Genome editing in Ustilago maydis using the CRISPR-Cas system

Fungal Genetics and Biology

Volumn 89, Issue , 2016, Pages 3-9

  Schuster, Mariana ^a   Schweizer, Gabriel ^a   Reissmann, Stefanie ^a   Kahmann, Regine ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR TERRESTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biotrophic fungus; Cas9; Plant pathogen; Reverse genetics; Ustilago maydis

Indexed keywords

CASPASE 9;

ARTICLE; CAS9 GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGAL VIRULENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; RNA EDITING; USTILAGO MAYDIS; GENE EDITING; GENETICS; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MAIZE; MICROBIOLOGY; PLASMID; PROCEDURES; REVERSE GENETICS; USTILAGO; VIRULENCE;

CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE EDITING; GENES, FUNGAL; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; PLASMIDS; REVERSE GENETICS; USTILAGO; VIRULENCE; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84960093445     PISSN: 10871845     EISSN: 10960937     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Aichinger C., et al. Identification of plant-regulated genes in Ustilago maydis by enhancer-trapping mutagenesis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2003, 270:303-314.
2. Arazoef T., et al. Tailor-made CRISPR/Cas system for highly efficient targeted gene replacement in the rice blast fungus. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 999:1-7.
3. Banuett F., Herskowitz I. Different a alleles of Ustilago maydis are necessary for maintenance of filamentous growth but not for meiosis. PNAS 1989, 86:5878-5882.
4. Bao Z., et al. Homology-integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4:585-594.
5. Barrangou R., et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 2007, 315:1709-1712.
6. Bolker M., et al. Tagging pathogenicity genes in Ustilago maydis by restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI). Mol. Gen. Genet. 1995, 248:547-552.
7. Bolker M., et al. Genetic regulation of mating and dimorphism in Ustilago maydis. Can. J. Bot.-Rev. Canadienne De Botanique 1995, 73:320-325.
8. Bon E., et al. Molecular evolution of eukaryotic genomes: hemiascomycetous yeast spliceosomal introns. Nucl. Acids Res. 2003, 31:1121-1135.
9. Brachmann A., et al. Identification of genes in the bW/bE regulatory cascade in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 42:1047-1063.
10. Cho S.W., et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. 2014, 24:132-141.
11. Cong L., et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013, 339:819-823.
12. DiCarlo J.E., et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucl. Acids Res. 2013, 41:4336-4343.
13. Doudna J.A., Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014, 346:1258096-1258099.
14. Fu Y.F., et al. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:279-284.
15. Gibson D.G., et al. Chemical synthesis of the mouse mitochondrial genome. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:901-903.
16. Gillissen B., et al. A two-component regulatory system for self/non-self recognition in Ustilago maydis. Cell 1992, 68:647-657.
17. Goomer R., Kunkel G. The transcriptional start site for a human U6 small nuclear RNA gene is dictated by a compound promoter element consisting of the PSE and the TATA box. Nucl. Acids Res. 1992, 20:4903-4912.
18. Guthrie C., Patterson B. Spliceosomal snRNAs. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988, 22:387-419.
19. Heigwer F., et al. E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:122-123.
20. Hendel A., et al. Quantifying on- and off-target genome editing. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33:132-140.
21. Hoffman C.S., Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 1987, 57:267-272.
22. Holliday R. Ustilago maydis. Handbook of Genetics 1974, 575-595. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
23. Holloman W.K., et al. The homologous recombination system of Ustilago maydis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 45:S31-S39.
24. Horwitz A.A., et al. Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic alleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Syst. 2015, 1:88-96.
25. Jacobs J.Z., et al. Implementation of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:5344-5349.
26. Jao L.E., et al. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 2013, 110:13904-13909.
27. Ji L., et al. A Simplified and efficient method for transformation and gene tagging of Ustilago maydis using frozen cells. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47:279-287.
28. Jia H., Wang N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS One 2014, 9:e93806.
29. Jiang W., et al. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:233-239.
30. Jinek M., et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012, 337:816-821.
31. Kämper J. A PCR-based system for highly efficient generation of gene replacement mutants in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2004, 271:103-110.
32. Kämper J., et al. Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature 2006, 444:97-101.
33. Kämper J., et al. Multiallelic recognition: nonself-dependent dimerization of the bE and bW homeodomain proteins in Ustilago maydis. Cell 1995, 81:73-83.
34. Khrunyk Y., et al. The use of FLP-mediated recombination for the functional analysis of an effector gene family in the biotrophic smut fungus Ustilago maydis. New Phytologist 2010, 187:957-968.
35. Kim D., et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat. Methods 2015, 12:237-243.
36. Kim S., et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 2014, 24:1012-1019.
37. Kim Y., et al. TALENs and ZFNs are associated with different mutation signatures. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:185.
38. Ladendorf O., et al. Heterologous transposition in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2003, 269:395-405.
39. Liu R., et al. Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Discov. 2015, 1:1-11.
40. Mali P., et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 2013, 339:823-826.
41. Matsu-ura T., et al. Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2015, 2:1-7.
42. Muller P., et al. Mating and pathogenic development of the smut fungus Ustilago maydis are regulated by one mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Eukaryot. Cell 2003, 2:1187-1199.
43. Nissim L., et al. Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells. Mol. Cell 2014, 54:698-710.
44. Niu Y., et al. Generation of gene-modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos. Cell 2014, 156:836-843.
45. Nødvig C.S., et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genetic Engineering of Filamentous Fungi. PLoS One 2015, 10:e0133085.
46. Peng D., et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated single-gene and gene family disruption in Trypanosoma cruzi. mBio 2015, 6:e02097.
47. Sakuma T., et al. Multiplex genome engineering in human cells using all-in-one CRISPR/Cas9 vector system. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:1-6.
48. Sander J.D., Joung J.K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:347-355.
49. Schilling L., et al. Virulence of the maize smut Ustilago maydis is shaped by organ-specific effectors. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014, 15:780-789.
50. Schirawski J., et al. Pathogenicity determinants in smut fungi revealed by genome comparison. Science 2010, 330:1546-1548.
51. Schulz B., et al. The b alleles of U. maydis, whose combinations program pathogenic development, code for polypeptides containing a homeodomain-related motif. Cell 1990, 60:295-306.
52. Spellig T., et al. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a new vital marker in the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996, 252:503-509.
53. Stovicek V., et al. CRISPR-Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2015, 2:13-22.
54. Tsukuda T., et al. Isolation and characterization of an autonomously replicating sequence from Ustilago maydis. Mol. Cell Biol. 1988, 8:3703-3709.
55. Upadhyay S.K., et al. RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat. G3 (Bethesda) 2013, 3:2233-2238.
56. Vyas V.K., et al. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1:e1500248.
57. Wahl R., et al. The Ustilago maydis b mating type locus controls hyphal proliferation and expression of secreted virulence factors in planta. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75:208-220.
58. Weinzierl G., et al. Regulation of cell separation in the dimorphic fungus Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 45:219-231.
59. Xing H.L., et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14:327.
60. Zarnack K., et al. Tetracycline-regulated gene expression in the pathogen Ustilago maydis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2006, 43:727-738.