Told through the wine: A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry interplatform comparison reveals the influence of the global approach on the final annotated metabolites in non-targeted metabolomics

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1433, Issue , 2016, Pages 90-97

  Díaz, Ramon ^a   Gallart Ayala, Hector ^b,c   Sancho, Juan V ^a   Nuñez, Oscar ^b,d   Zamora, Tatiana ^a   Martins, Claudia P B ^e   Hernández, Félix ^a   Hernández Cassou, Santiago ^b   Saurina, Javier ^b   Checa, Antonio ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d GENERALITAT DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^e Thermo Fisher Scientific   (United States)

Author keywords

LC HRMS; Metabolite identification; Metabolomics; Wine

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHY; DATA HANDLING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLITES; WINE;

BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS; GLOBAL APPROACHES; LC-HRMS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY - MASS SPECTROMETRIES; METABOLITE IDENTIFICATION; METABOLITE LEVEL; METABOLOMICS; PROTECTED DENOMINATION OF ORIGINS;

BIOMOLECULES;

2 OXOGLUTARIC ACID; BENZOIC ACID; DRUG METABOLITE; EPICATECHIN; EPIGALLOCATECHIN; GALLIC ACID; GALLOCATECHIN; GLUCOSIDE; GOSSYPETIN; PICEID; SHIKIMIC ACID; BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; WINE; ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; PROCEDURES; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

BIOMARKERS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; WINE;

EID: 84961329019     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anas Kamleh M., Spagou K., Want E.J. Metabolic profiling in disease diagnosis, toxicology and personalized healthcare. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2011, 12:976-995.
2. Wolfender J.L., Rudaz S., Choi Y.H., Kim H.K. Plant metabolomics: from holistic data to relevant biomarkers. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20:1056-1090.
3. Cevallos-Cevallos J.M., Reyes-De-Corcuera J.I., Etxeberria E., Danyluk M.D., Rodrick G.E. Metabolomic analysis in food science: a review. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2009, 20:557-566.
4. Checa A., Saurina J. Chapter 6-Metabolomics and PDO, Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry 2013, 123-143. Elsevier.
5. Serrano-Lourido D., Saurina J., Hernández-Cassou S., Checa A. Classification and characterisation of Spanish red wines according to their appellation of origin based on chromatographic profiles and chemometric data analysis. Food Chem. 2012, 135:1425-1431.
6. Springer A.E., Riedl J., Esslinger S., Roth T., Glomb M.A., Fauhl-Hassek C. Validated modeling for german white wine varietal authentication based on headspace solid-phase microextraction online coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry fingerprinting. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2014, 62:6844-6851.
7. Versari A., Laurie V.F., Ricci A., Laghi L., Parpinello G.P. Progress in authentication, typification and traceability of grapes and wines by chemometric approaches. Food Res. Int. 2014, 60:2-18.
8. Gallagher L.T., Heo J.S., Lopez M.A., Ray B.M., Xiao J., Umali A.P., Zhang A., Dharmarajan S., Heymann H., Anslyn E.V. Pattern-based discrimination of organic acids and red wine varietals by arrays of synthetic receptors. Supramol. Chem. 2012, 24:143-148.
9. Fabani M.P., Ravera M.J.A., Wunderlin D.A. Markers of typical red wine varieties from the Valley of Tulum (San Juan-Argentina) based on VOCs profile and chemometrics. Food Chem. 2013, 141:1055-1062.
10. Jaitz L., Siegl K., Eder R., Rak G., Abranko L., Koellensperger G., Hann S. LC-MS/MS analysis of phenols for classification of red wine according to geographic origin, grape variety and vintage. Food Chem. 2010, 122:366-372.
11. Salvatore E., Cocchi M., Marchetti A., Marini F., de Juan A. Determination of phenolic compounds and authentication of PDO Lambrusco wines by HPLC-DAD and chemometric techniques. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 761:34-45.
12. Arbulu M., Sampedro M.C., Gómez-Caballero A., Goicolea M.A., Barrio R.J. Untargeted metabolomic analysis using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for non-volatile profiling of wines. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 858:32-41.
13. Ragone R., Crupi P., Piccinonna S., Bergamini C., Mazzone F., Fanizzi F., Schena F., Antonacci D. Classification and chemometric study of Southern Italy monovarietal wines based on NMR and HPLC-DAD-MS. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 24:817-826.
14. Diaz R., Ibanez M., Sancho J.V., Hernandez F. Building an empirical mass spectra library for screening of organic pollutants by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 25:355-369.
15. Díaz R., Pozo O.J., Sancho J.V., Hernández F. Metabolomic approaches for orange origin discrimination by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2014, 157:84-93.
16. Rubert J., Lacina O., Fauhl-Hassek C., Hajslova J. Metabolic fingerprinting based on high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry: a reliable tool for wine authentication?. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406:6791-6803.
17. Glauser G., Veyrat N., Rochat B., Wolfender J.-L., Turlings T.C.J. Ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for plant metabolomics: a systematic comparison of high-resolution quadrupole-time-of-flight and single stage orbitrap mass spectrometers. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1292:151-159.
18. Gika H.G., Theodoridis G.A., Earll M., Snyder R.W., Sumner S.J., Wilson I.D. Does the mass spectrometer define the marker? A comparison of global metabolite profiling data generated simultaneously via uplc-ms on two different mass spectrometers. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82:8226-8234.
19. Martin J.-C., Maillot M., Mazerolles G., Verdu A., Lyan B., Migné C., Defoort C., Canlet C., Junot C., Guillou C., Manach C., Jabob D., Bouveresse D.-R., Paris E., Pujos-Guillot E., Jourdan F., Giacomoni F., Courant F., Favé G., Le Gall G., Chassaigne H., Tabet J.-C., Martin J.-F., Antignac J.-P., Shintu L., Defernez M., Philo M., Alexandre-Gouaubau M.-C., Amiot-Carlin M.-J., Bossis M., Triba M., Stojilkovic N., Banzet N., Molinié R., Bott R., Goulitquer S., Caldarelli S., Rutledge D. Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study. Metabolomics 2015, 11:807-821.
20. Westerhuis J., Hoefsloot H.J., Smit S., Vis D., Smilde A., van Velzen E.J., van Duijnhoven J.M., van Dorsten F. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 2008, 4:81-89.
21. Veselkov K.A., Vingara L.K., Masson P., Robinette S.L., Want E., Li J.V., Barton R.H., Boursier-Neyret C., Walther B., Ebbels T.M., Pelczer I., Holmes E., Lindon J.C., Nicholson J.K. Optimized preprocessing of ultra-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry urinary metabolic profiles for improved information recovery. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:5864-5872.
22. Dervilly-Pinel G., Weigel S., Lommen A., Chereau S., Rambaud L., Essers M., Antignac J.-P., Nielen M.W.F., Le Bizec B. Assessment of two complementary liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry metabolomics strategies for the screening of anabolic steroid treatment in calves. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 700:144-154.