The minimal cadherin-catenin complex binds to actin filaments under force

Science

Volumn 346, Issue 6209, 2014, Pages

  Buckley, Craig D ^a   Tan, Jiongyi ^b   Anderson, Karen L ^c   Hanein, Dorit ^c   Volkmann, Niels ^c   Weis, William I ^b   Nelson, W James ^b   Dunn, Alexander R ^a,b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BURNHAM INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADHERIN; CATENIN; F ACTIN; ACTIN;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CHEMICAL BONDING; CYTOLOGY; HOMEOSTASIS; PROTEIN; REACTION KINETICS;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; CELL JUNCTION; DISSOCIATION; FORCE; HUMAN; KINETICS; PROTEIN BINDING; TENSION; CACO 2 CELL LINE; CELL ADHESION; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METABOLISM;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; ACTINS; ADHERENS JUNCTIONS; CACO-2 CELLS; CADHERINS; CATENINS; CELL ADHESION; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; PROTEIN BINDING;

EID: 84909592568     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1254211     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. B. M. Gumbiner, Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 622-634 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nrm1699; pmid: 16025097
2. C. M. Niessen, D. Leckband, A. S. Yap, Tissue organization by cadherin adhesion molecules: Dynamic molecular and cellular mechanisms of morphogenetic regulation. Physiol. Rev. 91, 691-731 (2011). doi: 10.1152/physrev. 00004.2010; pmid: 21527735
3. V. Vasioukhin, Adherens junctions and cancer. Subcell. Biochem. 60, 379-414 (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4186-7-16; pmid: 22674080
4. M. Takeichi, Dynamic contacts: Rearranging adherens junctions to drive epithelial remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 397-410 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nrm3802; pmid: 24824068
5. W. Meng, M. Takeichi, Adherens junction: Molecular architecture and regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a002899 (2009). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002899; pmid: 20457565
6. B. Janssens et al., αT-catenin: A novel tissue-specific b-catenin-binding protein mediating strong cell-cell adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 114, 3177-3188 (2001). pmid: 11590244
7. S. Pokutta, H. J. Choi, G. Ahlsen, S. D. Hansen, W. I. Weis, Structural and thermodynamic characterization of cadherin·β-catenin·α-catenin complex formation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 13589-13601 (2014). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M114.554709; pmid: 24692547
8. S. Yamada, S. Pokutta, F. Drees, W. I. Weis, W. J. Nelson, Deconstructing the cadherin-catenin-actin complex. Cell 123, 889-901 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.020; pmid: 16325582
9. S. D. Hansen et al., αE-catenin actin-binding domain alters actin filament conformation and regulates binding of nucleation and disassembly factors. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3710-3720 (2013). doi: 10.1091/mbc. E13-07-0388; pmid: 24068324
10. P. W. Miller et al., Danio rerio αE-catenin is a monomeric F-actin binding protein with distinct properties from Mus musculus αE-catenin. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 22324-22332 (2013). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M113.458406; pmid: 23788645
11. D. L. Rimm, E. R. Koslov, P. Kebriaei, C. D. Cianci, J. S. Morrow, α 1 (E)-catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8813-8817 (1995). doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8813; pmid: 7568023
12. N. Borghi et al., E-cadherin is under constitutive actomyosingenerated tension that is increased at cell-cell contacts upon externally applied stretch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 12568-12573 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204390109; pmid: 22802638
13. F. Drees, S. Pokutta, S. Yamada, W. J. Nelson, W. I. Weis, α-catenin is a molecular switch that binds E-cadherin-β-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly. Cell 123, 903-915 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.021; pmid: 16325583
14. H. J. Choi et al., αE-catenin is an autoinhibited molecule that coactivates vinculin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 8576-8581 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203906109; pmid: 22586082
15. S. Yonemura, Y. Wada, T. Watanabe, A. Nagafuchi, M. Shibata, α-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 533-542 (2010). doi: 10.1038/ncb2055; pmid: 20453849
16. M. Yao et al., Force-dependent conformational switch of a-catenin controls vinculin binding. Nat. Commun. 5, 4525 (2014). doi: 10.1038/n omms5525; pmid: 25077739
17. R. B. Hazan, L. Kang, Roe, P. I. Borgen, D. L. Rimm, Vinculin is associated th the E-cadherin adhesion complex. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32 48-32453 (1997). doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32448; pm 9405455
18. E. E. Weiss, M. Kroemr, A. H. Rüdiger, B. M. Jockusch, M. Rüdiger, Vinculin is art of the cadherin-catenin junctional complex: Complex for ation between a-catenin and vinculin. J. Cell Biol. 141, 755-7 4 (1998). doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.3.755; pmid: 9566974
19. K. Abe, M. Takeichi, E IN mediates linkage of the cadherin catenin complex to F-actin and stabilizes the circumferential actin belt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 13-19 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710504105; pmid: 18093941
20. K. A. Knudsen, A. P. Soler, K. R. Johnson, M. J. Wheelock, Interaction of α-actinin with the cadherin/catenin cell-cell adhesion complex via a-catenin. J. Cell Biol. 130, 67-77 (1995). doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.1.67; pmid: 7790378
21. S. Pokutta, F. Drees, Y. Takai, W. J. Nelson, W. I. Weis, Biochemical and structural definition of the l-afadin- and actinbinding sites of α-catenin. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18868-18874 (2002). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M201463200; pmid: 11907041
22. K. Tachibana et al., Two cell adhesion molecules, nectin and cadherin, interact through their cytoplasmic domainassociated proteins. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1161-1176 (2000). doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.5.1161; pmid: 10974003
