Shaping the future of nanomedicine: Anisotropy in polymeric nanoparticle design

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 191-207

  Meyer, Randall A ^a   Green, Jordan J ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; SPHERES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANISOTROPIC NANOPARTICLES; BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLES; SPHERICAL NANOPARTICLES; STATE-OF-THE ART FABRICATIONS;

POLYMERS;

ANISOTROPIC POLYMERIC NANOPARTICLE; COPOLYMER; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; MACROGOL; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; POLYGLACTIN; POLYLACTIC ACID; POLYMER; POLYSTYRENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANISOTROPY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ERYTHROCYTE SHAPE; MICROFLUIDICS; NANOENGINEERING; NANOFABRICATION; NANOMEDICINE; NANOPHARMACEUTICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE SEPARATION; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; ANISOTROPY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MICROFLUIDICS; NANOMEDICINE; NANOPARTICLES; POLYMERS;

EID: 84959225132     PISSN: 19395116     EISSN: 19390041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1348     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006, 58:1456-1459.
2. Cheng R, Meng F, Deng C, Klok H-A, Zhong Z. Dual and multi-stimuli responsive polymeric nanoparticles for programmed site-specific drug delivery. Biomaterials 2013, 34:3647-3657.
3. Brannon-Peppas L, Blanchette JO. Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012, 64:206-212.
4. Colson YL, Grinstaff MW. Biologically responsive polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Adv Mater 2012, 24:3878-3886.
5. Shokeen M, Pressly ED, Hagooly A, Zheleznyak A, Ramos N, Fiamengo AL, Welch MJ, Hawker CJ, Anderson CJ. Evaluation of multivalent, functional polymeric nanoparticles for imaging applications. ACS Nano 2011, 5:738-747.
6. Vollrath A, Schubert S, Schubert US. Fluorescence imaging of cancer tissue based on metal-free polymeric nanoparticles-a review. J Mater Chem B 2013, 1:1994-2007.
7. Choi KY, Liu G, Lee S, Chen X. Theranostic nanoplatforms for simultaneous cancer imaging and therapy: current approaches and future perspectives. Nanoscale 2012, 4:330-342.
8. Rao JP, Geckeler KE. Polymer nanoparticles: preparation techniques and size-control parameters. Prog Polym Sci 2011, 36:887-913.
9. Bally F, Garg DK, Serra CA, Hoarau Y, Anton N, Brochon C, Parida D, Vandamme T, Hadziioannou G. Improved size-tunable preparation of polymeric nanoparticles by microfluidic nanoprecipitation. Polymer 2012, 53:5045-5051.
10. Chen S, Cheng SX, Zhuo RX. Self-assembly strategy for the preparation of polymer-based nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11:576-589.
11. Lerch S, Dass M, Musyanovych A, Landfester K, Mailänder V. Polymeric nanoparticles of different sizes overcome the cell membrane barrier. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013, 84:265-274.
12. Walkey CD, Olsen JB, Guo H, Emili A, Chan WC. Nanoparticle size and surface chemistry determine serum protein adsorption and macrophage uptake. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:2139-2147.
13. Kulkarni SA, Feng S-S. Effects of particle size and surface modification on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pharm Res 2013, 30:2512-2522.
14. Tao L, Hu W, Liu Y, Huang G, Sumer BD, Gao J. Shape-specific polymeric nanomedicine: emerging opportunities and challenges. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2011, 236:20-29.
15. Falchi F, Caporuscio F, Recanatini M. Structure-based design of small-molecule protein-protein interaction modulators: the story so far. Future Med Chem 2014, 6:343-357.
16. Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 2010, 463:485-492.
17. Bidan CM, Kommareddy KP, Rumpler M, Kollmannsberger P, Fratzl P, Dunlop JW. Geometry as a factor for tissue growth: towards shape optimization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater 2013, 2:186-194.
18. Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S. Particle shape: a new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J Control Release 2007, 121:3-9.
19. Murphy CJ, Sau TK, Gole AM, Orendorff CJ, Gao J, Gou L, Hunyadi SE, Li T. Anisotropic metal nanoparticles: synthesis, assembly, and optical applications. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109:13857-13870.
