Europes top 10 invasive species: Relative importance of climatic, habitat and socio-economic factors

Ethology Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 2-3, 2014, Pages 130-151

  Gallardo, Belinda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cold tolerance; country GDP; Europe; human influence index; logistic model; port; road density

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CLIMATE EFFECT; COLD TOLERANCE; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; LOGISTICS; PORT; PROPAGULE; ROAD; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT;

EUROPE;

EID: 84899486374     PISSN: 03949370     EISSN: 18287131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2014.896417     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. AIROLDI L. & BULLERI F. 2011. Anthropogenic disturbance can determine the magnitude of opportunistic species responses on marine urban infrastructures. Plos One 6: e22985. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022985.
2. ALCARAZ C., VILAGISPERT A. & GARCí ABERTHOU E. 2005. Profiling invasive fish species: the importance of phylogeny and human use. Diversity and Distributions 11: 289-298. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00170.x.
3. ALDRIDGE D.C., ELLIOTT P. & MOGGRIDGE G.D. 2004. The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain. Biological Conservation 119: 253-261. doi:10.1016/j.bioco n.2003.11.008.
4. ARAúJO M.B., FERRI-YánEZ F., BOZINOVIC F., MARQUET P.A., VALLADARES F. & CHOWN S.L. 2013. Heat freezes niche evolution. Ecology Letters 16: 1206-1219. doi:10.1111/ele.12155.
5. ARBAIAUSKAS K., SEMENCHENKO V., GRABOWSKI M., LEUVEN R.S.E.W., PAUNOVI M., SON M.O., CSá NYI B., GUMULIAUSKAIT S., KONOPACKA A., NEHRING S., VAN DER VELDE G., VEZHNOVETZ V. & PANOV V.E. 2008. Assessment of biocontamination o f benthic macroinvertebrate communities in European inland waterways. Aquatic Invasions 3: 211-230. doi:10.3391/ai.2008.3.2.12.
6. AUSTIN M.P. 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio 42: 11-21. doi:10.1007/BF00048865.
7. BARBET-MASSIN M., JIGUET F., ALBERT C.H. & THUILLER W. 2012. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many Methods in Ecolo gy and Evolution 3: 327-338. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011. 00172.x.
8. BARBOSA N.P.U., WILSON FERNANDES G., CARNEIRO M.A.A. & JúNIOR L.A.C. 2010. Distribution of non-native invasive species and soil pr operties in proximity to paved roads and unpaved roads in a quartzitic mountainous grassland of southeastern Brazil (rupestrian fields). Biological Invasions 12: 3745-3755. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9767-y.
9. BAX N., WILLIAM SON A., AGUERO M., GONZALEZ E. & GEEVES W. 2003. Marine invasive alien species: A threat to global biodiversity. Marine Policy 27: 313-323. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X (03)00041-1.
10. BOSSEN BROEK J.M., JOHNSON L.E., PETERS B. & LODGE D.M. 2007. Forecasting the expansion of zebra mussels in the United States. Conservation Biology 21: 800-810. doi:10.1111/j.1523- 1739.2006.00614.x.
11. CAMERON E.K. & BAYNE E.M. 2009. Road age and its importance in earthworm invasion of northern boreal forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 28- 36. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2664.2008.01535.x.
12. CARLTON J. 1993. Dispersal mechanisms of the Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), pp. 677-697. In: Nalepa T.F. & Schloesser D.W., Eds. Zebra Mussels: biology, impacts, and control. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
13. COLAUTTI R.I., GRIGOROVICH I.A. & MACISAAC H.J. 2006. Propagule pressure: A null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 8: 1023-1037. doi:10.1007/s10530-005-3735-y.
14. COPP G.H., TEMPLETON M. & GOZLAN R.E. 2007. Propagule pressure and the invasion risks of nonnative freshwater fishes: A case study in England. Journal of Fish Biology 71: 148-159. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007. 01680.x.
15. CORBET G. & HARRIS S. 1991. The handbook of British mammals (3rd ed.). Oxford (UK): Blackwell Scientific Publications.
16. CRAWLEY M.J. 2005. Statistics: an introduction using R. London (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
17. DAISIE 2009. Handbook of alien species in Europe. Knoxville, TN (USA): Springer.
18. DAVIDSON A.M., JENNIONS M. & NICOTRA A.B. 2011. Do invasive species sho w higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 14: 419-431. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248. 2011.01596.x.
