Catch-bond mechanism of the bacterial adhesin FimH

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Sauer, Maximilian M ^a   Jakob, Roman P ^b   Eras, Jonathan ^a   Baday, Sefer ^b,c   Eriş, Deniz ^c   Navarra, Giulio ^c   Bernèche, Simon ^b,c   Ernst, Beat ^c   Maier, Timm ^b   Glockshuber, Rudi ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIN; LIGAND; PROTEIN FIMH; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; FIMBRIA PROTEIN; FIMH PROTEIN, E COLI; MANNOSE; PROTEIN BINDING;

ADHESION; BACTERIUM; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CHEMICAL BONDING; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LIGAND; MOTILITY; PROTEIN; SHEAR STRESS;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BINDING AFFINITY; CELL TRACKING; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DISSOCIATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MANNOSYLATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PH; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTION; FIMBRIA; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI;

ADHESINS, ESCHERICHIA COLI; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTIONS; FIMBRIAE PROTEINS; FIMBRIAE, BACTERIAL; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MANNOSE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 84960462939     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10738     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Marshall, B. T. et al. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature 423, 190-193 (2003).
2. Evans, E., Leung, A., Heinrich, V. & Zhu, C. Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11281-11286 (2004).
3. Buckley, C. D. et al. Cell adhesion. The minimal cadherin-catenin complex binds to actin filaments under force. Science 346, 1254211 (2014).
4. Akiyoshi, B. et al. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochoremicrotubule attachments. Nature 468, 576-579 (2010).
5. Fiore, V. F., Ju, L., Chen, Y., Zhu, C. & Barker, T. H. Dynamic catch of a Thy-1-alpha5beta1+syndecan-4 trimolecular complex. Nat. Commun. 5, 4886 (2014).
6. Liu, B., Chen, W., Evavold, B. D. & Zhu, C. Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell 157, 357-368 (2014).
7. Das, D. K. et al. Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor beta-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1517-1522 (2015).
8. Ronald, A. The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging pathogens. Am. J. Med. 113, 14S-19S (2002).
9. Jones, C. H. et al. FimH adhesin of type 1 pili is assembled into a fibrillar tip structure in the Enterobacteriaceae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 2081-2085 (1995).
10. Hahn, E. et al. Exploring the 3D molecular architecture of Escherichia coli type 1 pili. J. Mol. Biol. 323, 845-857 (2002).
11. Waksman, G. & Hultgren, S. J. Structural biology of the chaperone-usher pathway of pilus biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 765-774 (2009).
12. Thomas, W. E., Trintchina, E., Forero, M., Vogel, V. & Sokurenko, E. V. Bacterial adhesion to target cells enhanced by shear force. Cell 109, 913-923 (2002).
13. Zhou, G. et al. Uroplakin Ia is the urothelial receptor for uropathogenic Escherichia coli: evidence from in vitro FimH binding. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4095-4103 (2001).
14. Sharon, N. Carbohydrates as future anti-adhesion drugs for infectious diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1760, 527-537 (2006).
15. Ofek, I., Hasty, D. L. & Sharon, N. Anti-adhesion therapy of bacterial diseases: prospects and problems. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 38, 181-191 (2003).
16. Guo, B. & Guilford, W. H. Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9844-9849 (2006).
17. Le Trong, I. et al. Structural basis for mechanical force regulation of the adhesin FimH via finger trap-like beta sheet twisting. Cell 141, 645-655 (2010).
18. Han, Z. et al. Structure-based drug design and optimization of mannoside bacterial FimH antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 53, 4779-4792 (2010).
19. Wellens, A. et al. The tyrosine gate as a potential entropic lever in the receptorbinding site of the bacterial adhesin FimH. Biochemistry 51, 4790-4799 (2012).
20. Bouckaert, J. et al. Receptor binding studies disclose a novel class of high-affinity inhibitors of the Escherichia coli FimH adhesin. Mol. Microbiol. 55, 441-455 (2005).
21. Wellens, A. et al. Intervening with urinary tract infections using anti-adhesives based on the crystal structure of the FimH-oligomannose-3 complex. PLoS ONE 3, e2040 (2008).
22. Brument, S. et al. Thiazolylaminomannosides as potent antiadhesives of type 1 piliated Escherichia coli isolated from Crohn's disease patients. J. Med. Chem. (2013).
23. Vanwetswinkel, S. et al. Study of the structural and dynamic effects in the FimH adhesin upon alpha-d-heptyl mannose binding. J. Med. Chem. 57, 1416-1427 (2014).
24. Choudhury, D. et al. X-ray structure of the FimC-FimH chaperone-adhesin complex from uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 285, 1061-1066 (1999).
25. Schwartz, D. J. et al. Positively selected FimH residues enhance virulence during urinary tract infection by altering FimH conformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15530-15537 (2013).
26. Yakovenko, O. et al. FimH forms catch bonds that are enhanced by mechanical force due to allosteric regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 11596-11605 (2008).
27. Vetsch, M., Sebbel, P. & Glockshuber, R. Chaperone-independent folding of type 1 pilus domains. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 827-840 (2002).
28. Gouin, S., Roos, G. & Bouckaert, J. Discovery and Application of FimH Antagonists 1-46 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014).
29. Thomas, W. E., Nilsson, L. M., Forero, M., Sokurenko, E. V. & Vogel, V. Shear-dependent 'stick-and-roll' adhesion of type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 53, 1545-1557 (2004).