20. Ho C, Keller A, Odell J, Ottewill R. Preparation of monodisperse ellipsoidal polystyrene particles. Colloid Polym Sci 1993, 271:469-479.
21. Champion JA, Katare YK, Mitragotri S. Making polymeric micro- and nanoparticles of complex shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:11901-11904.
22. Yoo JW, Mitragotri S. Polymer particles that switch shape in response to a stimulus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:11205-11210.
23. Wischke C, Schossig M, Lendlein A. Shape-memory effect of micro-/nanoparticles from thermoplastic multiblock copolymers. Small 2014, 10:83-87.
24. Fadel TR, Steenblock ER, Stern E, Li N, Wang X, Haller GL, Pfefferle LD, Fahmy TM. Enhanced cellular activation with single walled carbon nanotube bundles presenting antibody stimuli. Nano Lett 2008, 8:2070-2076.
25. Rolland JP, Maynor BW, Euliss LE, Exner AE, Denison GM, DeSimone JM. Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape-specific nanobiomaterials. J Am Chem Soc 2005, 127:10096-10100.
26. Wang Y, Merkel TJ, Chen K, Fromen CA, Betts DE, DeSimone JM. Generation of a library of particles having controlled sizes and shapes via the mechanical elongation of master templates. Langmuir 2011, 27:524-528.
27. Morton SW, Herlihy KP, Shopsowitz KE, Deng ZJ, Chu KS, Bowerman CJ, Desimone JM, Hammond PT. Scalable manufacture of built-to-order nanomedicine: spray-assisted layer-by-layer functionalization of PRINT nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2013, 25:4707-4713.
28. Cayre O, Paunov VN, Velev OD. Fabrication of dipolar colloid particles by microcontact printing. Chem Commun 2003, 18:2296-2297.
29. Snyder CE, Yake AM, Feick JD, Velegol D. Nanoscale functionalization and site-specific assembly of colloids by particle lithography. Langmuir 2005, 21:4813-4815.
30. Zhang G, Wang D, Möhwald H. Patterning microsphere surfaces by templating colloidal crystals. Nano Lett 2005, 5:143-146.
31. Buyukserin F, Aryal M, Gao J, Hu W. Fabrication of polymeric nanorods using bilayer nanoimprint lithography. Small 2009, 5:1632-1636.
32. Glangchai LC, Caldorera-Moore M, Shi L, Roy K. Nanoimprint lithography based fabrication of shape-specific, enzymatically-triggered smart nanoparticles. J Control Release 2008, 125:263-272.
33. Jiang X, Leong D, Ren Y, Li Z, Torbenson MS, Mao HQ. String-like micellar nanoparticles formed by complexation of PEG-b-PPA and plasmid DNA and their transfection efficiency. Pharm Res 2011, 28:1317-1327.
34. Petzetakis N, Dove AP, O'Reilly RK. Cylindrical micelles from the living crystallization-driven self-assembly of poly(lactide)-containing block copolymers. Chem Sci 2011, 2:955.
35. Jang SG, Audus DJ, Klinger D, Krogstad DV, Kim BJ, Cameron A, Kim SW, Delaney KT, Hur SM, Killops KL, et al. Striped, ellipsoidal particles by controlled assembly of diblock copolymers. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:6649-6657.
36. Kaewsaneha C, Tangboriboonrat P, Polpanich D, Eissa M, Elaissari A. Anisotropic janus magnetic polymeric nanoparticles prepared via miniemulsion polymerization. J Polym Sci 2013, 51:4779-4785.
37. Mondiot F, Wang X, de Pablo JJ, Abbott NL. Liquid crystal-based emulsions for synthesis of spherical and non-spherical particles with chemical patches. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:9972-9975.
38. Park J-G, Forster JD, Dufresne ER. High-yield synthesis of monodisperse dumbbell-shaped polymer nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132:5960-5961.
39. Niu Q, Pan M, Yuan J, Liu X, Wang X, Yu H. Anisotropic nanoparticles with controllable morphologies from non-cross-linked seeded emulsion polymerization. Macromol Rapid Commun 2013, 34:1363-1367.
