ASTRAL-II: Coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2015, Pages i44-i52

  Mirarab, Siavash ^a   Warnow, Tandy ^b  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLANT GENE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS;

EID: 84931034856     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv234     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bayzid M.S., et al. (2014). Disk covering methods improve phylogenomic analyses. BMC Genomics, 15 (Suppl 6) , S7
2. Degnan J.H. and Rosenberg N.A. (2009). Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 332-340
3. Drew B.T., et al. (2014). Another look at the root of the angiosperms reveals a familiar tale. Syst. Biol., 63, 368-382
4. Edwards S.V. (2009). Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?. Evolution, 63, 1-19
5. Fletcher W. and Yang Z. (2009). Indelible: a flexible simulator of biological sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol., 26, 1879-1888
6. Gatesy J. and Springer M. (2014). Phylogenetic analysis at deep timescales: unreliable gene trees, bypassed hidden support, and the coalescence/concatalescence conundrum. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 80, 231-266
7. Goremykin V.V., et al. (2013). The evolutionary root of flowering plants. Syst. Biol., 62, 50-61
8. Heled J. and Drummond A.J. (2010). Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol., 27, 570-580
9. Kubatko L.S. and Degnan J. (2007). Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol., 56, 17-24
10. Liu K., et al. (2011). RAxML and FastTree: comparing two methods for large-scale maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation. PLoS One, 6, e27731
11. Liu L., et al. (2010). A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol. Biol., 10, 302
12. Liu L. and Yu L. . (2011). Estimating Species Trees from Unrooted Gene Trees. Syst. Biol., 60, 661-667
13. Maddison W. (1997). Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol., 46, 523-536
14. Mirarab S., et al. (2014a) ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics, 30, i541-i548
15. Mirarab S., et al. (2014b) Evaluating summary methods for multi-locus species tree estimation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol., pii, DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu063
16. Mirarab S., et al. (2014c) Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescentbased estimation of the avian tree. Science, 346, 1250463
17. Patel S., et al. (2013). Error in phylogenetic estimation for bushes in the tree of life. J. Phylogenet. Evol. Biol., 1, 110
18. Price M.N., et al. (2010). FastTree-2 approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One, 5, e9490
19. Qiu Y., et al. (2000). Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. Int. J. Plant Sci., 161, S3-S27
20. Rannala B. and Yang Z. (2003). Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics, 164, 1645-1656
21. Robinson D. and Foulds L. (1981). Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci., 53, 131-147
22. Roch S. and Steel M. (2014). Likelihood-based tree reconstruction on a concatenation of aligned sequence data sets can be statistically inconsistent. Theor. Popul. Biol., 100, 56-62
23. Roch S. and Warnow T. (2015). On the robustness to gene tree estimation error (or lack thereof) of coalescent-based species tree methods. Syst. Biol., pii, syv016
24. Stamatakis A. (2014). RAxML Version 8: A Tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 30, 1312-1313
25. Wickett N.J., et al. (2014). Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, E4859-E4868
26. Xi Z., et al. (2014). Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies. Syst. Biol., 63, 919-932
27. Zhang N., et al. (2012). Highly conserved low-copy nuclear genes as effective markers for phylogenetic analyses in angiosperms. New Phytol., 195, 923-937
28. Zimmermann T., et al. (2014). BBCA: improving the scalability of∗BEAST using random binning. BMC Genomics, 15 (Suppl 6) , S11