Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: Its ecological and evolutionary significance

New Phytologist

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 395-407

  Cheptou, Pierre Olivier ^a   Donohue, Kathleen ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Balancing selection; Dispersal; Environment dependence; Evolutionary ecology; Inbreeding depression; Mating systems

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; DISPERSAL; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ALLELE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; EVOLUTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; INBREEDING; REVIEW;

ALLELES; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHENOMENA; FEEDBACK; INBREEDING;

EID: 78650339177     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03541.x     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Ågren J, Schemske DW. 1993. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in 2 annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata. Evolution 47: 125-135.
2. Armbruster P, Reed DH. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Balkau BJ, Feldman MW. 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74: 171-174.
4. Barrett SCH, Harder LD. 1996. Ecology and evolution of plant mating system. TREE 11: 73-79.
5. Bawa KS. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 15-39.
6. Bengtsson BO. 1978. Avoiding inbreeding: at what cost? Journal of Theoretical Biology 73: 439-444.
7. Biémont C. 2010. Inbreeding effects in the epigenetic era. Nature Review Genetics 11: 234.
8. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC. 2000. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? predictions from Drosophila. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 502-514.
9. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Van Putten WF. 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 1125-1137.
10. Bourguet D, Prout M, Raymond M. 1996. Dominance of insecticide resistance presents a plastic response. Genetics 143: 407-416.
11. Byers DL, Waller DM. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. In: Annual review of ecology and systematics. 479-513.
12. Carr DE, Fenster CB, Dudash HR. 1997. The relationship between mating-system characters and inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 363-372.
13. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetical Research 74: 329-340.
14. Charlesworth B, Miyo T, Borthwick H. 2007. Selection responses of mean and inbreeding depression for female fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster suggest contributions from intermediate-frequency alleles to quantitative trait variation. Genetical Research 89: 85-91.
15. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-268.
16. Charlesworth D, Morgan T, Charlesworth B. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44: 1469-1489.
17. Charlesworth D, Willis JH. 2009. Fundamental concepts in genetics: the genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics 10: 783-796.
18. Cheptou PO, Dieckmann U. 2002. The evolution of self-fertilization in density-regulated populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269: 1177-1186.
19. Cheptou PO, Imbert E, Lepart J, Escarre J. 2000. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 522-531.
20. Cheptou PO, Mathias A. 2001. Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary selfing rates? The American Naturalist 157: 361-373.
21. Cheptou PO, Schoen DJ. 2003. Frequency-dependent inbreeding depression in Amsinckia. American Naturalist 162: 744-753.
22. Crnokrak P, Roff DA. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270.
23. Crow JF. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Survey Evolutionary Biology 9: 3-42.
24. Culley TM, Weller SG, Sakai AK, Rankin AE. 1999. Inbreeding depression and selfing rates in a self-compatible, hermaphroditic species, Schiedea membranacea (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 980-987.
25. Darwin CR. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. London, UK: Murray.
26. Dudash MR. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-incompatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae) a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139.
27. Dudash MR, Carr DE. 1998. Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems. Nature 393: 682-684.
28. Dudash MR, Fenster CB. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in fragmented populations. In: Young AG, Clark GM, eds. Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 35-54.
29. Epinat G, Lenormand T. 2009. The evolution of assortative mating and selfing with in- and outbreeding depression. Evolution 63: 2047-2060.
30. Fenster CB. 1991. Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). 2. Gene establishment. Evolution 45: 410-422.
31. Fenster CB, Galloway LF. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populatins of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conservation Biology 14: 1406-1412.
32. Fisher RA. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11: 53-63.
33. Fox CW, Reed DH. 2010. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 62: 2236-2249.
34. Frankham R. 1995. Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics 29: 305-327.
35. Gallardo JA, Neira R. 2005. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression in cultured Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): aggressiveness, dominance and intraspecific competition. Heredity 95: 449-456.
36. Gandon S. 1999. Kin competition, the cost of inbreeding and the evolution of dispersal. Journal of Theoretical Biology 200: 345-364.
37. Glemin S, Ronfort J, Bataillon T. 2003. Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations. Genetics 165: 2193-2212.
38. Haag CR, Hottinger JW, Riek M, Ebert D. 2002. Strong inbreeding depression in a Daphnia metapopulation. Evolution 56: 518-526.
39. Halley JM, Manasse RS. 1993. A population dynamics model for annual plants subject to inbreeding depression. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 15-24.
40. Hamilton WD, May RM. 1977. Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269: 578-581.
41. Hastings A. 1983. Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal. Theoretical Population Biology 24: 244-251.
42. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 139-162.
43. Henry PH, Pardel R, Jarne P. 2003. Environment-dependent inbreeding depression in a hermaphroditic freshwater snail. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 1211-1222.
