Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments

Nature Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 303-309

  Gusmao, Eduardo G ^a   Allhoff, Manuel ^a,b   Zenke, Martin ^a   Costa, Ivan G ^a,b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; DNA FRAGMENT; NAKED DNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; CHROMATIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; DNA FOOTPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; K562 CELL LINE; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; DNA FOOTPRINTING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; K562 CELLS; PROTEIN BINDING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84959116092     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3772     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57-74 (2012).
2. Crawford, G.E. et al. Genome-wide mapping of DNase hypersensitive sites using massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Genome Res. 16, 123-131 (2006).
3. Sabo, P.J. et al. Genome-wide identifcation of DNase I hypersensitive sites using active chromatin sequence libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4537-4542 (2004).
4. Neph, S. et al. An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints. Nature 489, 83-90 (2012).
5. Boyle, A.P. et al. High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. Genome Res. 21, 456-464 (2011).
6. Piper, J. et al. Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identifcation of digital genomic footprints from DNase-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e201 (2013).
7. Sung, M.-H.H., Guertin, M.J., Baek, S. & Hager, G.L. DNase footprint signatures are dictated by factor dynamics and DNA sequence. Mol. Cell 56, 275-285 (2014).
8. Gusmao, E.G., Dieterich, C., Zenke, M. & Costa, I.G. Detection of active transcription factor binding sites with the combination of DNase hypersensitivity and histone modifcations. Bioinformatics 30, 3143-3151 (2014).
9. Pique-Regi, R. et al. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data. Genome Res. 21, 447-455 (2011).
10. Cuellar-Partida, G. et al. Epigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 28, 56-62 (2012).
11. Sherwood, R.I. et al. Discovery of directional and nondirectional pioneer transcription factors by modeling DNase profle magnitude and shape. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 171-178 (2014).
12. Yardimci, G.G., Frank, C.L., Crawford, G.E. & Ohler, U. Explicit DNase sequence bias modeling enables high-resolution transcription factor footprint detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 11865-11878 (2014).
13. Kähärä, J. & Lähdesmäki, H. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data. Bioinformatics 31, 2852-2859 (2015).
14. Stergachis, A.B. et al. Conservation of trans-acting circuitry during mammalian regulatory evolution. Nature 515, 365-370 (2014).
15. He, H.H. et al. Refned DNase-seq protocol and data analysis reveals intrinsic bias in transcription factor footprint identifcation. Nat. Methods 11, 73-78 (2014).
16. Meyer, C.A. & Liu, X.S. Identifying and mitigating bias in next-generation sequencing methods for chromatin biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 709-721 (2014).
17. Park, P.J. ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 669-680 (2009).
18. Teytelman, L., Thurtle, D.M., Rine, J. & van Oudenaarden, A. Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18602-18607 (2013).
19. The diffculty of a fair comparison. Nat. Methods 12, 273 (2015).
20. Davis, J. & Goadrich, M. The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. Proc. 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning-ICML 2006 233-240 (2006).
21. Tewari, A.K. et al. Chromatin accessibility reveals insights into androgen receptor activation and transcriptional specifcity. Genome Biol. 13, R88 (2012).
22. Sharp, Z.D. et al. Estrogen-receptor-alpha exchange and chromatin dynamics are ligand-and domain-dependent. J. Cell Sci. 119, 4101-4116 (2006).
23. McNally, J.G., Müller, W.G., Walker, D., Wolford, R. & Hager, G.L. The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. Science 287, 1262-1265 (2000).
24. Malnou, C.E. et al. Heterodimerization with different Jun proteins controls c-Fos intranuclear dynamics and distribution. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 6552-6562 (2010).
25. Nakahashi, H. et al. A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefnes the CTCF code. Cell Rep. 3, 1678-1689 (2013).
26. Lazarovici, A. et al. Probing DNA shape and methylation state on a genomic scale with DNase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6376-6381 (2013).
27. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
28. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
29. Yu, J. et al. An integrated network of androgen receptor, polycomb and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell 17, 443-454 (2010).
30. Guertin, M.J., Zhang, X., Coonrod, S.A. & Hager, G.L. Transient estrogen receptor binding and p300 redistribution support a squelching mechanism for estradiol-repressed genes. Mol. Endocrinol. 28, 1522-1533 (2014).
31. John, S. et al. Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nat. Genet. 43, 264-268 (2011).
32. Mathelier, A. et al. JASPAR 2014: an extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profles. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D142-D147 (2014).
33. Robasky, K. & Bulyk, M.L. UniPROBE, update 2011: expanded content and search tools in the online database of protein-binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D124-D128 (2011).
34. Matys, V. et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D108-D110 (2006).
35. Boyle, A.P., Guinney, J., Crawford, G.E. & Furey, T.S. F-seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags. Bioinformatics 24, 2537-2538 (2008).
36. Hesselberth, J.R. et al. Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat. Methods 6, 283-289 (2009).
37. Sabo, P.J. et al. Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16837-16842 (2004).
38. Madden, H.H. Comments on the Savitzky-Golay convolution method for least-squares ft smoothing and differentiation of digital data. Anal. Chem. 50, 1383-1386 (1978).
39. Siepel, A. et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 15, 1034-1050 (2005).
40. Hubbard, T. et al. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 38-41 (2002).
41. Grant, C.E., Bailey, T.L. & Noble, W.S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics 27, 1017-1018 (2011).
42. Stormo, G.D. DNA binding sites: representation and discovery. Bioinformatics 16, 16-23 (2000).
43. Cock, P.J.A. et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25, 1422-1423 (2009).
44. Korhonen, J., Martinmäki, P., Pizzi, C., Rastas, P. & Ukkonen, E. MOODS: fast search for position weight matrix matches in DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 25, 3181-3182 (2009).
45. Wilczynski, B., Dojer, N., Patelak, M. & Tiuryn, J. Finding evolutionarily conserved cis-regulatory modules with a universal set of motifs. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 82 (2009).
46. Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27, 861-874 (2006).
47. Ritchie, M.E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
48. Demšar, J. Statistical comparisons of classifers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 1-30 (2006).
49. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57, 289-300 (1995).