Structure and organization of heteromeric AMPA-type glutamate receptors

Science

Volumn 352, Issue 6285, 2016, Pages

  Herguedas, Beatriz ^a   García Nafría, Javier ^a   Cais, Ondrej ^a   Fernández Leiro, Rafael ^a   Krieger, James ^a   Ho, Hinze ^a   Greger, Ingo H ^a  

^a MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA AMINO 3 HYDROXY 5 METHYL 4 ISOXAZOLEPROPIONIC ACID; CYSTEINE; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR; AMPA RECEPTOR; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR IONOTROPIC, AMPA 2; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR IONOTROPIC, AMPA 3; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR IONOTROPIC, AMPA 4; LIGAND;

AMINO ACID; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LIGAND; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; POLYMER; PROTEIN; SENSORY SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLIZATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROTRANSMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BRAIN; CHEMISTRY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BRAIN; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECEPTORS, AMPA;

EID: 84960939779     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad3873     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. S. F. Traynelis et al., Glutamate receptor ion channels: Structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 405-496 (2010). doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451; pmid: 20716669.
2. D. Bowie, Ionotropic glutamate receptors & CNS disorders. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 7, 129-143 (2008). doi:10.2174/187152708784083821; pmid: 18537642.
3. R. L. Huganir, R. A. Nicoll, AMPARs and synaptic plasticity: The last 25 years. Neuron 80, 704-717 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025; pmid: 24183021.
4. J. T. Isaac, M. C. Ashby, C. J. McBain, The role of the GluR2 subunit in AMPA receptor function and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 54, 859-871 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.001; pmid: 17582328.
5. A. I. Sobolevsky, M. P. Rosconi, E. Gouaux, X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature 462, 745-756 (2009). doi:10.1038/nature08624; pmid: 19946266 6.
6. E. Karakas, H. Furukawa, Crystal structure of a heterotetrameric NMDA receptor ion channel. Science 344, 992-997 (2014). doi:10.1126/science.1251915; pmid: 24876489.
7. C. H. Lee et al., NMDA receptor structures reveal subunit arrangement and pore architecture. Nature 511, 191-197 (2014). doi:10.1038/nature13548; pmid: 25008524.
8. R. Kazi, J. Dai, C. Sweeney, H. X. Zhou, L. P. Wollmuth, Mechanical coupling maintains the fidelity of NMDA receptormediated currents. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 914-922 (2014). doi:10.1038/nn.3724; pmid: 24859202.
9. M. Mansour, N. Nagarajan, R. B. Nehring, J. D. Clements, C. Rosenmund, Heteromeric AMPA receptors assemble with a preferred subunit stoichiometry and spatial arrangement. Neuron 32, 841-853 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00520-7; pmid: 11738030.
10. J. García-Nafría, B. Herguedas, J. F. Watson, I. H. Greger, The dynamic AMPA receptor extracellular region: A platform for synaptic protein interactions. J. Physiol. (2016). doi:10.1113/JP271844; pmid: 26891027.
11. G. M. Sia et al., Interaction of the N-terminal domain of the AMPA receptor GluR4 subunit with the neuronal pentraxin NP1 mediates GluR4 synaptic recruitment. Neuron 55, 87-102 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.020; pmid: 17610819.
12. S. Zhu, P. Paoletti, Allosteric modulators of NMDA receptors: Multiple sites and mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 20, 14-23 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.coph.2014.10.009; pmid: 25462287.
13. K. B. Hansen, H. Furukawa, S. F. Traynelis, Control of assembly and function of glutamate receptors by the amino-terminal domain. Mol. Pharmacol. 78, 535-549 (2010). doi:10.1124/mol.110.067157; pmid: 20660085.
14. B. Herguedas, J. Krieger, I. H. Greger, Receptor heteromeric assembly-How it works and why it matters: The case of ionotropic glutamate receptors. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 117, 361-386 (2013). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-386931-9.00013-1; pmid: 23663975.
15. J. Kumar, M. L. Mayer, Functional insights from glutamate receptor ion channel structures. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 313-337 (2013). doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183711; pmid: 22974439.
16. E. Karakas, N. Simorowski, H. Furukawa, Subunit arrangement and phenylethanolamine binding in GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors. Nature 475, 249-253 (2011). doi:10.1038/nature10180;pmid:21677647.
17. J. Kumar, P. Schuck, M. L. Mayer, Structure and assembly mechanism for heteromeric kainate receptors. Neuron 71, 319-331 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.038; pmid: 21791290.