40. Yang Z, Huck WT, Clarke SM, Tajbakhsh AR, Terentjev EM. Shape-memory nanoparticles from inherently non-spherical polymer colloids. Nat Mater 2005, 4:486-490.
41. Klinger D, Wang CX, Connal LA, Audus DJ, Jang SG, Kraemer S, Killops KL, Fredrickson GH, Kramer EJ, Hawker CJ. A facile synthesis of dynamic, shape-changing polymer particles. Angew Chem Int Ed 2014, 53:7018-7022.
42. Doshi N, Zahr AS, Bhaskar S, Lahann J, Mitragotri S. Red blood cell-mimicking synthetic biomaterial particles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:21495-21499.
43. Zhou Z, Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Synthesis of protein-based, rod-shaped particles from spherical templates using layer-by-layer assembly. Adv Mater 2013, 25:2723-2727.
44. Shum HC, Abate AR, Lee D, Studart AR, Wang B, Chen CH, Thiele J, Shah RK, Krummel A, Weitz DA. Droplet microfluidics for fabrication of non-spherical particles. Macromol Rapid Commun 2010, 31:108-118.
45. Luo G, Du L, Wang Y, Lu Y, Xu J. Controllable preparation of particles with microfluidics. Particuology 2011, 9:545-558.
46. Yang S, Guo F, Kiraly B, Mao X, Lu M, Leong KW, Huang TJ. Microfluidic synthesis of multifunctional Janus particles for biomedical applications. Lab Chip 2012, 12:2097-2102.
47. Roh KH, Martin DC, Lahann J. Biphasic Janus particles with nanoscale anisotropy. Nat Mater 2005, 4:759-763.
48. Hwang S, Roh K-H, Lim DW, Wang G, Uher C, Lahann J. Anisotropic hybrid particles based on electrohydrodynamic co-jetting of nanoparticle suspensions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010, 12:11894-11899.
49. Lan W, Li S, Xu J, Luo G. A one-step microfluidic approach for controllable preparation of nanoparticle-coated patchy microparticles. Microfluid Nanofluid 2012, 13:491-498.
50. Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Majedi FS, VanDersarl JJ, Dashtimoghadam E, Ghaffarian SR, Bertsch A, Moaddel H, Renaud P. Morphological tuning of polymeric nanoparticles via microfluidic platform for fuel cell applications. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:18904-18907.
51. Suh SK, Yuet K, Hwang DK, Bong KW, Doyle PS, Hatton TA. Synthesis of nonspherical superparamagnetic particles: in situ coprecipitation of magnetic nanoparticles in microgels prepared by stop-flow lithography. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:7337-7343.
52. Angly J, Iazzolino A, Salmon J-B, Leng J, Chandran SP, Ponsinet V, Désert A, Le Beulze A, Mornet S, Tréguer-Delapierre M, et al. Microfluidic-induced growth and shape-up of three-dimensional extended arrays of densely packed nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2013, 7:6465-6477.
53. Mathaes R, Winter G, Engert J, Besheer A. Application of different analytical methods for the characterization of non-spherical micro- and nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2013, 453:620-629.
54. Wang A, Dimiduk TG, Fung J, Razavi S, Kretzschmar I, Chaudhary K, Manoharan VN. Using the discrete dipole approximation and holographic microscopy to measure rotational dynamics of non-spherical colloidal particles. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2014, 146:499-509.
55. Zhang B, Lan T, Huang X, Dong C, Ren J. Sensitive single particle method for characterizing rapid rotational and translational diffusion and aspect ratio of anisotropic nanoparticles and its application in immunoassays. Anal Chem 2013, 85:9433-9438.
56. Li M, You R, Mulholland GW, Zachariah MR. Development of a pulsed-field differential mobility analyzer: a method for measuring shape parameters for nonspherical particles. Aerosol Sci Tech 2014, 48:22-30.
57. Toy R, Peiris PM, Ghaghada KB, Karathanasis E. Shaping cancer nanomedicine: the effect of particle shape on the in vivo journey of nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2013, 9:121-134.
58. Dasgupta S, Auth T, Gompper G. Shape and orientation matter for the cellular uptake of nonspherical particles. Nano Lett 2014, 14:687-693.