30. Puorger, C. et al. Infinite kinetic stability against dissociation of supramolecular protein complexes through donor strand complementation. Structure 16, 631-642 (2008).
31. Thomas, W. et al. Catch-bond model derived from allostery explains force-activated bacterial adhesion. Biophys. J. 90, 753-764 (2006).
32. Lane, M. C. et al. Role of motility in the colonization of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the urinary tract. Infect. Immun. 73, 7644-7656 (2005).
33. Wright, K. J., Seed, P. C. & Hultgren, S. J. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli flagella aid in efficient urinary tract colonization. Infect. Immun. 73, 7657-7668 (2005).
34. Nilsson, L. M., Thomas, W. E., Trintchina, E., Vogel, V. & Sokurenko, E. V. Catch bond-mediated adhesion without a shear threshold: trimannose versus monomannose interactions with the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16656-16663 (2006).
35. Aprikian, P. et al. Interdomain interaction in the FimH adhesin of Escherichia coli regulates the affinity to mannose. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 23437-23446 (2007).
36. Petit, C. M., Zhang, J., Sapienza, P. J., Fuentes, E. J. & Lee, A. L. Hidden dynamic allostery in a PDZ domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18249-18254 (2009).
37. Tzeng, S. R. & Kalodimos, C. G. Protein dynamics and allostery: an NMR view. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 62-67 (2011).
38. Laskowski, R. A., Gerick, F. & Thornton, J. M. The structural basis of allosteric regulation in proteins. FEBS Lett. 583, 1692-1698 (2009).
39. Cooper, A. & Dryden, D. T. Allostery without conformational change. A plausible model. Eur. Biophys. J. 11, 103-109 (1984).
40. Tsai, C. J., del Sol, A. & Nussinov, R. Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. J. Mol. Biol. 378, 1-11 (2008).
41. Pereverzev, Y. V., Prezhdo, O. V., Forero, M., Sokurenko, E. V. & Thomas, W. E. The two-pathway model for the catch-slip transition in biological adhesion. Biophys. J. 89, 1446-1454 (2005).
42. Pereverzev, Y. V. & Prezhdo, O. V. Force-induced deformations and stability of biological bonds. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 73, 050902 (2006).
43. Lou, J. Z. & Zhu, C. A structure-based sliding-rebinding mechanism for catch bonds. Biophys. J. 92, 1471-1485 (2007).
44. Manibog, K., Li, H., Rakshit, S. & Sivasankar, S. Resolving the molecular mechanism of cadherin catch bond formation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3941 (2014).
45. Choi, Y. I. et al. Dynamic control of beta1 integrin adhesion by the plexinD1-sema3E axis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 379-384 (2014).
46. Kong, F., Garcia, A. J., Mould, A. P., Humphries, M. J. & Zhu, C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1275-1284 (2009).
47. Depoil, D. & Dustin, M. L. Force and affinity in ligand discrimination by the TCR. Trends Immunol. 35, 597-603 (2014).
48. Somers, W. S., Tang, J., Shaw, G. D. & Camphausen, R. T. Insights into the molecular basis of leukocyte tethering and rolling revealed by structures of P-and E-selectin bound to SLe(X) and PSGL-1. Cell 103, 467-479 (2000).
49. Preston, R. C. et al. E-selectin ligand complexes adopt an extended high-affinity conformation. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 62-72 (2015).
50. Zakrisson, J., Wiklund, K., Axner, O. & Andersson, M. The shaft of the type 1 fimbriae regulates an external force to match the FimH catch bond. Biophys. J. 104, 2137-2148 (2013).
51. Whitfield, M. J., Luo, J. P. & Thomas, W. E. Yielding elastic tethers stabilize robust cell adhesion. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003971 (2014).
52. Xie, B. et al. Distinct glycan structures of uroplakins Ia and Ib: structural basis for the selective binding of FimH adhesin to uroplakin Ia. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 14644-14653 (2006).
53. Anderson, B. N. et al. Weak rolling adhesion enhances bacterial surface colonization. J. Bacteriol. 189, 1794-1802 (2007).
54. Pak, J., Pu, Y., Zhang, Z. T., Hasty, D. L. & Wu, X. R. Tamm-Horsfall protein binds to type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli and prevents E. coli from binding to uroplakin Ia and Ib receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 9924-9930 (2001).
55. Klein, T. et al. FimH antagonists for the oral treatment of urinary tract infections: from design and synthesis to in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 53, 8627-8641 (2010).
56. Cusumano, C. K. et al. Treatment and prevention of urinary tract infection with orally active FimH inhibitors. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 109ra115 (2011).
57. Sokurenko, E. V., Courtney, H. S., Ohman, D. E., Klemm, P. & Hasty, D. L. FimH family of type 1 fimbrial adhesins: functional heterogeneity due to minor sequence variations among fimH genes. J. Bacteriol. 176, 748-755 (1994).
58. Kleeb, S. et al. FimH antagonists: bioisosteres to improve the in vitro and in vivo PK/PD profile. J. Med. Chem. 58, 2221-2239 (2015).
59. Kuzmic, P. Program DYNAFIT for the analysis of enzyme kinetic data: application to HIV proteinase. Anal. Biochem. 237, 260-273 (1996).
60. Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 133-144 (2010).
61. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658-674 (2007).
62. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
63. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1948-1954, 2002).
64. Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859-1865 (2008).
65. Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781-1802 (2005).
66. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577-8593 (1995).
67. Sokurenko, E. V., Courtney, H. S., Maslow, J., Siitonen, A. & Hasty, D. L. Quantitative differences in adhesiveness of type 1 fimbriated Escherichia coli due to structural differences in fimH genes. J. Bacteriol. 177, 3680-3686 (1995).
68. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676-682 (2012).