19. ELITH J. & LEATHWICK J. 2007. Predicting sp ecies distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Diversity and Distributions 13: 265-275. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00340.x.
20. ESSL F. DULLINGER S. RABITSCH W. HULME P.E. HULBER K. JAROSIK V. KLEINBAUER I. KRAUSMANN F. KUHN I. NENTWIG W. VILA M. GENOVESI P. GHERARDI F. DESPREZLOUSTAU M.-L. ROQUES A. PYSEK P 2011 Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 203-207. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011728108.
21. FERREIRA J.G., ANDERSEN J.H., BORJA A., BRICKER S.B., CAMP J., CARDOSO DA SILVA M., GARCéS E., HEISKANEN A.-S., HUMBORG C., IGNATIADES L., LANCELOT C., MENESGUEN A., TETT P., HOEPFFNER N. & CLAUSSEN U. 2011. Overview of eutrop hication indicators to assess environmental status within the European marine strategy framework directive. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 93: 117-131. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2011.03.014.
22. FLORY S.L. & CLAY K. 2009. Effects of roads and forest successional age on experimental plant invasions. Biological Conservation 142: 2531-2537. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.024.
23. GALLARDO B. & ALDRIDGE D.C. 2013. The 'dirty dozen': socio-economic factors amplify the invasion potential of 12 high risk aquatic invasive species in Great Britain and Ireland. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 757-766. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12079.
24. GALLARDO B., ZIERITZ A. & ALDRIDGE D.C. 2013a. Targeting and prioritisation for INS in the RINSE project area. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
25. GALLARDO B., ZUERMGASSEN P.S.E. & ALDRIDGE D. 2013b. Invasion ratcheting in the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and the ability of native and invaded ranges to predict its global distribution. Journal of Biogeography doi:10.1111/jbi.12170.
26. GILLOOLY J.F., BROWN J.H., WEST G.B., SAVAGE V.M. & CHARNOV E.L. 2001. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293: 2248-2251. doi:10.1126/scienc e.1061967.
27. GOZLAN R.E., NEWTON A.C., PY šEK P. & VILǎ M. 2009. Biological Invasions: Benefits versus risks response. Science 324: 1015-1016. doi:10.1126/science.324-1015a.
28. HAVEL J.E., LEE C.E. & VANDER ZANDEN M.J. 2005. Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes Bioscience 55: 518-525. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0518:DRFIIL]2.0.CO;2.
29. HIJMANS R.J. & GRAHAM C.H. 2006. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology 12: 2272-2281. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01256.x.
30. HOLDICH D. & PöCKL M. 2007. Invasive crustaceans in European inland waters, pp. 29-75. In: Gherardi F., Ed. Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Springer.
31. HULME P. E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 10-18. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x.
32. JOHNSON D.W. & WEBSTER D.A. 1977. Avoidance of low pH in selection of spawning sites by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34: 2210-2215. doi:10.1139/f77-293.
33. JOLY M., BERTRAND P., GBANGOU R.Y., WHITE M.-C., DUBéJ. & LAVOIE C. 2011. Paving the way for invasive species: road type and the spread of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Environmental Management 48: 514-522. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9711-7.
34. KALUZA P.,KOLZSCH A.,GASTNER M.T. &BLASIUS B. 2010. The complex network of global cargo ship movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7: 1093-1103. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0495.
35. KELLER R.P., ZU ERMGASSEN P. & ALDRIDGE D.C. 2009. Vectors and timing of freshwater invasions in Great Britain. Conservation Biology 23: 1526- 1534. doi:10.1111/j.1523- 1739.2009.01249.x.
36. LIU J., LIANG S.C., LIU F.H., WANG R.Q. & DONG M. 2005. Invasive alien plant species in China: regional distribution patterns. Diversity and Distributions 11: 341-347. doi:10.1111/j.1366- 9516.2005.00162.x.
37. LOBO J.M., JIMéNEZ-VALVERDE A. & HORTAL J. 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography 33: 103- 114. doi:10.1111/j.1600- 0587.2009.06039.x.
38. LOO S.E., MAC NALLY R., O'DOWD D.J., THOMSON J.R. & LAKE P.S. 2009. Multiple scale analysis of factors influencing the distribution of an invasive aquatic grass. Biologic al Invasions 11: 1903-1912. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9368- 1.