59. Kim J, Sunshine JC, Green JJ. Differential polymer structure tunes mechanism of cellular uptake and transfection routes of poly (β-amino ester) polyplexes in human breast cancer cells. Bioconjug Chem 2013, 25:43-51.
60. Perry JL, Reuter KG, Kai MP, Herlihy KP, Jones SW, Luft JC, Napier M, Bear JE, DeSimone JM. PEGylated PRINT nanoparticles: the impact of PEG density on protein binding, macrophage association, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics. Nano Lett 2012, 12:5304-5310.
61. Schütz C, Fleck M, Mackensen A, Zoso A, Halbritter D, Schneck JP, Oelke M. Killer artificial antigen-presenting cells: a novel strategy to delete specific T cells. Blood 2008, 111:3546-3552.
62. Barua S, Yoo J-W, Kolhar P, Wakankar A, Gokarn YR, Mitragotri S. Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:3270-3275.
63. Adriani G, de Tullio MD, Ferrari M, Hussain F, Pascazio G, Liu X, Decuzzi P. The preferential targeting of the diseased microvasculature by disk-like particles. Biomaterials 2012, 33:5504-5513.
64. Kolhar P, Anselmo AC, Gupta V, Pant K, Prabhakarpandian B, Ruoslahti E, Mitragotri S. Using shape effects to target antibody-coated nanoparticles to lung and brain endothelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:10753-10758.
65. Chu KS, Hasan W, Rawal S, Walsh MD, Enlow EM, Luft JC, Bridges AS, Kuijer JL, Napier ME, Zamboni WC, et al. Plasma, tumor and tissue pharmacokinetics of Docetaxel delivered via nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes in mice bearing SKOV-3 human ovarian carcinoma xenograft. Nanomedicine 2013, 9:686-693.
66. Chu KS, Finniss MC, Schorzman AN, Kuijer JL, Luft JC, Bowerman CJ, Napier ME, Haroon ZA, Zamboni WC, DeSimone JM. Particle replication in nonwetting templates nanoparticles with tumor selective alkyl silyl ether docetaxel prodrug reduces toxicity. Nano Lett 2014, 14:1472-1476.
67. Chen K, Merkel TJ, Pandya A, Napier ME, Luft JC, Daniel W, Sheiko S, DeSimone JM. Low modulus biomimetic microgel particles with high loading of hemoglobin. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13:2748-2759.
68. Sharma G, Valenta DT, Altman Y, Harvey S, Xie H, Mitragotri S, Smith JW. Polymer particle shape independently influences binding and internalization by macrophages. J Control Release 2010, 147:408-412.
69. Florez L, Herrmann C, Cramer JM, Hauser CP, Koynov K, Landfester K, Crespy D, Mailander V. How shape influences uptake: interactions of anisotropic polymer nanoparticles and human mesenchymal stem cells. Small 2012, 8:2222-2230.
70. Champion JA, Mitragotri S. Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:4930-4934.
71. Gratton SE, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD, Luft JC, Madden VJ, Napier ME, DeSimone JM. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:11613-11618.
72. Muro S, Garnacho C, Champion JA, Leferovich J, Gajewski C, Schuchman EH, Mitragotri S, Muzykantov VR. Control of endothelial targeting and intracellular delivery of therapeutic enzymes by modulating the size and shape of ICAM-1-targeted carriers. Mol Ther 2008, 16:1450-1458.
73. Hasan W, Chu K, Gullapalli A, Dunn SS, Enlow EM, Luft JC, Tian S, Napier ME, Pohlhaus PD, Rolland JP, et al. Delivery of multiple siRNAs using lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles for treatment of prostate cancer. Nano Lett 2012, 12:287-292.
74. Xu J, Luft JC, Yi X, Tian S, Owens G, Wang J, Johnson A, Berglund P, Smith J, Napier ME, et al. RNA replicon delivery via lipid-complexed PRINT protein particles. Mol Pharm 2013, 10:3366-3374.
75. Merkel TJ, Jones SW, Herlihy KP, Kersey FR, Shields AR, Napier M, Luft JC, Wu H, Zamboni WC, Wang AZ, et al. Using mechanobiological mimicry of red blood cells to extend circulation times of hydrogel microparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:586-591.
