Application of bioclimatic models coupled with network analysis for risk assessment of the killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus, in Great Britain

Biological Invasions

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1265-1278

  Gallardo, Belinda ^a   Errea, M Paz ^b   Aldridge, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTO PIRENAICO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aquatic invasive species; Dispersal velocity; Great Ouse River; Species distribution model; Support Vector Machine; Zebra mussel

Indexed keywords

BIOCLIMATOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CATCHMENT; CLIMATE MODELING; COLONIZATION; CONNECTIVITY; CRUSTACEAN; DECISION MAKING; DISPERSAL; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; NETWORK ANALYSIS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PROPAGULE; RAMSAR CONVENTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TOLERANCE;

ENGLAND; GREAT OUSE RIVER; UNITED KINGDOM;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); DIKEROGAMMARUS VILLOSUS; DREISSENA; DREISSENA POLYMORPHA;

EID: 84861008527     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-011-0154-0     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aldridge DC (2005) The zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in the Anglian region: results of river and water treatment works surveys. Cambridge Environmental Consultants, Cambridge, p 31.
2. Aldridge DC (2010) Dreissena polymorpha in Great Britain: history of spread, impacts and control. In: van der Velde G, Rajagopal S, bij de Vaate A (eds) The Zebra Mussel in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 79-91.
3. Aldridge DC, Elliott P, Moggridge GD (2004) The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain. Biol Conserv 119: 253-261.
4. Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W et al (2009) Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Divers Distrib 15: 409-420.
5. Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32: 159-181.
6. Boets P, Lock K, Messiaen M et al (2010) Combining data-driven methods and lab studies to analyse the ecology of Dikerogammarus villosus. Ecol Inform 5: 133-139.
7. Bruijs MCM, Kelleher B, van der Velde G et al (2001) Oxygen consumption, temperature and salinity tolerance of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus: indicators of further dispersal via ballast water transport. Arch Hydrobiol 152: 633-646.
8. Casellato S, Visentin A, La Piana G (2007) The predatory impact of Dikerogammarus villosus on fish. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution and threats. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 495-506.
9. Chen PF, Wiley EO, Mcnyset KM (2007) Ecological niche modeling as a predictive tool: silver and bighead carps in North America. Biol Invasions 9: 43-51.
10. de Souza Muñoz M, De Giovanni R, de Siqueira M, Sutton T, Brewer P, Pereira R, Canhos D, Canhos V (2011) openModeller: a generic approach to species' potential distribution modelling. GeoInformatica 15: 111-135.
11. Devin S, Beisel JN, Bachmann V et al (2001) Dikerogammarus villosus (Amphipoda: Gammaridae): another invasive species newly established in the Moselle river and French hydrosystems. Ann De Limnol Int J Limnol 37: 21-27.
12. Devin S, Piscart C, Beisel JN et al (2003) Ecological traits of the amphipod invader Dikerogammarus villosus on a mesohabitat scale. Arch Hydrobiol 158: 43-56.
13. Dick JTA, Platvoet D, Kelly DW (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59: 1078-1084.
14. Drake JM, Bossenbroek JM (2004) The potential distribution of zebra mussels in the United States. Bioscience 54: 931-941.
15. Drake JM, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Modelling ecological niches with support vector machines. J Appl Ecol 43: 424-432.
16. Elith J, Graham CH (2009) Do they? how do they? why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32: 66-77.
17. Elliott JM (2002) The drift distances and time spent in the drift by freshwater shrimps, Gammarus pulex, in a small stony stream, and their implications for the interpretation of downstream dispersal. Freshw Biol 47: 1403-1417.
18. Elliott JM (2003) A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebrates. Freshw Biol 48: 1652-1668.
19. Gergs R, Rothhaupt KO (2008) Feeding rates, assimilation efficiencies and growth of two amphipod species on biodeposited material from zebra mussels. Freshw Biol 53: 2494-2503.
20. Gherardi F (2007) Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview. In: Gherardi F (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3-25.
21. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8: 993-1009.
22. Hancock MA, Hughes JM (1999) Direct measures of instream movement in a freshwater shrimp using a genetic marker. Hydrobiologia 416: 23-32.
23. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1: 29-36.
24. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25: 1965-1978.
25. Jocque M, Field R, Brendonck L et al (2010) Climatic control of dispersal-ecological specialization trade-offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? Global Ecol Biogeogr 19: 244-252.
