Turning practically: Broadening the horizon

Journal of Organizational Change Management

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 164-174

  Eikeland, Olav ^a   Nicolini, Davide ^b  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Change management; Organizational change

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954512554     PISSN: 09534814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09534811111119744     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Argyris, C. (1996), “Actionable knowledge: intent versus actuality”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 441-4.
2. Clot, Y. (1999), La fonction psychologique du travail, PUF Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
3. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S. and Verzelloni, L. (2010), “Through the practice lens: where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading?”, Management Learning, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 265-83.
4. Eikeland, O. (2006), “Validity of action research and validity in action research”, in Nielsen, K.A. and Svensson, L. (Eds), Action and Interactive Research: Beyond Practice and Theory, Shaker, Maastricht and Aachen, pp. 193-240.
5. Eikeland, O. (2007), “Why should mainstream social researchers be interested in action research?”, International Journal of Action Research, Vol. 3 Nos 1/2, pp. 38-64.
6. Eikeland, O. (2008), The Ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian Phrónêsis, Aristotelian Philosophy of Dialogue, and Action Research, Peter Lang, Bern.
7. Eikeland, O. (2009), “Habitus-validity in organisational theory and research - social research and work life transformed”, in Eikeland, O. (Ed.), Turning to Practice with Action Research, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 33-66.
8. Engeström, Y. (1987), Learning by Expanding: An Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Orienta-Konsultit, Helsink.
9. Gadamer, H.G. (1989), “Truth and Method”, in Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D.G. (Eds), 2nd rev. ed., Crossroad, New York, NY (original work 1960).
10. Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
11. Gherardi, S. (2001), “From organizational learning to practice-based knowing”, Human Relations, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 131-9.
12. Gherardi, S. (2009), “Introduction to the special issue on the critical power of the practice lens”, Management Learning, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 115-28.
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge - The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.
14. MacIntyre, A. (1981), After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Duckworth, London.
15. Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D. and Yanow, D. (2009), “Re-turn to practice: an introductory essay”, Organization Studies, Vol. 30 No. 12, pp. 1309-27.
16. Nagel, T. (1986), The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
17. Nicolini, D. (2011), “Practice as the site of knowing”, Organization Science, published on line (in press).
18. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (Eds) (2003), Knowing in Organizations. A Practice-based Approach, M.E. Sharpe, New York, NY.
19. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001), Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge.
20. Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
21. Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K. and Von Savigny, E. (Eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, London.
22. Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.
23. Clot, Y. (2009), “Clinic of activity: the dialogue as instrument”, in Sannino, A., Daniels, H. and Gutierrez, K. (Eds), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, Sage, London.