Phylogenomics provides strong evidence for relationships of butterflies and moths

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1788, 2014, Pages

  Kawahara, Akito Y ^a   Breinholt, Jesse W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Butterfly; Lepidoptera; Moth; Orthologue; Phylogeny; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CLADISTICS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; MOTH; NEW RECORD; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMAL; BUTTERFLY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; INSECT GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOTH; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS; GENOME, INSECT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOTHS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84903120639     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0970     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Grimaldi D, Engel MS. 2005 Evolution of the insects, p. 772. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. van Nieukerken EJ et al. 2011 Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In Z-Q Zhang (ed), animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148, 212-221.
3. Powell JA, Mitter C, Farrell BD. 1998 Evolution of larval food preferences in Lepidoptera. In Lepidoptera: moths and butterflies 1 Handbuch der Zoologie/handbook of zoology IV/35 (ed. NP Kristensen), pp. 403-422. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
4. Wahlberg N, Wheat CW, Peña C. 2013 Timing and patterns in the taxonomic diversification of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths). PLoS ONE 8, e80875. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080875)
5. Winkler IS, Mitter C. 2008 The phylogenetic dimension of insect/plant interactions: a summary of recent evidence. In Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects (ed. KJ Tilmon), pp. 240-263. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Kristensen NP, Skalski AW. 1998 Phylogeny and palaeontology. In Lepidoptera: moths and butterflies 1 Handbuch der Zoologie/handbook of zoology IV/35 (ed. NP Kristensen), pp. 7-25. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
7. Roe AD et al. 2009 Evolutionary framework for Lepidoptera model systems. In Genetics and molecular biology of Lepidoptera (eds M Goldsmith & F Marec), pp. 1-24. Gainesville, FL: CRC Press.
8. Trautwein MD, Wiegmann BM, Beutel R, Kjer KM, Yeates DK. 2012 Advances in insect phylogeny at the dawn of the postgenomic era. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57, 449-468. (doi:10.1146/annurev-ento- 120710-100538)
9. Regier JC et al. 2009 Toward reconstructing the evolution of advanced moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia): an initial molecular study. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 280. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148- 9-280)
10. Cho S et al. 2011 Can deliberately incomplete gene sample augmentation improve a phylogeny estimate for the advanced moths and butterflies (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera)? Syst. Biol. 60, 782-796. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr079)
11. Mutanen M, Wahlberg N, Kaila L. 2010 Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2839-2848. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2010.0392)
12. Regier JC et al. 2013 A large-scale, higher-level, molecular phylogenetic study of the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). PLoS ONE 8, e58568. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058568)
13. Minet J. 1991 Tentative reconstruction of the ditrysian phylogeny (Lepidoptera, Glossata). Entomol. Scand. 22, 69-95. (doi:10.1163/ 187631291X00327)
14. DeJong R, VaneWright RI, Ackery PR. 1996 The higher classification of butterflies (Lepidoptera): problems and prospects. Entomol. Scand. 27, 65-101. (doi:10.1163/187631296X00205)
15. Heikkilä M, Kaila L, Mutanen M, Peña C, Wahlberg N. 2012 Cretaceous origin and repeated tertiary diversification of the redefined butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1093-1099. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2011.1430)
16. McCormack JE, Hird SM, Zellmer AJ, Carstens BC, Brumfield RT. 2013 Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 66, 526-538. (doi:10.1016/j. ympev.2011.12.007)
17. Metzker ML. 2010 Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies: the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 31-46. (doi:10.1038/nrg2626)
18. Koboldt DC, Steinberg KM, Larson DE, Wilson RK, Mardis ER. 2013 The next-generation sequencing revolution and its impact on genomics. Cell 155, 27-38. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.006)
19. Li H, Homer N. 2010 A survey of sequence alignment algorithms for next-generation sequencing. Brief. Bioinform. 11, 473-483. (doi:10. 1093/bib/bbq015)
20. Bazinet AL, Cummings MP, Mitter K, Mitter C. 2013 Can RNA-Seq resolve the rapid radiation of advanced moths and butterflies (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera: Apoditrysia)? An exploratory study. PLoS ONE 8, e82615. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0082615)
21. Breinholt JW, Kawahara AY. 2013 Phylotranscriptomics: saturated third codon positions radically influence the estimation of trees based on next-gen data. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 2082-2092. (doi:10.1093/gbe/evt157)
22. Surget-Groba Y, Montoya-Burgos JI. 2010 Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from next-generation sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1432-1440. (doi:10.1101/gr.103846.109)
23. Luo R et al. 2012 SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1, 18. (doi:10.1186/2047- 217X-1-18)
24. Li WZ, Godzik A. 2006 Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658-1659. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158)
25. Waterhouse RM, Tegenfeldt F, Li J, Zdobnov EM, Kriventseva EV. 2013 OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D358-D365. (doi:10.1093/nar/ gks1116)
26. Xia QY et al. 2004 A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori). Science 306, 1937-1940. (doi:10.1126/science. 1102210)
27. Zhan S, Merlin C, Boore JL, Reppert SM. 2011 The monarch butterfly genome yields insights into longdistance migration. Cell 147, 1171-1185. (doi:10. 1016/j.cell.2011.09.052)
28. Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012 Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487, 94-98. (doi:10.1038/nature11041)
29. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A. 2009 HaMStR: profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 157. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-157)
30. You MS et al. 2013 A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat. Genet. 45, 220-225. (doi:10.1038/ng.2524)
31. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Telford MJ. 2010 TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W7-W13. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkq291)
32. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013 MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772-780. (doi:10.1093/molbev/ mst010)
33. Kück P, Meusemann K, Dambach J, Thormann B, von Reumont BM, Wagele JW, Misof B. 2010 Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees. Front. Zool. 7, 1-12. (doi:10.1186/1742-9994-7-10)
34. Misof B, Misof K. 2009 A Monte Carlo approach successfully identifies randomness in multiple sequence alignments: a more objective means of data exclusion. Syst. Biol. 58, 21-34. (doi:10.1093/ sysbio/syp006)
35. Kück P. 2009 ALICUT: a Perlscript which cuts ALISCORE identified RSS. Department of Bioinformatics, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK), Bonn, Germany, version 2.3.