26. Keller RP, Ermgassen P, Aldridge DC (2009) Vectors and timing of freshwater invasions in Great Britain. Conserv Biol 23: 1526-1534.
27. Kraft CE, Sullivan PJ, Karatayev AY et al (2002) Landscape patterns of an aquatic invader: assessing dispersal extent from spatial distributions. Ecol Appl 12: 749-759.
28. Kumar S, Spaulding SA, Stohlgren TJ et al (2009) Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Front Ecol Environ 7: 415-420.
29. Leathwick JR, Elith J, Chadderton WL et al (2008) Dispersal, disturbance and the contrasting biogeographies of New Zealand's diadromous and non-diadromous fish species. J Biogeogr 35: 1481-1497.
30. Leuven R, van der Velde G, Baijens I et al (2009) The River Rhine: a global highway for dispersal of aquatic invasive species. Biol Invasions 11: 1989-2008.
31. Loo SE, Mac Nally R, Lake PS (2007) Forecasting New Zealand mudsnail invasion range: model comparisons using native and invaded ranges. Ecol Appl 17: 181-189.
32. MacNeil C, Platvoet D, Dick JTA et al (2010) The Ponto-Caspian 'killer shrimp', Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), invades the British Isles. Aquat Invasions 5: 441-445.
33. Madgwick G, Aldridge DC (2011) Killer shrimps in Britain: hype or horror? British Wildlife Publishing, Dorset, UK, pp 408-412.
34. McNyset KM (2005) Use of ecological niche modelling to predict distributions of freshwater fish species in Kansas. Ecol Freshw Fish 14: 243-255.
35. Niggebrugge K, Durance I, Watson AM et al (2007) Applying landscape ecology to conservation biology: spatially explicit analysis reveals dispersal limits on threatened wetland gastropods. Biol Conserv 139: 286-296.
36. Oreska M, Aldridge D (2011) Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: a standardized approach to invasive species costing. Biol Invasions 13: 305-319.
37. Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78: 419-433.
38. Phillips SJ, Elith J (2010) POC plots: calibrating species distribution models with presence-only data. Ecology 91: 2476-2484.
39. Piscart C, Devin S, Beisel JN et al (2003) Growth-related life-history traits of an invasive gammarid species: evaluation with a Laird-Gompertz model. Can J Zool Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 81: 2006-2014.
40. Platt JC (1999) Probabilistic outputs for Support Vector Machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. In: Scholkopf B, Burges CJC, Smola AJ (eds) Advances in Kernel methods-support vector learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 185-208.
41. Platvoet D, Dick JTA, MacNeil C et al (2009) Invader-invader interactions in relation to environmental heterogeneity leads to zonation of two invasive amphipods, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky) and Gammarus tigrinus. Biol Invasions 11: 2085-2093.
42. Pockl M (2009) Success of the invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus by life history traits and reproductive capacity. Biol Invasions 11: 2021-2041.
43. Pockl M, Webb BW, Sutcliffe DW (2003) Life history and reproductive capacity of Gammarus fossarum and G. roeseli (Crustacea: Amphipoda) under naturally fluctuating water temperatures: a simulation study. Freshw Biol 48: 53-66.
44. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1998) Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 1759-1765.
45. Rodda GH, Jarnevich CS, Reed RN (2011) Challenges in identifying sites climatically matched to the native ranges of animal invaders. Plos One 6(2): e14670. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0014670.
46. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ et al (2000) Biodiversity-global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770-1774.
47. Schick RS, Lindley ST (2007) Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network. J Appl Ecol 44: 1116-1126.
48. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ, Williamson RC et al (2000) New support vector algorithms. Neural Comput 12: 1207-1245.
49. Sheader M (1996) Factors influencing egg size in the gammarid amphipod Gammarus insensibilis. Mar Biol 124: 519-526.
50. Timar L, Phaneuf DJ (2009) Modeling the human-induced spread of an aquatic invasive: the case of the zebra mussel. Ecol Econ 68: 3060-3071.
51. Urban DL, Minor ES, Treml EA et al (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12: 260-273.
52. Václavík T, Meentemeyer RK (2011) Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion. Divers Distrib. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1472-4642. 2011. 00854. x.
53. van Riel MC, van der Velde G, Rajagopal S et al (2006) Trophic relationships in the Rhine food web during invasion and after establishment of the Ponto-Caspian invader Dikerogammarus villosus. Hydrobiologia 565: 39-58.
54. Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47: 501-515.
55. Wijnhoven S, van Riel MC, van der Velde G (2003) Exotic and indigenous freshwater gammarid species: physiological tolerance to water temperature in relation to ionic content of the water. Aquat Ecol 37: 151-158.