Probing DNA shape and methylation state on a genomic scale with DNase i

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 16, 2013, Pages 6376-6381

  Lazarovici, Allan ^a,b   Zhou, Tianyin ^c   Shafer, Anthony ^d   MacHado, Ana Carolina Dantas ^c   Riley, Todd R ^b   Sandstrom, Richard ^d   Sabo, Peter J ^d   Lu, Yan ^c   Rohs, Remo ^c   Stamatoyannopoulos, John A ^d   Bussemaker, Harmen J ^b  

^a Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science   (United States)

^b Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISULFITE; CYTOSINE; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; DINUCLEOTIDE; GENOMIC DNA; GUANINE; NAKED DNA; PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CPG ISLAND; DNA CLEAVAGE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CLEAVAGE; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION;

CELLS, CULTURED; CPG ISLANDS; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; DNA; DNA METHYLATION; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84876245094     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216822110     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Oliveri M, et al. (2004) DNase I behaves as a transcription factor which modulates Fas expression in human cells. Eur J Immunol 34(1):273-279.
2. Suck D, Lahm A, Oefner C (1988) Structure refined to 2A of a nicked DNA octanu-cleotide complex with DNase I. Nature 332(6163):464-468.
3. Weston SA, Lahm A, Suck D (1992) X-ray structure of the DNase I-d(GGTATACC)2 complex at 2.3 A resolution. J Mol Biol 226(4):1237-1256.
4. Hogan ME, Roberson MW, Austin RH (1989) DNA flexibility variation may dominate DNase I cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(23):9273-9277.
5. Heddi B, Abi-Ghanem J, Lavigne M, Hartmann B (2010) Sequence-dependent DNA flexibility mediates DNase I cleavage. J Mol Biol 395(1):123-133.
6. Dorschner MO, et al. (2004) High-throughput localization of functional elements by quantitative chromatin profiling. Nat Methods 1(3):219-225.
7. Sabo PJ, et al. (2004) Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(48):16837-16842.
8. John S, et al. (2011) Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nat Genet 43(3):264-268.
9. Sabo PJ, et al. (2006) Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays. Nat Methods 3(7):511-518.
10. Galas DJ, Schmitz A (1978) DNAse footprinting: A simple method for the detection of protein-DNA binding specificity. Nucleic Acids Res 5(9):3157-3170.
11. Hesselberth JR, et al. (2009) Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat Methods 6(4):283-289.
12. Pennings S, Allan J, Davey CS (2005) DNA methylation, nucleosome formation and positioning. Brief Funct Genomics Proteomics 3(4):351-361.
13. Suzuki MM, Bird A (2008) DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 9(6):465-476.
14. Kangaspeska S, et al. (2008) Transient cyclical methylation of promoter DNA. Nature 452(7183):112-115.
15. Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev 16(1): 6-21.
16. Eckhardt F, et al. (2006) DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat Genet 38(12):1378-1385.
17. Weber M, et al. (2007) Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat Genet 39(4):457-466.
18. Rozenberg JM, et al. (2008) All and only CpG containing sequences are enriched in promoters abundantly bound by RNA polymerase II in multiple tissues. BMC Genomics 9:67.
19. Rishi V, et al. (2010) CpG methylation of half-CRE sequences creates C/EBPalpha binding sites that activate some tissue-specific genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(47): 20311-20316.
20. Rohs R, West SM, Liu P, Honig B (2009) Nuance in the double-helix and its role in protein-DNA recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19(2):171-177.
21. Joshi R, et al. (2007) Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell 131(3):530-543.
22. Rohs R, et al. (2009) The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature 461(7268):1248-1253.
23. Rohs R, et al. (2010) Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Bi-ochem 79:233-269.
24. Slattery M, et al. (2011) Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell 147(6):1270-1282.
25. Kitayner M, et al. (2010) Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(4):423-429.
26. Suck D (1994) DNA recognition by DNase I. J Mol Recognit 7(2):65-70.
27. Drew HR, Travers AA (1984) DNA structural variations in the E. coli tyrT promoter. Cell 37(2):491-502.
28. Herrera JE, Chaires JB (1994) Characterization of preferred deoxyribonuclease I cleavage sites. J Mol Biol 236(2):405-411.
29. Brukner I, Sánchez R, Suck D, Pongor S (1995) Sequence-dependent bending propensity of DNA as revealed by DNase I: Parameters for trinucleotides. EMBO J 14(8):1812-1818.
30. Marcourt L, Cordier C, Couesnon T, Dodin G (1999) Impact of C5-cytosine methylation on the solution structure of d(GAAAACGTTTTC)2. An NMR and molecular modelling investigation. Euro J Biochem 265(3):1032-1042.
31. Lahm A, Suck D (1991) DNase I-induced DNA conformation. 2 A structure of a DNase I-octamer complex. J Mol Biol 222(3):645-667.
32. Lomonossoff GP, Butler PJ, Klug A (1981) Sequence-dependent variation in the conformation of DNA. J Mol Biol 149(4):745-760.
33. Brukner I, Jurukovski V, Savic A (1990) Sequence-dependent structural variations of DNA revealed by DNase I. Nucleic Acids Res 18(4):891-894.
34. Bishop EP, et al. (2011) A map of minor groove shape and electrostatic potential from hydroxyl radical cleavage patterns of DNA. ACS Chem Biol 6(12):1314-1320.
35. Adams RL (1990) DNA methylation. The effect of minor bases on DNA-protein interactions. Biochem J 265(2):309-320.
36. Lister R, et al. (2009) Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature 462(7271):315-322.
37. Fox KR (1986) The effect of HhaI methylation on DNA local structure. Biochem J 234(1):213-216.
38. Kochanek S, Renz D, Doerfler W (1993) Differences in the accessibility of methylated and unmethylated DNA to DNase I. Nucleic Acids Res 21(25):5843-5845.
39. N'soukpoé-Kossi CN, Diamantoglou S, Tajmir-Riahi HA (2008) DNase I-DNA interaction alters DNA and protein conformations. Biochem Cell Biol 86(3):244-250.
40. Meijsing SH, et al. (2009) DNA binding site sequence directs glucocorticoid receptor structure and activity. Science 324(5925):407-410.
41. Neph S, et al. (2012) An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints. Nature 489(7414):83-90.
42. Wang X, et al. (2008) Using RNase sequence specificity to refine the identification of RNA-protein binding regions. BMC Genomics 9(Suppl 1):S17.
43. Lister R, et al. (2011) Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471(7336):68-73.
44. Hansen KD, et al. (2011) Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nat Genet 43(8):768-775.
45. Chodavarapu RK, et al. (2010) Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature 466(7304):388-392.
46. Kelly TK, et al. (2012) Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation within individual DNA molecules. Genome Res 22(12):2497-2506.
47. West SM, Rohs R, Mann RS, Honig B (2010) Electrostatic interactions between argi-nines and the minor groove in the nucleosome. J Biomol Struct Dyn 27(6):861-866.