Including dominance effects in the genomic BLUP method for genomic evaluation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Nishio, Motohide ^a   Satoh, Masahiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LIVESTOCK AND GRASSLAND SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMIC BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION; MALE; MATING SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; GENOMICS; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; LINEAR MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84896955534     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085792     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Muewissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic effect using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829. (Pubitemid 32298846)
2. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AL, Goddard ME (2009) Invited review: Genomic selection in daily cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci 92: 433-443.
3. VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91: 4414-4423.
4. McHugh N, Muewissen TH, Cromie AR, Sonesson AK (2011) Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs. J Dairy Sci 94: 4109-4118.
5. Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM, Cooper T. 2011. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: Pasts, present, future. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3202-3211.
6. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD (2009) Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci 92: 16-24.
7. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME (2009) Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res 91: 47-60.
8. Calus MPL (2010) Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. Animal 4: 157-164.
9. Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL (2009) Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol 41: 55.
10. Toro MA, Varona L (2010) A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 42: 33.
11. Su G, Christensen OF, Henryon M, Lund MS (2012) Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and prediction genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS One 7: e45293.
12. Vitezica ZG, Varona L, Legarra A (2013) On the additive and dominance variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics: In press.
13. Da Y, Wang S (2013) Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and estimation of variance components of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers. J Dairy Sci 96 (E-Suppl.1): 620.
14. Wang C, Prakapenka D, Wang S, Runesha HB, Da Y (2013) GVCBLUP 2.1: Acomputing package for genomic prediction and estimation of variance components for additive and dominance effects using SNP markers. J Dairy Sci 96 (E-Suppl.1): 620.
15. Wittenburg D, Melzer N, Reinsch N (2011) Including non-additive genetic effects in Bayesian methods for the prediction of genetic values based on genome-wide markers. BMC Genet 12: 74.
16. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex: Longman Group. 126 p.
17. Cleveland MA, Hickey JM, Forni S (2012) A common dataset for genomic analysis of livestock populations. G3 2: 429-435.
18. Johnson DL, Thompson R (1995) Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components for univariate animal models using sparse matrix techniques and average information. J Dairy Sci 78: 449-456.
19. Sun C, VanRaden PM, O'Connell JR, Weigel KA, Gianola D (2013) Mating programs including genomic relationships and dominance effects. J Dairy Sci: In press.
20. Schadt EE, Lamb J, Yang X, Zhu J, Edwards S (2005) An interactive genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nat Genet 37: 710-717. (Pubitemid 41754887)
21. Evans DM, Marchini J, Morris AP, Cardon LR (2006) Two-stage two-locus models in genome-wide association. PLoS One 2: e157.
22. Marchini J, Donnelly P, Cardon LR (2005) Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat Genet 37: 413-417.
23. Lee SH, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2008) Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. PLoS Genet 4: e1000231.
24. Xu S (2013) Mapping quantitative trait loci by controlling polygenic background effects. Genetics: In press.
25. Gianola D, Fernando RL, Stella A (2006) Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedure. Genetics 173: 1761-1776. (Pubitemid 44127674)
26. Gonzalez-Recio O, Gianola D, Long N, Weigel KA, Rosa GJM (2008) Nonparametric methods for incorporating genomic information into genetic evaluations: an application to mortality in broilers. Genetics 178: 2305-2313.
27. Yao C, Spurlock DM, Armentano LE, Page Jr CD, VandeHarr JM, et al. (2013) Random forests approach for identifying additive and epistatic single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with residual feed intake in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 96: 6716-6729.