Potential impacts of climate and landscape fragmentation changes on plant distributions: Coupling multi-temporal satellite imagery with GIS-based cellular automata model

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 32, Issue , 2016, Pages 145-155

  Keshtkar, Hamidreza ^a   Voigt, Winfried ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Climate change; Dispersal distance; Dispersal modeling; Landscape fragmentation; Markov chain

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FUTURE PROSPECT; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GIS; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; MARKOV CHAIN; PLANT COMMUNITY; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84958954040     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Aeschimann D., Heitz C. Index synonymique de la flore de Suisse et territoires limitrophes (ISFS) 1996, Centre du Réseau Suisse de Floristique.
2. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike 1998, 215-222. Springer, New York. E. Parzen (Ed.).
3. Allouche O., et al. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43:1223-1232.
4. Barbet-Massin M., et al. The fate of European breeding birds under climate, land-use and dispersal scenarios. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18:881-890.
5. Bateman B.L., et al. Appropriateness of full-, partial- and no-dispersal scenarios in climate change impact modelling. Divers. Distrib. 2013, 19:1224-1234.
6. Bennie J., et al. Slope, aspect and climate: spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland. Ecol. Model. 2008, 216:47-59.
7. Bertrand R., et al. Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests. Nature 2011, 479:517-520.
8. Boeckmann M., Joyner T.A. Old health risks in new places? An ecological niche model for I. ricinus tick distribution in Europe under a changing climate. Health Place 2014, 30:70-77.
9. Brooker R.W. Plant-plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytol. 2006, 171:271-284.
10. Brown R.G., et al. Habitat fragmentation: simple models for local persistence and the spread of invasive species. J. Theor. Biol. 2012, 310:231-238.
11. Bullock J.M., et al. Modelling spread of British wind-dispersed plants under future wind speeds in a changing climate. J. Ecol. 2012, 100:104-115.
12. Collingham Y.C., Huntley B. Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10:131-144.
13. Collins S.L., Gordon E.U. Seed predation, seed dispersal, and disturbance in grasslands: a comment. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:866-872.
14. Cordeiro N.J., et al. Disperser limitation and recruitment of an endemic African tree in a fragmented landscape. Ecology 2009, 90:1030-1041.
15. Davis A.J., et al. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 1998, 391:783-786.
16. Dewhirst S., Lutscher F. Dispersal in heterogeneous habitats: thresholds, spatial scales, and approximate rates of spread. Ecology 2009, 90:1338-1345.
17. Dirnböck T., et al. A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30:401-417.
18. Dirnböck T., et al. Disproportional risk for habitat loss of high-altitude endemic species under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17:990-996.
19. Elith J., et al. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2010, 1:330-342.
20. Engler R., Guisan A. MigClim: Predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15:590-601.
21. Engler R., et al. Predicting future distributions of mountain plants under climate change: does dispersal capacity matter?. Ecography 2009, 32:34-45.
22. Engler R., et al. 21st century climate change threatens mountain flora unequally across Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17:2330-2341.
23. Engler R., et al. The MIGCLIM R package - seamless integration of dispersal constraints into projections of species distribution models. Ecography 2012, 35:872-878.
24. Fitter A.H., Fitter R.S.R. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 2002, 296:1689-1691.
25. Fontaine T.A., et al. Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). J. Hydrol. 2002, 262:209-223.
26. Franklin J. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction 2009, Cambridge University Press.
27. Franklin J. Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16:321-330.
28. Gilman S.E., et al. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:325-331.
29. Grabs T., et al. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: a comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. J. Hydrol. 2009, 373:15-23.
30. Guan D., et al. Modeling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:3761-3772.
31. Guisan A., Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:993-1009.
32. Guisan A., Zimmermann N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135:147-186.
33. Hampe A. Plants on the move: the role of seed dispersal and initial population establishment for climate-driven range expansions. Acta Oecol. 2011, 37:666-673.
34. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
35. Hannah L.E.E. Climate change, connectivity, and conservation success. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:1139-1142.
36. Hastie T.J., Tibshirani R.J. Generalized Additive Models 1990, Chapman and Hall.
37. Heikkinen R.K., et al. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2006, 30:751-777.
38. Hijmans R.J., Graham C.H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12:2272-2281.
39. Hong Y.T., et al. Inverse phase oscillations between the East Asian and Indian Ocean summer monsoons during the last 12,000 years and paleo-El Nino. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2005, 231:337-346.
40. Huberty C.J. Applied Discriminant Analysis 1994, Wiley.
41. Huntley B., et al. Beyond bioclimatic envelopes: dynamic species' range and abundance modelling in the context of climatic change. Ecography 2010, 33:621-626.
42. Imbach P.A., et al. Climate change and plant dispersal along corridors in fragmented landscapes of Mesoamerica. Ecol. Evol. 2013, 3:2917-2932.
43. Jeschke J.M., Strayer D.L. Usefulness of bioclimatic models for studying climate change and invasive species. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1134:1-24.
44. Jones P.G., Thornton P.K. Generating downscaled weather data from a suite of climate models for agricultural modelling applications. Agric. Syst. 2013, 114:1-5.
