QTL mapping and breeding value estimation through pedigree-based analysis of fruit size and weight in four diverse peach breeding programs

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Fresnedo Ramírez, Jonathan ^a,b   Frett, Terrence J ^c,d   Sandefur, Paul J ^c,e   Salgado Rojas, Alejandra ^c   Clark, John R ^c   Gasic, Ksenija ^d   Peace, Cameron P ^e   Anderson, Natalie ^f   Hartmann, Timothy P ^f   Byrne, David H ^f   Bink, Marco C A M ^g   van de Weg, Eric ^g   Crisosto, Carlos H ^a   Gradziel, Thomas M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Cornell University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^d CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breeding germplasm diversity; Complex traits; Dominance; Prunus persica (L.) Batsch; Orange Cling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961248925     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-016-0985-z     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abascal E, García Lautre I, Landaluce MI (2006) Multiple factor analysis of mixed tables of metric and categorical data. In: Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC Statistics in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp 351–367. doi:10.1201/9781420011319.ch15
2. American Pomological Society, Ragan WH (1899) Revised catalogue of fruits recommended for cultivation in the various sections of the United States and the British provinces by the American pomological society. U.S. Dept. of agriculture. Division of Pomology. Bulletin ;no. 8, vol 63 p. Govt. print. off., Washington
3. Aranzana MJ, Abbassi EK, Howad W, Arus P (2010) Genetic variation, population structure and linkage disequilibrium in peach commercial varieties. BMC Genet 11:69. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-11-69
4. Bai XF, Wu B, Xing YZ (2012) Yield-related QTLs and their applications in rice genetic improvement. J Integr Plant Biol 54:300–311. doi:10.1111/J.1744-7909.2012.01117.X
5. Bink MCAM, Uimari P, Sillanpaa MJ, Janss LLG, Jansen RC (2002) Multiple QTL mapping in related plant populations via a pedigree-analysis approach. Theor Appl Genet 104:751–762. doi:10.1007/s00122-001-0796-x
6. Bink MCAM, Boer MP, Braak CJF, Jansen J, Voorrips RE, de Weg WE (2008) Bayesian analysis of complex traits in pedigreed plant populations. Euphytica 161:85–96
7. Bink MCAM, Totir LR, ter Braak CJF, Winkler CR, Boer MP, Smith OS (2012) QTL linkage analysis of connected populations using ancestral marker and pedigree information. Theor Appl Genet 124:1097–1113. doi:10.1007/S00122-011-1772-8
8. Bink MCAM et al (2014) Bayesian QTL analyses using pedigreed families of an outcrossing species, with application to fruit firmness in apple. Theor Appl Genet 127:1073–1090. doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2281-3
9. Byrne DH, Bassols-Raseira M, Bassi D, Piagnani MC, Gasic K, Reighard GL, Moreno MA, Pérez S (2012) Peach. In: Badenes ML, Byrne DH (eds) Handbook of plant breeding, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 505–569
10. Cabrera A, Kozik A, Howad W, Arus P, Iezzoni AF, van der Knaap E (2009) Development and bin mapping of a Rosaceae conserved ortholog set (COS) of markers. BMC Genomics 10 doi:Artn 562. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-562
11. Calboli FCF, Sampson J, Fretwell N, Balding DJ (2008) Population structure and inbreeding from pedigree analysis of purebred dogs. Genetics 179:593–601. doi:10.1534/Genetics.107.084954
12. 2 peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) progeny. Mol Breed 35:1–19. doi:10.1007/s11032-015-0271-z
13. De Franceschi P et al (2013) Cell number regulator genes in Prunus provide candidate genes for the control of fruit size in sweet and sour cherry. Mol Breed 32:311–326. doi:10.1007/S11032-013-9872-6
14. de Souza VAB, Byrne DH, Taylor JF (1998a) Heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlations, and predicted selection response of quantitative traits in peach: I. An analysis of several reproductive traits. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123 (4):598–603
15. de Souza VAB, Byrne DH, Taylor JF (1998b) Heritability, genetic and phenotypic correlations, and predicted selection response of quantitative traits in peach: II. An analysis of several fruit traits. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123 (4):604–611
16. de Souza VAB, Byrne DH, Taylor JF (2000) Predicted breeding values for nine plant and fruit characteristics of 28 peach genotypes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci Science 125 (4):460–465
