Sex chromosome dosage compensation in heliconius butterflies: Global yet still incomplete?

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 2545-2559

  Walters, James R ^a   Hardcastle, Thomas J ^b   Jiggins, Chris D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Butterfly; Dosage compensation; Heliconius; Lepidoptera; Sex chromosomes

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BUTTERFLY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; INSECT CHROMOSOME; MALE; SEX CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CHROMOSOMES, INSECT; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; FEMALE; MALE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEX CHROMOSOMES;

EID: 84959308281     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv156     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ahola V, et al 2014. The Glanville fritillary genome retains an ancientkar-yotype and reveals selective chromosomalfusions in Lepidoptera. Nat Commun. 5:1-9.
2. Allen SL, Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF 2013. The Genomic distribution of sex-biased genes in Drosophila serrata: X chromosome demasculinization, feminization, and hyperexpression in both sexes. Genome Biol Evol. 5:1986-1994.
3. Arunkumar KP, Mita K, Nagaraju J. 2009. The silkworm Z chromosome is enriched in testis-specific genes. Genetics 182:493-501.
4. Bachtrog D. 2006. A dynamic view of sex chromosome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 16:578-585.
5. Bachtrog D. 2013. Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration. Nat Rev Genet. 14:113-124.
6. Bachtrog D, et al 2011. Are all sex chromosomes created equal? Trends Genet 27:350-357.
7. Bates D, Machler M, bolker B, Walker S. 2014. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv:1406.5823.
8. Birchler JA, Bhadra U, Bhadra MP, Auger DL 2001. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Dev Biol. 234:275-288.
9. Briscoe AD, et al 2013. Female behaviour drives expression and evolution of gustatory receptors in butterflies. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003620.
10. Bullard JH, Purdom E, Hansen KD, Dudoit S. 2010. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 11:94.
11. Catalán A, Hutter S, Parsch J. 2012. Population and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster brain gene expression. BMC Genomics 13:654.
12. Charlesworth B. 1978. Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 75:5618-5622.
13. Charlesworth B. 1996. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr Biol. 6:149-162.
14. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 2000. The degeneration of Y chromosomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 355:1563-1572.
15. Chen X, Zhang J. 2015. No X-chromosome dosage compensation in human proteomes. Mol Biol Evol. 32:1456-1460.
16. Connallon T, Clark AG 2010. Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression. Evolution 64:3417-3442.
17. Deng X, et al 2011. Evidence for compensatory upregulation of expressed X-linked genes in mammals, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 43:1179-1185.
18. Disteche CM. 2012. Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet. 46:537-560.
19. Dunlap-Pianka H, Boggs CL, Gilbert LE 1977. Ovarian dynamics in heliconiine butterflies: programmed senescence versus eternal youth. Science 197:487-490.
20. Ellegren H, et al 2007. Faced with inequality: chicken do not have a general dosage compensation of sex-linked genes. BMC Biol. 5:40.
21. Ellegren H, Parsch J. 2007. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sexbiased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 8:689-698.
22. Ferrari F, Alekseyenko AA, Park PJ, Kuroda MI 2014. Transcriptional control of a whole chromosome: emerging models for dosage compensation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 21:118-125.
23. Gupta V, et al 2006. Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation. J Biol. 5:3.
24. Hamada FN. 2005. Global regulation of X chromosomal genes by the MSL complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 9:2289-2294.
25. Hardcastle TJ. 2014. Generalised empirical Bayesian methods for discovery of differential data in high-throughput biology. bioRxiv.
26. Hardcastle TJ, Kelly KA 2010. baySeq: empirical Bayesian methods for identifying differential expression in sequence count data. BMC Bioinformatics 11:422.
27. Hardcastle TJ, Kelly KA, Baulcombe DC 2012. Identifying small interfering RNA loci from high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28:457-463.
28. Harrison PW, et al 2015. Sexual selection drives evolution and rapid turnover of male gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112, 4393-4398.
29. Harrison PW, Mank JE, Wedell N. 2012. Incomplete sex chromosome dosage compensation in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella, based on de novo transcriptome assembly. Genome Biol Evol. 4:1118-1126.
30. Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487:94-98.
31. Itoh Y, et al 2007. Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. J Biol. 6:2.
32. Itoh Y, et al 2010. Sex bias and dosage compensation in the zebra finch versus chicken genomes: general and specialized patterns among birds. Genome Res. 20:512-518.
33. Jue NK, et al 2013. Determination of dosage compensation of themammalian X chromosome by RNA-seq is dependent on analytical approach. BMC Genomics 14:1-1.
34. Julien P, et al 2012. Mechanisms and evolutionary patterns of mammalian and avian dosage compensation. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001328.
35. Kaiser VB, Ellegren H. 2006. Nonrandom distribution of genes with sex-biased expression in the chicken genome. Evolution 60:1945-1951.
36. Kawahara AY, Breinholt JW 2014. Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths. Proc R Soc B Lond Biol Sci. 281:20140970-20140970.
37. Kharchenko PV, Xi R, Park PJ 2011. Correspondence. Nat Genet. 43:1167-1169.
38. Khil PP, Smirnova NA, Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD. 2004. The mouse X chromosome is enriched for sex-biased genes not subject to selection by meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Nat Genet. 36:642-646.
