The role of trust in automation reliance

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 697-718

  Dzindolet, Mary T ^a   Peterson, Scott A ^a   Pomranky, Regina A ^b   Pierce, Linda G ^b   Beck, Hall P ^c  

^a CAMERON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation reliance; Automation trust; Disuse; Misuse

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RELIABILITY;

AUTOMATION RELIANCE; AUTOMATION TRUST; DISUSE; MISUSE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0037939746     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00038-7     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aschcraft, 1994. Human Memory and Cognition, 2nd Edition. Harper Collins, Glenview, IL.
2. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., 1986. The mediator-moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173-1182.
3. Bruner, J.S., Tagiuri, R., 1954. The perception of people. In: Lindzey, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
4. Cacioppo, J.T., Berntson, G.G., 1994. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin 115, 401-423.
5. Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., Berntson, G.G., 1997. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychological Review 1, 3-25.
6. Cohen, M.S., Parasuraman, R., Freeman, J.T., 1998. Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications. Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. CCRP, Washington, DC.
7. Corcoran, D.W., Dennett, J.L., Carpenter, A., 1972. Cooperation of listener and computer in a recognition task: II effects of computer reliability and "dependent" versus "independent" conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 52, 1613-1619.
8. Dalal, N.P., Kasper, G.M., 1994. The design of joint cognitive systems: the effect of cognitive coupling on performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 677-702.
9. Dijkstra, J.J., Liebrand, W.B.G., Timminga, E., 1998. Persuasiveness of expert systems. Behaviour and Information Technology 17, 155-163.
10. Dzindolet, M.T., Beck, H.P., Pierce, L.G., Dawe, L.A., 2001a. A framework of automation use (Rep. No. ARL-TR-2412). Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
11. Dzindolet, M.T., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P., Dawe, L.A., Anderson, W.B., 2001a. Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Accepted for publication in Military Psychology 13 (3), 147-164.
12. Dzindolet, M.T., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P., Dawe, L.A., 2002. The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors 44, 79-94.
13. Howell, D.C., 1992. Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd Edition. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
14. Jian, J., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., 2000. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 53-71.
15. Layton, C., Smith, P.J., Mccoy, C.E., 1994. Design of a cooperative problem-solving system for en-route flight planning: an empirical evaluation. Human Factors 36, 94-119.
16. Lee, J.D., Moray, N., 1992. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 35, 1243-1270.
17. Lee, J.D., Moray, N., 1994. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 153-184.
18. Lerch, F.J., Prietula, M.J., Kulik, C.T., 1997. The turing effect: the nature of trust in expert system advice. In: Feltovich, P.J., Ford, K.M., Hoffman's, R.R. (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 417-448.
19. Moes, M., Knox, K., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P., 1999. Should I decide or let the machine decide for me? Poster presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Savannah, GA.
20. Moray, N., Inagaki, T., Itoh, M., 2000. Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6, 44-58.
21. Mosier, K.L., Shitka, L.J., 1996. Human decision makers and automated decision aids: made for each other? In: Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. (Eds.), Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, Human Factors in Transportation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 201-220.
22. Muir, B.M., 1987. Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27, 527-539.
23. Muir, B.M., 1994. Trust in automation: part I. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics 37, 1905-1922.
24. Parasuraman, R., 1987. Human-computer monitoring. Human Factors Special Issue: Vigilance: Basic and applied research 29, 695-706.
25. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Singh, I.L., 1993. Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 1-23.
26. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., Molloy, R., 1996. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors 38, 665-679.
27. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V., 1997. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39, 230-253.
28. Peeters, G., Czapinski, J., 1990. Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: the distinction between affective and informational negative effects. European Review of Social Psychology 1, 33-60.
29. Rempel, J.K., Holmes, J.G., Zanna, M.P., 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 95-112.
30. Riley, V., 1994. A theory of operator reliance on automation. In: Mouloua, M., Parasuraman's, R. (Eds.), Human Performance in Automated Systems: Recent Research and Trends. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 8-14.
31. Riley, V., 1996. Operator reliance on automation: theory and data. In: Parasuraman, R., Mouloua's, M. (Eds.), Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp. 19-35.
32. Ruble, D.N., Stangor, C., 1986. Stalking the elusive schema: insights from developmental and social-psychological analyses of gender schemas. Social Cognition 4, 227-261.
33. Sheridan, T.B., 1988. Trustworthiness of command and control systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Man Machine Systems. Pergamon, Elmsford, NY, pp. 427-431.
34. Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., Parasuraman, R., 1993. Automation-induced "complacency": development of the complacency-potential rating scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 111-122.
35. Singh, I.L., Molloy, R., Parasuraman, R., 1997. Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: role of display location. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46, 17-30.
36. Smith, D.A., Graesser, A.C., 1981. Memory for actions in scripted activities as a functions of typicality, retention interval, and retrieval task. Memory & Cognition 9, 550-559.
37. Sorkin, R.D., Woods, D.D., 1985. Systems with human monitors: a signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 1, 49-75.
38. Tan, G., Lewandowsky, S., 1996. A comparison of operator trust in humans Versus machines. Presentation of the First International Cyberspace Conference on Ergonomics: http://www.curtin.edu.au/conference/cyberg/paper/tan/paper.html
39. Thackray, R.I., Touchstone, R.M., 1989. Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine 60, 744-748.
40. Wickens, C., (2002, October). Automation types, consequences of imperfect automation, automation and situation awareness, effects on attention, resources, and task management. Presented at the Humans, Automation, and Issues of Trust Workshop, Adelphi, MD.
41. Wickens, C.D., Hoolands, J.G., 2000. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
42. Wiener, J.L., 1981. A theory of human information processing for economists. Dissertation Abstracts International 42, 809.