Design of human-machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 161-167

  Inagaki, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Authority and responsibility; Human interface; Human centered automation; Levels of automation; Transportation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748689017     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-006-0034-z     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Billings CE (1992) Human-centered aircraft automation: a concept and guidelines (NASA Techn. Mem. 103885). NASA Ames Research Center
2. Billings CE (1997) Aviation automation - the search for a human-centered approach. LEA
3. Bresley B, Egilsrud J (1997) Enhanced ground proximity warning system. Boeing Airliner, July-September 1997, 1-13
4. Cacciabue PC (2004) Guide to applying human factors methods: human error and accident management in safety critical systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
5. Endsley MR, Kiris EO (1995) The out-of-the-loop performance problem and the level of control in automation. Hum Factors 37(2):3181-3194
6. FAA (1992) Takeoff safety training aid
7. Hollnagel E, Bye A (2000) Principles for modeling function allocation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:253-265
8. Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton
9. ICAO (1998) Human factors training manual. Doc 9683-AN/950
10. Inagaki T (1993) Situation-adaptive degree of automation for system safety. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international workshop on robot and human communication, 231-236
11. Inagaki T (1997) To go no not to go: decision under time-criticality and situation-adaptive autonomy for takeoff safety. Proceedings of the IASTED international conference on applied modelling and simulation, 144-147
12. Inagaki T (1999) Situation-adaptive autonomy: trading control of authority in human-machine systems. Automation technology and human performance: current research and trends, pp 154-159, LEA
13. Inagaki T (2000) Situation-adaptive autonomy for time-critical takeoff decisions. Int J Model Simul 20(2):175-180
14. Inagaki T (2003) Adaptive automation: Sharing and trading of control. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. LEA, pp. 147-169
15. Inagaki T, Kunioka T (2002) Possible automation surprises in the low-speed range adaptive cruise control system. IASTED International Conference on Appl Model Simul, pp 335-340
16. Inagaki T, Furukawa H (2004) Computer simulation for the design of authority in the adaptive cruise control systems under possibility of driver's over-trust in automation. Proceedings of the IEEE SMC conference, 3932-3937
17. Inagaki T, Stahre J (2004) Human supervision and control in engineering and music: similarities, dissimilarities, and their implications. Proc IEEE 92(4):589-600
18. Inagaki T, Moray N, Itoh M (1998) Trust self-confidence and authority in human-machine systems. Proceedings of the IFAC man-machine systems, 431-436
19. Inagaki T, Takae Y, Moray N (1999) Automation and human interface for takeoff safety. Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on aviation psychology, 402-407
20. ITARDA (2003) Anecdotal report on traffic accident investigations and analyses (in Japanese). ITARDA
21. Kayano J, Fukuto J, Imazu H, Igarashi K (2004) On a collision avoidance support system for one-person bridge operation. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on collision and grounding of ships (ICCGS), 81-86
22. Klein G (1993) A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein G et al (eds) Decision making in action. Ablex, 138-147
23. Mainichi Daily News (2005) Captain, crewmembers of Israeli ship arrested over fatal collision. (2005, October 24) http:// www.mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/ national/news/p20051024p2a00m0na007000c.html
24. Orlady HW, Orlady LM (1999) Human factors in multi-crew flight operations. Ashgate
25. Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors 39(2):230-253
26. Parasuraman R, Bhari T, Deaton JE, Morrison JG, Barnes M (1992) Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems (Progress Report No. NAWCADWAR-92033-60). Naval air development center aircraft division
27. Rouse WB (1988) Adaptive aiding for human/computer control. Hum Factors 30(4):431-443
28. Sarter NB, Woods DD (1995) How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum Factors 37(1):5-19
29. Sarter NB, Woods DD, Billings CE (1997) Automation surprises. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, London, 1926-1943
30. Scerbo MW (1996) Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In: Parasuraman R, Mouloua M (eds) Automation and human performance. LEA, pp 37-63
31. Scott WB (1999) Automatic GCAS: "You can't fly any lower." Aviat Week Space Technol 150(5):76-79
32. Sheridan TB (1992) Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT Press, Cambridge
33. Sheridan TB (2002) Humans and automation: system design and research issues. Human factors and ergonomics society & Wiley
34. US Department of Transportation & FAA (2000) Introduction to TCAS II version 7
35. Wickens CD (1994) Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation. Proceedings of IFAC integrated systems engineering, 77-82
36. Wickens CD, Lee JD, Liu Y, Becker SEG (2004) An introduction to human factors engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
37. Woods D (1989) The effects of automation on human's role: experience from non-aviation industries. In: Norman S, Orlady H (eds) Flight deck automation: promises and realities (NASA CR-10036, pp.61-85). NASA Ames Research Center