44. Houle D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
45. Husband B, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
46. Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Kalisz S, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Vallejo-Marin M et al. 2009. Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. American Naturalist 173: 1-11.
47. Johnston MO, Schoen DJ. 1996. Correlated evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression: an experimental study of nine populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 50: 1478-1491.
48. Keller LF, Waller DM. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 230-241.
49. Keller LF, Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K. 2002. Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches. Evolution 56: 1229-1239.
50. Kelly JK, Willis JH. 2001. Deleterious mutations and genetic variation for flower size in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 55: 937-942.
51. Koelewijn HP. 2004. Sibling competition, size variation and frequency-dependent outcrossing advantage in Plantago coronopus. Evolutionary Ecology 18: 51-74.
52. Kondrashov AS. 1985. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. II. Facultative apomixis and selfing. Genetics 111: 635-653.
53. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
54. Latta R, Ritland K. 1994. Conditions favoring stable mixed mating systems with jointly evolving inbreeding depression. Journal of Theoretical Biology 170: 15-23.
55. Latter BDH, Mulley JC, Reid D, Pascoe L. 1995. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 287-297.
56. Levin DA. 1977. The organization of genetic variability in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 31: 477-494.
57. Levin DA. 1984. Inbreeding depression and proximity-dependent crossing success in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 38: 116-127.
58. Levin SA, Cohen D, Hastings A. 1984. Dispersal strategies in patchy environments. Theoretical Population Biology 26: 165-191.
59. Levins R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
60. Liao W, Reed DH. 2009. Inbreeding-environment interactions increase extinction risk. Animal Conservation 12: 54-61.
61. Lloyd DG. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-79.
62. Lloyd DG. 1980. Demographic factors and mating patterns in Angiosperms. In: Solbrig OT, ed. Demography and evolution in plant populations. Berkeley, CA, USA: California Press, 67-88.
63. Luijten SH, Kery M, Oostermeijer JGB, Den Nijs HCM. 2002. Demographic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding in Arnica montana: a field experiment. Journal of Ecology 90: 593-603.
64. Lynch M, Walsh JB. 1997. Genetics and analysis of quantitative characters. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associations.
65. Miller PS. 1994. Is inbreeding depression more severe in a stressful environment? Zoo Biology 13: 195-208.
66. Moorad JA, Wade MJ. 2005. A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression. Genetics 170: 1373-1384.
67. Morgan MT. 2002. Genome-wide deleterious mutation favors dispersal and species integrity. Heredity 89: 253-257.
68. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ. 1956. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 42: 855-863.
69. Mutikainen P, Delph LF. 1998. Inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52: 1572-1582.
70. Porcher E, Kelly JK, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Johnston MO, Kalisz S. 2009. The genetic consequences of fluctuating inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant selfing rates. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 708-717.
71. Pray LA, Schwartz JM, Goodnight CJ, Stevens L. 1994. Environmental dependency nof inbreeding depression - implications for conservation biology. Conservation Biology 8: 562-568.
72. Pujol B, Zhou SR, Vilas JS, Pannell JR. 2009. Reduced inbreeding depression after species range expansion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 15379-15383.
73. Randle AM, Slyder JB, Kalisz S. 2009. Can differences in autonomous selfing ability explain differences in range size among sister-taxa pairs of Collinsia (Plantaginaceae)? An extension of Baker's Law. New Phytologist 183: 618-629.
74. Ravigne V, Olivieri I, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Rousset F. 2006. Selective interactions between short-distance pollen and seed dispersal in self-compatible species. Evolution 60: 2257-2271.
75. Reed DH, Nicholas AC, Stratton GE. 2007. Genetic quality of individuals impacts population dynamics. Animal Conservation 10: 275-283.
76. Ronce O, Shaw FH, Rousset F, Shaw RG. 2009. Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model. Evolution 63: 1807-1819.
77. Roze D, Rousset F. 2005. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of dispersal rates: a multilocus model. American Naturalist 166: 708-721.
78. Rutter MT, Shaw FH, Fenster CB. 2010. Spontaneous mutation parameters for Arabidopsis thaliana measured in the wild. Evolution 64: 1825-1835.
79. Schmitt J, Ehrhardt DW. 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44: 269-278.
80. Schmitt J, Gamble SE. 1990. The effect of distance from te parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis- a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44: 2022-2030.
81. Schoen DJ. 2005. Spontaneous deleterious mutation in wild plant species with contrasting mating systems. Evolution 59: 2370-2377.
82. Shultz S, Willis JH. 1995. Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics 141: 1209-1223.
83. Stebbins GL. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in higher plants. The American Midland Naturalist 91: 337-354.
84. Venable DL, Lawlor LR. 1980. Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia 46: 272-282.
85. Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ. 2008. Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62: 917-931.
86. Wiener P, Feldman MW. 1993. The effects of the mating system on the evolution of migration in a spatially heterogeneous population. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 251-269.
87. Willis JH. 1999. The contribution of male sterility mutations to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83: 337-346.
88. Wolfe LM. 1993. Inbreeding depression in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum- role of maternal effects, crowding, and parental mating history. Evolution 47: 374-386.
89. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.