Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: Effects of stress and density dependence

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3599-3606

  Yun, Li ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competition; Deleterious mutations; Density dependence; Inbreeding depression; Selection; Stress

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC FITNESS; INBREEDING; MUTATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84914147108     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12527     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agrawal, A. F., and M. C. Whitlock . 2010. Environmental duress and epistasis: How does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:450-458.
2. Agrawal, A. F., and M. C. Whitlock . 2011. Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data. Genetics 178:553-566.
3. Barrett, S. C. H., and D. Charlesworth . 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352:522-524.
4. Brewer, B. A., R. C. Lacy, M. L. Foster, and G. Alaks . 1990. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. J. Hered. 81:257-266.
5. Busch, J. W. 2005. Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica. Heredity 94:159-165.
6. Byers, D. L., and D. M. Waller . 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:479-513.
7. Carr, D. E., and M. R. Dudash . 1995. Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function. Heredity 75:437-445.
8. Cheptou, P.-O., and D. J. Schoen . 2003. Frequency-dependent inbreeding depression in Amsinckia. Am. Nat. 162:744-753.
9. Cheptou, P.-O., J. Lepart, and J. Escarré . 2001. Inbreeding depression under intraspecific competition in a highly outcrossing population of Crepsis sancta (Asteraceae): evidence for frequency-dependent variation. Am. J. Bot. 88:1424-1429.
10. Crnokrak, P., and S. C. H. Barrett . 2002. Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358.
11. Dole, J., and K. Ritland . 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multi-generational changes of the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47:361-373.
12. Eckert, C. G., and S. C. H. Barrett . 1994. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population-genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution 48:952-964.
13. Fowler, K., and M. C. Whitlock . 1999. The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266:2061-2066.
14. Fox, C. W., and D. H. Reed . 2010. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65:246-258.
15. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske . 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
16. Johnston, M. O. 1992. Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution 46:688-702.
17. Koelewijn, H. P. 1998. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness in Plantago coronopus. Evolution 52:692-702.
18. Koelewijn, H. P. 2004. Sibling competition, size variation and frequency-dependent outcrossing advantage in Plantago coronopus. Evol. Ecol. 18:51-74.
19. Long, T. A. F., L. Rowe, and A. F. Agrawal . 2013. The effects of selective history and environmental heterogeneity on inbreeding depression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 181:532-544.
20. Manna, F., G. Martin, and T. Lenormand . 2011. Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation. Genetics 189:923-937.
21. Manna, F., R. Gallet, G. Martin, and T. Lenormand . 2012. The high-throughput yeast deletion fitness data and the theories of dominance. J. Evol. Biol. 25:892-903.
22. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand . 2006. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in the light of fitness land- scape models. Evolution 60:2413-2427.
23. Phadnis, N., and J. D. Fry . 2005. Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance. Genetics 171:385-392.
24. Schmitt, J., and D. W. Ehrhardt . 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44:269-278.
25. Waller, D. M., J. Dole, and A. J. Bersch . 2008. Effects of stress andphenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62:917-931.
26. Weiner, J. 1985. Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Ecology 66:743-752.