Potential for behavioral reproductive isolation between greater prairie-chickens and sharp-tailed grouse in west-central Minnesota

Journal of Ethology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 15-24

  Augustine, Jacqueline K ^a,b   Trauba, David R ^c  

^a SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Galliformes; Hybridization; Mating success; Nonvocal sound; Species isolation; Tympanuchus cupido; Tympanuchus phasianellus

Indexed keywords

GALLIFORMES; TYMPANUCHUS CUPIDO; TYMPANUCHUS PHASIANELLUS;

EID: 84919787283     PISSN: 02890771     EISSN: 14395444     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10164-014-0410-8     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bain MR, Farley GH (2002) Display by apparent hybrid prairie-chickens in a zone of geographic overlap. Condor 104:683–687
2. Ceugniet M, Aubin T, Bernard-Laurent A, Soyez D (1999) Vocal signatures of the rally call of red-legged and rock partridges and of their hybrids. C R Acad Sci III 322:887–895
3. Clark CW, Marler P, Beeman K (1987) Quantitative analysis of animal vocal phonology: an application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology 76:101–115
4. Connelly JW, Gratson MW, Reese KP (1998) Sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/354
5. Cornell Lab of Ornithology (2008) Raven Pro Release 1.3. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca
6. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
7. Cramer ERA (2013) Measuring consistency: spectrogram cross-correlation versus targeted acoustic parameters. Bioacoustics 22:247–257
8. Derégnaucourt S, Guyomarc’h J-C, Richard V (2001) Classification of hybrid crows in quail using artificial neural networks. Behav Process 56:103–112
9. Engineering Design (2006) Signal, release 4.04.24. Engineering Design, Berkeley
10. Evans K (1966) Observations on a hybrid between the sharp-tailed grouse and the greater prairie chicken. Auk 83:128–129
11. Hamerstrom Jr. FN, Hamerstrom F (1973) The prairie chicken in Wisconsin: highlights of a 22-year study of counts, behavior, movements, turnover, and habitat. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Tech Bull 64. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/EcoNatRes.DNRBull64
12. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1991) Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behav Ecol 2:165–180
13. Gibson RM, Aspbury AS, McDaniel LL (2002) Active formation of mixed-species grouse leks: a role for predation in lek evolution? Proc R Soc B 269:2503–2507
14. Good TP, Ellis JC, Annett CA, Pierotti R (2000) Bounded hybrid superiority in an avian hybrid zone: effects of mate, diet, and habitat choice. Evolution 54:1774–1783
15. Grant PR, Grant BR (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193–197
16. Gratson MW, Gratson GK, Bergerud AT (1991) Male dominance and copulation disruption do not explain variance in male mating success on sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus) leks. Behaviour 118:187–213
17. Hjorth I (1970) Reproductive behaviour in tetraonidae. Viltrevy 7(4)
18. Johnsgard PA (1982) Etho-ecological aspects of hybridization in the tetraonidae. Paul Johnsgard Collection: Paper 16. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/16
19. Johnsgard PA (2002) Grassland grouse and their conservation. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, DC
20. Johnsgard PA, Wood RE (1968) Distributional changes and interaction between prairie chickens and sharp-tailed grouse in the midwest. Wilson Bull 80:173–188
21. Johnson JA, Schroeder MA, Robb LA (2011) Greater prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus cupido). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/036
22. Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20:141–151
23. Kermott LH, Oring LW (1975) Acoustical communication of male sharp-tailed grouse (Pedioecetes phasianellus) on a North Dakota dancing ground. Anim Behav 23:375–386
24. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat 159:S22–S35
25. Landel HF (1989) A study of female and male mating behavior and female mate choice in the sharp-tailed grouse, Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesi. PhD dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette
26. Losey GS Jr, Stanton GF, Telecky TM, Tyler WA III, Zoology 691 Graduate Seminar Class (1986) Copying others, an evolutionarily stable strategy for mate choice: a model. Am Nat 128:653–664
27. Lumsden HG (2005) Plumage and internal morphology of the “prairie grouse”, Tympanuchus cupido × phasianellus, of Manitoulin Island, Ontario. Can Field-Nat 119:515–524
28. Mallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20:229–237
29. McDonald DB, Clay RP, Brumfield RT, Braun MJ (2001) Sexual selection on plumage and behavior in an avian hybrid zone: experimental tests of male–male interactions. Evolution 55:1443–1451
30. Mendelson TC, Shaw KL (2012) The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 27:421–427
31. Moore WS (1977) An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 52:263–277
32. Nooker JK, Sandercock BK (2008) Phenotypic correlates and survival consequences of male mating success in lek-mating greater prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1377–1388
33. Pearson SF, Rohwer S (2000) Asymmetries in male aggression across an avian hybrid zone. Behav Ecol 11:93–101
34. Pfennig KS (1998) The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1743–1748
35. Pierotti R, Annett CA (1993) Hybridization and male parental investment in birds. Condor 95:670–679
36. 1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083–2089
37. Randler C (2004) Aggressive interaction in swan geese Anser cygnoides and their hybrids. Acta Ornithol 39:147–153
38. SAS Institute Inc. (2010a) SAS for Windows, release 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary
39. SAS Institute Inc. (2010b) JMP Pro, release 9.0.0, 64-bit edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary
40. Sparling DW (1979) Evidence of vocal learning in prairie grouse. Wilson Bull 91:618–621
41. Sparling DW (1980) Hybridization and taxonomic status of greater prairie chickens and sharp-tailed grouse (hybridization in grouse). Prairie Nat 12:92–102
42. Sparling DW (1981a) Communication in prairie grouse: I. Information content and intraspecific function of principal vocalizations. Behav Neural Biol 32:463–486
43. Sparling DW (1981b) Communication in prairie grouse: II. Ethological isolating mechanisms. Behav Neural Biol 32:487–503
44. Sparling DW (1983) Quantitative analysis of prairie grouse vocalizations. Condor 85:30–42
45. Svedarsky WD, Kalahar TJ (1980) Female sharp-tailed grouse copulates with greater prairie chicken in Minnesota. Wilson Bull 92:260–261
46. Wood TC, Brooks TO, Sladen WJL (2002) Vocal characteristics of trumpeter and tundra swans and their hybrid offspring. Waterbirds 25(Special Publication 1):360–362