18. M. Rossmann et al., Subunit-selective N-terminal domain associations organize the formation of AMPA receptor heteromers. EMBO J. 30, 959-971 (2011). doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.16; pmid: 21317873.
19. M. Sukumaran et al., Dynamics and allosteric potential of the AMPA receptor N-terminal domain. EMBO J. 30, 972-982 (2011). doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.17; pmid: 21317871.
20. L. Saglietti et al., Extracellular interactions between GluR2 and N-cadherin in spine regulation. Neuron 54, 461-477 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.012; pmid: 17481398.
21. K. L. Dürr et al., Structure and dynamics of AMPA receptor GluA2 in resting, pre-open, and desensitized states. Cell 158, 778-792 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.023; pmid: 25109876.
22. J. R. Meyerson et al., Structural mechanism of glutamate receptor activation and desensitization. Nature 514, 328-334 (2014). doi:10.1038/nature13603; pmid: 25119039.
23. T. Nakagawa, Y. Cheng, E. Ramm, M. Sheng, T. Walz, Structure and different conformational states of native AMPA receptor complexes. Nature 433, 545-549 (2005). doi:10.1038/nature03328; pmid: 15690046.
24. C. R. Midgett, D. R. Madden, The quaternary structure of a calcium-permeable AMPA receptor: Conservation of shape and symmetry across functionally distinct subunit assemblies. J. Mol. Biol. 382, 578-584 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.021 pmid: 18656486.
25. Y. Sun et al., Mechanism of glutamate receptor desensitization. Nature 417, 245-253 (2002). doi:10.1038/417245a pmid: 12015593.
26. I. Bahar, T. R. Lezon, L. W. Yang, E. Eyal, Global dynamics of proteins: Bridging between structure and function. Annu Rev Biophys 39, 23-42 (2010). doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131258; pmid: 20192781.
27. A. Dutta et al., Cooperative dynamics of intact AMPA and NMDA glutamate receptors: Similarities and subfamily-specific differences. Structure 23, 1692-1704 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.str.2015.07.002; pmid: 26256538.
28. X. C. Bai, G. McMullan, S. H. Scheres, How cryo-EM is revolutionizing structural biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 49-57 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.005; pmid: 25544475.
29. M. Liao, E. Cao, D. Julius, Y. Cheng, Single particle electron cryo-microscopy of a mammalian ion channel. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 27, 1-7 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.02.005; pmid: 24681231.
30. S. H. Scheres, RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 pmid: 23000701.
31. L. Chen, K. L. Dürr, E. Gouaux, X-ray structures of AMPA receptor-cone snail toxin complexes illuminate activation mechanism. Science 345, 1021-1026 (2014). doi:10.1126/science.1258409 pmid: 25103405.
32. A. Robert, J. R. Howe, How AMPA receptor desensitization depends on receptor occupancy. J. Neurosci. 23, 847-858 (2003). pmid: 12574413.
33. C. Rosenmund, Y. Stern-Bach, C. F. Stevens, The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. Science 280, 1596-1599 (1998). doi:10.1126/science.280.5369.1596; pmid: 9616121.
34. D. M. Schauder et al., Glutamate receptor desensitization is mediated by changes in quaternary structure of the ligand binding domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 5921-5926 (2013). doi:10.1073/pnas.1217549110; pmid: 23530186.
35. A. J. Plested, M. L. Mayer, AMPA receptor ligand binding domain mobility revealed by functional cross linking. J. Neurosci. 29, 11912-11923 (2009). doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2971-09.2009; pmid: 19776277.
36. J. Gonzalez, M. Du, K. Parameshwaran, V. Suppiramaniam, V. Jayaraman, Role of dimer interface in activation and desensitization in AMPA receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9891-9896 (2010). doi:10.1073/pnas.0911854107 pmid: 20457909.
37. O. Cais et al., Mapping the interaction sites between AMPA receptors and TARPs reveals a role for the receptor N-terminal domain in channel gating. Cell Reports 9, 728-740 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.09.029; pmid: 25373908.
38. P. J. Reeves, J. M. Kim, H. G. Khorana, Structure and function in rhodopsin: A tetracycline-inducible system in stable mammalian cell lines for high-level expression of opsin mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13413-13418 (2002). doi:10.1073/pnas.212519199; pmid: 12370422.
39. P. A. Longo, J. M. Kavran, M. S. Kim, D. J. Leahy, Transient mammalian cell transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI). Methods Enzymol. 529, 227-240 (2013). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-418687-3.00018-5 pmid: 24011049.
40. E. Seiradake, Y. Zhao, W. Lu, A. R. Aricescu, E. Y. Jones, Production of cell surface and secreted glycoproteins in mammalian cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1261, 115-127 (2014). doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2230-7-6; pmid: 25502196.
41. G. Winter, C. M. Lobley, S. M. Prince, Decision making in xia2. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1260-1273 (2013). doi:10.1107/S0907444913015308; pmid: 23793152.
