Extensive genomic characterization of a set of near-isogenic lines for heterotic QTL in maize (Zea mays L.)

BMC Genomics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Pea, Giorgio ^a   Aung, Htay Htay ^a   Frascaroli, Elisabetta ^b   Landi, Pierangelo ^b   Pè, Mario Enrico ^a  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Genome wide genotyping; Heterosis; Linkage drag; Maize; Near isogenic lines; Single nucleotide polymorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE LOCATION; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; INTROGRESSION; MAIZE; NEAR ISOGENIC LINE; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; GENOMICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84872933238     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-61     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Birchler JA, Yao H, Chudalayandi S, Vaiman D, Veitia RA. Heterosis. Plant Cell 2010, 22:2105-2112. 10.1105/tpc.110.076133, 2929104, 20622146.
2. Hochholdinger F, Hoecker N. Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trends Plant Sci 2007, 12:427-432. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.005, 17720610.
3. Lippman ZB, Zamir D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet 2007, 23:60-66. 10.1016/j.tig.2006.12.006, 17188398.
4. Frascaroli E, Canè MA, Landi P, Pea G, Gianfranceschi L, Villa M, Morgante M, Pè ME. Classical genetic and quantitative trait loci analyses of heterosis in a maize hybrid between two elite inbred lines. Genetics 2007, 176:625-644. 10.1534/genetics.106.064493, 1893040, 17339211.
5. Lu H, Romero-Severson J, Bernardo R. Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor Appl Genet 2003, 107:494-502. 10.1007/s00122-003-1271-7, 12759730.
6. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 1992, 132:823-839. 1205218, 1468633.
7. Barth S, Busimi AK, Friedrich Utz H, Melchinger AE. Heterosis for biomass yield and related traits in five hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh Heredity 2003, 91:36-42.
8. Cheng S-H, Zhuang J-Y, Fan Y-Y, Du J-H, Cao L-Y. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: a super-domesticate in China. Ann Bot 2007, 100:959-966. 10.1093/aob/mcm121, 2759200, 17704538.
9. Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:2574-2579. 10.1073/pnas.0437907100, 151382, 12604771.
10. Kusterer B, Piepho HP, Utz HF, Schon CC, Muminovic J, Meyer RC, Altmann T, Melchinger AE. Heterosis for biomass-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by quantitative trait loci analysis of the triple testcross design with recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 2007, 177:1839-1850. 10.1534/genetics.107.077628, 2147944, 18039885.
11. Li Z-K, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB, Ying CS, Stansel JW, Khush GS, Paterson AH. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 2001, 158:1737-1753. 1461764, 11514459.
12. Luo LJ, Li ZK, Mei HW, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 2001, 158:1755-1771. 1461757, 11514460.
13. Melchinger AE, Piepho HP, Utz HF, Muminovic J, Wegenast T, Torjek O, Altmann T, Kusterer B. Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 2007, 177:1827-1837. 10.1534/genetics.107.080564, 2147963, 18039884.
14. Meyer RC, Torjek O, Becher M, Altmann T. Heterosis of biomass production in Arabidopsis, Establishment during early development. Plant Physiol 2004, 134:1813-1823. 10.1104/pp.103.033001, 419853, 15064384.
15. Semel Y, Nissenbaum J, Menda N, Zinder M, Krieger U, Issman N, Pleban T, Lippman Z, Gur A, Zamir D. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:12981-12986. 10.1073/pnas.0604635103, 1552043, 16938842.
16. Syed NH, Chen ZJ. Molecular marker genotypes, heterozygosity and genetic interactions explain heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 2005, 94:295-304. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800558, 2041864, 15316557.
17. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 1995, 140:745-754. 1206649, 7498751.
18. Yu SB, Li JX, Xu CG, Tan YF, Gao YJ, Li XH, Zhang Q, Maroof MA. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:9226-9231. 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9226, 23127, 11038567.
19. Eichten SR, Foerster JM, de Leon N, Kai Y, Yeh CT, Liu S, Jeddeloh JA, Schnable PS, Kaeppler SM, Springer NM. B73-Mo17 near-isogenic lines demonstrate dispersed structural variation in maize. Plant Physiol 2011, 156:1679-1690. 10.1104/pp.111.174748, 3149956, 21705654.