45. Kawakami K., et al. Re-established mutualism in a seed-dispersal system consisting of native and introduced birds and plants on the Bonin Islands, Japan. Ecol. Res. 2009, 24:741-748.
46. Kelly A.E., Goulden M.L. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:11823-11826.
47. Kinezaki N., et al. The effect of the spatial configuration of habitat fragmentation on invasive spread. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2010, 78:298-308.
48. Kirika J.M., et al. Fragmentation and local disturbance of forests reduce frugivore diversity and fruit removal in Ficus thonningii trees. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2008, 9:663-672.
49. Kissling W.D., et al. Woody plants and the prediction of climate-change impacts on bird diversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2010, 365:2035-2045.
50. Körner C. Alpine Plant Life - Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems 2003, Springer.
51. Kraemer H.C. Kappa coefficient. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 1982, John Wiley & Sons. S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson (Eds.).
52. Lambers J.H.R. Extinction risks from climate change. Science 2015, 348:501-502.
53. Lehouck V., et al. Habitat disturbance reduces seed dispersal of a forest interior tree in a fragmented African cloud forest. Oikos 2009, 118:1023-1034.
54. Leimu R., et al. Habitat fragmentation, climate change, and inbreeding in plants. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1195:84-98.
55. Levey D.J., et al. Modelling long-distance seed dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:599-608.
56. Liu C., et al. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 2005, 28:385-393.
57. Loarie S.R., et al. Climate change and the future of california's endemic flora. PLoS ONE 2008, 3.
58. Lu N., et al. Species-specific habitat fragmentation assessment, considering the ecological niche requirements and dispersal capability. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 152:102-109.
59. Marage D., et al. Soil seed banks and vegetation succession in the Southern Alps: effects of historical and ecological factors. Can. J. Bot. 2006, 84:99-111.
60. Martin Y., et al. Testing instead of assuming the importance of land use change scenarios to model species distributions under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:1204-1216.
61. McConkey K.R., et al. Seed dispersal in changing landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 146:1-13.
62. McKenney D.W., et al. Potential Impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. Bioscience 2007, 57:939-948.
63. Meier E.S., et al. Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions. Ecography 2010, 33:1038-1048.
64. Meier E.S., et al. Climate, competition and connectivity affect future migration and ranges of European trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21:164-178.
65. Memmott J., et al. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:710-717.
66. Midgley G.F., et al. Migration rate limitations on climate change-induced range shifts in Cape Proteaceae. Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12:555-562.
67. Nathan R., et al. Mechanistic models of seed dispersal by wind. Theor. Ecol. 2011, 4:113-132.
68. Oliver T.H., et al. Interacting effects of climate change and habitat fragmentation on drought-sensitive butterflies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5:941-945.
69. Opdam P., Wascher D. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 117:285-297.
70. Parmesan C., Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 2003, 421:37-42.
71. Pearson R.G., Dawson T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12:361-371.
72. Pearson R.G., et al. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecol. Model. 2002, 154:289-300.
73. Peterson L.K., et al. Forested land-cover patterns and trends over changing forest management eras in the Siberian Baikal region. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 257:911-922.
74. Pierce D.W., et al. Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106:8441-8446.
75. Purves D., Pacala S. Predictive models of forest dynamics. Science 2008, 320:1452-1453.
76. Radeloff V.C., et al. Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:1036-1049.
77. Reichler T., Kim J. How well do coupled models simulate today's climate?. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2008, 89:303-311.
78. Rodríguez-Cabal M.A., et al. Habitat fragmentation disrupts a plant-disperser mutualism in the temperate forest of South America. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139:195-202.
79. Stanton J.C., et al. Combining static and dynamic variables in species distribution models under climate change. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012, 3:349-357.
80. Suttle K.B., et al. Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science 2007, 315:640-642.
81. Swets J. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240:1285-1293.
82. Taylor K.E., et al. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2011, 93:485-498.
83. Team, R.D.C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2009, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
84. Thomas C.D., et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427:145-148.
85. Thuiller W., et al. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2005, 11:2234-2250.
86. Thuiller W., et al. Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12:49-60.
87. Thuiller W., et al. biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modelling 2013.
88. Tingley M.W., et al. Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106:19637-19643.
89. Urban M.C., et al. On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2012.
90. Uriarte M., et al. Disentangling the drivers of reduced long-distance seed dispersal by birds in an experimentally fragmented landscape. Ecology 2011, 92:924-937.
91. Vittoz P., Engler R. Seed dispersal distances: a typological system for data analyses and models. Bot. Helv. 2007, 117:109-124.
92. Vittoz P., et al. Low impact of climate change on subalpine grasslands in the Swiss Northern Alps. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15:209-220.
93. Wiens J.A., et al. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:19729-19736.
94. Zimmermann N.E., et al. New trends in species distribution modelling. Ecography 2010, 33:985-989.