The importance of the human footprint in shaping the global distribution of terrestrial, freshwater and marine invaders

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Gallardo, Belinda ^a,b   Zieritz, Alexandra ^a   Aldridge, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTO PIRENAICO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL A; FRESH WATER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLIMATE; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; EUTROPHICATION; FRANCE; FRESHWATER SPECIES; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GEOLOGY; HABITAT; HUMAN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; INVASIVE SPECIES; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE SPECIES; NETHERLANDS; NONHUMAN; PLANT; POPULATION DENSITY; PREDICTION; PROPAGULE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES INVASION; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; TERRESTRIAL SPECIES; TOPOGRAPHY; UNITED KINGDOM; WATER TEMPERATURE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; INTRODUCED SPECIES; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; BELGIUM; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; FRANCE; FRESH WATER; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMANS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NETHERLANDS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84960442977     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125801     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Guisan A, Tingley R, Baumgartner JB, Naujokaitis-Lewis I, Sutcliffe PR, Tulloch AIT, et al. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(12):1424-35. doi: 10.1111/ele. 12189 PMID: 24134332
2. Jeschke JM, Strayer DL. Usefulness of bioclimatic models for studying climate change and invasive species. Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2008. 2008; 1134:1-24. doi: 10.1196/annals.1439. 002 PMID: ISI:000257506400001.
3. Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett. 2005; 8(9):993-1009.
4. Hijmans RJ, Graham CH. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology. 2006; 12(12):2272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486. 2006.01256.x PMID: ISI:000242659400004.
5. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 2007; 176(2):256-73. PMID: 17822399
6. Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008; 23(3):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005 PMID: ISI:000254721800006.
7. González-Moreno P, Diez JM, Richardson DM, Vilà M. Beyond climate: disturbance niche shifts in invasive species. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2015; 24(3):360-70. doi: 10.1111/geb.12271
8. González-Moreno P, Diez JM, Ibáñez I, Font X, Vilà M. Plant invasions are context-dependent: multiscale effects of climate, human activity and habitat. Diversity and Distributions. 2014; 20(6):720-31. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12206
9. Gallardo B. Europe\'s top 10 invasive species: relative importance of climatic, habitat and socio-economic factors. Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 2014; 26(2-3):130-51. doi: 10.1080/03949370.2014. 896417
10. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Wild J, Arianoutsou M, et al. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107:12157-62.
11. McNeely JA. An introduction to human dimensions of invasive alien species. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species IUCN Publishers, Gland, Switzerland2001. p. 5-22.
12. Hulme PE. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol. 2009; 46(1):10-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x PMID: ISI:000262477800002.
13. Flory SL, Clay K. Effects of roads and forest successional age on experimental plant invasions. Biol Conserv. 2009; 142(11):2531-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.024 PMID: WOS:000270203100018.
14. Mortensen DA, Rauschert ESJ, Nord AN, Jones BP. Forest roads facilitate the spread of invasive plants. Invasive Plant Science and Management. 2009; 2(3):191-9. doi: 10.1614/ipsm-08-125.1 PMID: WOS:000207948200001.
15. Vilà M, Pujadas J. Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol Conserv. 2001; 100(3):397-401.
16. Real R, Márquez AL, Estrada A, Muñoz AR, Vargas JM. Modelling chorotypes of invasive vertebrates in mainland Spain. Diversity and Distributions. 2008; 14(2):364-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007. 00419.x
17. Chytŕ M, Pysek P, Wild J, Pino J, Maskell LC, Vilà M. European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Diversity and Distributions. 2009; 15(1):98-107. doi: 10. 1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00515.x PMID: ISI:000261521400010.
18. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience. 2002; 52(10):891-904. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:thfatl] 2.0.co;2 PMID: WOS:000178573400011.
19. Taylor BW, Irwin RE. Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101(51):17725-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405176101 PMID: WOS:000225951500030.
20. Gallardo B, Aldridge DC. The \'dirty dozen\': socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. J Appl Ecol. 2013; 50(3):757-66.
21. Zieritz A, Gallardo B, Aldridge DC. Registry of non-native species in the Two Seas region countries (Great Britain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands). Neobiota. 2014; 23:65-80.
22. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography. 2010; 33(3):607-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06142.x PMID: ISI:000280457500019.
23. Rodríguez-Castañeda G, Hof AR, Jansson R, Harding LE. Predicting the fate of biodiversity using Species\' Distribution Models: enhancing model comparability and repeatability. Plos One. 2012; 7(9): e44402. ARTN e44402 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044402 PMID: ISI:000308638700057.
24. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography. 2004; 27(3):285-98. PMID: ISI:000221421200002.