36. Stamatakis A. 2006 RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688-2690. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/ btl446)
37. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S. 2012 PARTITIONFINDER: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695-1701. (doi:10. 1093/molbev/mss020)
38. Kawahara AY, Breinholt JB, Ponce FV, Haxaire J, Xiao L, Lamarre GPA, Rubinoff D, Kitching IJ. 2013 Evolution of Manduca sexta hornworms and relatives: biogeographical analysis reveals an ancestral diversification in Central America. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 68, 381-386. (doi:10.1016/j. ympev.2013.04.017)
39. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. 2010 How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J. Comput. Biol. 17, 337-354. (doi:10.1089/cmb.2009.0179)
40. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999 Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1114-1116. (doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals. molbev.a026201)
41. Anisimova M, Gascuel O. 2006 Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: a fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst. Biol. 55, 539-552. (doi:10.1080/10635150600755453)
42. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A. 1997 Likelihoodmapping: a simple method to visualize phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6815-6819. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.94.13.6815)
43. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A. 2002 TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18, 502-504. (doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/18.3.502)
44. Anisimova M, Gil M, Dufayard JF, Dessimoz C, Gascuel O. 2011 Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power, and robustness of fast likelihood-based approximation schemes. Syst. Biol. 60, 685-699. (doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr041)
45. Scott JA. 1985 The phylogeny of butterflies (Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). J. Res. Lepid. 23, 241-281.
46. Scott JA, Wright DM. 1990 Butterfly phylogeny and fossils. In Butterflies of Europe, vol. 2 (ed. O Kudrna), pp. 152-208. Wiesbaden, Germany: Aula.
47. Scoble MJ. 1992 The Lepidoptera. Form, function and diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Ackery PR, de Jong R, Vane-Wright RI. 1998 The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperoidea and Papilionoidea. In Lepidoptera: moths and butterflies 1 Handbuch der Zoologie/handbook of zoology IV/35 (ed. NP Kristensen), pp. 263-300. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
49. Weller SJ, Pashley DP. 1995 In search of butterfly origins. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4, 235-246. (doi:10. 1006/mpev.1995.1022)
50. Scoble MJ. 1986 The structure and affinities of the Hedyloidea: a new concept of butterflies. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Entomol.) 53, 251-286.
51. Minet J. 1983 Etude morphologique et phylogénétique des organes tympaniques des Pyraloidea. 1 - généralités et homologies. (Lep. Glossata). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 19, 175-207.
52. Kaila L. 2004 Phylogeny of the superfamily Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia): an exemplar approach. Cladistics 20, 303-340. (doi:10.1111/j. 1096-0031.2004.00027.x)
53. Zwick A, Regier JC, Mitter C, Cummings MP. 2011 Increased gene sampling yields robust support for higher-level clades within Bombycoidea (Lepidoptera). Syst. Entomol. 36, 31-43. (doi:10. 1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00543.x)
54. Minet J. 1994 The Bombycoidea: phylogeny and higher classification (Lepidoptera, Glossata). Entomol. Scand. 25, 63-88. (doi:10.1163/ 187631294X00045)
55. Huan-Na C, Yu-Zhou D, Bao-Ping Z. 2012 Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genomes of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int. J. Biol. Sci. 8, 561-579. (doi:10.7150/ijbs.3540)
56. Kim MJ, Kang AR, Jeong HC, Kim KG, Kim I. 2011 Reconstructing intraordinal relationships in Lepidoptera using mitochondrial genome data with the description of two newly sequenced lycaenids, Spindasis takanonis and Protantigius superans (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 61, 436-445. (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011. 07.013)
57. Brock JP. 1971 Contribution towards an understanding of morphology and phylogeny of Ditrysian-Lepidoptera. J. Nat. Hist. 5, 29-102. (doi:10.1080/00222937100770031)
58. Labandeira CC. 2005 Fossil history and evolutionary ecology of Diptera and their associations with plants. In The evolutionary biology of flies (eds D Yeates, BM Wiegmann), pp. 217-273. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
59. Wiegmann BM et al. 2011 Episodic radiations in the fly tree of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5690-5695. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1012675108)
60. Farrell BD. 1998 'Inordinate fondness' explained: why are there so many beetles? Science 281, 555-559. (doi:10.1126/science.281.5376.555)
61. Sohn JC, Labandeira CC, Davis DR, Mitter C. 2012 An annotated catalog of fossil and subfossil Lepidoptera (Insecta: Holometabola) of the world. Zootaxa 3286, 1-132.
62. Menken SBJ, Boomsma JJ, van Nieukerken EJ. 2010 Large-scale evolutionary patterns of host plant associations in the Lepidoptera. Evolution 64, 1098-1119. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00889.x)
63. Barber JR, Kawahara AY. 2013 Hawkmoths produce anti-bat ultrasound. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130161. (doi:10. 1098/rsbl.2013.0161)
64. Connor WE, Corcoran AJ. 2012 Sound strategies: the 65-million-year-old battle between bats and insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57, 21-39. (doi:10.1146/ annurev-ento-121510-133537)
65. Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Conner WE. 2009 Tiger moth jams bat sonar. Science 325, 325-327. (doi:10. 1126/science.1174096)