Modelling species distributions in Britain: A hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data

Ecography

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 285-298

  Pearson, Richard G ^a   Dawson, Terence P ^a   Liu, Canran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CLIMATE; LAND COVER; TEMPORAL VARIATION; VEGETATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

ERICA; ERICA TETRALIX; GERANIUM SYLVATICUM; RHYNCHOSPORA; RHYNCHOSPORA ALBA; SALIX; SALIX HERBACEA;

EID: 3042532648     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03740.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beckett, G., Bull, A. and Stevenson, R. 1999. A Flora of Norfolk. - Gillian Beckett.
2. Berry, P. M. et al. 2002. Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. - Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 453-462.
3. Berry, P. M. et al. 2003. The sensitivity and vulnerability of terrestrial habitats and species in Britain and Ireland to climate change. - J. Nat. Conserv. 11: 15-24.
4. Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. - Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20: 37-46.
5. Collingham, Y. C., Hill, M. O. and Huntley, B. 1996. The migration of sessile organisms: a simulation model with measurable parameters. - J. Veg. Sci. 7: 831-846.
6. Collingham, Y. C. et al. 2000. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. - J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 13-27.
7. Fielding, A. H. and Bell, J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. - Environ. Conserv. 24: 38-49.
8. Franklin, J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. - Prog. Phys. Geogr. 19: 474-499.
9. Gevrey, M., Ioannis, D. and Lek, S. 2003. Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. - Ecol. Modell. 160: 249-264.
10. Griffiths, G. H., Eversham, B. C. and Roy, D. B. 1999. Integrating species and habitat data for nature conservation in Great Britain: data sources and methods. - Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 8: 329-345.
11. Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. - Ecol. Modell. 135: 147-186.
12. Halliday, G. et al. 1997. A Flora of Cumbria: comprising the vice-counties of Westmorland with Furness (v.c.69), Cumberland (v.c.70) and parts of north-west Yorkshire (v.c.65) and north Lancashire (v.c.60). - Lancaster Univ.
13. Hanley, J. A. and McNeil, B. J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. - Radiology 143: 29-36.
14. Hilbert, D. W. and Ostendorf, B. 2001. The utility of artificial nerual networks for modelling the distribution of vegetation in past, present and future climates. - Ecol. Modell. 146: 311-327.
15. Hulme, M. and Jenkins, G. J. 1998. Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom: scientific report. - U.K. Climate Impacts Programme Technical Report No. 1, Climatic Research Unit, Norwich.
16. Hulme, M. et al. 1995. Construction of a 1961-1990 European climatology for climate change modelling and impact applications. - Int. J. Climatol. 15: 1333-1363.
17. Ivimey-Cook, R. B. 1984. Atlas of the Devon Flora: flowering plants and ferns. - Devonshire Ass. Adv. Sci., Lit. Arts.
18. Lek, S. and Guegan, J. F. 1999. Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling: an introduction. - Ecol. Modell. 120: 65-73.
19. Maier, H. R. and Dandy, G. C. 1998. Understanding the behaviour and optimising the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study. - Environ. Modell. Softw. 13: 179-191.
20. Manel, S., Williams, H. C. and Ormerod, S. J. 2001. Evaluating presences-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. - J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 921-931.
21. Martinez, J. A., Serrano, D. and Zuberogoitia, I. 2003. Predictive models of habitat preferences for the Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo: a multi-scale approach. - Ecography 26: 21-28.
22. May, R. M. 1989. Levels of organisation in ecology. - In: Cherrett, J. M. (ed.), Ecological concepts. Blackwell, pp. 339-363.
23. Monserud, R. A. and Leemans, R. 1992. Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. - Ecol. Modell. 62: 275-293.
24. Openshaw, S. 1984. The modifiable areal unit problem. - Geo Books.
25. Parmesan, C. and Yohe, G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. - Nature 421: 37-42.
26. Pearce, J. and Ferrier, S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. - Ecol. Modell. 133: 225-245.
27. Pearson, R. G. and Dawson, T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? - Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 361-371.
28. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2002. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. - Ecol. Modell. 154: 289-300.
29. Perring, F. H. and Walters, S. M. (eds) 1962. Atlas of the British Flora. - Thomas Nelson and Sons.
30. Preston, C. D., Pearman, D. A. and Dines, T. D. (eds) 2002. New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. - Oxford Univ. Press.
31. Rettie, W. J. and Messier, F. 2000. Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. - Ecography 23: 466-478.
32. Sala, O. E. et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. - Science 287: 1770-1774.
33. Swets, J. A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. - Science 240: 1285-1293.
34. Tarassenko, L. 1998. A guide to neural computing applications. - Arnold.
35. Thuiller, W. et al. 2003. Large-scale environmental correlates of forest tree distributions in Catalonia (NE Spain). - Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 313-325.
36. Travis, J. M. J. 2003. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 270: 467-473.
37. Warren, M. S. et al. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. - Nature 414: 65-69.