25. Levinsky I, Skov F, Svenning J-C, Rahbek C. Potential impacts of climate change on the distributions and diversity patterns of European mammals. Biodivers Conserv. 2007; 16(13):3803-16. doi: 10.1007/ s10531-007-9181-7
26. Gallardo B, Zu Ermgassen PSE, Aldridge DC. Invasion ratcheting in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and the ability of native and invaded ranges to predict its global distribution. J Biogeogr. 2013; 40(12):2274-84.
27. Gallardo B, Errea M, Aldridge DC. Application of bioclimatic models coupled with network analysis for risk assessment of the killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus, in Great Britain. Biological Invasions. 2012; 14:1265-78. doi: 10.1007/s10530-011-0154-0
28. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions. 2010; 17(1):43-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
29. Béllard C, Thuiller W, Leroy B, Genovesi P, Bakkenes M, Courchamp F. Will climate change promote future invasions? Global Change Biology. 2013; 19(12):3740-8. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12344 PMID: 23913552
30. Barbosa AM, Pautasso M, Figueiredo D. Species-people correlations and the need to account for survey effort in biodiversity analyses. Diversity and Distributions. 2013; 19(9):1188-97. doi: 10.1111/ddi. 12106
31. Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008; 31(2):161-75. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x PMID: WOS:000254499200001.
32. Tyberghein L, Verbruggen H, Pauly K, Troupin C, Mineur F, De Clerck O. Bio-ORACLE: a global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2012; 21(2):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00656.x
33. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D\'Agrosa C, et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science. 2008; 319(5865):948-52. doi: 10.1126/science.1149345 PMID: 18276889
34. Ferreira JG, Andersen JH, Borja A, Bricker SB, Camp J, Cardoso da Silva M, et al. Overview of eutrophication indicators to assess environmental status within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2011; 93(2):117-31.
35. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species\' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006; 29(2):129-51. PMID: ISI:000236767000001.
36. Merow C, Smith MJ, Silander JA. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species\' distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography. 2013; 36(10):1058-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x
37. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 2006; 190(3-4):231-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 PMID: ISI:000233859600001.
38. Warren DL, Seifert SN. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol Appl. 2011; 21(2):335-42. doi: 10.1890/10-1171.1 PMID: 21563566
39. Pearce J, Ferrier S. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling. 2000; 133(3):225-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00) 00322-7.
40. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2010; 1(1):3-14.
41. Murtaugh PA. Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data. Ecol Lett. 2009; 12(10):1061-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01361.x PMID: 19702634
42. Wood SN. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Press CaHC, editor2006. PMID: 23242683
43. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2014.
44. Lobo JM, Jimenez-Valverde A, Real R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2008; 17(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358. x PMID: ISI:000252966000001.
45. Jiménez-Valverde A. Threshold-dependence as a desirable attribute for discrimination assessment: implications for the evaluation of species distribution models. Biodivers Conserv. 2014; 23(2):369-85. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0606-1
46. Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 2005; 28(3):385-93. PMID: ISI:000229428800011.
47. Gallardo B, Aldridge DC. Priority setting for invasive species management: integrated risk assessment of multiple Ponto Caspian invasive species into Great Britain. Ecol Appl. 2013; 23(2):352-64. PMID: 23634587
48. Araújo MB, Ferri-Yáñez F, Bozinovic F, Marquet PA, Valladares F, Chown SL. Heat freezes niche evolution. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(9):1206-19. doi: 10.1111/ele.12155 PMID: 23869696
49. Zerebecki RA, Sorte CJ. Temperature tolerance and stress proteins as mechanisms of invasive species success. Plos One. 2011; 6(4):e14806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014806 PMID: 21541309
50. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology. 2000; 14(1):18-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x PMID: WOS:000085366700006.
51. Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Blanchet S, Oberdorff T, Brosse S. Fish invasions in the world\'s river systems: when natural processes are blurred by human activities. Plos Biology. 2008; 6(2):e28. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pbio.0060028 PMID: 18254661
52. Kiritani K, Yamamura Y. Exotic insects and their pathways for invasion. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, editors. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Washington: Island Press; 2003. p. 518.
53. Seebens H, Gastner MT, Blasius B. The risk of marine bioinvasion caused by global shipping. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16(6):782-90. doi: 10.1111/ele.12111 PMID: 23611311
54. Keller RP, Ermgassen P, Aldridge DC. Vectors and timing of freshwater invasions in Great Britain. Conservation Biology. 2009; 23(6):1526-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01249.x PMID: WOS:000272163100025.
55. Airoldi L, Bulleri F. Anthropogenic disturbance can determine the magnitude of opportunistic species responses on marine urban infrastructures. Plos One. 2011; 6(8):e22985. PMID: MEDLINE:21826224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022985
56. Elith J, Leathwick JR. Species Distribution Models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 402009. p. 677-97.