Tracking changes in cardiac output: Statistical considerations on the 4-quadrant plot and the polar plot methodology

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 514-524

  Saugel, Bernd ^a   Grothe, Oliver ^b,c   Wagner, Julia Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TECHNOLOGY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PULMONARY ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THERMODILUTION; TIME;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PULMONARY ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; THERMODILUTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84937834773     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000725     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG, Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007 17 571 82
2. Bland JM, Altman DG, Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. Anesthesiology 2012 116 182 5
3. Critchley LA, Critchley JA, A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999 15 85 91
4. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM, Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies-with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009 13 201
5. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD, Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009 35 1801 8
6. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM, A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010 111 1180 92
7. Perrino AC Jr, O'Connor T, Luther M, Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1994 78 1060 6
8. Perrino AC Jr, Harris SN, Luther MA, Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1998 89 350 7
9. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A, Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011 25 536 46
10. Ganz W, Donoso R, Marcus HS, Forrester JS, Swan HJ, A new technique for measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution in man. Am J Cardiol 1971 27 392 6
11. Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D, Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 1970 283 447 51
12. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A, Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1999 25 843 6
13. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Wegscheider K, Meier-Hellmann A, Is the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter still justified solely for the measurement of cardiac output? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000 14 119 24
14. Marx G, Schuerholz T, Sümpelmann R, Simon T, Leuwer M, Comparison of cardiac output measurements by arterial trans-cardiopulmonary and pulmonary arterial thermodilution with direct Fick in septic shock. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005 22 129 34
15. Linton RA, Band DM, Haire KM, A new method of measuring cardiac output in man using lithium dilution. Br J Anaesth 1993 71 262 6
16. Linton R, Band D, O'Brien T, Jonas M, Leach R, Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1997 25 1796 800
17. Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Intensive Care Med 2009 35 498 504
18. Gödje O, Höke K, Goetz AE, Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Reichart B, Friedl R, Hannekum A, Pfeiffer UJ, Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002 30 52 8
19. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, Bayerlein J, Goetz AE, Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: a comparison of pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis. J Clin Anesth 2005 17 241 8
20. Chakravarthy M, Patil TA, Jayaprakash K, Kalligudd P, Prabhakumar D, Jawali V, Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery - A prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth 2007 10 121 6
21. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D, Chemla D, Teboul JL, Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008 36 434 40
22. De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, Junker C, Van Nuffelen M, Hüter L, Ching W, Michard F, Vincent JL, Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2011 37 233 40
23. Pittman J, Bar-Yosef S, SumPing J, Sherwood M, Mark J, Continuous cardiac output monitoring with pulse contour analysis: a comparison with lithium indicator dilution cardiac output measurement. Crit Care Med 2005 33 2015 21
24. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK, Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007 99 329 36
25. Pugsley J, Lerner AB, Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010 14 274 82
26. Bein B, Worthmann F, Tonner PH, Paris A, Steinfath M, Hedderich J, Scholz J, Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004 18 185 9
27. Spiess BD, Patel MA, Soltow LO, Wright IH, Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001 15 567 73
28. Sageman WS, Riffenburgh RH, Spiess BD, Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002 16 8 14
29. Gujjar AR, Muralidhar K, Banakal S, Gupta R, Sathyaprabha TN, Jairaj PS, Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method. J Clin Monit Comput 2008 22 175 80
30. Chakravarthy M, Rajeev S, Jawali V, Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2009 23 175 80
31. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C, Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007 33 1191 4
32. Marik PE, Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013 27 121 34
33. ® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2012 67 377 83
34. Westerhof N, Elzinga G, Sipkema P, An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. J Appl Physiol 1971 31 776 81
35. Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof BE, The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009 47 131 41
36. Truijen J, van Lieshout JJ, Wesselink WA, Westerhof BE, Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 2012 26 267 78
37. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Langwieser N, Wagner JY, Fassio F, Hapfelmeier A, Prechtl LM, Huber W, Schmid RM, Gödje O, An autocalibrating algorithm for non-invasive cardiac output determination based on the analysis of an arterial pressure waveform recorded with radial artery applanation tonometry: a proof of concept pilot analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 2014 28 357 62
38. Nelsen R, Cuadras C, Fortiana J, Rodriguez-Lallena J, Concordance and copulas: a survey. In: Distributions with Given Marginals and Statistical Modelling 2002 Dordrecht, The Netherlands Springer 169 77
39. Bland JM, Altman DG, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 1 307 10
40. Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, Perel A, Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2013 117 366 72
41. Ledolter J, Dexter F, Analysis of interventions influencing or reducing patient waiting while stratifying by surgical procedure. Anesth Analg 2011 112 950 7
42. Ledolter J, Dexter F, Epstein RH, Analysis of variance of communication latencies in anesthesia: comparing means of multiple log-normal distributions. Anesth Analg 2011 113 888 96
43. Wachtel RE, Dexter F, Epstein RH, Ledolter J, Meta-analysis of desflurane and propofol average times and variability in times to extubation and following commands. Can J Anaesth 2011 58 714 24
44. Bland JM, Altman DG, Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995 346 1085 7
45. Myles PS, Cui J, Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007 99 309 11
46. Hamilton C, Lewis S, The importance of using the correct bounds on the Bland-Altman limits of agreement when multiple measurements are recorded per patient. J Clin Monit Comput 2010 24 173 5
47. Bland JM, Altman DG, Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999 8 135 60