Sorting out relationships among the grouse and ptarmigan using intron, mitochondrial, and ultra-conserved element sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 98, Issue , 2016, Pages 123-132

  Persons, Nicholas W ^a   Hosner, Peter A ^a   Meiklejohn, Kelly A ^a   Braun, Edward L ^a   Kimball, Rebecca T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Cyto nuclear discordance; Species tree; Ultra conserved elements

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GALLIFORMES; GENETICS; INTRON; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GALLIFORMES; INTRONS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84958741907     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Alatalo R.V., Höglund J., Lundberg A. Lekking in the black grouse - a test of male viability. Nature 1991, 352:155-156.
2. Aldridge C.L., Oyler-McCance S.J., Brigham R.M. Occurrence of greater sage-grouse × sharp-tailed grouse hybrids in Alberta. Condor 2001, 103:657-660.
3. Augustine J.K., Trauba D.R. Potential for behavioral reproductive isolation between greater prairie-chickens and sharp-tailed grouse in west-central Minnesota. J. Ethol. 2015, 33:15-24.
4. Bain M.R., Farley G.H. Display by apparent hybrid Prairie-Chickens in a zone of geographic overlap. Condor 2002, 104:683-687.
5. Benson D.P. Low extra-pair paternity in White-tailed Ptarmigan. Condor 2002, 104:192-197.
6. Bergerud A.T., Mossop D.H. The pair bond in ptarmigan. Can. J. Zool. 1984, 62:2129-2141.
7. Bird K.L., Aldridge C.L., Carpenter J.E., Paszkowski C.A., Boyce M.S., Coltman D.W. The secret sex lives of sage-grouse: multiple paternity and intraspecific nest parasitism revealed through genetic analysis. Behav. Ecol. 2013, 24:29-38.
8. Blomberg E.J., Tefft B.C., Reed J.M., McWilliams S.R. Evaluating spatially explicit viability of a declining ruffed grouse population. J. Wildlife Manage. 2011, 76:503-513.
9. Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:2114-2120.
10. Bouckaert R., Heled J., Kuhnert D., Vaughan T., Wu C.H., Xie D., Suchard M.A., Rambaut A., Drummond A.J. BEAST 2: A software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10.
11. Burleigh J.G., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Building the avian tree of life using a large-scale sparse supermatrix. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015, 84:53-63.
12. Butorina O.T., Solovenchuk L.L. The use of c-mos nuclear gene as a phylogenetic marker in Tetraonidae birds. Russ. J. Genet. 2004, 40:1080-1084.
13. Chamberlain D.E., Bocca M., Migliore L., Caprio E., Rolando A. The dynamics of alternative male mating tactics in a population of Black Grouse Tetrao tetrix in the Italian Alps. J. Ornith. 2012, 153:999-1009.
14. Chojnowski J.L., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Introns outperform exons in analyses of basal avian phylogeny using clathrin heavy chain genes. Gene 2008, 410:89-96.
15. Clements, J.F., Schulenberg, T.S., Iliff, M.J., Roberson, D., Fredericks, T.A., Sullivan, B.L., Wood, C.L., 2014. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Version 6.9. Downloaded from . http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/.
16. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e68.
17. Dimcheff D.E., Drovetski S.V., Mindell D.P. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 24:203-215.
18. Drovetski S.V. Molecular phylogeny of grouse: Individual and combined performance of W-linked, autosomal, and mitochondrial loci. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:930-945.
19. Drovetski S.V., Rohwer S., Mode N.A. Role of sexual and natural selection in evolution of body size and shape: a phylogenetic study of morphological radiation in grouse. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:1083-1091.
20. Ellsworth D.L., Honeycutt R.L., Silvy N.J. Systematics of grouse and ptarmigan determined by nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Auk 1996, 113:811-822.
21. Eng R.L. 2 hybrid Sage Grouse × Sharp-tailed Grouse from central Montana. Condor 1971, 73:491.
22. Evans K. Observations on a hybrid between Sharp-tailed Grouse and Greater Prairie Chicken. Auk 1966, 83:128.
23. Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C. Not all sequence tags are created equal: designing and validating sequence identification tags robust to indels. PLoS ONE 2012, 7.
24. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61:717-726.