17. DeStefano AL, Hoeschele I (1992) Utilization of dominance variance through mate allocation strategies. J Dairy Sci 75:1680–1690. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77925-9
18. Eduardo I, Pacheco I, Chietera G, Bassi D, Pozzi C, Vecchietti A, Rossini L (2011) QTL analysis of fruit quality traits in two peach intraspecific populations and importance of maturity date pleiotropic effect. Tree Genet Genomes 7:323–335. doi:10.1007/S11295-010-0334-6
19. Esch E, Horn R (2008) Variability of recombination rates in higher plants. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Murata J (eds) Progress in botany, vol 69, Progress in botany. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–60. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72954-9_2
20. Etienne C et al (2002) Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar and organic acid content in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. Theor Appl Genet 105:145–159. doi:10.1007/S00122-001-0841-9
21. Fan S, Bielenberg DG, Zhebentyayeva TN, Reighard GL, Okie WR, Holland D, Abbott AG (2010) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with chilling requirement, heat requirement and bloom date in peach (Prunus persica). New Phytol 185:917–930. doi:10.1111/J.1469-8137.2009.03119.X
22. Fanizza G, Lamaj F, Costantini L, Chaabane R, Grando MS (2005) QTL analysis for fruit yield components in table grapes (Vitis vinifera). Theor Appl Genet 111:658–664. doi:10.1007/S00122-005-2016-6
23. Fernández i Martí A, Font i Forcada C, Socias i Company R (2013) Genetic analysis for physical nut traits in almond. Tree Genet Genomes 9:455–465. doi:10.1007/S11295-012-0566-8
24. Font i Forcada C, Oraguzie N, Igartua E, Moreno MÁ, Gogorcena Y (2012) Population structure and marker–trait associations for pomological traits in peach and nectarine cultivars. Tree Genet Genomes 9:331–349. doi:10.1007/s11295-012-0553-0
25. Fresnedo-Ramírez J, Crisosto CH, Gradziel TM, Famula TR (2015a) Pedigree correction and estimation of breeding values for peach genetic improvement. Acta Hortic 1084:249–256. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1084.35
26. Fresnedo-Ramírez J, Bink MCAM, van de Weg E, Famula TR, Crisosto CH, Frett TJ, Gasic K, Peace CP, Gradziel TM (2015b) QTL mapping of pomological traits in peach and related species breeding germplasm. Mol Breed 35(8):166. doi:10.1007/s11032-015-0357-7
27. Frett TJ, Gasic K, Clark JR, Byrne D, Gradziel T, Crisosto C (2012) Standardized phenotyping for fruit quality in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]. J Am Pomol Soc 66:214–219
28. Gradziel TM (2012) Traditional genetics and breeding. In: Kole C, Abbott AG (eds) Genetics, genomics and breeding of crop plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 22–54
29. Gradziel TM, Beres W, Pelletreau K (1993) Inbreeding in California canning clingstone peach cultivars. Fruit Varieties J 47:160–168
30. Guo M, Simmons CR (2011) Cell number counts—the fw2.2 and CNR genes and implications for controlling plant fruit and organ size. Plant Sci 181:1–7. doi:10.1016/J.Plantsci.2011.03.010
31. Hallander J, Waldmann P (2007) The effect of non-additive genetic interactions on selection in multi-locus genetic models. Heredity 98:349–359. doi:10.1038/Sj.Hdy.6800946
32. Hallander J, Waldmann P (2009) Optimum contribution selection in large general tree breeding populations with an application to Scots pine. Theor Appl Genet 118:1133–1142. doi:10.1007/S00122-009-0968-7
33. Hansche PE (1986a) Heritability of juvenility in peach. HortScience 21:1197–1198
34. Hansche PE (1986b) Heritability of fruit-quality traits in peach and nectarine breeding stocks dwarfed by the Dw gene. HortScience 21:1193–1195
35. Hansche PE (1988) Two genes that induce brachytic dwarfism in peach. HortScience 23:604–606
36. Hansche PE, Boynton B (1986) Heritability of enzymatic browning in peaches. HortScience 21:1195–1197
37. Hansche PE, Beres V, Hesse CO (1972) Estimates of genetic and environmental effects on several traits in peach. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 97:76
38. Hedrick UP, Howe GH, Taylor OM, Tubergen CB, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station., New York (U.S.: state). Department of Agriculture. (1917) The peaches of New York: report of the New York Agricultural Experiment Station for the year 1916. Annual Report / New York, U.S.: state, Department of Agriculture, vol 24 2 pt II. J.B. Lyon Co. printers, Albany
