Use of the NexfinTM device to detect acute arterial pressure variations during anaesthesia induction

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 52-60

  Weiss, E ^a   Gayat, E ^b   Dumans Nizard, V ^a   Le Guen, M ^a   Fischler, M ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

anaesthesiology; arterial pressure monitors; monitoring, intraoperative

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYPOTENSION; MALE; NON INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; SENSOR; AGED; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE MONITORS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; EQUIPMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ANAESTHESIOLOGY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE MONITORS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903974142     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu055     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Standards of the American Society of Anesthesiologists: Standards for Basic Anesthetic Monitoring. 2011. Available from http://www. google.fr/webhp?nord=1#nord=1&q=Standards+of+the+American+ Society+of+Anesthesiologists%3A+Standards+for+Basic+Anesthetic+ Monitoring+2011&safe=off (accessed 17 November 2013)
2. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard; Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. 2002. Available from http://www.google.fr/webhp? nord=1#nord=1&q= American+national+standard+for+electronic+ or+automated+sphygmomanometers+2002&safe=off (accessed 17 November 2013)
3. Penaz J, Voigt A, Teichmann W. Contribution to the continuous indirect blood pressure measurement. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1976; 31: 1030-3
4. Braune S, Schulte-Monting J, Schwerbrock S, Lucking CH. Retest variation of cardiovascular parameters in autonomic testing. J Auton Nerv Syst 1996; 60: 103-7
5. Diedrich A, Crossman AA, Beightol LA, et al. Baroreflex physiology studied in healthy subjects with very infrequent musclesympathetic bursts. J Appl Physiol 2013; 114: 203-10
6. Hofhuizen CM, Lemson J, Hemelaar AE, et al. Continuous noninvasive finger arterial pressure monitoring reflects intra-arterial pressure changes in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 493-500
7. Garnier RP, van der Spoel AG, Sibarani-Ponsen R, Markhorst DG, Boer C. Level of agreement between Nexfin non-invasive arterial pressure with invasive arterial pressure measurements in children. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 609-15
8. Lansdorp B, Ouweneel D, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J, Pickkers P. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 540-5
9. Chen G, Chung E, Meng L, et al. Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26: 133-40
10. Fischer MO, Avram R, Carjaliu I, et al. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 514-21
11. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van Goudoever J, et al. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfinw. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1092-103
12. Imholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 38: 605-16
13. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement-dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 1981; 54: 227-36
14. Kleinman B, Powell S, Kumar P, Gardner RM. The fast flush test measures thedynamicresponseof the entireblood pressure monitoring system. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 1215-20
15. Cantraine FR, Coussaert EJ. The first object oriented monitor for intravenous anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput 2000; 16: 3-10
16. Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, et al. Closed-loop coadministration of propofoland remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 546-57
17. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique inmethod comparison studies-with specific referenceto themeasurement ofcardiacoutput. CritCare2009;13:201
18. Perrino AC Jr, O'Connor T, Luther M. Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 1060-6
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007; 17: 571-82
21. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trendingabilityof cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 536-46
22. Ilies C, Bauer M, Berg P, et al. Investigation of the agreement of a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 202-10
23. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91
24. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J 2010; 340: 8-69
25. Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 4-10
26. Aronson S, Stafford-Smith M, Phillips-Bute B, Shaw A, Gaca J, Newman M. Intraoperative systolic blood pressure variability predicts 30-day mortality in aortocoronary bypass surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 305-12
27. Aronson S, Dyke CM, Levy JH, et al. Does perioperative systolic blood pressure variability predict mortality after cardiac surgery? Anexploratory analysis of the ECLIPSE trials. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 19-30
28. Sessler DI, Sigl JC, Kelley SD, et al. Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a 'triple low' of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1195-203
29. Hohn A, Defosse JM, Becker S, Steffen C, Wappler F, Sakka SG. Noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 178-84
30. Gizdulich P, Prentza A, Wesseling KH. Models of brachial to finger pulse wave distortion and pressure decrement. Cardiovasc Res 1997; 33: 698-705