Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster

Heredity

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 304-313

  Enders, L S ^a,b   Nunney, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABIOTIC FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FITNESS; FLY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATING SUCCESS; SURVIVAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETICS; INBREEDING; LARVA; MALE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; LARVA; MALE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84958125550     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.103     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agrawal AF, Whitlock M (2010). Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutaitons? Trends Ecol Evol 25: 450-458.
2. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE (2012). The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J Exp Bot 63: 3523-3543.
4. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Van Putten WF (1999). Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 12: 1125-1137.
5. Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2012). Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl 5: 117-129.
6. Bokor K, Pecsenye K (2000). Differences in the effect of ethanol on fertility and viability components among laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132: 215-227.
7. Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10: 783-796.
8. Cheptou PO, Donohue K (2011). Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: its ecological and evolutionary significance. New Phytol 189: 395-407.
9. de Cara MÁ, Villanueva B, Toro MÁ, Fernández J (2013). Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings. Heredity 110: 530-537.
10. Enders L, Nunney L (2010). The sex-specific effects if inbreeding in wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Bio 23: 2309-2323.
11. Enders LS, Nunney L (2012). Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci 279: 3756-3764.
12. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Longman: New York.
13. Fox C, Reed DH (2011). Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: and experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65: 246-258.
14. Frankham R (2005). Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics. J Evol Biol 18: 750-755.
15. Gale J (1964). Competition between three lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 19: 681.
16. Garofalo RS (2002). Genetic analysis of insulin signaling in Drosophila. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13: 156-162.
17. Goodrich S, Beans C, Roach D (2013). Environmental conditions during early life determine the consequences of inbreeding in Agrostemma githago (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 26: 499-508.
18. Hedrick PW (1994). Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: Full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363-372.
19. Hoffmann AA, Parsons PA (1991). Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford University Press: New York.
20. Knight GR, Roberston A (1957). Fitness as a measureable character in Drosophila. Genetics 42: 524-530.
21. Kong EC, Allouche L, Chapot PA, Vranizan K, Moore M, Heberlein U et al. (2010). Ethanolregulated genes that contribute to ethanol sensitivity and rapid tolerance in Drosophila. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34: 302-316.
22. Krebs RA, Loeschcke V (1994) Response to environmental change: Genetic variation and fitness in Drosophila buzzatii following temperature stress. In: Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK (eds). Conservation Genetics. Basel: Birkhäuser. pp 309-322.
23. Kristensen TN, Dahlgaard J, Loeschcke V (2003). Effects of inbreeding and environmental stress on fitness-using Drosophila buzzatii as a model organism. Cons Gen 4: 453-465.
24. Kristensen TN, Sorensen P, Kruhoffer M, Pedersen KS, Loeschcke V (2005). Genome-wide analysis on inbreeding effects on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 171: 157-167.
25. Kristensen TN, Sorensen P, Pedersen KS, Kruhoffer M, Loeschcke V (2006). Inbreeding by environmental interactions affect gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173: 1329-1336.
26. Kültz D (2005). Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annu Rev Physiol 67: 225-257.
27. Leberg P, Firmin B (2008). Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol Ecol 17: 334-343.
28. Loeschcke V, Sorensen JG, Kristensen TN (2004). Ecologically relevant stress resistance: from microarrays and quantitative trait loci to candidate genes-a research plan and preliminary results using Drosophila as a model organism and climatic and genetic stress as model stresses. J Biosci 29: 503-511.
29. Montalvo A (1994). Inbreeding depression and maternal effects in Aquilegia caerulea, a partially selfing plant. Evolution 75: 2395-2409.
30. Montooth KL, Siebenthall KT, Clark AG (2006). Membrane lipid physiology and toxin catabolism underlie ethanol and acetic acid tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 209: 3837-3850.
31. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ (1956). An estimation of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 42: 855-863.
32. Parsons PA (1997). Success in mating: a coordinated approach to fitness through genotypes incorporating genes for stress resistance and heterozygous advantage under stress. Behavioral Genetics 27: 75-81.
33. Parsons PA (2007). Energetic efficiency under stress underlies positive genetic correlations between longevity and other fitness traits in natural populations. Biogerontology 8: 55-61.
34. Plough LV (2012). Environmental stress increases selection against and dominance of deleterious mutations in inbred families of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Mol Ecol 21: 3974-3987.
35. Reed DH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2002). Inbreeding and extinction: The effect of environmental stress and lineage. Cons Gen 3: 301-307.
36. Reed DH, Fox CW, Enders LS, Kristensen TN (2012). Inbreeding-stress interactions: evolutionary and conservation consequences. Ann NY Acad Sci 1256: 33-48.
37. Schou M, Loeschcke V, Kristensen T (2015). Inbreeding depression across a nutritional stress continuum. Heredity 115: 56-62.
38. Sorensen JG, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V (2003). The evolutionary and ecological role of heat shock proteins. Ecol Lett 6: 1025-1037.
39. Sørensen JG, Nielsen M, Loeschcke V (2007). Gene expression profile analysis of Drosophila melanogaster selected for resistance to environmental stressors. J Evol Biol 20: 1624-1636.
40. Sorensen JG, Nielsen MM, Kruhoffer M, Justesen J, Loeschcke V (2005). Full genome gene expression analysis of the heat stress response in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Stress Chaperones 10: 312-328.
41. Storz G, Hengge R (2011). Bacterial Stress Responses. ASM press: Washington, DC, USA.
42. Swindell WR, Bouzat JL (2006). Ancestral inbreeding reduces the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60: 762-767.
43. Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ, Schoen D (2008). Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62: 917-931.
44. Wang J (2000). Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations. Gen Res 76: 75-86.
45. Whitlock MC, Agrawal AF (2009). Purging the genome with sexual selection:reducing mutation load through selection on males. Evolution 63: 569-582.
46. Whitlock MC, Bourguet D (2000). Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: Synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution 54: 1654-1660.
47. Wright S (1931). Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
48. Yun L, Agrawal AF (2014). Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: Effects of stress and density dependence. Evolution 68: 3599-3606.