20. Kaeppler SM, Phillips RL, Kim TS. Use of near-isogenic lines derived by backcrossing or selfing to map qualitative traits. Theor Appl Genet 1993, 87:233-237.
21. Paterson AH, DeVerna JW, Lanini B, Tanksley SD. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 1990, 124:735-742. 1203964, 1968874.
22. Eshed Y, Zamir D. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 1995, 141:1147-1162. 1206837, 8582620.
23. Szalma S, Hostert B, LeDeaux J, Stuber C, Holland J. QTL mapping with near-isogenic lines in maize. Theor Appl Genet 2007, 114:1211. 10.1007/s00122-007-0512-6, 17308934.
24. Salvi S, Corneti S, Bellotti M, Carraro N, Sanguineti MC, Castelletti S, Tuberosa R. Genetic dissection of maize phenology using an intraspecific introgression library. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11:4. 10.1186/1471-2229-11-4, 3025946, 21211047.
25. Pea G, Paulstephenraj P, Canè MA, Savo Sardaro ML, Landi P, Morgante M, Porceddu E, Pè ME, Frascaroli E. Recombinant near-isogenic lines: a resource for the mendelization of heterotic QTL in maize. Mol Genet Genomics 2009, 281:447-457. 10.1007/s00438-008-0422-6, 19152004.
26. Frascaroli E, Canè MA, Pè ME, Pea G, Landi P. Characterization of heterotic quantitative trait loci in maize by evaluation of near-isogenic lines and their crosses at two competition levels. Theor Appl Genet 2012, 124:35-47. 10.1007/s00122-011-1685-6, 21953207.
27. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, Graves TA, Minx P, Reily AD, Courtney L, Kruchowski SS, Tomlinson C, Strong C, Delehaunty K, Fronick C, Courtney B, Rock SM, Belter E, Du F, Kim K, Abbott RM, Cotton M, Levy A, Marchetto P, Ochoa K, Jackson SM, Gillam B, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326:1112-1115. 10.1126/science.1178534, 19965430.
28. Fu Y, Springer NM, Ying K, Yeh CT, Iniguez AL, Richmond T, Wu W, Barbazuk B, Nettleton D, Jeddeloh J, Schnable PS. High-resolution genotyping via whole genome hybridizations to microarrays containing long oligonucleotide probes. PLoS One 2010, 5:e14178. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014178, 2996289, 21152036.
29. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 2011, 6:e19379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379, 3087801, 21573248.
30. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Berard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, Clarke JD, Graner EM, Hansen M, Joets J, Le Paslier MC, McMullen MD, Montalent P, Rose M, Schon CC, Sun Q, Walter H, Martin OC, Falque M. A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS One 2011, 6:e28334. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028334, 3234264, 22174790.
31. Schaeffer ML, Harper LC, Gardiner JM, Andorf CM, Campbell DA, Cannon EKS, Sen TZ, Lawrence CJ. MaizeGDB: curation and outreach go hand-in-hand. Database 2011, bar022, http://www.maizedgb.org.
32. Springer NM, Ying K, Fu Y, Ji T, Yeh CT, Jia Y, Wu W, Richmond T, Kitzman J, Rosenbaum H, Iniguez AL, Barbazuk WB, Jeddeloh JA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS. Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content. PLoS Genet 2009, 5:e1000734. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000734, 2780416, 19956538.
33. Frascaroli E, Schrag TA, Melchinger AE. Genetic diversity analysis of elite European maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines using AFLP, SSR, and SNP markers reveals ascertainment bias for a subset of SNPs. Theor Appl Genet 2012, 126:133-141.
34. Van Inghelandt D, Melchinger AE, Lebreton C, Stich B. Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theor Appl Genet 2010, 120:1289-1299. 10.1007/s00122-009-1256-2, 2854351, 20063144.
35. Melchinger AE, Messmer MM, Lee M, Woodman WL, Lamkey KL. Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction-fragment-length-polymorphisms. Crop Sci 1991, 31:669-678.
36. Frova C, Krajewski P, di Fonzo N, Villa M, Sari-Gorla M. Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by molecular markers, I. Yield components. Theor Appl Genet 1999, 99:280-288.
37. Sari-Gorla M, Krajewski P, Binelli G, Frova C, Taramino G, Villa M. Genetic dissection of herbicide tolerance in maize by molecular markers. Molecular Breeding 1997, 3:481-493.
38. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Method 1995, 57:289-300.