25. Freeland J.R., Hannon S.J., Dobush G., Boag P.T. Extra-pair paternity in Willow Ptarmigan broods - measuring costs of polygyny to males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1995, 36:349-355.
26. Galla S.J., Johnson J.A. Differential introgression and effective size of marker type influence phylogenetic inference of a recently divergent avian group (Phasianidae: Tympanuchus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015, 84:1-13.
27. Geiger A.E. Greater Prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus cupido) × Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus) hybrid. Passenger Pigeon 1993, 55:266.
28. Gibson R.M., Bradbury J.W. Sexual selection in lekking Sage Grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1985, 18:117-123.
29. Gill, F., Donsker, D. (Eds.), 2015. IOC World Bird List (v 5.3), . doi:10.14344/IOC.ML.5.3.
30. Grabherr M.G., Haas B.J., Yassour M., Levin J.Z., Thompson D.A., Amit I., Adiconis X., Fan L., Raychowdhury R., Zeng Q., Chen Z., Mauceli E., Hacohen N., Gnirke A., Rhind N., di Palma F., Birren B.W., Nusbaum C., Lindblad-Toh K., Friedman N., Regev A. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotech. 2011, 29:644-652.
31. Gratson M. Sexual selection for increased male courtship and acoustic signals and against large male size at sharp-tailed grouse leks. Evolution 1993, 47:691-696.
32. Gutierrez R.J., Barrowclough G.F., Groth J.G. A classification of the grouse (Aves: Tetraoninae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Wildlife Biol. 2000, 6:205-211.
33. Hannon S.J. Factors limiting polygyny in the Willow Ptarmigan. Anim. Behav. 1984, 32:153-161.
34. Hoelzer G.A. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees revisited. Evolution 1997, 51:622-626.
35. Höglund J. Size and plumage dimorphism in lek-breeding birds - a comparative analysis. Am. Nat. 1989, 134:72-87.
36. Höglund J., Johansson T., Pelabon C. Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse. Anim. Behav. 1997, 54:255-264.
37. Holder K., Montgomerie R., Friesen V.L. A test of the glacial refugium hypothesis using patterns of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence variation in rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus). Evolution 1999, 53:1936-1950.
38. Holder K., Montgomerie R., Friesen V.L. Glacial vicariance and historical biogeography of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) in the Bering region. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1265-1278.
39. Hosner P.A., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Land connectivity changes and global cooling shaped the colonization history and diversification of New World quail (Aves: Galliformes: Odontophoridae). J. Biogeogr. 2015, n/a-n/a. 10.1111/jbi.12555.
40. Hosner P.A., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Avoiding missing data biases in assembling the landfowl tree of life (Aves: Galliformes). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, in press. 10.1093/molbev/msv347.
41. Hovick T.J., Elmore R.D., Dahlgren D.K., Fuhlendorf S.D., Engle D.M. Evidence of negative effects of anthropogenic structures on wildlife: a review of grouse survival and behaviour. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 51:1680-1689.
42. Hudson R.R., Turelli M. Stochasticity overrules the "three-times rule": genetic drift, genetic draft, and coalescence times for nuclear loci versus mitochondrial DNA. Evolution 2003, 57:182-190.
43. Jetz W., Thomas G.H., Joy J.B., Hartmann K., Mooers A.O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 2012, 491:444-448.
44. Johnsgard P.A. The Grouse of the World 1983, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
45. Katoh K., Misawa K., Kuma K.-I., Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucl. Acids Res. 2002, 30:3059-3066.
46. Katoh K., Standley D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:772-780.
47. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non-feathered facial traits. J. Avian Biol. 2008, 39:438-445.
48. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Does more sequence data improve estimates of galliform phylogeny? Analyses of a rapid radiation using a complete data matrix. PeerJ 2014, 2.
49. Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Barker F.K., Bowie R.C.K., Braun M.J., Chojnowski J.L., Hackett S.J., Han K.L., Harshman J., Heimer-Torres V., Holznagel W., Huddleston C.J., Marks B.D., Miglia K.J., Moore W.S., Reddy S., Sheldon F.H., Smith J.V., Witt C.C., Yuri T. A well-tested set of primers to amplify regions spread across the avian genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 50:654-660.
50. Kimball R.T., Wang N., Heimer-McGinn V., Ferguson C., Braun E.L. Identifying localized biases in large datasets: a case study using the avian tree of life. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 69:1021-1032.