39. MCLAUGHLAN C., GALLARDO B. & ALDRIDGE D.C. 2013. How complete is our knowledge of the ecosystem services impacts of Europe's top 10 invasive species Acta Oecologica doi:10.1016/j.actao.2013.03.005.
40. MCMAHON R.F. 1996. The physiological ecology of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha, in North America and Europe. American Zoologist 36: 339-363.
41. MOKANY K. FERRIER S 2011 Predicting impacts of climate change on biodiversity: A role for semi-mechanistic community-level modelling Diversity and Distributions 17 374-380. doi:10.111 1/j.1472-4642.2010.00735.x.
42. MORTENSEN D.A., RAUSCHERT E.S.J., NORD A.N. & JONES B.P. 2009. Forest roads facilitate the spread of invasive plants. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2: 191-199. doi:10.1614/IPSM-08-125.1.
43. ORESKA M. & ALDRIDGE D. 2011. Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing. Biological Invasions 13: 305-319. doi:10.1007/s10530- 010-9807-7.
44. PEARCE J.L. & BOYCE M.S. 2006. Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 405-412. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01112.x.
45. PEARMAN P.B., GUISAN A., BROENNIMANN O. & RANDIN C.F. 2008. Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 149-158. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.00 5.
46. PINO J., FONT X., CARBöJ., JOVéM. & PALLARèS L. 2005. Large-scale correlates of alien plant invasion in Catalonia (NE of Spain). Biological Conservation 122: 339-350. doi:10.1016/j. biocon.2004.08.006.
47. POFF N.L. 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 391-409. doi:10.2307/1468026.
48. PYSEK P., JAROSIK V., HULME P.E., KUHN I., WILD J., ARIANOUTSOU M., BACHER S., CHIRON F., DIDZIULIS V., ESSL F., GENOVESI P., GHERARDI F., HEJDA M., KARK S., LAMBDON P.W., DESPRE Z-LOUSTAU M.-L., NENTWIG W., PERGL J., POBOLJSAJ K., RABITSCH W., ROQUES A., ROY D.B., SHIRLEY S., SOLARZ W., VILA M. & WINTER M. 2010. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proceedings of t he National Academy of Sciences 107: 12157-12162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1002314107.
49. REHFISCH M., ALLAN J. & AUSTIN G. 2010. The effect on the environment of Great Britain's naturalized Greater Canada Branta canad ensis and Egyptian Geese Alopochen aegyptiacus. BOU Proceedings-The Impacts of Non-native Species. http://www.bou.org.uk/bouproc-net/non-natives/rehfisch-etal.pdf.
50. SANDERSON E.W., JAITEH M., LEVY M.A., REDFORD K.H., WANNEBO A.V. & WOOLMER G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52: 891- 904. doi:10.1641/0006-3568 (2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2.
51. SEEBENS H., GASTNER M. & BLASIUS B.2013. The risk of marine bioinvasion caused by global shipping. Ecology Letters 16 (6): 782-790. doi:10.1111/ele.12111.
52. SIMBERLOFF D. 2013. Biological invasions: what's worth fighting and what can be won Ecological Engineering doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.08.004.
53. STEFFANI C.N. & BRANCH G.M. 2003. Growth rate, condition, and shell shape of Mytilus galloprovincialis: responses to w ave exposure. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 246: 197-209. doi:10.3354/meps246197.
54. TAYLOR B.W. & IRWIN R.E. 2004. Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. Proceedings of the Nation al Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 17725-17730. doi:10.1073/pnas.0405176101.
55. THEOHARIDES K.A. & DUKES J.S. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenou s species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytologist 176: 256-273. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02207.x.
56. TYBERGHEIN L., VERBRUGGEN H., PAULY K., TROUPIN C., MINEUR F. & DE CLERCK O. 2012. Bio- ORACLE: A global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 272-281. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00656.x.
57. VILǎ M., BASNOU C., PYšEK P., JOSEFSSON M., GENOVESI P., GOLLASCH S., NENTWIG W., OLENIN S., ROQUES A., ROY D., HULME P.E. & DAISIE PARTNERS 2010. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services A pan-European, c ross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 135-144. doi:10.1890/080083.
58. ZEREBECKI R.A. & SORTE C.J.2011. Temperature tolerance and stress proteins as mechanisms of invasive species success. Plos One 6: e14806. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014806.