23. F. Twiss et al., Vinculin-dependent cadherin mechanosensing regulates efficient epithelial barrier formation. Biol. Open 1, 1128-1140 (2012). doi: 10.1242/bio.20122428; pmid: 23213393
24. S. Huveneers et al., Vinculin associates with endothelial VE-cadherin junctions to control force-dependent remodeling. J. Cell Biol. 196, 641-652 (2012). doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108120; pmid: 22391038
25. Q. le Duc et al., Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner. J. Cell Biol. 189, 1107-1115 (2010). doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001149; pmid: 20584916
26. A. K. Barry et al., α-catenin cytomechanics: Role in cadherindependent adhesion and mechanotransduction. J. Cell Sci. 127, 1779-1791 (2014). doi: 10.1242/jcs.139014; pmid: 24522187
27. E. S. Rangarajan, T. Izard, The cytoskeletal protein α-catenin unfurls upon binding to vinculin. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18492-18499 (2012). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M112.351023; pmid: 22493458
28. B. T. Marshall et al., Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature 423, 190-193 (2003). doi: 10.1038/nature01605; pmid: 12736689
29. W. E. Thomas, V. Vogel, E. Sokurenko, Biophysics of catch bonds. Annu Rev Biophys 37, 399-416 (2008). doi: 10.1146/annurev. biophys.37.032807.125804; pmid: 18573088
30. W. Thomas et al., Catch-bond model derived from allostery explains force-activated bacterial adhesion. Biophys. J. 90, 753-764 (2006). doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.066548; pmid: 16272438
31. S. Yamada, W. J. Nelson, Localized zones of Rho and Rac activities drive initiation and expansion of epithelial cell-cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 178, 517-527 (2007). doi: 10.1083/jcb.200701058; pmid: 17646397
32. G. I. Bell, Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618-627 (1978). doi: 10.1126/science.347575; pmid: 347575
33. E. Evans, Probing the relation between force-lifetime- and chemistry in single molecular bonds. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 105-128 (2001). doi: 10.1146/annurev. biophys.30.1.105; pmid: 11340054
34. H. A. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica 7, 284-304 (1940). doi: 10.1016/S0031-8914 (40) 90098-2
35. D. Bartolo, I. Derényi, A. Ajdari, Dynamic response of adhesion complexes: Beyond the single-path picture. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 65, 051910 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.051910; pmid: 12059596
36. E. Evans, A. Leung, V. Heinrich, C. Zhu, Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 11281-11286 (2004). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401870101; pmid: 15277675
37. V. Barsegov, D. Thirumalai, Dynamics of unbinding of cell adhesion molecules: Transition from catch to slip bonds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 1835-1839 (2005). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406938102; pmid: 15701706
38. B. T. Marshall, K. K. Sarangapani, J. Lou, R. P. McEver, C. Zhu, Force history dependence of receptor-ligand dissociation. Biophys. J. 88, 1458-1466 (2005). doi: 10.1529/biophysj. 104.050567; pmid: 15556978
39. J. Yang, P. Dokurno, N. K. Tonks, D. Barford, Crystal structure of the M-fragment of α-catenin: Implications for modulation of cell adhesion. EMBO J. 20, 3645-3656 (2001). doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.14.3645; pmid: 11447106
40. E. S. Rangarajan, T. Izard, Dimer asymmetry defines α-catenin interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 188-193 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2479; pmid: 23292143
41. S. Pokutta, W. I. Weis, Structure of the dimerization and b-catenin-binding region of a-catenin. Mol. Cell 5, 533-543 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765 (00) 80447-5; pmid: 10882138
42. N. Ishiyama et al., An autoinhibited structure of α-catenin and its implications for vinculin recruitment to adherens junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 15913-15925 (2013). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M113.453928; pmid: 23589308
43. F. Kong, A. J. García, A. P. Mould, M. J. Humphries, C. Zhu, Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1275-1284 (2009). doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810002; pmid: 19564406
44. K. K. Sarangapani et al., Low force decelerates L-selectin dissociation from P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 and endoglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2291-2298 (2004). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M310396200; pmid: 14573602
45. B. Guo, W. H. Guilford, Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 9844-9849 (2006). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601255103; pmid: 16785439
46. A. M. Clobes, W. H. Guilford, Loop 2 of myosin is a force-dependent inhibitor of the rigor bond. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 35, 143-152 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s10974-014-9375-z; pmid: 24500136
47. S. Rakshit, Y. Zhang, K. Manibog, O. Shafraz, S. Sivasankar, Ideal, catch, and slip bonds in cadherin adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 18815-18820 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208349109; pmid: 23112161
48. K. Manibog, H. Li, S. Rakshit, S. Sivasankar, Resolving the molecular mechanism of cadherin catch bond formation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3941 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ncomms4941; pmid: 24887573
49. J. Lou, C. Zhu, A structure-based sliding-rebinding mechanism for catch bonds. Biophys. J. 92, 1471-1485 (2007). doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.097048; pmid: 17142266
50. T. A. Springer, Structural basis for selectin mechanochemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 91-96 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810784105; pmid: 19118197
51. S. Chakrabarti, M. Hinczewski, D. Thirumalai, Plasticity of hydrogen bond networks regulates mechanochemistry of cell adhesion complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 9048-9053 (2014). doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1405384111; pmid: 24927549
52. D. Cai et al., Mechanical feedback through E-cadherin promotes direction sensing during collective cell migration Cell 157, 1146-1159 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.045; pmid: 24855950