39. Kiuchi T, et al 2014. A single female-specific piRNA is the primary determiner of sex in the silkworm. Nature 509:633-636.
40. Langmead B, Salzberg SL 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9:357-359.
41. Li B, Dewey CN 2011. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12:323.
42. Lin F, Xing K, Zhang J, He X. 2012. Expression reduction in mammalian X chromosome evolution refutes Ohno's hypothesis of dosage compensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109:11752-11757.
43. Lin H, et al 2011. Relative overexpression of X-linked genes in mouse embryonic stem cells is consistent with Ohno's hypothesis. Nat Genet. 43:1169-1170.
44. Lukhtanov VA. 2000. Sex chromatin and sex chromosome systems in nonditrysian Lepidoptera (Insecta). J Zool Syst Evol Res. 38:73-79.
45. Mahajan S, Bachtrog D. 2015. Partial dosage compensation in Strepsiptera, a sister group of beetles. Genome Biol Evol. 7:591-600.
46. Mank JE. 2009. The W, X, Y and Z of sex-chromosome dosage compensation. Trends Genet. 25:226-233.
47. Mank JE. 2013. Sex chromosome dosage compensation: definitely not for everyone. Trends Genet. 29:677-683.
48. Mank JE, Ellegren H. 2009. All dosage compensation is local: gene-by-gene regulation of sex-biased expression on the chicken Z chromosome. Heredity 102:312-320.
49. Mank JE, Hosken DJ, Wedell N. 2011. Some inconvenient truths about sex chromosome dosage compensation and the potential role of sexual conflict. Evolution 65:2133-2144.
50. Martin SH, et al 2013. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 23:1817-1828.
51. Meisel RP, Malone JH, Clark AG 2012. Disentangling the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage. Genome Res. 22:1255-1265.
52. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. 2008. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 5:621-628.
53. Naurin S, Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D. 2010. Why does dosage compensation differ between XY and ZW taxa? Trends Genet 26:15-20.
54. Naurin S, Hansson B, Hasselquist D, Kim Y-H, Bensch S. 2011. The sex-biased brain: sexual dimorphism in gene expression in two species of songbirds. BMC Genomics 12:37.
55. Nguyen DK, Disteche CM 2006. Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals. Nat Genet. 38:47-53.
56. Nozawa M, Fukuda N, Ikeo K, Gojobori T. 2014. Tissue- and stage-dependent dosage compensation on the neo-X chromosome in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Mol Biol Evol. 31:614-624.
57. Ohno S. 1967. Sex chromosomes and sex-linked genes. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
58. Parsch J, Ellegren H. 2013. The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 14:83-87.
59. Pessia E, Engelstädter J, Marais GAB. 2013. The evolution of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: the demise of Ohno's hypothesis? Cell Mol Life Sci 71:1383-1394.
60. Prince EG, Kirkland D, Demuth JP 2010. Hyperexpression of the X chromosome in both sexes results in extensive female bias of X-linked genes in the flour beetle. Genome Biol Evol. 2:336-346.
61. Pringle EG, et al 2007. Synteny and chromosome evolution in the Lepidoptera: evidence from mapping in Heliconius melpomene. Genetics 177:417-426.
62. Quek SP, et al 2010. Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:7365-7370.
63. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.
64. Regier JC, et al 2013. A large-scale, higher-level, molecular phylogenetic study of the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). PLoS One 8:e58568.
65. Reinke V, et al 2000. A global profile of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Mol Cell. 6:605-616.
66. Rice W. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
67. Sahara K, Yoshido A, Traut W. 2011. Sex chromosome evolution in moths and butterflies. Chromosome Res. 20:83-94.
68. Smith G, Chen YR, Blissard GW, Briscoe AD 2014. Complete dosage compensation and sex-biased gene expression in the moth Manduca sexta. Genome Biol Evol. 6:526-537.
69. Straub T, Becker PB 2011. Transcription modulation chromosome-wide: universal features and principles of dosage compensation in worms and flies. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 21:147-153.
70. Suetsugu Y, et al 2013. Large scale full-length cDNA sequencing reveals a unique genomic landscape in a Lepidopteran model insect, Bombyx mori. G3 3:1481-1492.
71. Traut W, Marec F. 1996. Sex chromatin in Lepidoptera. Q Rev Biol. 71:239-256.
72. Veitia RA, Veyrunes F, Bottani S, Birchler JA 2015. X chromosome inactivation and active X upregulation in therian mammals: facts, questions, and hypotheses. J Mol Cell Biol. 7:2-11.
73. Vicoso B, Bachtrog D. 2009. Progress and prospects toward our understanding of the evolution of dosage compensation. Chromosome Res. 17:585-602.
74. Vicoso B, Bachtrog D. 2011. Lack of global dosage compensation in Schistosoma mansoni, a female-heterogametic parasite. Genome Biol Evol. 3:230-235.
75. Vicoso B, Emerson JJ, Zektser Y, Mahajan S, Bachtrog D. 2013. Comparative sex chromosome genomics in snakes: differentiation, evolutionary strata, and lack of global dosage compensation. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001643
76. Vicoso B, Kaiser VB, Bachtrog D. 2013. Sex-biased gene expression at homomorphic sex chromosomes in emus and its implication for sex chromosome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110:6453-6458.
77. Walters JR, Hardcastle TJ 2011. Getting a full dose? Reconsidering sex chromosome dosage compensation in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Genome Biol Evol. 3:491-504.
78. Xia Q, et al 2007. Microarray-based gene expression profiles in multiple tissues of the domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori. Genome Biol. 8:R162.
79. Xiong Y, et al 2010. RNA sequencing shows no dosage compensation of the active X-chromosome. Nat Genet. 42:1043-1047.
80. Yang X, et al 2006. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res. 16:995-1004.
81. Yue Z, et al 2013. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat Genet. 45:220-225.
82. Zha X, et al 2009. Dosage analysis of Z chromosome genes using microarray in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 39:315-321.