QTL analysis of quality traits in an advanced backcross between Prunus persica cultivars and the wild relative species P. davidiana

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 884-897

  Quilot, B ^a   Wu, B H ^b   Kervella, J ^c   Genard M ^a   Foulongne, M ^c,d   Moreau, K ^c  

^a Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^c Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDS; AGRONOMY; CLONING; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS);

ALLELES; QTL ANALYSIS; TRAITS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

CARBOHYDRATE;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FRUIT; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRUNUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT;

AGRICULTURE; CARBOHYDRATES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FRUIT; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MINISATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; PRUNUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

ERYSIPHALES; PRUNUS; PRUNUS DAVIDIANA; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 4544310865     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1703-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allard RW (1956) Formulas and tables to facilitate the calculation or recombination values in heredity. Hilgardia 24:235-278
2. Aranzana MJ, Pineda A, Cosson P, Dirlewanger E, Ascasibar J, Cipriani G, Ryder CD, Testolin R, Abbott A, King GJ, Iezzoni AF, Arus P (2003) A set of simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers covering the Prunus genome. Theor Appl Genet 106:819-825
3. Bernacchi D, Beck-Bunn T, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1998) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 97:381-397
4. Causse M, Saliba-Colombani V, Lecomte L, Duffe P, Rousselle P, Buret M (2002) QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato: a few chromosome regions control the variation of sensory and instrumental traits. J Exp Bot 53:2089-2098
5. Chapman GW, Horvat RJ (1990) Changes in non volatile acids, sugars, pectin, and sugar composition of pectin during peach cv. Monroe maturation. J Agric Food Chem 38:383-387
6. Cipriani G, Lot G, Huang WG, Marrazzo MT, Peterlunger E, Testolin R (1999) AC/GT and AG/CT and AG/GT microsatellite repeats in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch): isolation characterisation and cross-species amplification in Prunus. Theor Appl Genet 99:65-72
7. Dirlewanger E, Moing A, Rothan C, Svanella L, Pronier V, Guye A, Plomion C, Monet R (1999) Mapping QTLs controlling fruit quality in peach Prunus persica L. Batsch. Theor Appl Genet 98:18-31
8. Etienne C, Rothan C, Moing A, Plomion C, Bodenes C, Svanella-Dumas L, Cosson P, Pronier V, Monet R, Dirlewanger E (2002) Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar and organic acid content in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch). Theor Appl Genet 105:145-159
9. Foulongne M, Pascal T, Pfeiffer F, Kervella J (2003) QTLs for powdery mildew resistance in peach x Prunus davidiana crosses: consistency across generations and environments. Mol Breed 12:33-50
10. Fulton TM, Beck-Bunn T, Emmatty D, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1997) QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theor Appl Genet 95:881-894
11. Génard M, Lescourret F, Gomez L, Habib R (2003) Changes in fruit sugar concentrations in response to assimilate supply, metabolism and dilution: a modeling approach applied to peach fruit Prunus persica. Tree Physiol 23:373-385
12. Gomez L, Rubio E, Augé M (2002) A new procedure for extraction and measurement of soluble sugars in ligneous plants. J Sci Food Agric 82:360-369
13. Keener ME, de Michele DW, Sharpe PJ (1979) Sink metabolism. A conceptual framework for analysis. Ann Bot 44:659-669
14. Klann EM, Hall B, Bennett AB (1996) Antisense acid invertase (TIV1) gene alters soluble sugar composition and size in transgenic tomato fruit. Plant Physiol 112:1321-1330
15. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174-181
16. Liverani A, Cangini A (1991) Ethylene evolution and changes in carbohydrates and organic acid during maturation of two white and two yellow fleshed peach cultivars. Adv Hortic Sci 5:59-63
17. Lu ZX, Sosinski B, Reighard GL, Baird WV, Abbott AG (1998) Construction of a genetic linkage map and identification of AFLP markers for resistance to root-knot nematodes in peach rootstocks. Genome 41:199-207
18. Moing A, Carbonne F, Rashad MH, Gaudillère JP (1992) Carbon fluxes in mature peach leaves. Plant Physiol 100:1878-1884
19. Moing A, Svanella L, Rolin D, Gaudillère M, Gaudillère JP, Monet R (1998) Compositional changes during the fruit development of two peach cultivars differing in juice acidity. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:770-775
20. Moing A, Poëssel JL, Svanella-Dumas L, Loonis M, Kervella J (2003) Biochemical basis of low fruit quality of Prunus davidiana, a pest and disease resistance donor for peach breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:55-62
21. 2 population evaluated in an upland environment. Theor Appl Genet 102:41-52
22. Pangborn RM (1963) Relative taste intensities of selected sugars and organic acids. J Food Sci 28:726-733
23. Pillen K, Zacharias A, Leon J (2003) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:340-352
24. Roitsch T (1999) Source-sink regulation by sugar and stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2:198-206
25. Smykov VK, Oycharenko GV, Perfilyeva ZN, Shoeferistov EP (1982) Estimation of the peach hybrid resources by its mildew resistance against the infection background. Byull Gos Nikitsk Bot Sada 88:74-80
26. Sosinski B, Gannavarapu M, Hager LD, Beck LE, Ryder CD, Rajapakse S, Baird WV, Ballard RE, Abbott AG (2000) Characterisation of microsatellite markers in peach Prunus persica L. Batsch. Theor Appl Genet 101:421-428
27. Sturm A, Tang GQ (1999) The sucrose-cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development, growth and carbon partitioning. Trends Plant Sci 4:401-407
28. Swanston JS (1987) The consequences, for malting quality, of Hordeum laevigatum as a source of mildew resistance in barley breeding. Ann Appl Biol 110:351-355
29. Testolin R, Marrazzo T, Cipriani G, Quarta R, Verde I, Dettori MT, Pancaldi M, Sansavini S (2000) Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome 43:512-520
30. Thomas WTB, Baird E, Fuller JD, Lawrence P, Young GR, Russell J, Ramsay L, Waugh R, Powell W (1998) Identification of a QTL decreasing yield in barley linked to Mlo powdery mildew resistance. Mol Breed 4:381-393
31. 1 peach population. Acta Hortic 592:291-297
32. Wang T, Gonzales AR, Gbur EE, Aselage JM (1993) Organic acid changes during ripening of processing peaches. J Food Sci 58:631-632
33. Wu BH, Génard M, Lescourret F, Gomez L, Li SH (2002) Influence of assimilate and water supply on seasonal variation of acids in peach cv. Suncrest. J Sci Food Agric 82:1829-1836
34. Wu BH, Quilot B, Kervella J, Génard M, Li S (2003) Analysis of genotypic variation in sugar and acid contents in peaches and nectarines through the principal component analysis. Euphytica 132:375-384
35. Yamaki S, Asakura T (1988) Energy coupled transport of sorbitol and other sugars into the protoplast isolated from apple fruit flesh. Plant Cell Physiol 29:961-967