39. Howad W et al (2005) Mapping with a few plants: using selective mapping for microsatellite saturation of the Prunus reference map. Genetics 171:1305–1309. doi:10.1534/Genetics.105.043661
40. Iezzoni A (2010) RosBREED: enabling marker-assisted breeding in the Rosaceae. HortScience 45:S27–S28
41. Iezzoni A, Peace C, Bassil N, Coe M, Finn C, Gasic K, Luby JJ, Main D, McFerson J, Norelli J, Olmstead M, Whitaker VM, Chengyan Y (2015) RosBREED: Combining disease resistance with horticultural quality in new Rosaceous cultivars. XXIII Plant and Animal Genome Conference, San Diego 2015
42. Jannink JL, Bink MCAM, Jansen RC (2001) Using complex plant pedigrees to map valuable genes. Trends Plant Sci 6:337–342
43. Jelenkovic G, Harrington E (1972) Morphology of the pachytene chromosomes in Prunus persica. Can J Genet Cytol 14:317–324. doi:10.1139/g72-039
44. Jung S, Staton M, Lee T, Blenda A, Svancara R, Abbott A, Main D (2008) GDR (Genome Database for Rosaceae): integrated web-database for Rosaceae genomics and genetics data. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D1034–D1040. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm803
45. Jung S et al (2014) The Genome Database for Rosaceae (GDR): year 10 update. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D1237–D1244. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1012
46. Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes Factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773–795. doi:10.2307/2291091
47. Kinghorn B (1987) On computing strategies for mate allocation. J Anim Breed Genet 104:12–22. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.1987.tb00104.x
48. Knox MR, Ellis THN (2002) Excess heterozygosity contributes to genetic map expansion in pea recombinant inbred populations. Genetics 162:861–873
49. Lacape JM et al (2013) Mapping QTLs for traits related to phenology, morphology and yield components in an inter-specific Gossypium hirsutum x G. barbadense cotton RIL population. Field Crop Res 144:256–267. doi:10.1016/J.Fcr.2013.01.001
50. Le S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25:1–18
51. Li XW et al. (2013) Peach genetic resources: diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium. BMC Genet 14 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-14-84
52. Lippman Z, Tanksley SD (2001) Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. giant heirloom. Genetics 158:413–422
53. Nishio M, Satoh M (2014) Including dominance effects in the genomic BLUP method for genomic evaluation. Plos One 9:e85792. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085792
54. Olmstead JW, Lezzoni AF, Whiting MD (2007) Genotypic differences in sweet cherry fruit size are primarily a function of cell number. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 132:697–703
55. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335:721–726. doi:10.1038/335721a0
56. Pea G, Aung HH, Frascaroli E, Landi P, Pe ME (2013) Extensive genomic characterization of a set of near-isogenic lines for heterotic QTL in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Genomics 14:61
57. Peace CP, Crisosto CH, Gradziel TM (2005) Endopolygalacturonase: a candidate gene for freestone and melting flesh in peach. Mol Breed 16(1):21–31. doi:10.1007/s11032-005-0828-3
58. Peace CP, Luby JJ, van de Weg WE, Bink MCAM, Iezzoni AF (2014) A strategy for developing representative germplasm sets for systematic QTL validation, demonstrated for apple, peach, and sweet cherry. Tree Genet Genomes 10(6):1679–1694. doi:10.1007/s11295-014-0788-z
59. Peng B et al (2011) QTL analysis for yield components and kernel-related traits in maize across multi-environments. Theor Appl Genet 122:1305–1320. doi:10.1007/S00122-011-1532-9
60. Portis E et al (2014) QTL mapping in eggplant reveals clusters of yield-related loci and orthology with the tomato genome. Plos One 9:e89499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089499
61. Quarrie SA et al (2006) Dissecting a wheat QTL for yield present in a range of environments: from the QTL to candidate genes. J Exp Bot 57:2627–2637. doi:10.1093/Jxb/Erl026
62. Quilot B, Wu BH, Kervella J, Genard M, Foulongne M, Moreau K (2004) QTL analysis of quality traits in an advanced backcross between Prunus persica cultivars and the wild relative species P. davidiana. Theor Appl Genet 109:884–897. doi:10.1007/S00122-004-1703-Z
63. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.0.1 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
