Molecular Recognition by Templated Folding of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Toto, Angelo ^a   Camilloni, Carlo ^b   Giri, Rajanish ^a,c   Brunori, Maurizio ^a   Vendruscolo, Michele ^b   Gianni, Stefano ^a,b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MANDI   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEIN; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN C MYB;

CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CARRIER PROTEINS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-MYB; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84959441550     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep21994     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Dyson, H. J. Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins. Quart. Rev. Biophysics 44, 467-518 (2011).
2. Tompa, P. Unstructural biology coming of age. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 419-425 (2011).
3. Uversky, V. N. & Dunker, A. K. Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 1231-1264 (2010).
4. Wright, P. E. & Dyson, H. J. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 293 (1999).
5. Tompa, P. & Fuxreiter, M. Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Bioch. Sci 33, 2-8 (2008).
6. Tompa, P., Szász, C. & Buday, L. Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Bioch. Sci 30, 484-489 (2005).
7. Uversky, V. N. A decade and a half of protein intrinsic disorder: biology still waits for physics. Protein Sci 22, 693-724 (2013).
8. Wright, P. E. & Dyson, H. J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 18-29 (2015).
9. Xue, B. et al. Structural disorder in viral proteins. Chem Rev 114, 6880-6911 (204).
10. Habchi, J., Tompa, P., Longhi, S. & Uversky, V. N. Introducing protein intrinsic disorder. Chem. Rev. 114, 6561-6588 (2014).
11. Jemth, P., Mu, X., Engström, A. & Dogan, J. A frustrated binding interface for intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 5528-5533 (2014).
12. Dogan, J., Mu, X., Engström, A. & Jemth, P. The transition state structure for coupled binding and folding of disordered protein domains. Sci. Rep. 3, 2076 (2013).
13. Giri, R., Morrone, A., Toto, A., Brunori, M. & Gianni, S. Structure of the transition state for the binding of c-Myb and KIX highlights an unexpected order for a disordered system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14942-14947 (2013).
14. Hill, S. A., Kwa, L. G., Shammas, S. L., Lee, J. C. & J., C. Mechanism of assembly of the non-covalent spectrin tetramerization domain from intrinsically disordered partners. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 21-35 (2014).
15. Rogers, J. M. et al. Interplay between partner and ligand facilitates the folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1520-1525 (2014).
16. Iešmantavičius, V., Dogan, J., Jemth, P., Teilum, K. & Kjaergaard, M. Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 53, 1548-1551 (2014).
17. Arai, M., Sugase, K., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9614-9619 (2015).
18. Fersht, A. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science. Freeman W.H. and Co New York (1999).
19. Fersht, A. R. Optimization of rates of protein folding: the nucleation-condensation mechanism and its implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 21, 10869-10873 (1995).
20. Fersht, A. R. Relationship of Leffler (Bronsted) alpha values and protein folding Phi values to position of transition-state structures on reaction coordinates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14338-14342 (2004).
21. Itzhaki, L. S., Otzen, D. E. & Fersht, A. R. The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analysed by protein engineering methods: evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 260-288 (1995).
22. Vendruscolo, M., Paci, E., Dobson, C. M. & Karplus, M. Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature 409, 641-645 (2001).
23. Naganathan, A. N. & Munoz, V. Insights into protein folding mechanisms from large scale analysis of mutational effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8611-8616 (2010).
24. Radhakrishnan, I. et al. Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator:coactivator interactions. Cell 91, 741-752 (1997).
25. Goto, N. K., Zor, T., Martinez-Yamout, M., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Cooperativity in transcription factor binding to the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). The mixed lineage leukemia protein (MLL) activation domain binds to an allosteric site on the KIX domain. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 43168-43174 (2002).
26. Zor, T., De Guzman, R. N., Dyson, H. J. & Wright, P. E. Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of c-Myb. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 521-534 (2004).
27. Gianni, S., Morrone, A., Giri, R. & Brunori, M. A folding-after-binding mechanism describes the recognition between the transactivation domain of c-Myb and the KIX domain of the CREB-binding protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 428, 205-209 (2012).
28. Brüschweiler, S. et al. Direct observation of the dynamic process underlying allosteric signal transmission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3063-3068 (2009).
29. Brüschweiler, S., Konrat, R. & Tollinger, M. Allosteric communication in the KIX domain proceeds through dynamic repacking of the hydrophobic core. ACS Chem Biol 8, 1600-1610 (2013).
30. Palazzesi, F., Barducci, A., Tollinger, M. & Parrinello, M. The allosteric communication pathways in KIX domain of CBP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14237-14242 (2013).
31. Wang, N., Lodge, J. M., Fierke, C. A. & Mapp, A. K. Dissecting allosteric effects of activator-coactivator complexes using a covalent small molecule ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12061-12066 (2014).
32. Law, S. M., Gagnon, J. K., Mapp, A. K. & Brooks, C. L. r. Prepaying the entropic cost for allosteric regulation in KIX. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12067-12072 (2014).
33. Shammas, S. L., A.J., T. & Clarke, J. Allostery within a transcription coactivator is predominantly mediated through dissociation rate constants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12055-12060 (2014).
34. Toto, A., Giri, R., Brunori, M. & Gianni, S. The mechanism of binding of the KIX domain to the mixed lineage leukemia protein and its allosteric role in the recognition of c-Myb. Protein Sci. 23, 962-969 (2014).
35. Leffler, J. E. Parameters for the description of transition states. Science 117, 340-341 (1953).
36. Hammond, G. S. A correlation of reaction rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 334-339 (1955).
37. Fersht, A. R., Matouschek, A. & Serrano, L. The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 224, 771-782, doi: 0022-2836(92)90561-W [pii] (1992).
38. Fersht, A. R. & Sato, S. Phi-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7976-7981 (2004).
39. Cho, J.-H. & Raleigh, D. P. Denatured state effects and the origin of nonclassical phi values in protein folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16492-16493 (2006).
40. Sanchez, I. E. & Kiefhaber, T. Origin of unusual phi-values in protein folding: evidence against specific nucleation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 334, 1077-1085 (2003).
41. De los Rios, M. A. et al. On the precision of experimentally determined protein folding rates and phi-values. Protein Sci 15, 553-563 (2006).
42. Bachmann, A., Wildemann, D., Praetorius, F., Fischer, G. & Kiefhaber, T. Mapping backbone and side-chain interactions in the transition state of a coupled protein folding and binding reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3952-3957 (2011).
43. Richards, F. M. & Vithayathil, P. J. The preparation of subtilisn-modified ribonuclease and the separation of the peptide and protein components. J. Biol. Chem. 234, 1459-1465 (1959).
44. Tribello, G. A., Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Camilloni, C. & Bussi, G. PLUMED2: New feathers for an old bird. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 604-613 (2014).
45. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).