76. Jiang X, Qu W, Pan D, Ren Y, Williford JM, Cui H, Luijten E, Mao HQ. Plasmid-templated shape control of condensed DNA-block copolymer nanoparticles. Adv Mater 2013, 25:227-232.
77. Karagoz B, Esser L, Duong HT, Basuki JS, Boyer C, Davis TP. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA)-control over the morphology of nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. Polym Chem 2014, 5:350.
78. Geng Y, Dalhaimer P, Cai S, Tsai R, Tewari M, Minko T, Discher DE. Shape effects of filaments versus spherical particles in flow and drug delivery. Nat Nanotechnol 2007, 2:249-255.
79. Sunshine JC, Green JJ. Nanoengineering approaches to the design of artificial antigen-presenting cells. Nanomedicine 2013, 8:1173-1189.
80. Sahdev P, Ochyl LJ, Moon JJ. Biomaterials for nanoparticle vaccine delivery systems. Pharm Res 2014, 31:1-20.
81. Roberts RA, Shen T, Allen IC, Hasan W, DeSimone JM, Ting JP. Analysis of the murine immune response to pulmonary delivery of precisely fabricated nano- and microscale particles. PLoS One 2013, 8:e62115.
82. Demento SL, Siefert AL, Bandyopadhyay A, Sharp FA, Fahmy TM. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns on biomaterials: a paradigm for engineering new vaccines. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29:294-306.
83. Li WA, Mooney DJ. Materials based tumor immunotherapy vaccines. Curr Opin Immunol 2013, 25:238-245.
84. Engelhard VH, Strominger JL, Mescher M, Burakoff S. Induction of secondary cytotoxic T lymphocytes by purified HLA-A and HLA-B antigens reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978, 75:5688-5691.
85. Oelke M, Krueger C, Giuntoli RL II, Schneck JP. Artificial antigen-presenting cells: artificial solutions for real diseases. Trends Mol Med 2005, 11:412-420.
86. Perica K, De León MA, Durai M, Chiu YL, Bieler JG, Sibener L, Niemöller M, Assenmacher M, Richter A, Edidin M. Nanoscale artificial antigen presenting cells for T cell immunotherapy. Nanomedicine 2014, 10:119-129.
87. Steenblock ER, Fahmy TM. A comprehensive platform for ex vivo T-cell expansion based on biodegradable polymeric artificial antigen-presenting cells. Mol Ther 2008, 16:765-772.
88. Sunshine JC, Perica K, Schneck JP, Green JJ. Particle shape dependence of CD8+ T cell activation by artificial antigen presenting cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35:269-277.
89. Fadel TR, Li N, Shah S, Look M, Pfefferle LD, Haller GL, Justesen S, Wilson CJ, Fahmy TM. Adsorption of multimeric T cell antigens on carbon nanotubes: effect on protein structure and antigen-specific T cell stimulation. Small 2013, 9:666-672.
90. Fadel TR, Look M, Staffier PA, Haller GL, Pfefferle LD, Fahmy TM. Clustering of stimuli on single-walled carbon nanotube bundles enhances cellular activation. Langmuir 2010, 26:5645-5654.
91. Dvir T, Timko BP, Kohane DS, Langer R. Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues. Nat Nanotechnol 2011, 6:13-22.
92. Zhang S, Uludağ H. Nanoparticulate systems for growth factor delivery. Pharm Res 2009, 26:1561-1580.
93. Kim HN, Jiao A, Hwang NS, Kim MS, Kang DH, Kim D-H, Suh K-Y. Nanotopography-guided tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013, 65:536-558.
94. Kim ES, Ahn EH, Dvir T, Kim DH. Emerging nanotechnology approaches in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Nanomedicine 2014, 9(suppl 1):1-5.
95. Hopley EL, Salmasi S, Kalaskar DM, Seifalian AM. Carbon nanotubes leading the way forward in new generation 3D tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 2014, 32:1000-1014.
96. Rim NG, Shin CS, Shin H. Current approaches to electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2013, 8:14.
97. Roohani-Esfahani S-I, Nouri-Khorasani S, Lu Z, Appleyard R, Zreiqat H. The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5498-5509.