressure variations during anaesthesia induction. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:52-60.
23. Hofhuizen C, Lansdorp B, van der Hoeven JG, et al. Validation of noninvasive pulse contour cardiac output using finger arterial pressure in cardiac surgery patients requiring fluid therapy. J Crit Care. 2014;29:161-165.
24. Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, et al. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: Validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:1-11.
25. Ameloot K, Palmers P-J, Malbrain MLNG. The accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output and pressure measurements with finger cuff: A concise review. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:232-239.
26. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392-1402.
27. Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, et al. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: A comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:704-712.
28. Maass SW, Roekaerts PM, Lancé MD. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28:534-539.
29. Taton O, Fagnoul D, De Backer D, et al. Evaluation of cardiac output in intensive care using a non-invasive arterial pulse contour technique (Nexfins) compared with echocardiography. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:917-923.
30. Trinkmann F, Sampels M, Doesch C, et al. Is arterial pulse contour analysis using Nexfin a new option in the noninvasive measurement of cardiac output?- A pilot study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013; 27:283-287.
31. Møller-Sørensen H, Graeser K, Hansen KL, et al. Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:80-88.
32. Parra V, Fita G, Rovira I, et al. Transoesophageal echocardiography accurately detects cardiac output variation: A prospective comparison with thermodilution in cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:135-143.
33. Bettex DA, Hinselmann V, Hellermann JP, et al. Transoesophageal echocardiography is unreliable for cardiac output assessment after cardiac surgery compared with thermodilution. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59:1184-1192.