51. Kohn S.C., Kobriger G.D. Occurrence of a Sage Grouse Centrocercus urophasianus and Sharp-tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesi hybrid in North Dakota USA. Prairie Nat. 1986, 18:33-36.
52. Kubatko L.S., Degnan J.H. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:17-24.
53. Lanfear R., Calcott B., Ho S.Y.W., Guindon S. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1695-1701.
54. Lepage, D., Warnier, J., 2014. The Peters' Check-list of the Birds of the World (1931-1987) Database. Accessed on 22/07/2015 from Avibase, the World Database: . http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/peterschecklist.jsp.
55. Lislevand T., Figuerola J., Szekely T. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:1895-1905.
56. Lucchini V., Hoglund J., Klaus S., Swenson J., Randi E. Historical biogeography and a mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of grouse and ptarmigan. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001, 20:149-162.
57. Ludwig T., Storch I., Gartner S. Large-scale land use change may explain bird species declines in semi-natural areas: the case of Black Grouse population collapse in Lower Saxony, Germany. J. Ornith. 2009, 150:871-882.
58. Lumsden H.G. "Prairie Grouse", Tympanuchus cupido × phasianellus, hybridization on Manitoulin Island, Ontario. Can. Field Nat. 2005, 119:507-514.
59. Maddison D., Maddison W. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution 2000, Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
60. Madge S., McGowan P. Pheasants, Partridges and Grouse 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
61. Marincovich L., Gladenkov A.Y. Evidence for an early opening of the Bering Strait. Nature 1999, 397:149-151.
62. Martin K. Bi-parental care in willow ptarmigan: a luxury?. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35:369-379.
63. Matzke, N.J., 2013a. BioGeoBEARS: BioGeography with Bayesian (and likelihood) Evolutionary Analysis in R scripts. R package, version 0.2.1, published July 27, 2013. Downloaded from: . http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BioGeoBEARS.
64. Matzke, N.J., 2013b. cladoRcpp: C++ Implementations of Phylogenetic Calculations. R Package, Version 0.14.2, published July 15, 2013. Downloaded from: . http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cladoRcpp.
65. Matzke, N.J., Sidje, R.B., 2013. rexpokit: R wrappers for EXPOKIT. R package, Version 0.24.2, published July 15, 2013. Downloaded from: . http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rexpokit.
66. Matzke N.J. Model selection in historical biogeography reveals that founder-event speciation is a crucial process in island clades. Syst. Biol. 2014, 63:951-970.
67. Meiklejohn K.A., Danielson M.J., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. Incongruence among different mitochondrial regions: a case study using complete mitogenomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014, 78:314-323.
68. Meiklejohn K.A., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Analysis of a rapid evolutionary radiation using ultraconserved elements (UCEs): evidence for a bias in some multi-species coalescent methods. Syst. Biol. 2016, in press. 10.1093/sysbio/syw014.
69. Mirarab S., Reaz R., Bayzid M.S., Zimmermann T., Swenson M.S., Warnow T. ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:I541-I548.
70. Mirarab S., Warnow T. ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes. Bioinformatics 2015, 31:44-52.
71. Mooers A.O., Heard S.B., Chrostowski E. Evolutionary heritage as a metric for conservation. Phylogeny and Conservation 2005, 120-138. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Purvis, T.L. Brooks, J.L. Gittleman (Eds.).
72. Moore W.S. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 1995, 49:718-726.
73. Nylander, J.A.A., 2004. MrAIC.pl. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
74. Olson S.L., Farrand J. Rhegminornis restudied - tiny Miocene turkey. Wilson Bull. 1974, 86:114-120.
75. Ouellet H. An intergeneric grouse hybrid Bonasa × Canachites. Can. Field Nat. 1974, 88:183-186.
76. Oyler-McCance S.J., St.John J., Quinn T.W. Rapid evolution in lekking grouse: implications for taxonomic definitions. Ornithol. Monogr. 2010, 67:114-122.
77. Pagel M. First steps for birds. Nature 2012, 491:337.
78. Palumbi S.R., Cipriano F., Hare M.P. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three-times rule. Evolution 2001, 55:859-868.