42. T. G. Battye, L. Kontogiannis, O. Johnson, H. R. Powell, A. G. Leslie, iMOSFLM: A new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 271-281 (2011). doi:10.1107/S0907444910048675; pmid: 21460445.
43. P. R. Evans, G. N. Murshudov, How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1204-1214 (2013). doi:10.1107/S0907444913000061 pmid: 23793146.
44. A. Vagin, A. Teplyakov, Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 22-25 (2010). doi:10.1107/S0907444909042589; pmid: 20057045.
45. A. Dutta, I. H. Shrivastava, M. Sukumaran, I. H. Greger, I. Bahar, Comparative dynamics of NMDA- and AMPA-glutamate receptor N-terminal domains. Structure 20, 1838-1849 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.08.012; pmid: 22959625.
46. A. J. McCoy et al., Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658-674 (2007). doi:10.1107/S0021889807021206 pmid: 19461840.
47. G. N. Murshudov et al., REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355-367 (2011). doi:10.1107/S0907444911001314; pmid: 21460454.
48. M. D. Winn et al., Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235-242 (2011). doi:10.1107/S0907444910045749; pmid: 21460441.
49. P. Emsley, B. Lohkamp, W. G. Scott, K. Cowtan, Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486-501 (2010). doi:10.1107/S0907444910007493; pmid: 20383002.
50. G. Tang et al., EMAN2: An extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009; pmid: 16859925.
51. X. Li et al., Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods (2013). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2472; pmid: 23644547.
52. K. Zhang, Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1-12 (2016). pmid: 26592709.
53. S. H. Scheres, S. Chen, Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 9, 853-854 (2012). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2115; pmid: 22842542.
54. S. Chen et al., High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24-35 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.004; pmid: 23872039.
55. S. H. Scheres, R. Núñez-Ramírez, C. O. Sorzano, J. M. Carazo, R. Marabini, Image processing for electron microscopy singleparticle analysis using XMIPP. Nat. Protoc. 3, 977-990 (2008). doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.62pmid: 18536645.
56. A. Kucukelbir, F. J. Sigworth, H. D. Tagare, Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63-65 (2014). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2727; pmid: 24213166.
57. E. F. Pettersen et al., UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004). doi:10.1002/jcc.20084; pmid: 15264254.
58. K. Suhre, J. Navaza, Y. H. Sanejouand, NORMA: A tool for flexible fitting of high-resolution protein structures into lowresolution electron-microscopy-derived density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1098-1100 (2006). doi:10.1107/S090744490602244X; pmid: 16929111.
59. N. Armstrong, E. Gouaux, Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-sensitive glutamate receptor: Crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core. Neuron 28, 165-181 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00094-5; pmid: 11086992.
60. D. Orain et al., 6-Amino quinazolinedione sulfonamides as orally active competitive AMPA receptor antagonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22, 996-999 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.12.009; pmid: 22197388.
61. W. L. DeLano, The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (DeLano Scientific, 2002).
62. N. Armstrong, J. Jasti, M. Beich-Frandsen, E. Gouaux, Measurement of conformational changes accompanying desensitization in an ionotropic glutamate receptor. Cell 127, 85-97 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.037 pmid: 17018279.
63. A. Robert, N. Armstrong, J. E. Gouaux, J. R. Howe, AMPA receptor binding cleft mutations that alter affinity, efficacy, and recovery from desensitization. J. Neurosci. 25, 3752-3762 (2005). doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0188-05.2005 pmid: 15829627.
64. A. R. Atilgan et al., Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80, 505-515 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76033-X pmid: 11159421.
65. C. Xu, D. Tobi, I. Bahar, Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: Hemoglobin T↔R2 transition. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 153-168 (2003). doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.027; pmid: 14516750.
66. E. Eyal, G. Lum, I. Bahar, The anisotropic network model web server at 2015 (ANM 2.0). Bioinformatics 31, 1487-1489 (2015). doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu847; pmid: 25568280.
67. A. Bakan, L. M. Meireles, I. Bahar, ProDy: Protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments. Bioinformatics 27, 1575-1577 (2011). doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168; pmid: 21471012.
68. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, K. Schulten, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38, 27-28 (1996). doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5; pmid: 8744570.