64. Rosyara UR et al (2013) Fruit size QTL identification and the prediction of parental QTL genotypes and breeding values in multiple pedigreed populations of sweet cherry. Mol Breed 32:875–887. doi:10.1007/S11032-013-9916-Y
65. Scorza R, Sherman BW (1996) Peaches. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding. Wiley, New York, pp 325–440
66. Scorza R, Mehlenbacher SA, Lightner GW (1985) Inbreeding and coancestry of freestone peach cultivars of the eastern United States and implications for peach germplasm improvement. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110:547–552
67. Semel Y et al (2006) Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12981–12986. doi:10.1073/Pnas.0604635103
68. Shi J et al (2009) Unraveling the complex trait of crop yield with quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica napus. Genetics 182:851–861. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.101642
69. Shulaev V et al (2008) Multiple models for Rosaceae genomics. Plant Physiol 147:985–1003. doi:10.1104/pp.107.115618
70. Sorensen D, Gianola D (2002) Likelihood, Bayesian and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics. Statistics for biology and health. Springer-Verlag, New York
71. Therneau T, Atkinson E, Sinnwell J, Schaid D, McDonnell S (2013) kinship2: Pedigree functions, 1.54 edn. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pedigree
72. van de Weg WE, Voorrips RE, Finkers R, Kodde LP, Jansen J, Bink MCAM (2004) Pedigree genotyping: a new approach of QTL identification and allele mining by exploiting breeding material. Acta Horticult 663:45–50
73. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Statistics and computing, 4th edn. Springer, New York
74. Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S, Jung S, Shu S, Marroni F, Zhebentyayeva T, Dettori MT, Grimwood J, Cattonaro F, Zuccolo A, Rossini L, Jenkins J, Vendramin E, Meisel LA, Decroocq V, Sosinski B, Prochnik S, Mitros T, Policriti A, Cipriani G, Dondini L, Ficklin S, Goodstein DM, Xuan P, Fabbro CD, Aramini V, Copetti D, Gonzalez S, Horner DS, Falchi R, Lucas S, Mica E, Maldonado J, Lazzari B, Bielenberg D, Pirona R, Miculan M, Barakat A, Testolin R, Stella A, Tartarini S, Tonutti P, Arus P, Orellana A, Wells C, Main D, Vizzotto G, Silva H, Salamini F, Schmutz J, Morgante M, Rokhsar DS (2013) The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution. Nat Genet 45:487–U447. doi:10.1038/ng.2586
75. Verde I et al. (2012a) Development and Evaluation of a 9K SNP Array for Peach by Internationally Coordinated SNP Detection and Validation in Breeding Germplasm. Plos One 7 doi:ARTN e35668. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035668
76. Verde I, Gazza L, Aramini V, Taller DL, Dettori MT (2012b) A second generation peach linkage map using IPSC 9K SNP chip for advanced QTL identification. Paper presented at the RGC6 6th Rosaceous Genomics Conference, San Michele, Italy, June 2014 http://www.fruitbreedomics.com/index.php/the-results/posters/55-rgc6-6th-rosaceous-genomics-conference-2012-san-michele/77-verde-i-et-al-2012-a-second-generation-peach-linkage-map-using-the-ipsc-9k-chip-for-advanced-qtl-identification
77. Voorrips RE, Bink MCAM, van de Weg WE (2012) Pedimap: software for the visualization of genetic and phenotypic data in pedigrees. J Hered 103:903–907. doi:10.1093/Jhered/Ess060
78. Waldmann P, Hallander J, Hoti F, Sillanpaa MJ (2008) Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of Bayesian analysis of additive and dominance genetic variances in noninbred pedigrees. Genetics 179:1101–1112. doi:10.1534/Genetics.107.084160
79. Wricke GN, Weber E (1986) Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. W. de Gruyter, Berlin
80. Yamamoto T et al (2001) Characterization of morphological traits based on a genetic linkage map in peach. Breed Sci 51:271–278. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.51.271
81. Yu J, Buckler ES (2006) Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:155–160. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.003
82. Zdravkovic J, Zivoslav M, Mirjana M, Bogoljub Z, Milan Z (2000) Epistatic gene effects on the yield of the parents of F-1, F-2, BC1 and BC2 progeny. Acta Physiol Plant 22:261–265. doi:10.1007/S11738-000-0027-0
83. 1 population derived from a cross between a domesticated sweet cherry cultivar and a wild forest sweet cherry. Tree Genet Genomes 6:25–36. doi:10.1007/s11295-009-0225-x
84. Zhebentyayeva TN et al (2008) A framework physical map for peach, a model Rosaceae species. Tree Genet Genomes 4:745–756. doi:10.1007/S11295-008-0147-Z