79. Patel S., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L. Error in phylogenetic estimation for bushes in the tree of life. J. Phylogen. Evolution. Biol. 2013, 1:110.
80. Pereira S.L., Baker A.J., Wajntal A. Combined nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences resolve generic relationships within the Cracidae (Galliformes, Aves). Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:946-958.
81. Porkert J., Solheim R., Flor A. Behaviour of hybrid male Tetrao tetrix male × T. urogallus female on black grouse leks. Wildlife Biol. 1997, 3:169-176.
82. Quintela M., Thulin C.-G., Hoglund J. Detecting hybridization between willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) and rock ptarmigan (L. muta) in Central Sweden through Bayesian admixture analyses and mtDNA screening. Conserv. Genet. 2010, 11:557-569.
83. Ree R.H., Sanmartin I. Prospects and challenges for parametric models in historical biogeographical inference. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:1211-1220.
84. Rensel J.A., White C.M. 1st description of hybrid Blue × Sage Grouse. Condor 1988, 90:716-717.
85. Rintamäki P.T., Alatalo R.V., Hoglund J., Lundberg A. Male territoriality and female choice on black grouse leks. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49:759-767.
86. Roch S., Steel M. Likelihood-based tree reconstruction on a concatenation of aligned sequence data sets can be statistically inconsistent. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2015, 100:56-62.
87. Rolstad J., Wegge P., Sivkov A.V., Hjeljord O., Storaunet K.O. Size and spacing of grouse leks: comparing capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) in two contrasting Eurasian boreal forest landscapes. Can. J. Zool. 2009, 87:1032-1043.
88. Ronquist F. Phylogenetic approaches in coevolution and biogeography. Zool. Scr. 1997, 26:313-322.
89. Rusch, D.H., Destefano, S., Reynolds, M.C., Lauten, D., 2000. Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus). In: Poole, A. (Ed.), The Birds of North America Online Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY.
90. Saether B.E., Andersen R. Ecological consequences of body size in grouse Tetraonidae. Fauna norv. Ser. C, Cinclus 1988, 11:19-26.
91. Scherini G.C., Tosi G., Wauters L.A. Social behaviour, reproductive biology and breeding succes of Alpine Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus mutus helveticus in northern Italy. Ardea 2003, 91:11-23.
92. Sim I.M.W., Eaton M.A., Setchfield R.P., Warren P.K., Lindley P. Abundance of male Black Grouse Tetrao tetrix in Britain in 2005, and change since 1995-96. Bird Study 2008, 55:304-313.
93. Smith E.J., Shi L., Tu Z.J. Gallus gallus aggrecan gene-based phylogenetic analysis of selected avian taxonomic groups. Genetica 2005, 124:23-32.
94. Spaulding A. Rapid courtship evolution in grouse (Tetraonidae): contrasting patterns of acceleration between the Eurasian and North American polygynous clades. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 2007, 274:1079-1086.
95. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:1312-1313.
96. Stein R.W., Brown J.W., Mooers A.Ø. A molecular genetic time scale demonstrates Cretaceous origins and multiple diversification rate shifts within the order Galliformes (Aves). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015, 92:155-164.
97. Storch I. Conservation status of grouse worldwide: an update. Wildlife Biol. 2007, 13:5-12.
98. Storch I. Human disturbance of grouse - why and when?. Wildlife Biol. 2013, 19:390-403.
99. Sun K., Meiklejohn K.A., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Braun E.L., Kimball R.T. The evolution of peafowl and other taxa with ocelli (eyespots): a phylogenomic approach. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 2014, 281:20140823. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0823.
100. Sun Y.H., Fang Y. Notes on the natural history and behaviour of the Chinese grouse Bonasa sewerzowi. Wildlife Biol. 1997, 3:265-268.
101. Swenson J.E., Boag D.A. Are hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia monogamous. Ibis 1993, 135:463-467.
102. Wang N., Kimball R.T., Braun E.L., Liang B., Zhang Z. Assessing phylogenetic relationships among Galliformes: a multigene phylogeny with expanded taxon sampling in Phasianidae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e64312.
103. Zwickel F.C., Bendell J.F. Blue Grouse (Dendragapus obscurus). The Birds of North America Online 2005, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. A. Poole (Ed.).
104. Zwickl D.J. Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion 2006, University of Texas, Austin.